Loose Ankles (1930) Poster

(1930)

User Reviews

Review this title
23 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
Wildly uneven comedy
gridoon202425 February 2018
"Loose Ankles" has a lively start (certainly any movie that opens with a close-up of Loretta Young's legs starts on the right foot - pun intended), Young and Jr. (Douglas Fairbanks Jr., that is) are appealing, and Inez Cortney is a joy as Young's cousin. But when the focus switches to Young's two middle-aged aunts and their two "professional escorts", especially in the extended "circus cafe" segment, the film becomes dreadfully unfunny. ** out of 4.
10 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Nice little comedy from the pre-Code era.
JohnKyle10 December 2003
This film is a little known entry from the early days of "talkies" that deserves better recognition. Not a masterpiece by any means, it is still a forerunner of the screwball comedies of the later 30s and 40s and, as such, is pleasant and delightful in its own way.

The cast is very good. It is hard to believe that Loretta Young, playing an heiress who wants to create a family scandal, was only sixteen or seventeen when this movie was made. She has a charm and sensuality that belies her years. Douglas Fairbanks, Jr., who was nearly as young, does a nice job as a bumbling wannabe gigolo who falls in love with Loretta. Also, as noted by other reviewers, Louise Fazenda, as Young's aunt, and Daphne Pollard, as the "helpful" maid, give very funny performances.

The next time that this movie is on TCM, try to catch it or tape it. There are a lot worse ways to spend an hour or so.
15 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Eddie Nugent and Ethel Wales Cut Loose
wes-connors7 January 2013
After receiving a "foot powder" (as director Ted Wilde has the camera caress her beautiful legs), pretty Loretta Young (as Ann Harper Berry) is ready to attend the reading of a wealthy grandmother's will. She inherits a fortune, but Ms. Young must marry a nice young man and avoid scandal in order to collect. Young decides to advertise. She finds good-looking and unscrupulous Douglas Fairbanks Jr. (as Gil Hayden) through an escort service. However, their business arrangement gets complicated by love and scandal...

Young's sexy opening is followed by the beautiful actress appearing in slinky attire. Not to be outdone, Mr. Fairbanks is stripped of his clothing by zealous maid Daphne Pollard (as Agnes), in order to assume a "compromising" position. However, it is cute gigolo Eddie Nugent (as Andy Martin) who gets the naughtiest scenes. Introduced in a bathtub, Mr. Nugent later appears without his pants; apparently, for no other reason than to exchange more personal foot spankings with fellow escort Norman Selby (as Terry Todd)...

The cast winds up in the wicked "Circus Cafe", with leggy dancers and plenty to drink. Straight-laced aunts Ethel Wales (as Katherine) and Louise Fazenda (as Sarah) don't know the punch is spiked. Also appearing are snorting Otis Harlan (as Rupert Harper), smoking Inez Courtney (as Betty), and studly Raymond Keane (Linton Harper). Young and Fairbanks become mechanical as the supporting players take over the screen. "Loose Ankles" is stolen from them, especially by Nugent and Ms. Wales.

******* Loose Ankles (2/2/30) Ted Wilde ~ Loretta Young, Douglas Fairbanks Jr., Edward J. Nugent, Ethel Wales
11 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Young and Her Legs Win
Michael_Elliott7 January 2013
Loose Ankles (1930)

** 1/2 (out of 4)

Rich girl Ann Harper (Loretta Young) inherits her grandmother's fortune but she must get married and have the man approved by two of three selected people as well as avoid any scandal. Feeling the entire thing is a bunch of junk, Ann decides to "hire" Gil Hayden (Douglas Fairbanks, Jr.) to make some trouble and cause her the inheritance. LOOSE ANKLES starts off on a very good path but it quickly falls apart during the second half but there's still plenty of reasons to check this out. If you're a fan of Douglas or especially Young then this here is going to be a must see because the two of them have some nice chemistry together and this helps keep the film moving at a good pace. This is especially true for Young who is very good in the part and the director wastes no time showing off her beautiful legs. The film certainly fits the pre-code standard of allowing more frank situations to enter and there's a very funny scene where Young is trying to undress Fairbanks but not really knowing how. Another funny scene is the will reading where Young really gets a chance to shine. The supporting players are also good and help keep this film moving. I think the film starts off well but begins to fall apart in the second half because things get a tad bit too silly for their own good. Still, fans of the stars or pre-code films should still have plenty here to enjoy.
9 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Eddie Nugent is a Riot!!
kidboots26 September 2016
Warning: Spoilers
During 1930-31 Loretta Young churned out 14 films, none of them were that good and her acting bland at best. She once said of these movies - "I was coasting on my youth and I knew it" and the titles tell the tale ie "Loose Ankles", "I Like Your Nerve", "The Truth About Youth" etc. "Loose Ankles" was a film considered so trivial that it didn't even rate a New York review - Loretta may have been the star but the film only came alive when the supporting players were given the spotlight. That included bouncy Inez Courtney who introduces the jazzy song "Loose Ankles" at the film's start and even though the first shot was of Young's rather loose ankles being massaged, the film didn't live up to it's racy start!!

The film starts off when beautiful Ann Harper (Young) finds the only way she can capture her inheritance is on the death of her husband but being a carefree flapper she doesn't even have a steady beau!! The real kicker is that if she finds herself caught out in a public scandal the whole estate will be given to a dog and cat home!! Of course because she has no interest in money she immediately sets about to get her picture in the papers!! She advertises for a handsome but unscrupulous man and it is instantly seen by a trio of male escorts!! This is when the fun starts - as Eddie Nugent takes centre stage, with his mad mugging and eye rolling, he is a riot!! Sure, he'd love the job but he decides to offer it to young Gil (Douglas Fairbanks Jnr.) a decent chap who is down on his luck job wise!!

Wouldn't you know it, it is love at first sight for Ann and Gil and after a farcical bit containing lost pants and hiding in closets, helped immeasurably by Daphne Pollard's resourceful maid - everyone heads to the Circus Café. Ann has now engaged the services of one of the other escorts, Lin, who is big on unscrupulousness but small on niceness. She is hoping to meet up with Gil because she found the tickets in his pants - the only problem is, they weren't Gil's. After a pretty bizarre circus/cabaret dance routine along comes third billed Louise Fazenda as straight laced Aunt Sarah and most of the rest of the movie consists of that old faithful "drunk routine"!! You know the one, where two maiden aunts of the "lips that touch liquor shall never touch mine" variety proceed to get well and truly plastered and claim that they can do the dance better than the two professionals out on the dance floor!!

The film really opens out at the club which has a very similar look to some of the sets from "Gold Diggers of Broadway" but the film betrays it's stagey, early talkie origins when the whole cast gathers to pair off at the finale!!
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Loose ankles could have used tighter scripting...
AlsExGal18 July 2012
... but overall it was a delightful little precode with Loretta Young seeming much more mature than her 17 years would have you expect. The film opens with a close up of Loretta's ankle swaying to the beat of the title song "Loose Ankles" her foot is wearing only an ankle bracelet as a man's hand caresses her leg and foot. The camera pans back and we see that the man is just a pedicurist surveying his work. That's the fun about precode. Nothing has to happen. By today's standards nothing really does. It's the possibilities and the implications.

The back story here is that Grandma Berry has just died and her already wealthy relatives are drooling for more on this, the day of the reading of her will. Ann Harper Berry (Loretta Young) turns out to be the recipient of the lion's share of the estate, but she must marry and also bring no scandal - as in nothing in the newspapers - to the Berry name in order to fully inherit. To incentivize the rest of the family, they cannot inherit their portion of the estate until Ann marries. Ann rebels against the entire set-up and puts out an ad for a "young unscrupulous man" to compromise her and cause a newspaper-worthy scandal so she and her greedy family will be barred from the inheritance. Gil Hayden (Douglas Fairbanks Jr.) is the man who applies for the job at the cajoling of his male escort roommates who are trying to get him back into the workforce, and Ann is under constant watch by the rest of the family to make sure she causes no scandal. The scene in her bedroom as an inexperienced Ann tries to figure out the actual mechanics of creating a scandal with Gil with the help and advice of her obviously quite experienced maid is worth the price of admission.

This film runs 69 minutes and probably would have been better paced if it had been about 15 minutes shorter. It features a nightclub scene that drags on way too long with not much going on during a large portion of that time. Louise Fazenda is a hoot as one of Ann's aunts, but it is odd that Warner Brothers had her dressed up as a bit of a vixen the year before in "On With the Show" and here she is playing a woman in her 50's - she was only 35 at the time. It's obvious they have her wearing some kind of body suit to make her look much heavier and older than she is.

The dancing act in the nightclub - "The Circus Cafe" - is unique among nightclubs with lots of toe dancers and clowns doing acrobatics. It's not every day that you see circus themed entertainment in a Prohibition era speak easy, and quite frankly it was very reminiscent of the final scene in "Gold Diggers of Broadway".

If this one was a little faster paced I'd give it an eight, but as it is I give it an entertaining seven as it makes the excellent point that people are neither as wild or as tame as they might seem on the surface or as they imagine themselves to be.
10 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
A mature talented actress at 17
SimonJack9 July 2018
The main reason to watch this film is to see the 17-year old Loretta Young in an early female lead. She is hardly recognizable from the face that movie buffs would soon see and remember for decades. Yet, she's every bit as beautiful a woman. For such a young actress she displays a mature talent. Young had been in silent films as a child, and by 1930 already had leading parts in several movies, including a couple of talkies before this one.

This isn't much of a story - a wealthy family whose members look to get even richer from a relative dowager's will. But there mustn't be a scandal among any of them, or the whole lot loses their inheritances. One can guess who the person might be who wants to raise a little cain.

Douglas Fairbanks Jr. co-stars in this film, but he seems quite wooden. He was a big star of his day - a romantic idol for women, but he isn't more than a mediocre actor in his several films that I've seen. He seems wooden in all of his roles.

Many films were made since the talkies debuted in 1928 until the enforcement by Hollywood of it's Hays Code in 1934. Some people make a big deal out of that, but in truth the vast majority of films made in that period didn't have naughty content that should be censored. This is one such film.

One does wonder, though, how this and similar films went over with audiences of the day. After the stock market crash of 1929, the U.S. and world were plunged into the Great Depression for nearly a decade. How many people enjoyed watching films about the wealthy gallivanting around the world or living the high life? Indeed, with unemployment that peaked at 25% in the U.S. and up to 35% elsewhere in the world, how many people could even afford to go to the movies?
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Very good for 1929...not so great otherwise.
planktonrules13 December 2019
"Loose Ankles", though released in 1930, was made in 1929. According to IMDB, the director died and the studio held the film for release until the following year. As you watch the movie, you need to consider when it was made. In 1929, sound films were still very new...and studios were still experimenting on how to use this new technology. While the sound quality is pretty good in "Loose Ankles" as you can clearly understand what folks are saying (this is NOT true with many other films of the day), the film suffers from a problem some films dealt with at the time...relying too much on dialog in order to show off the new technology It also tries too hard to be wacky! In other words, folks talk very rapidly and the dialog is practically shouted at the screen...and subtle, is sure ain't!

When the story begins, a strange will is being read. Ann (Loretta Young) has just been told that she'll inherit a huge amount IF she marries and gets her family's consent. But Ann dislikes her annoying family and she wants to break the will...because then no one will inherit anything. How will she break it? By creating a scandal...and the will stipulates if there are any newspaper scandals then the money will be donated to help pets instead of spoiled relatives. So, she advertises for a terrible, disreputable man to marry her...hoping for the worst. Of couse, along the way, she ends up meeting a dreamy guy instead (Douglas Fairbanks Jr.).

This is a very watchable film but probably won't appeal to folks who aren't already old movie buffs. For 1929, it's very good....but compared to films made just a year or two later, it is a bit dated.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Even Young and Fairbanks Jr Can't Save This Turkey - Loose Ankles
arthur_tafero6 October 2022
Loretta Young and Douglas Fairbanks Jr. Were two extraordinary talents of 1930s films. However, in this turkey, their combined talents are wasted due to a very lame script and poor plot development. The film starts well, but eventually grinds to a halt less than halfway through the film with the introduction of Young's two middle-aged aunts and the two male hookers they have hired to escort them about town. The cafe scenes are arduously long and unfunny, and the film finally goes into a sort of numbness that was probably not intended. Young and Fairbanks should have been on the screen much more and the aunt gag deleted. But the writers made the wrong choice, and the film suffers.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Make way for Loretta!
JohnHowardReid17 February 2014
Warning: Spoilers
I was really looking forward to this one. Ted Wilde directed my all-time favorite Harold Lloyd picture, Speedy (1928), and another of my top five Lloyd bests, namely The Kid Brother (1927). So I've always been curious about the other three features he directed before his early death in late 1929, namely Babe Comes Home (1927) – Babe Ruth that is, of course – Clancy in Wall Street (1930) and Loose Ankles. Now Loose Ankles proved a little disappointing for me first time around, but, oddly, it improved a lot on a second viewing. I particularly enjoyed young Loretta Young's performance on both occasions, but I thought young Doug Fairbanks' more subtle playing improved no end on my second view. Interestingly, Loretta had acted with young Fairbanks in a Clayton's murder thriller – the murder you have when you don't have a murder – The Careless Age (1929) in which young Doug was the star and Loretta's role of little importance (even though she was billed fifth). Getting back to Loose Ankles, Otis Harlan's stagey over-acting seemed even more superficial on a second viewing. And the same goes for Louise Fazenda. Although obviously filmed on a tight "A" budget, nevertheless the movie's attractive costumes and bright photography were both impressive. Available on an excellent Warner Archive DVD.
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Considering it's from 1929, it quite good.
1930s_Time_Machine2 September 2023
I was convinced I'd not like this but I found it surprisingly enjoyable. Like a Laurel and Hardy film, it isn't meant to be realistic, or an insightful drama, it's just a silly, fun and fast old fashioned farce.

With the advent of sound, one of the studios' first ideas to fill their picture houses was to simply film stage plays. These were almost always awful.... but not in this case... it's actually quite entertaining.

The staging and the acting style is what you'd expect in a live comedy stage play from the 1920s but surprisingly once you acclimatise to that, it works. It almost has that feel of being at a live performance and that sense of being there always makes a stage comedy funnier than it often is. For the first fifteen minutes you will be probably be thinking: I can't watch this rubbish, the acting is terrible, the story is stupid but stay with it because it's genuinely quite funny.

As a piece of filmmaking I have to admit it's not good. But it was 1929 and being a First National picture meant they had to use Warner's cumbersome Vitaphone system which was meant massively less creative scope for a director and it also required the actors to speak very slowly and clearly. Ted Wilde was given this to direct after its intended director died in a car crash. The second choice was Mervyn LeRoy who would have made a better job of this but he decided to make PLAYING AROUND with Alice White instead. Anything with Alice White (the sexiest actress of the thirties - if not sexist woman in the world ever) is worth watching but PLAYING AROUND was a particularly good one. Ted Wilde does a better job than a lot of directors managed back then but sadly he died in December 1929 just before the premiere.

Douglas Fairbanks Jr was very Jr in this - just 19 years old and Loretta Young was just 17. Seems strange to us now that in late twenties it seemed so normal for people of this age to think that now is the time in their lives that they needed to get married.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Spotlight on Character Actors
Maleejandra28 May 2007
This film, based on a 1926 stage play, is extremely funny and fun to watch. It is also somewhat hard to find. I was fortunate to see it screened at Cinevent 39.

The story concerns a group of society people hearing a will read to them. The deceased's niece (Loretta Young) has most of the luck when an estate is left to her under the condition that she find a husband and no scandal be brought to the family. Everyone else's inheritance depends on this clause, but Ann (Young) doesn't want her share. In fact, she's determined to force everyone out of theirs because she thinks the family is too greedy. Off she goes to put an ad in the paper for a boy to "compromise her." Andy (Edward Nugent) finds it in the paper and thinks he'd be perfect for the role, but instead thinks maybe his room mate Gil (Douglas Fairbanks Jr.) would be better suited. In a very funny scene, Gil goes to Ann's home and is taken advantage of by the maid (Daphne Pollard).

Somehow, they all end up at a speakeasy where Ann's uptight aunts Katherine (Ethel Wales) and Sarah (Louise Fazenda) steal the show during a drunken spectacle where Andy tries to control his laughter.

This film is certainly a pre-code. Aside from outright illegal drunkenness, we see Andy taking a bath and women disrobing men, along with the generally racy storyline. Possibly the reason they got away with so much (besides being made during the pre-code era) is because this film is based on a play.

Thankfully, the camera-work does not make the film's roots evident. Of course, there are many shots that look like characters on a stage, but we also have a moving camera and many close-ups to take advantage of the beautiful stars. Young and Fairbanks struggle with their dialogue, but there are enough scenes with the character actors to make up for their scenes.
18 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
One of Loretta Young's First Leading Roles
springfieldrental20 July 2022
Talkies introduced a new breed of cinematic female comedians that were quickly replacing such silent movies' light-hearted actresses as Mabel Norman and Mary Pickford. Teenager Loretta Young, 17, serves as a prime example of those young performers with silky voices ready to step into the shoes of the silent veterans. Her February 1930 comedy "Loose Ankles" demonstrates Young's ability to draw laughs from theater audiences. The film's premise showcases a pair of prudish spinster aunts to Ann Berry (Young), who stands to inherit a fortune from her late wealthy grandmother if she marries a man acceptable to her two guardians The plot, adapted from the 1925 Sam Janney play as well as the 1925 silent, 'Ladies At Play,' follows the manipulations of Young and her cousin, Betty (Inez Courtney) when they place an ad in the paper for a potential hubby. Ann Berry doesn't want the money and is looking for a scandal to break the inheritance. They pick one sucker, Gil Hayden (Douglas Fairbanks, Jr.), who answered the ad.

The free-spirited movie fires at a near 'screwball comedy'-fashion pace in the hands of Ted Wilde's direction. An Academy Award nominee for Best Director of a Comedy Picture for his 1928 Harold Lloyd "Speedy," Wilde had the natural touch of making scenes hilarious by mixing full-to-medium framed shots with reactionary close-ups in the midst of a quickened pace. Wilde's imprint shows during the scene when Ann Berry arranges reporters to come to her apartment as a naked Gil is discovered in her bedroom. As a 'pre-code' era film, when the Hays' Production Code Office was more permissive with their censorship than later on, "Loose Ankles" was allowed to show a sequence of the two aunts, Aunt Sarah Harper (Louise Fazenda) and Aunt Katherine Harper (Ethel Wales), getting snookered at an illegal speakeasy by two of Gil's roommates acting as gigolos.

The film's snappy dialogue shows an advancement in suggestiveness from those silent movies where their inter-titles were restricted from displaying over-the-top innuendos. One exchange in "Loose Ankles": "You don't mean to say you've been in a compromising position?" Response: "Well, the positions weren't so bad, but the circumstances were." With scenes of illegal drinking, salty language and suggestive sequences, Hollywood was indeed heading in a new direction with the arrival of talkies.

Loretta Young fit snugly in this 'new woman-of-the-screen' category. Born Gretchen Young, her mother secured parts parts for her at the tender age three, beginning in 1916. Appearing in ten movies in the next 12 years, Young's big role during that span was as an extra as an Arab girl in the 1921 Rudolph Valentino's "The Sheik." Young's hired manager's wife, actress Colleen Moore, gave Gretchen her stage name, Loretta, after Moore's favorite doll. Young's first credited debut under her new name was in Lon Chaney's 1928 'Laugh, Clown, Laugh.' After filming "Loose Ankles," she eloped with actor Grant Withers, nine years her senior. A year later, her marriage was annulled. Even an emotional divorce couldn't stop Young from playing spritely roles in comedy, especially after she displayed her comedic chops in "Loose Ankles.".
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Loretta Young Is The Berries
boblipton11 December 2019
When the will is read, everyone in the family gets something. The residual -- and a large one it is, too -- is left to Loretta Young, provided she get married, and stay married. She has no interest in getting married, especially when she mustn't kill her husband; so she pins her hopes on the codicil that says that if anyone in the family gets mentioned in the scandal sheets, everything -- including the stuff left to the aunts and uncles -- goes to a home for dogs and cats. She puts an ad in the paper for a good-looking young man to sin with, and who shows up but Douglas Fairbanks Jr?

Miss Young was 16 when she made this movie, and was not called upon to do much but look lovely, which she does exceedingly well. Most of the show is taken up with the elder family members trying to keep her name out of the papers without getting their own in. These proceedings are supposed to be funny, but despite being well shot, stuffy rich families were a dime a dozen in the movies by 1930s, and while everyone does a heckuva job, this movie relies mostly on its visuals; that's not a bad thing, but by 1930, musicals were going out of popularity fast because there were too many mediocre ones.

Still, this is a lot of fun to look at, including some big production numbers shot from interesting angles, and costume design that makes this look like a John Held Jr. cartoon.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Young Doug & Loretta are charming in this light romantic comedy!
larry41onEbay3 December 2003
Warning: Spoilers
A good friend loaned me a copy on tape and I am grateful! This is a rare film so catch it if you can! SPOILERS:A young woman stands to inherit a million bucks in this comedy. The deal is thus: her aunts will give her a cool million if she can stay out of trouble and marry a reputable man with a clean background whom her benefactors approve of. The girl eagerly advertises for her mate, and she finds a handsome fellow with whom she falls in love. The trouble is the man is a gigolo and the aunties most definitely do not approve. Fortunately for him, his buddies intervene and threaten to make public an embarrassing incident involving the ladies and a certain raided cafe. They quickly change their minds and happiness ensues.
6 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A cute movie with some fun bits.
ShazInCA9 December 2003
I enjoyed so many of the performances in this movie. The plots been summarized in other reviews, so let me just mention my favorites. Louise Fazenda as Aunt Sarah lets loose with some great physical comedy. According to IMDB she was 45 when this was made, but had performed in Mack Sennett comedies and her training shows in this. I also enjoyed the maid (Inez Courtney?) who responds to Loretta Young's comment that she "must have been in a comprising position at one time" -- "Oh, the position wasn't so bad....." The help she provides to the young and innocent Loretta as she tries to involve herself in scandal is quite funny.

A very enjoyable way to spend just over an hour.
5 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Piffle, but nice to look at
marcslope7 October 2014
Based on a successful play and moderately pre-Code, this look at 1930 Flaming Youth has Loretta Young as a not-that-interesting heiress and Douglas Fairbanks Jr., looking younger than I've ever seen him, as the nice boy forced to pose as a gigolo by his roistering buddies. There's some amusing pre-Code clucking about overnight guests of the opposite gender, and a lot of footage given over to Louise Fazenda, as a too-prim aunt unwittingly given some liquor and turning into a loose woman; this was the era when alcohol was still automatically hilarious. Warners peddles its own contemporary hit songs in the background ("Am I Blue?", "Painting the Clouds With Sunshine") and there's some clunky choreography in the nightclub sequence, but the focus is mostly on Loretta and Doug, who are quite charming together. His lack of experience shows, but he's convincingly a young man in love, and what young man could wish for a lovelier conquest than Loretta. An undemanding time capsule, with sufficient spirit.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Yikes
HandsomeBen12 March 2021
A woman must marry a man, who her family approvals of, in order to collect her inheritance.

Who knew you could fall in love with someone you meet in the newspaper, 2 minutes after meeting them. The leading lady is boring. The leading man she falls for has no personality. How did they fall for eachother so quick? This was ridiculous, and the second half was even worse. Things got weird in a bad way once we get to Circus Cafe. I swear the madness never ended. The only thing that kept me from turning it off was one of the characters resembled Rain Phoenix.
3 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Illicit Adventures
richardchatten30 March 2019
Obviously based on a play, although beginning with a close-up of Loretta Young's legs - complete with ankle chain - that puts us immediately on notice that we're in pre-Code territory; a premonition later confirmed by the rather camp cameraderie shown by the trio of "professional escort"s (the term used in the film) and the skimpy outfits worn by the girls performing the floor show at the grandiose speakeasy at which bluestocking aunts Louise Fazenda & Ethel Wales get sozzled on illicit liquor.

It's also good to see Daphne Pollard (best remembered as Oliver Hardy's tiny but fierce wife in 'Thicker Than Water') in a substantial supporting role as Miss Young's worldly ladies maid who pursues the young pre-moustache Douglas Fairbanks Jr. with an enormous pair of scissors cutting the buttons off his clothes (the boys seem to lose their clothes more often than the girls in this).

Tinny but fun.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Absurd Plot
view_and_review3 February 2024
The very premise of this movie was absurd and the execution was worse. The Barry family gathered to listen to the will of the late Grandma Barry. She had a ridiculous clause in there for the whole family to get their share of her riches. Her granddaughter, Ann (Loretta Young), had to be married. What's more, the man she planned to marry had to be approved of by her Aunt Sara (Ethel Wales), Aunt Katherine (Louise Fazenda), and Major Rupert Harper (Otis Harlan). If this should occur and no one in the family falls into scandal that makes the newspaper, they would all get their inheritance.

Ann didn't want to get married which was a sure sign she would. Whenever someone says they'll never fall in love or never get married in these old movies it's like putting up a neon sign saying, "I'll fall in love and get married." It was done so often it's as if the writers never even watched movies.

To avoid being pestered about marriage Ann came up with the idea that she'd be a part of a scandal. That way the entire inheritance would go to the dog and cat hospital which would remove any impetus for her family to bother her about getting married. She and her cousin Betty (Inez Courtney) came up with the wonderfully stupid idea of putting an ad in the paper seeking an unscrupulous man. Should she be caught with an unscrupulous man it was sure to make the papers and the inheritance would be washed away.

Of all the people to read her ad in the New York World it was two male escorts, Terry (Norman Selby) and Andy (Eddie Nugent). They passed on the opportunity because they were sick of entertaining old biddies (as they presumed the advertiser must've been). They told their roommate Gil (Douglas Fairbanks) about the opportunity and he accepted.

Gil was a total square and the wrong man for the job. He arrived at the Barry estate ignorant, innocent, and unprepared. For Ann to get in the paper for scandalous purposes she threw herself all over Gill. It was a dumbass scheme that looked like a Three Stooges episode in application. She needed to get Gil undressed for a better effect so she went about disrobing him with the help of her maid Agnes (Daphne Pollard). There are porns with better scripts and plots. After only a few moments she regretted the idea and it became a mad scramble to prevent the scheme from being publicized.

Free on Odnoklassniki.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Where there's a will there's a way.
bkoganbing11 December 2019
Loose Ankles is a title referring to how skilled professional escorts in those Depression years on the dance floors. Any other skills are coming with a bigger price. Loretta Young and Douglas Fairbanks, Jr. are stars and this is a salad years picture for them.

This is also one of those eccentric wills pictures and the uncle and lawyer for the estate Otis Harlan reading the will says that the big house and most the loot provided go to granddaughter Loretta should she marry a man of the choosing of Harlan and his two sisters Louise Fazenda and Ethel Wales. And if scandal occurs it all goes to dog and cat hospital. Well if she can't have it all now it goes to the dogs, and the cats.

Whom she chooses to make scandal with is Fairbanks a young escort who's heart is just not in his work. I go no farther except that there's one wild and woolly nightclub scene involving a lot of the cast.

Big Kudos go out to Louise Fazenda who was doing physical comedy way before Lucille Ball on TV. She steals the film in the scenes she in.

Fans of the two stars shouldn't miss Loose Ankles.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Character Actresses Shine
Ron Oliver23 December 2003
A free spirited young heiress with LOOSE ANKLES shocks her rapacious relatives by embarking on a scandal with a naïve paid escort.

Loretta Young & Douglas Fairbanks, Jr. star in this forgotten pre-Code comedy. Heady with too much dialogue, as were so many of the first talkies, it tends to creak badly, leaving the performers to strain a bit for laughs. Very little more is required from the two leads than to look attractive and recite their lines. However, there are some fun performances from the supporting cast which makes the film worthwhile.

Louise Fazenda & Ethel Wales are a hoot as two stuffy old prunes who loosen-up when liquored-up at a fancy speakeasy--Fazenda's flat-on-the-floor wrestling match with gigolo Eddie Nugent is worth sitting through the rest of the movie. Spunky little Daphne Pollard (the occasional cinematic bane of Oliver Hardy's life) scores as Miss Young's feisty maid; watching her divest Fairbanks of his trousers so as to cinch the scandal is hilarious. Otis Harlan appears as a blustery Major.

Movie mavens will recognize silent comic Billy Bletcher, uncredited as the diminutive relative from Logan.
15 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Beach Blanket pre-Code
michaelchager23 September 2023
In Easy Rider it was dope, here the solution to all problems is what's in the punch. This is a teen movie about a generation gap between the Prohibitionist old people versus the young fast set. If you made it through Beach Blanket Bingo or similar experiences, you can last the 69 minutes. The acting is unusually bad. Perhaps by design. Young, of course, is as good as it gets. Although hard to justify spending any time to watch this, it is worth sticking around to the end. Fazenda and Nugent put on a show that is unique. Also as an early talkie this offers music and a dance line. Fairbanks Jr.

Is seen here just a year before his breakthrough in Little Caesar.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed