The Patricia Neal Story (TV Movie 1981) Poster

(1981 TV Movie)

User Reviews

Review this title
4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Well above average TV movie
kaos-231 November 2005
Warning: Spoilers
I'm not usually a fan of true-life heartwarming stories, but I happened to catch this on TV today and I was impressed.

It tells the story of the actress Patricia Neal, who has a massive stroke while still in her thirties and pregnant. She nearly dies but manages to pull through. Gradually, through speech therapy, physiotherapy, etc. and with the help of her husband, Roald Dahl, and her friends, she recovers and returns to her career as an actress.

The film is not overly slushy and sentimental, unlike many TV movies. This is mainly due to the excellent performances of the two leads, Glenda Jackson as Neal, and Dirk Bogarde as Dahl. They both portray the characters in a very convincing way, as real people with a believable relationship. Bogarde in particular gives an understated but really excellent performance. Although the film focuses mainly on the two of them, the rest of the cast provide fine support.

The direction and cinematography is also very good and understated. The realistic and stripped-down style of the film works well with the personalities of Neal and Dahl, who both come across as resilient and intelligent. The film benefits from the lack of sentimentality and overblown melodrama - it makes the situations and the people seem much more real.

This isn't a real tear-jerker, but the story is fascinating. The methods used by Dahl and the other therapists have been adopted as mainstream treatment for stroke victims, since they were so successful. The end of the film shows some contemporary (1981) footage of the real Patricia Neal helping in the rehabilitation process.

In short, while I would not necessarily bother to get this on DVD, it's well worth watching. As a TV movie, it's considerably above average, Bogarde's performance is outstanding, and the true story is very interesting.
11 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A legend of stage and screen plays another legend of stage and screen.
mark.waltz9 August 2023
Warning: Spoilers
Her low-key life, before and after parliament, had Glenda Jackson considered the unlikliest of stars, an actress because she had to be an actress, not just because she wanted to be an actress. She had already played a politician (Queen Elizabeth I) and an actress (Sarah Bernhardt) as well as other real life women with amazing lives, and taking on the real life struggle of fellow Oscar winner Patricia Neal following her stroke was a challenge she instantly proved to be up to.

It was shortly after her Oscar winning triumph in "Hud" when Neal had a stroke, and it took lots of courage, therapy and hope for her to recover and return to her career as well as be 100% well for her marriage to children's author Roald Dahl (a sincere Dirk Bogarde) and be a completely devoted mother and friend to her close circle (including veteran actress Mildred Dunnock, who plays herself here), coming back with the triumph of "The Subject Was Roses".

This shows a very strong, completely likeable woman fighting hard to recover, and Neal makes an appearance through recent news footage that shows her around the time of this TV movie's filming. Jackson makes you forget that she's one Oscar winner playing a another one, her British accent disappearing and beautifully sounding like the sandy voiced actress who continued to work for many years after this. It's less about an acting icon and more about a woman's fight for survival, so there's a much more human drama there than a movie star biography.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Slow recovery
alxnrth8 September 2006
Twenty-two years after seeing this film, I suffered a stroke subsequent to brain surgery. after 3 1/2 years, even though my mobility is much improved, I still have paralysis in left hand and arm. Unfortunately Blue Cross Blue Shield only paid for rehabilitation for several months or I might have progressed more than I have. I am still hopeful for the 100% recovery which doctors told me I could "probably" expect back in 2003.

I have nothing but admiration for Patricia Neal & her fight for recovery. The progress I have made is the result of work and the support of loved ones and friends. Paralysis is baffling. Sometimes I feel like I'm grasping with my hand, I suppose in a phenomenon similar to an amputee who still feels the missing limb. Dale Hix
16 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
OUTSTANDING EXAMPLE OF THE FIGHT NEEDED TO RECOVER FROM STROKE
skybird10125 November 2000
For the most part the techniques used to recover was good. Better methods are available now but the "fight" is still needed. And to reinvent your own therapy is still too much needed. I encourage all strokees to view this movie!. Love, Light, and Rainbows Ma
14 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed