It's a movie that goes strait to your heart.A brilliant movie about a terrible thing. I was 18 when I saw it. It frightened me, but I couldn't stop watching. When the movie was over I was stunned, I couldn't even think about going to sleep. It took me an hour to react and when I did I cried for about 30 min. My advise is that you should see this movie if you get the chance. Let us learn from the past so that it will never ever happen again.
5 Reviews
A cult movie for the ages
joeavalon11 February 2022
I fell in love with this movie in 1989, and have long since considered it one of my favorite cult movies of all times. I'm blown away that as a TV-Movie I still can't find a decent version of it.
This movie is cult because it's both obscure and also covers a critical aspect of history that is still insufficiently well known to the masses - the "Atomic Soldiers" of the 1950s. The movie was made during Reagan/Bush era that still tried to hide such history.
This movie is cult because it's both obscure and also covers a critical aspect of history that is still insufficiently well known to the masses - the "Atomic Soldiers" of the 1950s. The movie was made during Reagan/Bush era that still tried to hide such history.
Good but could be better
spkelsekladden8 June 2013
It is and interesting movie.With some good actors in it But could have done with some More meat on the bone. The movie spends a lot of time on the background story of Emilio's character,but spends less time on showing how he got there. Also the narration at the end could have used some more facts to give the movie more substance. You never get what happened to Lea Thompson she just seemed to be out of the picture when they switch to modern day. But its a really good movie the only problem is it left me with the feeling that a lot of stuff ended up on the cutting room floor,which make the story seem a bit thin. I dunno how much effort they've put in it, but i feel the story got a lot of unused potential.
One spooky movie.
rmax3048234 May 2004
Scarier than cannibalistic zombies or mutant rats, this is a fictional story built around a real incident.
In the early years of the atomic age, Emilio Estevez is a scientist working for the Atomic Energy Commission and is involved in testing bombs in Nevada. We don't hear much about it, but man were those tests badly bungled. These were above-ground tests of dirty devices. Sheen and some airborn troops are exposed to the blasts, first from far away, then closer. The last one is too close. We don't know it until we see the trucks delivering the troops to their positions. The men are hustled off and the trucks zoom away in a cloud of dust. The dugouts to have been provided for the men are not there. One of them looks up at the tower. In previous tests we've seen the tower as no more than a spike on the distant desert horizon. This time the monster is close enough to make out details of its structure. "Wow," says the soldier, "What's the range on THAT one?" No answer is forthcoming. Later we learn the records show the distance as twenty miles, about nineteen miles extra thrown in to cover someone's behind.
In the early tests a lot of colorful footage was shot of our brave soldiers emerging from their trenches and marching towards the demonic cauliflower cloud. It's hard to imagine why they were there in the first place except to inoculate the public to the idea of atomic war. See them walk into the dust? They're as safe as in their mother's arms. Nothing to be afraid of. I once asked a professor of chemistry who was familiar with the outlines of the testing program whether the authorities realized the danger they were putting the troops in, and he replied, "They knew." The movie doesn't mention it, but the troops weren't the only people put at risk. The detonations raised clouds of pretty tangerine dirt that drifted across the sky over southern Utah, bringing many of the resident of St. George out to view the colorful sunsets and breathe the fallout, with the expectable results.
The drama is relatively low key, especially for a TV movie, far less flamboyant than, say, "Fat Man and Little Boy." The most touching scene in the movie, probably, is when a handful of soldiers are invited to a party given by some young women. But when they return from one of the tests, they are denied entrance to the party because they may have been irradiated and might be dangerous to be around. Nobody goes into fits of screaming anger. It's not that kind of story. All we have is a rather long shot of the disappointed men standing wordlessly at parade rest outside the screen door.
The photography is particularly good. Most of the outdoor scenes are tinted a jaundiced yellow, as if already poisoned. The colors are all earth tones, but not depressing in themselves. And the desert is not ominous in any way.
The earth is not sentient or smart, except that part of it that we humans represent.
The film has no zombies or man-eating fish, but it's scarier than you might imagine. The most frightening thing about it is not the vastness of the desert, nor even the bomb itself, but rather the minds that put the bomb where it is, and the troops where they were, and then decided the bomb should explode. What were those minds thinking? We've never had an explanation and the movie gives us none. It's unlikely that we'll find out whether it was by accident or design that these lives were ruined.
PS: I just viewed this again for the first time since its release and expected to find the message overstated this time, but was wrong. Now that I'm more mature and a little more familiar with death in its more prosaic forms I find the movie more powerful than ever. It took courage to make it.
In the early years of the atomic age, Emilio Estevez is a scientist working for the Atomic Energy Commission and is involved in testing bombs in Nevada. We don't hear much about it, but man were those tests badly bungled. These were above-ground tests of dirty devices. Sheen and some airborn troops are exposed to the blasts, first from far away, then closer. The last one is too close. We don't know it until we see the trucks delivering the troops to their positions. The men are hustled off and the trucks zoom away in a cloud of dust. The dugouts to have been provided for the men are not there. One of them looks up at the tower. In previous tests we've seen the tower as no more than a spike on the distant desert horizon. This time the monster is close enough to make out details of its structure. "Wow," says the soldier, "What's the range on THAT one?" No answer is forthcoming. Later we learn the records show the distance as twenty miles, about nineteen miles extra thrown in to cover someone's behind.
In the early tests a lot of colorful footage was shot of our brave soldiers emerging from their trenches and marching towards the demonic cauliflower cloud. It's hard to imagine why they were there in the first place except to inoculate the public to the idea of atomic war. See them walk into the dust? They're as safe as in their mother's arms. Nothing to be afraid of. I once asked a professor of chemistry who was familiar with the outlines of the testing program whether the authorities realized the danger they were putting the troops in, and he replied, "They knew." The movie doesn't mention it, but the troops weren't the only people put at risk. The detonations raised clouds of pretty tangerine dirt that drifted across the sky over southern Utah, bringing many of the resident of St. George out to view the colorful sunsets and breathe the fallout, with the expectable results.
The drama is relatively low key, especially for a TV movie, far less flamboyant than, say, "Fat Man and Little Boy." The most touching scene in the movie, probably, is when a handful of soldiers are invited to a party given by some young women. But when they return from one of the tests, they are denied entrance to the party because they may have been irradiated and might be dangerous to be around. Nobody goes into fits of screaming anger. It's not that kind of story. All we have is a rather long shot of the disappointed men standing wordlessly at parade rest outside the screen door.
The photography is particularly good. Most of the outdoor scenes are tinted a jaundiced yellow, as if already poisoned. The colors are all earth tones, but not depressing in themselves. And the desert is not ominous in any way.
The earth is not sentient or smart, except that part of it that we humans represent.
The film has no zombies or man-eating fish, but it's scarier than you might imagine. The most frightening thing about it is not the vastness of the desert, nor even the bomb itself, but rather the minds that put the bomb where it is, and the troops where they were, and then decided the bomb should explode. What were those minds thinking? We've never had an explanation and the movie gives us none. It's unlikely that we'll find out whether it was by accident or design that these lives were ruined.
PS: I just viewed this again for the first time since its release and expected to find the message overstated this time, but was wrong. Now that I'm more mature and a little more familiar with death in its more prosaic forms I find the movie more powerful than ever. It took courage to make it.
Chilling docu-drama of insanity of the Cold War
enviro14 June 1999
Warning: Spoilers
This TNT Movie covers the events of operation of the Nevada Test Site in the late 1940's-early 1950's. It documents the early experiments using atomic bombs as tactical weapons, the collateral damage inflicted by such weapons, and battlefield survivability of troops when these weapons are used.
Martin Sheen plays a civilian doctor reflecting back to that time from the present, when he (Estevez) was a neophyte researcher hired to make observations of the troops being "experimented on" by the War Dept. Sheen documents what by today's standards would be clear atrocities through re-living his earlier days.
Agree or disagree with Sheen's politics, the film is outstanding. It clearly shows how naive we once were to the dangers of nuclear weapons. These earliest experiments form the body of work that now educate us to the dangers, and the film is clearly trying to show the human cost of that research.
Martin Sheen plays a civilian doctor reflecting back to that time from the present, when he (Estevez) was a neophyte researcher hired to make observations of the troops being "experimented on" by the War Dept. Sheen documents what by today's standards would be clear atrocities through re-living his earlier days.
Agree or disagree with Sheen's politics, the film is outstanding. It clearly shows how naive we once were to the dangers of nuclear weapons. These earliest experiments form the body of work that now educate us to the dangers, and the film is clearly trying to show the human cost of that research.
See also
Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews
