Espionage Agent (1939) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
11 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
terrorists in the U.S.?
blanche-226 August 2005
Joel McCrea is a member of the foreign service who inadvertently marries a part-time spy in "Espionage Agent." This is a very interesting film for several reasons. War is about to break out in Europe, and the U.S. is planning to stay neutral, and in fact, in one scene, an American broadcaster gives a call for neutrality.

After getting into the U.S. on a forged passport, McCrea's wife, played by the darkly beautiful Brenda Marshall, confesses her past associations, and states that she's been approached to do more favors for an espionage group. McCrea resigns his post, and with his wife's help, sets out to expose the spy network in the U.S.

In the aftermath of 9/11, watching a 67-year-old film where a group of people have agents in place throughout the country and sites ready to bomb is chilling.

There are some tense, exciting scenes and an attractive cast, but the film is more of historical interest than anything else. Look for TV Superman George Reeves in a very small, uncredited role.
23 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A lesson for our times
LCShackley12 November 2008
In these days, when many are more concerned about the rights of terrorists than the security of our country, a simple old movie like ESPIONAGE AGENT reminds us that no country can afford to relax its vigilance against terrorists within its borders.

Joel McCrea, on the verge of making one of the best WW2 spy pictures of all (Hitchcock's FOREIGN CORRESPONDENT, 1940), plays a likable US diplomat who makes the mistake of falling for a woman with a shady past. Orphaned in Europe, his wife Brenda was recruited by German spies, and now that she's married into the diplomatic corps, her handlers want her to use her connections for further infiltration. The two lovers decide to play their own double game to bring down the Germans.

There's nothing extraordinary about the film. It's simply done, with solid acting and a taut script with no wasted scenes (and no money wasted on actual location shoots). What makes it seem so special is its timing: being released just as WW2 openly broke out in Europe, and the danger of spies became more of a real threat to free countries everywhere. There's also a nice balance between the spy plot, the romance plot, and some humorous bits involving annoying American tourists.

Just like today's terrorists, the German saboteurs operate under a neutral-sounding front: the WORLD PEACE ORGANIZATION. Early in the picture, discussing the government's reluctance to do something about saboteurs, a high-ranking US official asks a question that rings true here in the post-9/11 world: "Will we as a nation ever learn the difference between tolerance and stupidity?"

Trivia bit: keep your eyes open for Clark Kent AND Perry White from the old SUPERMAN TV series.

And contrary to a previous poster, this film is not in the least confused about which war it's about. The opening scenes, with the father of McCrea's character, take place around WW1. Then there's a very clear narration bringing us up to the late 1930s, and there are several references later on to "20 years ago" (meaning the World War). Someone must have been dozing.
18 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Keeping America Safe
boblipton7 February 2023
Joel McCrea is training for the US diplomatic service when he meets refugee Brenda Marshall and marries her. Soon. She confesses she is a low-level spy, but loves him so much that she is willing to have her secret outed. When they go to McCrea's bosses, they kick him out of the service, but he and Miss Marshall decide to do some counterspying on their own.

It's the second movie in 1939 that Warners made about the German threat. True, the country is never named, and the uniforms worn merely suggest it, but only Universal had made a stand earlier, and that went away with the Laemmles. This is quite obviously not a major production, and Warners was risking no major assets. They borrowed McCrea from Paramount, and this was Miss Marshall's first credited role. Director Lloyd Bacon obviously shot this on the cheap in his usual high-speed manner, but there's a strident call for tougher anti-espionage laws, and the Foreign Service is talked up as "America's first line of defense."

Cryptography buffs will snort when the new mechanical encryption system is talked up. It boasts over 2700 possible cyphers!
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
A dress rehearsal for "Foreign Correspondent"
mgconlan-118 November 2008
Want to know how much difference a director can make? Watch this film, with Joel McCrea as a blundering American naïf in Europe on the eve of World War II exposing an Axis spy plot under the hacky direction of Lloyd Bacon, and then watch "Foreign Correspondent," which McCrea made the next year in a similar role, similar plot, at least one supporting cast member (Martin Kosleck) in common and even another sequence set during a rainstorm -- but under the direction of Alfred Hitchcock. "Espionage Agent" isn't a bad movie and it probably would be a lot more likable if McCrea hadn't made "Foreign Correspondent" (albeit playing a terminally naïve journalist instead of a terminally naïve diplomat) a year later.

Incidentally, the comment by "bkoganbing" is wrong. Though the film begins in 1915, it quickly leaps forward to 1936 (the year the Spanish Civil War broke out) and the bulk of it takes place in the late 1930's -- though, even so, the German uniforms are otherwise correct but their armbands are missing the swastika. Even after making "Confessions of a Nazi Spy" (which was about Nazi abuses in the U.S., not in their homeland), Warners was still being skittish about directly taking on the German government.
21 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
early wartime WW II film.
ksf-23 January 2021
Joel McCrae is Barry Corvall, consulate man who gets married right as the german forces were gathering and getting ready to move on all of europe. Brenda Marshall (in her first credited role!) is "Brenda", another american needing assistance in getting back to america, but of course, she doesn't have a passport. or family. or friends. and acts a bit suspiciously (at least to everyone except Barry...) it all blows up later,and now barry must prove that his new bride hasn't committed any crime. George Reeves (Superman! ) is in here as a bit part of a secretary in the office. sadly, Reeves died young at 45, from a gunshot, under suspicious circumstances. This came out in 1939, the same year that germany rolled into poland. the U.S. would be dragged into it in Pearl Harbor, 1941. directed by Lloyd Bacon, who worked with big stars in films 42nd Street, Marked Woman, WonderBar. and even directed Lucy in two comedies. it's okay, as long as you buy into the storyline. some of it is pretty hard to buy into...but it has the gung-ho patriotic message that we will see in so many WW II films.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Homeland Security
SnoopyStyle8 November 2020
The Black Tom explosion during WWI set off by German agents is a wake up call to the American homeland. During the Spanish Civil War, arrogant American tourists insist on traveling and foreign service agent Barry Corvall (Joel McCrea) is forced to take care of them. Brenda Ballard claims to be a destitute stranded American. Barry falls in love and marries her. There is an accusation against her and he is forced to resign.

This takes place during the build up to WWII. America is still a few years away from joining. This movie is actually willing to name Germany as the enemy state although it couches the animosity from the first world war. There is a long presentation in the middle railing against possible sabotage from within and proposes more drastic measures to combat it. The first half is a little interesting. Once Barry is forced to quit, the story muddles around and loses its intensity. Sneaking around in a mansion is not going to add to the thrills. This movie is more interested in pushing the panic button on the home front. There are good reasons for that in the real world and it works in its propaganda purposes. For the cinematic world, it seems to be preaching.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Surprise, anyone?
dexter-1020 April 2001
There is little doubt in this film that World War II is about to begin. In fact, it was released just twenty-one days after the invasion of Poland by German forces and was in production long before. Scare tactics aside, the movie reveals real fears during the months preceding the war. Spies, counterspies, terror, suspicions, and other prologues to war gave ample warning of renewed global conflict. This movie reflects that warning.Viewing this film leads one to wonder, given the ample clues, how the war could surprise anyone.
10 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
We Have Ways of Dealing With People Like You....
rmax30482310 May 2012
Warning: Spoilers
In the 30s and 40s, when Warner Brothers got hold of a social or political philosophy they didn't monkey around. In "Espionage Agent," released in 1939 when America was neutral and would remain so for another couple of years, Warners gives us a heads up on who the bad guys are.

Brenda Marshall, desperate and broke, in the middle of the Spanish Civil War, stumbles into the German Consulate and begs them for shelter. They give it to her -- forged passport and all -- with the proviso that she go to America and spy for them.

On the ship, she meets all-American Joel McRea, they fall in love and get married. She forgets about her agreement with the Germans until one of them shows up and reminds her of it -- and don't forget those forged papers. She tells all to her husband. The couple travel to Switzerland to unravel this tangled web of bent allegiances and threats.

The Nazis are never named, although the uniforms are suggestive. I'm not sure Germany is even mentioned. It's mainly "them" and "they" and "their kind." The Nazis come in three types. The thugs, the most numerous, are brutal and slimy. They do the wet work. Their skulls are misshapen or their jaws too large for their faces. The middle men are like Martin Kosleck, icy, smiling, holding his cigarette in a fancy European way, and so forth. Kosleck himself, born into a Jewish family, was a refugee from Hitler who looked so much like Goebbels that he managed to play him on screen five times. There is always a Nazi boss who runs the spies. As usual, he's tall, distinguished looking, gray haired, suave, and has a thin black mustache. He speaks with a British accent and carries a Luger.

Joel McRea could never play a Nazi. Not only didn't he look or sound enough like a Nazi -- that wouldn't necessarily have been a hindrance -- but he didn't have the acting range to pull it off. No, he could never play a Nazi. He would have had to stretch to play a man with devalued impulses, no matter how well he stifled them.

Brenda Marshall is the dame caught in a moral vice. She cares nothing for the Nazis but in revealing her circumstances she may lose the man she loves or, at the least, cause him to end his career with the Foreign Service. Like McRea's, her acting is reliable and straight out of the Hollywood lost wax process. She has a piercing stare, no matter what the rest of her features are doing. I'm not sure the camera ever catches her blinking. At the same time, she looks more attractive here than in any of the other films I've seen her in, like "The Sea Hawk" and "Captains of the Clouds." She looks spotless, dry cleaned and pressed, even sexy. She was married for years to William Holden, whom she evidently nagged constantly.

You know, though, taken all in all, the movie isn't as exciting as it ought to be. The tempo is fast. The scenes don't drag. Warner Brothers' scenes never drag. But the plot is surprisingly dull and director Lloyd Bacon adds little vitality to the proceedings. There is no subtlety in it. The actors hit their marks and say their lines. The camera is placed where it is most effective. A more talented and innovative director, Hitchcock, for instance, could have turned this into much more than it is.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Missed Dramatic Opportunities
mehsab17 February 2023
Warning: Spoilers
I recently watched this movie for the first time on TCM. It was easy to compare to the later Foreign Correspondent, but I thought there were several points where it could have been helped by some added tension and drama. At some times it seemed like more of a documentary than a feature movie. The only time a character seemed remotely in danger was when McCrea's wife was taken away on a train, but that was quickly and easily dealt with. Overall, I enjoyed the movie, mostly for its historical context, but I would have liked to have seen more dramatic tension. Near the end of the movie, when McCrea and his wife are flying back to England, it is mentioned that they only have a few hours to catch the Queen Mary, the last ship to leave England (really?). Cut to some stock footage of the QM in port, and the next thing you know, they're back in Washington. I guess that in 1939, they couldn't even begin to imagine the horrors of the war to come.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Dated, but still has interest!
JohnHowardReid29 March 2018
Warning: Spoilers
Producer: Hal B. Wallis. Executive producer: Jack L. Warner. Copyright 30 September 1939 by Warner Bros Pictures, Inc. A First National picture. New York opening at the Strand: 22 September 1939. U.S. release: 30 September 1939. Australian release: October-December 1939. 83 minutes. NOTES: Thanks to her co-starring roles with super-star Errol Flynn in The Sea Hawk and Footsteps in the Dark, Brenda Marshall was extremely popular with Australian audiences. This seems to be her film debut.

COMMENT: Politically dated but it still has some interest. There's a bit of excitement, though the climactic action finishes just as it is warming up. What makes the film interesting is that it is given the full Warner Bros "A" treatment: brisk, slick direction by Lloyd Bacon, attention-getting montage routines, lavish sets and a spectacular support cast. Brenda Marshall, although not as stunningly beautiful as the scriptwriters specify, makes a good fist of the title role.

One thing we like about the script is that it doesn't follow conventional melodramatic plot lines but has some unexpected, if politically motivated, twists. Joel McCrea fills the hero part with his usual likableness, while Jeffrey Lynn holds up a small and unimportant part as the hero's buddy. It's wonderful to see Martin Kosleck looking so neat and villainously smooth. Our old friends Robert O. Davis and Hans Schumm are also along to fill out the Nazi ranks. Sarah Edwards and Vera Lewis are disgruntled enquirers at the consulate and there is a large round of familiar cameo players on the State Department staff.

Bacon's direction is brisk and assured, if inclined to use too many close-ups. Rosher's lighting photography treats his players kindly, even if it is a minor factor in the creation of atmosphere. But the sets are impressive and the music score has that familiar Warners' sound.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Got Their Wars Mixed Up
bkoganbing25 November 2005
Warner Brothers really could have used a better script for this mishmash of a movie which managed to juxtapose the events of World War I into the days before World War II.

The film opens with a description of the famous Black Tom explosion of a munition factory located on an island in the middle of the Hudson River. You can still see the remnants of it today. This occurred before World War I and was traced to German saboteurs then.

The message is quite clear, America needs to have its own espionage agency and we got one with the formation of the Office of Strategic Services as World War II broke out. Until then such distasteful spying matters was handled within the State Department.

Joel McCrea is a foreign service officer who marries refugee Brenda Marshall. Problem is that Marshall had gotten help from the Germans and they expect some help in return. Of course she's in love with her new husband and she refuses and exposes their contact man, Martin Kosleck.

With McCrea's dismissal from the foreign service, the newlyweds decide to form there own plan to expose the German's secret espionage network with a little spying of their own. How they manage is the rest of the film.

For a film that supposedly takes place before American entry into World War I, why is that everyone is dressed in the Nazi uniforms of the Thirties? Everything is there but the swastika. There's not even any kind of effort with music or sets to set the film in its proper time frame.

The only reason this gets as much as three stars is a tribute to the players involved. Joel McCrea was simply in a dress rehearsal for the far better Foreign Correspondent he would do the following year.
5 out of 35 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed