The Man with 100 Faces (1938) User Reviews

Cracking entertainment

[Spondonman · 7/10 · 17 March 2014]

I've always liked Tom Walls' farces – this is a more straightforward comedy, full of frothy sometimes witty dialogue and period furnishings with music veering from staid British dance band to hot American and a corny yet cogent script. Mind you, it also had an innocent bystander shot by hoodlums at point blank defending "a string of duds" from being stolen.

Mysterious and confident cracksman robs to order for almost purely altruistic reasons, but takes great exception when he's embroiled with and considered by the police to be the head hoodlum of a rather nasty gang of thieves so decides decidedly to clear his alias. It's inventive and predictable at the same time, interesting and so-so – basically I enjoyed it! It was the first time of viewing, I really wouldn't mind taking another crack at it and viewing it again sometime. Tom Walls is urbane and monocled, Lilli Palmer is elegant and shrewd, Noel Madison is snarly and impetuous – and everything else runs true to form too. There seems to be even more of an age-gulf between Lilli and the rest of the cast which was ignored of course so we have to accept it too and put any qualms we may have down to our collective post-rock and roll cynicism. The other star of the picture is Art Deco – for example the "hotel" and its interiors and furniture where a lot of the story is based is quite breathtaking at times in its poignant gleaming beauty. Not so long ago this fashion was sneered at, now that it's becoming more obvious we're living in a completely styleless age the focus on the past only gets sharper.

And yes, that's clearly a sound mike seen dangling in the ornate mirror in Lilli Palmer's apartment at 46 minutes – even that's interesting to view! Enjoyable stuff, but probably only to those of us who appreciate British pre-War comedies.

Could have been really fine.

[paloma54 · 7/10 · 1 April 2012]

I had never heard of this film before and therefore had no expectations. I was also not familiar with any of the cast members. The movie was much more interesting than I would have thought with one big caveat: the lead male role, who plays "Crackerjack" is much too old for the part, and smokes incessantly, which is a distinct turn-off for me. Any romantic feelings between the two leads seemed highly unlikely for this reason alone. The part needed a Cary Grant or a David Niven. Although I found no fault with Tom Walls' acting, he is simply way too old for Lilli Palmer. The plot twists may have appeared in other movies, but none that I have seen before, and this viewer they were refreshing and fun. I was caught off guard with the plot on several occasions. So, while I can't give this any more than 7 stars, it could still be a fairly pleasant entertainment, especially if one enjoys films of the 1930s.

LILLI PALMER anything BUT annoying

[jonathan_lippman · 7/10 · 24 November 2007]

The Wonderful Lilli Palmer was very young when she made CRACKERJACK and she was a marvelous actress and a fabulously beautiful and charming actress and this film was just the beginning for her. She was rather unique in British films since most of the so called Gainsborough gals of the time were British such as Margaret Lockwood, Phyllis Calvert, Patricia Roc, Sally Gray, etc and only Miss Palmer, German born, went on to an international career and worked in Hollywood as well as in France and Germany over the years, coming back to British films from time to time. She was unique among the all British group of gals making names for themselves in the late 30s and 40s in British cinema. She married Rex Harrison, had a son with him and happens to be my favorite all time actress.

The butler did it!

[parky-3 · 4 February 1999]

A typically 30s-style charismatic gentleman thief and master of disguise tackles a dangerous criminal gang while posing as a butler at a stately home. Vintage in age rather than in quality, and not as good as the identically-titled British kids' TV programme of three or four decades later.

A 1930s Robin Hood enthralls all of London

[SimonJack · 7/10 · 24 March 2020]

Ever since the 13th century legend of Robin Hood surfaced, writers have created various good thieves as heroes. "The Adventures of Robin Hood" was first made as a 1922 silent film and then in a 1938 technicolor sound movie that is a classic today. That swashbuckler starred Erol Flynn and Olivia de Haviland and was set in the early Middle Ages.

"The Man With 100 Faces" film is a modern rendition, also set in England. It is based on a 1926 novel by William B.M. Ferguson, "Other Folks' Money: an adventure story." As the mythical Robin Hood before him, "Crackerjack" robs from the rich to help the poor. Only, the real person known as Crackerjack isn't known. And, the Sherwood Forest where the thievery takes places in this film is the world of the wealthy and high society of London.

Tom Walls stars as Jack Drake, aka "Crackerjack," known as such only by his personal secretary, Burdge (played by Charles Heslop), and a couple of other characters who are mostly out of sight except when needed. One can't help thinking that the Batman comic stories seem to have similar characters - masks that hide real identities, only a choice few in on the real people, and heroes for justice. Of course the hero there is independently wealthy.

Jack Drake has been taking from the wealthy for the benefit of the needy and good causes. After some years, he writes a book about his exploits. The best seller earns him considerable "honest" money on which to live - for a time. But, as he continues to give to good causes, he must once again resort to relieving the rich of some of their surplus.

Lili Palmer plays the love of Drake's life, Baroness Von Haltz. The film has a sizable cast of characters, many with substantial roles. All perform very well. Walls is particularly interesting to watch for his different disguises. He is excellent in each of his different roles. A mark of the superb makeup as well as his acting, is that one can barely tell that it is Walls under those disguises. But for the sake of the audience, he makes one or two gestures to convince viewers that this isn't a stand-in or double.

For a very early sound film, this one has quite good quality. It's an interesting story that has some nice scenes of the culture and social landscape of London just before World War II. This is a very good comedy mystery that those who like old films especially should enjoy.

Here are some favorite lines from the film.

Sculpie, after Jack Drake knocks out Benting of Scotland Yard during the airplane heist, "Thanks, brother. What's the big idea?" Jack Drake, "Well, I thought he might prefer a headache to lead."

Superintendent Benting, "From now on, every crime in the country will be attributed to Crackerjack."

Superintendent Benting, "Don't forget to let me know if you get on the trail of Crackerjack." Baroness Von Haltz, "Why should I do your work for you?" Benting, "Because, it's a woman's job, not a policeman's."

Jack Drake, "You've hit on the two reasons that are keeping me here. Firstly, the infernal woman you mentioned. And secondly, I dislike having my nice clean charitable robberies messed up by a lot of murdering swine. I'm gonna put those gangsters out of business." Burdge, "How?" Drake, "I haven't the faintest idea."

Hambro Golding, "You're a very clever young woman." Baroness Von Haltz, "You're the second person within the last hour who has told me that this is a woman's job."

Baroness Von Haltz, "The only way you'll meet that man is to catch him on a job."

Hambro Golding, "Many problems, my dear, have been solved by a woman's intuition."

Jack Drake, to Burdge, "You ought to know by now, that where the baroness Is concerned, you matter very little."

Who is Crackerjack?

[Britney-Keira · 6/10 · 30 January 2006]

Well no it is not a movie about lawn bowls and featuring Mick Molloy and other Australian actors, this is the British comedy of years gone by with Tom Walls and his typical farce and comedic stylisings. I have began watching Tom Walls comedies, in a race of filmographies with my brother and this is the third Walls comedy I have seen. This seems to be by far the best of them, and he appears to have honed his style. The beginning is especially memorable with the theft of diamonds and the switching of these around. The movie is very amusing and is well worth the watch, it is not an outstanding movie, and I am not as dedicated to Tom Walls as my brother is, but his movies are usually diverting and not terrible. This film is well worth a watch and is Tom Walls, watch this film to get a real understanding of the Walls filmography.

Mildly amusing, mildly entertaining routine crime caper

[1930s_Time_Machine · 4/10 · 26 March 2024]

Tom Walls was a very famous comedy actor in the thirties usually in very, very silly farces playing very, very silly characters. This is not one of those silly farces he was famous for, it's a routine comedy crime caper and it's not his "usual home" and I can see why the comments at the time were like: He should stick to what he's good at.

The problem with this is twofold: it's not that funny and the character he plays, an upper-class gentleman thief without any of the charm of say David Niven or Warren William would have had is not likeable. There were lots of likeable gentleman thieves in 1930s pictures but, without denigrating Mr Walls talents, they were played by proper actors, not comedians. He does his best to warm "Drake" to us - he steals from the rich, gives to the poor, helps sick children, builds hospitals, rights wrongs and is a general all round good guy but Tom Walls, as good a comedy character actor as he was, picked the wrong character to make a whole film out of.

Can you imagine TROUBLE IN PARADISE but with Miriam Hopkins and Kay Francis fighting over W C Fields instead of Herbert Marshall? I think the answer's probably no but I suspect that Tom Wall would probably have thought - yes - and I can do that as well.

The third problem I had with this - was the fact that sweet and lovely Lilli Palmer is 24 and she is meant to be head over heels in love with Tom Walls - not the most attractive man in the world when he was younger but now he's in his late fifties. He's old enough to be her father and looks like her grandfather - it just feels wrong! This was directed by Albert de Courville who was in his late fifties as well. He also made the (much better and much funnier) THERE GOES THE BRIDE several years earlier. In that, 24 year old Jessie Matthews (the sexiest and most beautiful woman in English cinema at the time) was herself head over heels with a guy also in his late fifties. I wonder did Mr de Courville have some issues he was trying to get out through his work!

Really rather charming

[minerva-11 · 8/10 · 29 July 1999]

This an early attempt at the gentleman thief idea and it works beautifully. The film offers much elegance, wit and sophistication, just like its two stars. If only Hollywood produced this type of film today.

Starts well but tails of rapidly

[malcolmgsw · 5/10 · 3 July 2013]

The early parts of this film are quite promising but it tails off pretty quickly.Part of the problem is Tom walls.He is clearly attempting to emulate Ronald Coleman as Raffles but fails miserably.He was 56 years old when he made this and having him romantically involved with a 22 year old Lili Palmer actually makes him look rather like a dirty old man.Palmer for her part is probably to young for her part.The plot seems to rather get lost in the middle part.The ending is predictable and clichéd,It has to be said that Tom walls disguised as a butler still looks very like Tom walls.There is an interesting tap routine that seems to have strayed in from a Jessie Matthews film and some really charming art deco sets.

Silly? Perhaps...but also a lot of fun.

[planktonrules · 8/10 · 12 May 2019]

If you combine Robin Hood with a communist, you'd get Jack Drake (Tom Walls)...a high-class crook who delights in stealing from the rich and giving to various deserving charities in Britain. Despite being a crook, however, you cannot help but like Drake and his exploits. The same can be said of Drake in the story...he cannot help but like his exploits as well...so much so that he wrote his memoires and had them published anonymously. Now, millions of Brits can read about 'Crackerjack' (his alter ego) and his brushes with the law.

While you might think that the police would be Crackerjack's worst enemies, there is a vicious gang who want to capture him even more. Why? Because twice during the course of the film he outsmarts them and steals jewels the gang intended to steal. To stop him, the gang recruits an innocent lady...the Baroness (Lilli Palmer). But once she realizes her mistake, can she alert Crackerjack before their wicked plan is enacted?

Tom Walls is a middle-aged man in the film and not especially handsome. However, despite this, he is mega-charming and easy to like....and it's a shame that very few these days have even heard of this excellent actor. My advice is watch the film....he's amazingly good in it and manages to make a somewhat ridiculous plot work...and work well.

Boring film

[AAdaSC · 3/10 · 30 May 2023]

This is boring. Tom Walls (Jack) is known as Crackerjack. He steals jewellery and hands out the proceeds of his thieving to good causes like hospitals. He's a bit creepy looking especially when he visits the children in a hospital. The whole thing just reminded me of Jimmy Saville. Anyway, on one particular job, a party gets held up by a gang who have been beaten to the prize once again by Walls. On this occasion, a rather fat rugby-player who is meant to be England's captain gets shot dead. Eventually the film finishes but you may be in a coma by that point.

We also get an unlikely romance due to the age gap - again, a bit creepy. The cast aren't that good and speak in that upper class English accent. It's a shame because I was looking forward to this Gainsborough film. The lady at the beginning is the standout during the logo.

Worth watching...Mainly for Tom Walls

[heebie_jeebies · 14 August 2003]

The film begins with a scene in which a plane is hijacked by a gang of criminals and some precious diamonds are stolen. However it is not the gang that gets away with the loot but rather the master thief and modern day Robin Hood, Jack Drake, who has beaten the gang to it. Meanwhile, the latest craze in London is the memoirs of a thief, who goes by the pseudonym of "Crackerjack." When a string of precious pearls is stolen at a society party, Crackerjack is suspected, owning to a number of idiosyncrasies of the culprit, which are also mentioned in Crackerjack's book. But who is Crackerjack - is he Jack Drake? And will Jack get away with his philanthropic thieving?

This film is good entertainment but nothing special. The sort of story that the film uses involving gangs of criminals, stolen jewels and princesses (or a Baroness in this case) has been used so many times before - even by Tom Walls himself - that it needs something special to make it work. There are a few fairly uninventive twists in the plot - the people you least expect turn out to be criminals and so on. All of it leads to a rather formulaic showdown towards the end of the film. Nevertheless, there are a few good surprises which add interest to what would otherwise be a fairly average film. For me, the most disappointing thing is that we know who Crackerjack is for almost all of the film. I think it would've added a whole extra dimension to the film if the answer had've been denied us until the end - and it would've justified the existence of the "Crackerjack" book, which, as the film stood, was totally peripheral to the plot.

Tom Walls makes a wonderful gentleman criminal; almost as great as James Mason, but in a different, more old-world chivalrous way. His name on the bill was what made me decide to watch this film, and he is definitely its strongest link. The rest of the cast are nothing special and I found Lilli Palmer a tad annoying but an acceptable leading lady. Overall the story is sufficiently engrossing and consistent enough to make this reasonable viewing - but only slightly above average.