Believe in Me (1971) Poster

(1971)

User Reviews

Review this title
7 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Drug culture of now and drug culture of 1960's,1970's are about real people
hallmatthewgeorge19 March 2021
Warning: Spoilers
A more innocent era,the early 1970's. A dubious addictive phenomenon. A reality. Amphetamine. Amphetamine as a escape. Love that is not concerned enough for the other as so many movies today exploit love and use women,and,men,to get to a point. Point being, not in love but trendy is interesting. Love is interesting and always the thing now then well in the drug culture of the current era I'm not sure people would respect the motives of the movie I'm not sure they would then but today's meth, crystal meth and massive hallucinogenic markets are so much worse than the barbiturates and amphetamine of the 1960's,1970's ...but with this movie it's a serious escapist near tragedy not a neat fun drama. I recommend this BELIEVE IN ME because it is empathetic
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A timely film for today's drug culture and the family it affects.
csydow-118 June 2006
This movie has haunted me for more than 35 years! I remember how beautiful Jacquelline Bissett was in the beginning and how she, the character, changed over the years with the use of drugs. I can still see the final scene - this from a fan who can barely remember the movies I saw last week! In the drug culture of the 1970's, this would have been a potent film to use as a drug deterrent for teens and adults alike. Her changing appearance was amazing! The family didn't looks at things very realistically either. My kids were pretty young then, so I didn't realize just how much this lifestyle could and would affect my own family's lifestyle. I have looked for this movie on all the TV movie channels and on movie sources for years, in the hopes to see it again. This space is the first I have found that tells that it hasn't been made into a CD. No wonder I haven't found it. However, I still would welcome an opportunity to see it again. The performances were outstanding and so important, even today.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Not Believable
boblipton26 August 2022
Michael Sarrazin is an intern in a big hospital. He develops rapport with the patients, and spends their entire date saving a life, which enchants children's book editor Jacqueline Bisset. How does he do it? He's a speed addict, and soon hooks Miss Bisset. Their lives go to pot, although they continue to look fabulous and dress well to the end.

It's a problem with Hollywood productions about people who lose their fabulous lives because of drugs, that they still look fabulous and wear good-looking clothes. Of course we don't want want to see our stars look the way their characters should -- although Christian Bale is willing to lose or gain 30 or so kilograms for artistic verisimilitude -- but Miss Bisset's performance, while spot on, isn't convincing when she continues to look so gorgeous, and Sarrazin ends looking like he's sleepy instead of strung out.

Sometimes you have to make sacrifices in order to tell a tragic story. They didn't here.
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Surprisingly Good
Crap_Connoisseur16 December 2005
"Believe In Me" has been aired quite regularly of late on Australian cable TV. I stumbled across it and (embarrassingly enough) thought I would check it out because I liked the Lou Rawls theme song. I'm really glad I did because this film turned out to be a small gem.

During the first 10 or 15 minutes of the film, I thought I was in for a corny romance about a dedicated doctor, Remy, and his editor girlfriend, Pamela. I was genuinely surprised when Dr. Do Good stole hospital supplies to get high and was really taken aback when Pamela decided to follow Remy's example and started to shoot up. Pamela and Remy's descent into drug addiction is affecting and very gritty for a mainstream movie made in 1971. I'm sure the subject matter of white collar drug use was even more confronting back then than it is now.

I was interested to read that a significant amount of the film was edited out and re-shot because it was thought to be too bleak. This explains the jarring way in which lighter moments are interspersed into the action and the very annoying use of the (quite lovely) romantic score, which I think was intended to give the impression that the film really just a tragic love story. I'm sure the studio thought this would make the film more palatable to audiences but it just makes the story seem ridiculous. Nevertheless, the studio butchery does not entirely ruin the film. The performances by Michael Sarrazin and Jacqueline Bisset are great and the film does provide a fresh perspective on drug addiction.

I would really love to see the film as the director originally intended. I think "Believe In Me" is ripe for a director's cut on DVD, this is one of those rare films that seems more relevant today than when it was made. Recommended!
18 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
druggie movie
SnoopyStyle25 August 2022
Remy (Michael Sarrazin) is a medical student working in a hospital. He is friendly with the patients but he's stealing drugs from his work. He starts dating Pamela (Jacqueline Bisset) and they move in together. The two become drug addicts.

It's a druggie movie. It's a little more realistic than the old government issued drug prevention shorts shown in high schools. It's still somewhat awkward like a lesson of the week movie. It doesn't have a free-flowing plot. They are druggies and they need the drugs. That seems to be the extend of the ideas in the writing.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Sterling Performances by Jacqueline Bisset and Michael Sarrazin
sdiner8218 April 2002
Originally filmed in 1970 as "Speed is of the Essence" (the title of Gail Sheehy's story about her sister that appeared in New York Magazine), this virtually-unknown film so alarmed MGM in its unflinching depiction of drug abuse that the studio ordered extensive re-shoots directed by John G. Avildsen (who receives no screen credit). The mangled result briefly appeared in theaters in 1971 and then vanished into obscurity. MGM's attempt to make the movie more "palatable" and "upbeat" proved disastrous (What did the studio want--"Love Story" with needle marks?) Among the approximately 50 minutes of the original version that hit the cutting room floor were several poignant scenes featuring George Rose and Geraldine Fitzgerald as Jacqueline Bisset's parents, frightened and helpless when confronted in their placid Connecticut home by their daughter's decline into amphetamine addiction. Even so, the drastically re-edited release print still glows with the warmth, sincerity and lacerating honesty of the performances by Michael Sarrazin and Jacqueline Bisset. In fact, Francois Truffaut was so impressed by Ms. Bisset's multi-faceted portrayal of a doomed young woman that he subsequently cast her in "Day for Night." "Believe in Me" has never aired on commercial or cable TV, nor has it been released on videotape. It is apparently a "lost" film, and a shame, because Ms. Bisset's and Mr. Sarrazin's work is exemplary.
19 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Jacqueline Bisset
MrDeWinter1 October 2021
Better than expected. Michael Sarrazin has never been overly convincing in anything really but Jacqueline Bisset is a revelation. It is also an interesting docu of the US in the 70s. For movie buffs.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed