The Naked Zoo (1970) Poster

(1970)

User Reviews

Review this title
8 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
Grefe gets Rita
BandSAboutMovies27 November 2020
Warning: Spoilers
Rita Hayworth spent the last few years of her life not knowing who she was anymore, painting when she did, and mostly staring out her window at Central Park. She died with many people thinking that alcoholism had robbed her of her career when the truth was Alzheimer's had impacted her final years and back then, the world didn't understand that disease at all.

Before she slipped away, she made a movie with William Gréfe, which blows my mind, and that movie is 1970's The Naked Zoo, which was originally called The Grove, named for Coconut Grove, a former artist's colony in Miami.

So how did Gréfe - the maker of movies like Sting of Death and Whiskey Mountain - get a big star like Hayworth into a movie made for just $250,000? Well, her agent originally wanted all of that cash, but they were able to make a deal for $50,000 for two weeks of shooting. Her parts were shot in a deserted house near the Pirate's World theme park (of my dreams, as well as movies like Santa and the Ice Cream Bunny and Musical Mutiny).

Once known as "The Great American Love Goddess," Hayworth's life was filled with men who wanted her to be the seductive woman she was in films only to learn that she was a real person. Or, perhaps even worse, men who only sought to control her, like first husband Edward Charles Judson, a twice her age businessman who remade her into a sex symbol that he could buy and sell to Hollywood. Her marriages to Orson Welles, Prince Aly Khan, Dick Haymes and James Hill were also marked with mental and physical abuse, with only Welles not outright beating and humiliating her in public*.

By 1972 - two years after this film - her health and mental state was so bad that she had to read her lines one at a time while making The Wrath of God. She was to be in Tales That Witness Madness, but left the set before she appearing in one scene.

Back to Willian Gréfe. He had hoped to make a movie closer to The Graduate, but you know, as seen through the Florida drive-in movie haze of sex, drugs and crime. And still, this was edited by its distributor, with cuts made to add a masturbation scene and the band Canned Heat playing at a party. Those scenes were filmed by Barry Mahon, pretty much making this movie a team-up of Florida's two top exploitation experts.

The film itself concerns Hayworth playing Mrs. Golden, a rich woman who lives with her cuckolder, wheelchair-bound husband Harry (Ford Rainey, Dr. Mixter from Halloween II!). She sleeps with an author named Terry Shaw (Steve Oliver from Peyton Place) and when her husband finds out - and tries to gun them down - Terry stops him, but despite the death of the old man being in self-defense, Mrs. Golden starts blackmailing him.

That's really the whole story, although there's also plenty of party scenes and romance between Terry and Nadine (Fleurette Carter, who was also in The Hookers) and Pauline (Fay Spain, Dragstrip Girl).

*Welles would say, a day before her death, that she was "one of the dearest and sweetest women that ever lived.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Not one of Bill Grefes' best.
Hey_Sweden29 April 2021
Warning: Spoilers
Steve Oliver of 'Peyton Place' stars here as Terry Shaw, a struggling writer and gigolo. One of his lovers is older woman Mrs. Golden (a slumming Rita Hayworth ("Gilda"), in one of her final film appearances). She's married to wealthy, wheelchair-bound Harry Golden (top character actor Ford Rainey ("The Sand Pebbles")).

Their affair comes to an end when Harry discovers the two of them together, but unfortunately the film does not end there. It then spends a fair amount of time indulging in sleazy, swinging, and surreal early 70's drug and dance sequences, and it remains to be seen whether the reprehensible Terry will ever pay the price for the vile things he does.

Overall, this is not as much fun as the typical output from Florida-based exploitation filmmaker William Grefe. It's good for some mild entertainment as a trashy melodrama, but it's rough going when the character with whom we're required to spend so much time is such a worthless jerk. It tends to run the gamut of entertainment value, ranging from being boring to fairly amusing to generally agreeable.

Rita shows some appeal in this late-career role, managing to retain some of her dignity. Oliver is good in the sense that he really makes you hate his character. Rainey is solid in his brief time on screen. The supporting cast, like Ms. Hayworth, has some appeal even if they don't possess her degree of talent: Fay Spain as the victimized Pauline and Fleurette Carter as the enticing Nadine have real showcase roles. Frequent Grefe collaborator / boxing legend Willie Pastrano appears here as a glasses and suit wearing character named Henry. Other familiar faces (at least to those familiar with Florida-made genre and exploitation titles) include John Vella ("Sting of Death") and Jeff Gillen ("Children Shouldn't Play with Dead Things"). Joe E. Ross of 'Car 54, Where are You?' fame has a cameo as Terry's agent; exploitation legend William Kerwin ("Blood Feast") turns up near the end as a uniformed cop. (Another Grefe collaborator, pop star Steve Alaimo, sings the songs on the soundtrack.)

All in all, this is the kind of thing one may stick with just in the hope of making sure that the despicable Terry receives his comeuppance before the end credits start rolling. But there are better (or at least more entertaining) Bill Grefe films out there.

Also available in an even more exploitative version, when the distributor took Grefe's finished film and added more nudity to try to spice it up.

Five out of 10.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Rita deserved better than this thing
jjnxn-17 November 2014
Really terrible film with a loathsome main character, horrible acting from everyone but Rita, hideous photography and costuming.

Poor Rita, in her last substantial part-thank goodness it wasn't her last credit, at least is spared the indignity of having to act with the group of no talents assembled for the picture. All her scenes seem to have been filmed in a different location and the only other actor she has any interaction with is lead actor, Steven Oliver. The only other minor point of interest, and it's slight, is the appearance in one of the party scenes of the 60's band Canned Heat. They aren't bad nor are they very memorable but at least they have some talent which is more than can be said for 95% of the cast.

If it's not the bottom of the barrel it's awfully close.
18 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
This is a mess of a film and a pathetic starring vehicle for an aging Rita Hayworth.
planktonrules21 November 2009
Warning: Spoilers
I don't know how William Grefe did it, but he had a bit of a knack for catching falling stars and putting them in his ultra-low budget films. What's amazing about this is that Grefe was one of the worst directors of his day--every bit as bad as Al Adamson, Larry Buchanan and Ted Mikels. In many ways, his starring Rita Hayworth and William Shatner in his films was much like Ed Wood securing the talents of Bela Lugosi and Lyle Talbot for PLAN 9 FROM OUTER SPACE--these actors were in desperate financial straits and would do just about anything. As for Shatner, according to IMDb, when he did Grefe's IMPULSE, he was basically homeless after "Star Trek" was finished and his ex-wife took him to the cleaners. As for Miss Hayworth, according to IMDb she was in the midst of undiagnosed Alzheimer's at the time this was made. It was not really that bad, yet, but her condition and age limited her acting opportunities. So it's pretty sad that she drifted into this film--a real mess with few redeeming qualities. In other words, it's a typical William Grefe film! And, in addition to Miss Hayworth, Joe E. Ross appears only at the very beginning...for no apparent reason at all--I suppose it was simply because Grefe could get him for next to nothing. After all, how far could his "ooooo, oooo" shtick really get him as an actor?!

The movie begins with a lot of nudity. Oddly, the rest of the film in not that graphic--other than a few totally random shots of a topless woman playing with a vibrator. I suspect these were added later to either pad out the film or sex it up a bit to try to attract an audience.

The film is about a character played by Steve Oliver. His character isn't that well-defined and he spends most of the film living like the embodiment of Freud's concept of the Id. In other words, whatever feels good, he simply does--with no conscience or concern about others. He alternates from having sex, doing drugs, having more sex, drinking, having even more sex, committing arson (in a completely incomprehensible scene) and ultimately, murder....and, of course, sex. The problem with all this is that there is virtually no plot. Only occasionally does a plot seem to develop--and then it disappears again!! The only real plot involves Oliver schmoozing with an older and rather pathetic rich lady (Hayworth). While they talk about sex, Miss Hayworth is saved the embarrassment of doing any nude scenes. Later, when her wheelchair-bound husband catches them, the husband tries to kill Oliver--but accidentally kills himself in the process. As for Oliver, this is not his problem---and he walks away to let her fend for herself. However, she keeps phoning him and demanding he helps her until he ultimately kills murders her.

This alone might have been an exceptional films--but it only makes up a small portion of the movie. Much of it is completely random footage of people partying, smoking pot, drinking, having sex and acting like total idiots. None of it is very coherent and it truly looks like Grefe simply took two or three projects he was working on and spliced them all together to make a film or just went to a wild party and filmed everyone acting like idiots. Seriously. And it all comes off as very pathetic and sad. Finally, when it all ends, you are filled with a sense of relief--this has truly been a dull and pointless waste of 85 minutes--and a sad second to last film for Hayworth.
11 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Really Awful Drama
Michael_Elliott17 May 2016
Warning: Spoilers
The Naked Zoo (1970)

1/2 (out of 4)

Rita Hayworth plays a woman who is having an affair with a much younger man. Half way through the picture her wheelchair bound husband catches them and he is accidentally killed.

THE NAKED ZOO comes from director William Grefe who is best remembered for horror films like DEATH CURSE OF TARTU and MAKO: THE JAWS OF DEATH. This film here is a drama and there's really only about five minutes worth of a story and then a bunch of other scenes that add up to nothing. In fact, I'm really not certain what this film is about because of the lack of any real story and more times than not it just seems a bunch of scenes were shot for no reason.

It almost seems like they were able to get Hayworth so they shot a bunch of scenes with her and then decided what to build around it. The surrounding scenes include a few touches of nudity as well as a topless woman with a vibrator. Other stuff includes party scenes but none of these add up to anything other than running the time up. The film is poorly edited, makes very little sense and on a technical level there's certainly nothing impressive here.

THE NAKED ZOO would turn out to be one of the last films that Hayworth did and like many Golden Era stars, it's too bad she had to appear in such an awful movie at this point in her life.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Drugs, boobs, and no plot
culwin3 April 2024
This movie is really, really boring. There's lots of "partying" and drug use - this takes up most of the movie and seems like anti-drug anti-hippie propaganda (but it probably isn't meant to be). Occasionally there is female topless nudity. The lead character, when he isn't partying or drugged out of his mind, apparently hooks up with several women daily (sometimes even multiple women sequentially at the same party!) - sometimes even getting paid to do so. Beyond that, there is very little plot. And by very little, I mean zero. The main character abuses people, parties and does drugs and has sex, and then it's over. Oh, and the band Canned Heat is there for some reason, looking like they wore the same clothes for 2 weeks straight without taking a shower. The only reason to watch this is for curiosity about one of Rita Hayworth's last roles, but otherwise don't waste your time.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
No good vibrations here, in spite of the electric appliance used in a key scene..
mark.waltz26 December 2023
Warning: Spoilers
Truly awful, and an absolute embarrassment for Rita Hayworth, just as "Angel, Angel, Down We Go" was for Jennifer Jones, what "The Big Cube" was for Lana Turner and what "Bunny O'Hare" was for Bette Davis, an aging star's effort to seem "groovy". "Trog" for Joan Crawford was a masterpiece compared to this. At least Hayworth looks glamorous here, playing a bored, frustrated socialite, having an affair with the much younger Stephen Elliott since her wheelchair bound husband (Ford Rainey) can't satisfy her.

Elliott, who's proud of the fact that he drives ah Edsel, is bedding at least two other women (one white, one black), and when Rainey attacks him and his wife, a bizarre twist leaves Hayworth full of rage and revenge. Wearing a cheap knock off Bonnie Parker hat, Fay Spain hurls racist epithets at Fleurette Carter whom Elliott claims is his maiden, using terms not heard since 1940 to describe her. It's weird and just tacky, especially since the three share some happy grass mixed with LSD.

Much of what's happening is unnecessary filter, and you wonder why they bothered at all. This might document late 60's/early 70's counterculture, but the plot that's set up with Elliott and Hayworth ends up completely on the backburner. Spain has hallucinations during a lengthy drug party while Elliott heads to deal with Hayworth after a long gap so she can taunt him over what she told the police. The smell of a zoo before they clean it is preferable to this garbage, and the only blessing for Hayworth fans back when this came out is that it barely got released.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Must see for Rita Hayworth Fans!
Hollywoodcanteen19453 March 2005
This William Grefe production is surprisingly an entertaining film. One of Rita Hayworth's final films, it's a story of double dealings, murder, and suspense. Hayworth, at 52, looks as attractive as ever. She always kept herself in great shape. Sort of sad to see this once great star reduced to this "B" South Florida made movie, but she gives an above average performance; considering the script and budget, that's pretty darn good. Grefe fills his supporting cast with his group of favorites; singer/actor/record producer Steve Alaimo, and former light-heavyweight boxing champ Willie Pastrano. The show however is "stolen" by the acting talents of "cult" acting legend Joe. "Ooh! Ooh!" E. Ross. And there's even t.v.'s Peyton Place regular Stephen Oliver(he played Lee Weber 1966-68 on the hit show)in his best on-screen role. A must-see for fans of Rita Hayworth. I'd rate this film a 9 out of 10.
33 out of 46 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed