I actually saw this when it was first aired on the BBC, over the course or a few weeks I got hooked. I was actually totally distraught when I went on holiday the week of the last instalment, and forgot to set the video. I got hold of the book on holiday, but as with many TV or Film adaptation their are always differences (Althought it was as close as i've seen an adaptation), and I am still wishing almost 20 years on that I had seen that last instalment. As you can tell from that comment I thought it was a great watch at the time. Unfortunately the BBC is yet to cotton onto the fact that there are many people out there waiting for them to release the DVD. Even though after 20 years I am sure it has dated I would still be at the front of the queue, jumping up and down to get my copy! If you ever see it up for a rerun (which so far I never have) then I would definitely recommend it to be watched. I believe that sometime this year, or next, there is a remake with Ben Afflek being made. Even though I might give this a watch, I am sure Brat will suddenly sprout a Yank accent and the British estate be transplanted to the mid-west or some such "across the pond" location. Ho Hum. *Am hoping that this might poke the BBC into releasing the UK version, as interest in the story will be sparked. One can always hope! :o)
8 Reviews
Unusual, dated but pleasantly nostalgic suspense story.
khunkrumark21 February 2018
The memorable and slightly annoying theme music still lingers on in my mind...
That withstanding, for a while this was a captivating weekend daytime drama, featuring stage actor Mark Greenstreet delivering a terrific performance as the titular character AND his brother Simon.
Francis Matthews (who was the brilliant Paul Temple) hams it up as a foppish actor who talks Brat into impersonating someone thought to have committed suicide years before.
The uncanny resemblance and weeks of training secure the confidence of the family and the legal eagles and Brat is soon welcomed into the rich family by all... except the brother Simon Ashby.
Then things start to get weird as he starts to fancy his supposed sister Eleanor (a delicious 20-year-old Dominique Barnes - whatever happened to her?) and his integrity and suspicions start to get the better of him.
Episode 1 is a treat as things happen quickly and the plot is set in motion. The second episode doesn't do much except flesh out the characters and give us insights into the world of equestrian royalty. The finale does much the same thing except for the last 15 minutes where things come to a head and loose ends are tied up.
Most of us watching today will have already guessed what's going on... and even back in 1986, there wasn't much subtlety as to who was guilty of what! There's a strange direction to this drama that reminds me of the live action dramas that were made for children at that time, but this seems to have been marketed at adults, so I could be wrong.
Anyway... it's dated of course but still has a unique character of its own which makes it worth watching again.
That withstanding, for a while this was a captivating weekend daytime drama, featuring stage actor Mark Greenstreet delivering a terrific performance as the titular character AND his brother Simon.
Francis Matthews (who was the brilliant Paul Temple) hams it up as a foppish actor who talks Brat into impersonating someone thought to have committed suicide years before.
The uncanny resemblance and weeks of training secure the confidence of the family and the legal eagles and Brat is soon welcomed into the rich family by all... except the brother Simon Ashby.
Then things start to get weird as he starts to fancy his supposed sister Eleanor (a delicious 20-year-old Dominique Barnes - whatever happened to her?) and his integrity and suspicions start to get the better of him.
Episode 1 is a treat as things happen quickly and the plot is set in motion. The second episode doesn't do much except flesh out the characters and give us insights into the world of equestrian royalty. The finale does much the same thing except for the last 15 minutes where things come to a head and loose ends are tied up.
Most of us watching today will have already guessed what's going on... and even back in 1986, there wasn't much subtlety as to who was guilty of what! There's a strange direction to this drama that reminds me of the live action dramas that were made for children at that time, but this seems to have been marketed at adults, so I could be wrong.
Anyway... it's dated of course but still has a unique character of its own which makes it worth watching again.
But if Patrick is alive,how did he die?
ulicknormanowen15 March 2020
Josephine Tey's "Brat Farrar" is,along Daphné Du Maurier's " the scapegoat" ,the most absorbing British detective story dealing with the impostor subject .Tey has the edge ,as far as plausibility is concerned ,for an eight-year gap changes a person, whereas a man who reluctantly replaces a real count overnight without his family noticing any changes is a little hard to swallow .
The novel has undergone some changes: the main difference is the role of Alec loding: it was fleshed out as he continues to coach his protégé as he makes his way through his new life ,and he is greedier than in the novel,asking not a small allowance but a hefty sum.The scenes given over to the "coach" make sense: many frames of mind of Brat and the suppression of the shepherd Abel character ( a good name for this kind of story) mean that the hero needs a person he can secretly talks to.
The rest is faithfull to Tey ,though her book was written in the late forties,and the action is transposed to the 80s, when the series was made. I have always thought that Uncle Charles 's providential intervention was the weakest link of the book (Du Maurier's denouement is stronger).
But ,by and large ,a good miniseries ,very absorbing ;it's too bad French TV never bothered to show it ,as they recently did for Agatha Christie's "and then there were none" .
The novel has undergone some changes: the main difference is the role of Alec loding: it was fleshed out as he continues to coach his protégé as he makes his way through his new life ,and he is greedier than in the novel,asking not a small allowance but a hefty sum.The scenes given over to the "coach" make sense: many frames of mind of Brat and the suppression of the shepherd Abel character ( a good name for this kind of story) mean that the hero needs a person he can secretly talks to.
The rest is faithfull to Tey ,though her book was written in the late forties,and the action is transposed to the 80s, when the series was made. I have always thought that Uncle Charles 's providential intervention was the weakest link of the book (Du Maurier's denouement is stronger).
But ,by and large ,a good miniseries ,very absorbing ;it's too bad French TV never bothered to show it ,as they recently did for Agatha Christie's "and then there were none" .
Classic outstanding British mystery/drama
paloma5423 June 2002
Our family was fortunate to have taped this off the TV broadcast many years ago when A & E still aired these excellent British series. We have watched it many times and invariably find it wonderful. The cast is uniformly outstanding, the characterizations are subtle and multi-layered, and although we know the outcome by now, it is still very suspenseful.
I can't imagine why this hasn't been released in video format, and I wish PBS or A & E would air this Josephine Tey classic mystery again.
I can't imagine why this hasn't been released in video format, and I wish PBS or A & E would air this Josephine Tey classic mystery again.
An Enjoyable Yarn!
christopher_greenleaf5 April 2004
First off, Josephine Tey died in the early 1950s, so her participation in this project or 'Paranoiac' (an earlier poster comments on Tey's direct participation in both these projects, and "storming" off the set of 'Paranoiac' despite having been dead a decade! Which certainly sounds more like the plot outline for a Hammer film!) must have been facilitated through a seance or oujia board session. In any case, Miss Tey's ghost was certainly justified in "storming" of the set of 'Paranoiac'. The earlier film is an enjoyable B movie which simply bastardizes the novel and has Oliver Reed going completely looney tunes by the end. This version does owe more to Robert Bloch's 'Psycho' than it does to Tey's 'Brat Farrar'. I would surmise that Hammer optioned the film rights to 'Brat Farrar' only to avoid any potential copyright conflicts.
The 1986 Television version of 'Brat Farrar' is much more faithful to the novel than 'Paranoiac' (This is probably due to the direct involvement of Miss Tey's poltergeist!) One major difference is that Farrar & Simon are now played by the same actor. In 'Paranoiac' Reed's brother was played by another actor who had no physical resemblance to him at all -- being that the characters in the Hammer film were no longer identical twins, in fact they were re-named! The lead does a remarkable job in playing both th ersatz 'Brat Farrar' and the cunning, sociopathic Simon. Despite the fact that, at points, the effect of the actor being on screen as both characters looks fake (as it did in many movies, especially flatly lit television movies in those pre, or very early post CGI days) the lead actor was able and adept enough in both performances, that I very often forgot that this was the same man. Another major advantage that 'Brat Farrar' has over 'Paranoiac', is that it was shown over the course of a few episodes (two at least if memory serves me!) and the tension is allowed to build slowly, almost painfully, to it's concluding climax. Despite being a British television film, the look, and feel of 'Brat Farrar' is much more akin to an American TV Soap Opera, and oddly enough, this adds greatly to the surreal, almost claustrophobic tone of deception and imminent danger.
The movies is served well by the fact that plot is allowed time to develop. This also allows the actors to develop and reveal their character's true natures and motives slowly, with all due fairness to the earlier film, 'Paranoiac' didn't have this luxury given the limitations of a feature film's restricted time frame. 'Brat Farrar' features a great cast especially the lead actor. Also noteworthy is Francis Matthews, a good actor who incidentally was featured in many Hammer horror films of the 1950s and 60s. If you can find this film, it is well worth watching!
The 1986 Television version of 'Brat Farrar' is much more faithful to the novel than 'Paranoiac' (This is probably due to the direct involvement of Miss Tey's poltergeist!) One major difference is that Farrar & Simon are now played by the same actor. In 'Paranoiac' Reed's brother was played by another actor who had no physical resemblance to him at all -- being that the characters in the Hammer film were no longer identical twins, in fact they were re-named! The lead does a remarkable job in playing both th ersatz 'Brat Farrar' and the cunning, sociopathic Simon. Despite the fact that, at points, the effect of the actor being on screen as both characters looks fake (as it did in many movies, especially flatly lit television movies in those pre, or very early post CGI days) the lead actor was able and adept enough in both performances, that I very often forgot that this was the same man. Another major advantage that 'Brat Farrar' has over 'Paranoiac', is that it was shown over the course of a few episodes (two at least if memory serves me!) and the tension is allowed to build slowly, almost painfully, to it's concluding climax. Despite being a British television film, the look, and feel of 'Brat Farrar' is much more akin to an American TV Soap Opera, and oddly enough, this adds greatly to the surreal, almost claustrophobic tone of deception and imminent danger.
The movies is served well by the fact that plot is allowed time to develop. This also allows the actors to develop and reveal their character's true natures and motives slowly, with all due fairness to the earlier film, 'Paranoiac' didn't have this luxury given the limitations of a feature film's restricted time frame. 'Brat Farrar' features a great cast especially the lead actor. Also noteworthy is Francis Matthews, a good actor who incidentally was featured in many Hammer horror films of the 1950s and 60s. If you can find this film, it is well worth watching!
Superb, Haunting Version of Josephine Tey's masterful novel,
sdiner8226 June 2003
Like many fine novelists, Josephine Tey sold the rights to her novel "Brat Farrar" to Universal Pictures, who was hellbent to capitalize on the success of "Psycho" and hopefully duplicate its boxoffice grosses as well. In order to insure the film version would remain truthful to her novel, Ms. Tey was also hired as one of the screenwriters. However, when she realized her dubious feelings were right (the title was changed to the lurid "Paranoiac," and the thrust of her novel was reduced to a Grade-B horror flick.) Miss Tey left the project in vocal disgust, expecting to hear from nobody in Hollywood ever again. And she didn't until some 23 years later when the Arts & Entertainment TV channel(located in the U.S.) and the BBC-TV network approached her to do a made-for-TV mini-mini-series (Running time: 155 minutes, but divided into 5 episodes for the A&E network--plus commercials. The result is one of the finest achievements ever accomplished by movies OR television. Playing two roles, Simon, a cold-hearted (and possibly homicidal) young man, and the impoverished youth Brat Farrar, who suddenly shows up after a 15-year absence and claims he is not only Simon's older brother but the true Lord of the Manor. An absolutely riveting young actor named Mark Greenstreet should have become a major star on the basis of his two performances in "Brat Farrar." Telling anything more of the plot would deprive the viewer of a maze of romance, familial love and hate, exquisite cinematography, and murder. The ending will astound you, as it still sticks in my mind after all these years. Two-and-a-half hours of television at its most extraordinary (off-handed, I can only think of "Brideshead Revisited" achieving the same bold, ambitious and absolutely shattering quality of the criminally neglected and now virtually forgotten "Brat Farrar." It's understandable why Josephine Tey found "Paranoiac" so offensive (it's actually one of the better "Psycho" rip-offs of the early 1960s, featuring a very young Oliver Reed chewing the scenery with all the bravado he can muster up). But "Brat Farrar," although unbearably suspenseful at times, digs deeply into the souls and motives of all its principal characters, and does so with such precision and empathy that are miraculous to behold. Josephine Tey was finally vindicated with the astoundingly gripping and achingly touching treatment of her magnificent novel "Brat Farrar." Now, A&E and the BBC, it is indeed high time you vindicated your loyal audiences by putting the full-length 155-minute version of "Brat Farrar" on VHS, DVD, or simply repeating it on your cable stations so that home viewers can finally become acquainted with 2 1/2 hours of the most elegant, stylish, heartbreaking and heartfelt drama television has ever gifted us with.
My favorite British mini-series of all time...
hcdeschaine16 May 2018
Saw this first as a small child, since my mom watched all the British mini series on Mystery! on PBS. We ended up seeing it again re-run on the Disney channel of all places. Mark Greenstreet was fantastic in this playing dual roles flawlessly. I wish so badly that he had become "James Bond" at some point, or risen to super stardom in some other way. Its a mystery to me why Mr. Greenstreet or this series are not more widely well-known. Just thinking about this series still makes me yearn to move to England and run a riding stable.
cunning mystery thriller about doubles and twins
myriamlenys10 January 2019
Warning: Spoilers
It's been a long time since I read Mrs. Tey's novel, but I get the impression that this miniseries is a faithful, careful adaptation. The miniseries certainly honours the cleverness and cunning of the novel, which keeps the readers on their intellectual toes from start to finish.
Still, I wonder whether the homosexual subtext was already present, or present to such an extent, in Mrs. Tey's source novel. Episode 1 pretty much evokes a handsome young man being seduced by a plain middle-aged man with an unpleasantly predatory and invasive mindset. This rather gives their secret meetings and their talk about "mutually satisfactory financial agreements" a comico-sordid tone.
I also get the impression - but I could be mistaken - that the happy ending of the miniseries is happier than the one in the book. Anyway, it is not clear why anyone would want to feel all jolly and festive, to the point of opening the champagne. Take the Eleanor character, for instance : if she does pursue a love affair with Brat Farrar, she's going to spend a large percentage of her life explaining that no, she isn't sleeping with her brother, even though the man once found it useful to pretend that he was her brother. Good luck with that, especially during the yearly village fetes... Or take "aunt Bee", a kindly and hard-working woman who had already seen much tragedy. She may very well spend the next five to ten years wading through red tape. What's more, she'll have to admit to herself that, for all her warmth and empathy, she was/is but a mediocre judge of character...
However, the miniseries has got quite a lot of assets, such as a cunning, fascinating plot, superb locations and a fine double performance by Mark Greenstreet. Moreover, lovers of all things equine will be sure to appreciate the feel and atmosphere of a horse-centered little universe.
I don't live in Great-Britain and I've got to admit that I find the British system of "first born son inherits all" quite strange, especially when it leads to one twin inheriting a fortune while his brother - born all of ten minutes later -receives bupkas. To me such an arrangement seems unjust to the point of cruelty. Still, that's cultural difference for you...
Still, I wonder whether the homosexual subtext was already present, or present to such an extent, in Mrs. Tey's source novel. Episode 1 pretty much evokes a handsome young man being seduced by a plain middle-aged man with an unpleasantly predatory and invasive mindset. This rather gives their secret meetings and their talk about "mutually satisfactory financial agreements" a comico-sordid tone.
I also get the impression - but I could be mistaken - that the happy ending of the miniseries is happier than the one in the book. Anyway, it is not clear why anyone would want to feel all jolly and festive, to the point of opening the champagne. Take the Eleanor character, for instance : if she does pursue a love affair with Brat Farrar, she's going to spend a large percentage of her life explaining that no, she isn't sleeping with her brother, even though the man once found it useful to pretend that he was her brother. Good luck with that, especially during the yearly village fetes... Or take "aunt Bee", a kindly and hard-working woman who had already seen much tragedy. She may very well spend the next five to ten years wading through red tape. What's more, she'll have to admit to herself that, for all her warmth and empathy, she was/is but a mediocre judge of character...
However, the miniseries has got quite a lot of assets, such as a cunning, fascinating plot, superb locations and a fine double performance by Mark Greenstreet. Moreover, lovers of all things equine will be sure to appreciate the feel and atmosphere of a horse-centered little universe.
I don't live in Great-Britain and I've got to admit that I find the British system of "first born son inherits all" quite strange, especially when it leads to one twin inheriting a fortune while his brother - born all of ten minutes later -receives bupkas. To me such an arrangement seems unjust to the point of cruelty. Still, that's cultural difference for you...
See also
Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews
