Don't Look Now (1936) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Love affair battle on Valentines Day
TheLittleSongbird4 November 2017
Love animation, it was a big part of my life as a child, particularly Disney, Looney Tunes and Tom and Jerry, and still love it whether it's film, television or cartoons.

Also have much admiration for Tex Avery, an animation genius whose best cartoons are animated masterpieces and some of the best he ever did. 'Don't Look Now' is fairly early career Avery, but it's a good, very good even, early Avery cartoon. For Avery, 'Don't Look Now' is fairly tame with his uniquely wacky style being more obvious from the 40s onward, a sense that he was still finding his style. Meaning that one doesn't see his ahead-of-its-time risk-taking and that his material would become more hilarious, refined and visually innovative later.

Don't take that as a knock against 'Don't Look Now', because it's still a lot of fun and although it is very cute it is nowhere near as sickly sweet as one would think reading the summary. The story is a fairly slight one but doesn't feel too predictable or too thin that the love affairs battle wears thin too early which fortunately it does not.

The animation in 'Don't Look Now' is as expected great, the character designs would become more creative later but everything is beautifully drawn, sumptuously coloured and meticulous in background detail. Carl Stalling's music is lush and characterful, with clever orchestration and a mastery of not just adding to the action but enhancing it as well (Stalling was a near-unequalled master at this, though Scott Bradley gave him a run for his money).

Material here is not as imaginative or as hilarious as the material when he properly found his style, but it's still well timed and funny and as said it is very cute without being sickly sweet or sentimental.

Pacing throughout is lively and the characters are a lot of fun. The voice acting is very good, especially from Billy Bletcher, typically larger than life as the Devil Cuckoo.

All in all, very well made and executed to a high standard but Avery has done better since. 8/10 Bethany Cox
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
...and not the one starring Julie Christie and Donald Sutherland
lee_eisenberg29 July 2007
When Tex Avery was one of the animation directors at Warner Bros., he turned out some neat stuff (including Bugs Bunny's debut "A Wild Hare"). One of his early ones was "Don't Look Now", in which Cupid and the Devil have their work cut out on Valentine's Day. Cupid goes around making people fall in love, while the Devil undermines relationships by throwing things all over the men so that it looks as if they've been having affairs. So, the two beings keep one-upping each other...until they figure out the most unpredictable negotiation ever.

It's a pretty interesting cartoon. As it is, anything relating to Valentine's Day has a different significance for me as an Oregonian (Oregon became a state on February 14, 1859). And although I know that it's St. Valentine's Day, I've only heard that description in reference to the St. Valentine's Day Massacre; not a very valentine-like event.

Anyway, this cartoon is worth seeing. And also watch Nicolas Roeg's 1973 movie "Don't Look Now", starring Julie Christie and Donald Sutherland. The combination of this cartoon and that movie should give you a whole new impression of the phrase!
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
cute early Tex Avery cartoon
llltdesq25 January 2001
Although it may be hard for anyone who's seen much of his output, Tex Avery did turn out a few cute cartoons. This was one, but you needn't fear. A Tex Avery cartoon is still a Tex Avery cartoon. One word of advice: don't get ol' Dan Cupid riled at you. He has a mean streak and sures knows how to get even! Entertaining cartoon with the usual sight gags and more dialogue than is typical in a Tex Avery short. Well worth watching.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed