The Seventh Horse of the Sun (1992) User Reviews

The best film by Shyam Benegal

[thavrani · 9/10 · 19 April 2005]

I don't usually write reviews on films, whether I have liked the movie or not, but when I tried to search the best film I have ever seen I was shocked to notice that there was only one review for this movie and to add more to it the rating of this movie which probably should have been higher.

Suraj Ka Satvan Ghoda title comes from the story of the seventh horse of the Sun's chariot, which is the weakest and youngest of the horses but goes on to become the driving horse of the chariot. The movie is about love seen from men's perspective at different situations.

The film is presented as a flashback of an artist, Raghuvir Yadav, who remembers the master raconteur Manik Mulla (Rajit Kapoor). In Allahabad, every evening, the bachelor Manik Mulla tells stories to a group of friends at his house. Over two evenings, he tells his friends three different stories of his love affairs to define what love is all about. These three stories are independent stories about three different women with whom Manik had relationships, first as pre-pubescent boy, then an adolescent and lastly as a mature adult. After each story, the friends discuss about the human traits and the definition of love. You are then surprised to notice that these stories were happening at the same time. The protagonist, Manik, is shown as an escapist in all his affairs. Each story is amazingly intertwined with the notion of love, romance and separation. The presence of the same characters in all the stories makes it the most amazing.

The way the film ends where in the raconteur, Manik just vanishes away, and in the process, a writer(Raghuvir Yadav) is born, makes it a classic. Its an ideal example of film-making. All the supporting cast for the film is fabulous.

This film is an adaption of Dharmvir Bharti's classic by the same name.

Story teller at his best!

[tellalok · 8/10 · 15 May 2007]

Manik Mulla (played by Rajit Kapoor) mesmerizes his listeners with his thoughts about love being disciplined on economic restrictions. The direction is mind blowing . The way the stories are connected is just superb, every story portrays manik mulla as central character , how his life takes shapes as he comes across three girls at different stages of his life... In the end there are definite conclusions (with little socialist angle ) The language in the movie is so pure and serene , it inspires to learn Hindi vocab. I have seen this movie several times .. there is a nice song in it too..

A must see if you like art movie , I bet you will fall in love with the characters as you see them.

A Masterpiece That Has Been Neglected

[user-169-219219 · 8/10 · 1 June 2013]

Dharamveer Bharti's work Suraj Ka Satvan Ghoda never got the recognition Gunaho Ka Devta got. However, on celluloid, Shyam Benegal's adaptation of the story stands tall as one of the most admired pieces of alternate cinema. Rarely we experience such an endearing effort on screen. Maybe SKSG is not as compelling as Benegal's other movies like Bhumika or as moving as Nishant, SKSG successfully balances all the elements of drama brilliantly.

SKSG is a metafiction. Sitting in his room with a bunch of friends, Manek tells some stories. Part of these stories are reality and part of them are his imagination. Stories are woven around Manek, three women in his life and people around them who actively influence the events. Manek, largely, remains a passive character. His friends ridicule him for this fact and he accepts the criticism gracefully. In the end, the way the title is explained by narrative, it successfully ties up all the open threads of different stories and bring about a conclusion that stays with you even after years.

Characters are contemporary and relevant. Even after twenty years, they seems to be carved out of people among us. Like most his films, Benegal keeps the focus on lives of lower-middle and lower class of the society and how their economic situation influences their life. Benegal doesn't try to create caricature. Manek or any other character is as close to the real world as it can be. Their situations, maybe borderline fiction, seems to be very realistic.

SKSG has some nice performances. Rajit Kapur, Amrish Puri, Neena Gupta, Lalit Tiwari and Raghuvir Yadav leave an impact. Music by Vanraj Bhatia is soulful. At no point it attempts to overpower the story and narrative and plays a very understated role. Direction is flawless. Aided by a brilliant story, Shyam Benegal brings out the best from the literary piece. No wonder, it received the National Award for Best Feature Film in Hindi.

A brilliant piece

[shashikrishna · 10/10 · 28 March 2010]

We, in Denmark, began daylight saving today – March 28, 2010. What this basically means is that our clocks will now be set to an hour ahead. It is curious how this day coincided with my viewing of Shyam Benegal's 'Suraj ka saatwa ghoda' (The seventh steed of the sun) last night. Based on a Hindi novella by the same name by Dr. Dharamvir Bharti's, the movie starts with Raghuvir Yadav introducing us to a few afternoons from his life where he knew a man called Manek Mulla (Rajit Kapur in his debut venture). Manek, we are told, was a master story-teller. A man who could blur out the distinct lines between reality and fiction purely by his talent at peppering his tales with metaphors aplenty. Working with the railways department, Manek had acquired the knack of keeping the three young men (of which Yadav is one too) occupied during lazy afternoons with his tales of love, deception, social imbalance and immorality within the lower middle classes of India.

So, with this premise, a question is thrown – 'Should love stories be built at being relevant to the socio-economic growth of a society?' A bizarre, albeit thought-provoking, reference is made to the literary importance of 'Devdas' where, Manek says, there is no room for any sort of social relevance or optimism towards love as a public emotion. A definition, he claims, is what makes love so wonderful. Its lack of being a private, mysterious and almost forbidden concoction. So, in an effort to tell a tale of love lost connected with the complex fabric of social strata, he starts speaking of Jamuna. He speaks of how he was in school back then and Jamuna, the attractive next door girl, was in love with Tanna, another neighborhood fellow. Jamuna's and Tanna's love story was dated given the venomous relationships the two families shared due to lack of consistency in the Indian economic balance. As a result of this, Tanna is married off to a more educated Lily and Jamuna ends up with an old man knocking on the door of his grave.

As you might have realized, there is nothing new or refreshing with this piece. What starts making this short story more interesting, is the way Manek describes his role in it and carefully begins to uncurl the tiny strands that were knotted during the narration of the aforementioned tale. For instance, the fact that Jamuna is unable to conceive from her old-man husband and so chooses to go on a bizarre religiously aligned but emotionally maligned detour with the tonga-wallah is brought to surface. Also, the fact that the girl Tanna ends up with – Lily – actually was Manek's love/friendship interest and how a mutual separation was finalized in both their interests is unearthed. Connected to this colorful mix as well, is the story of Tanna's lusty father (Amrish Puri in a truly memorable role as Mahesar Dalal) and his wile desires towards the lowly gypsy-woman Satti (Neena Gupta) who befriends Manek purely for his intellectual skills. Her eventual fate against an adamant Mahesar Dalal and the decisions young Manek makes form the twisting portions of the climactic sequences. All of these is documented from various angles aimed at the same scene. So, it isn't so much that Manek is narrating different short stories but essentially narrating just one story but from the perspectives of various characters in them. In some of them, the characters seem like the victims, while when seen from the view of another person's tale, the same character in the same scene will suddenly appear to have acquired some gray shades. Shades one would see in a predator. Truly – if a movie can accomplish this level of intellectual worth, then it has truly defined itself as the best example of cinema.

What makes this movie greater in its worth is the fact that such a unique feat was written by Dr. Bharti in the 70s and narrated by Benegal in early 90s! Today we sit in awe at the intermingling of multiple stories in Hollywood and, of course, in their remade versions within Bollywood, and applaud them as being 'masterpieces'. But to compare this work to any of these would be nothing short of a huge disservice. In fact, I would call 'Suraj ka...' a work of meta fiction which successfully attempts to expose the fictional aspect of the illusive world woven by Manek Mulla.

I also read some reviews that compared Manek's character to that of the holy trinity in Hindu mythology – Brahma, Vishnu and Maheshwar – and as to how he slips into these roles, albeit with varying degrees of subtlety. In the first tale with Jamuna, Manek is Brahma, the creator of a relationship that he knew was meant to be doomed. In the second tale with Lily, he became Vishnu, the preserver of her sanctity and an upholder of a more mature and practical relationship. In the final tale with Satti, he turned into the destroyer – Maheshwar – who ended up putting an end to what could have possibly been the redeeming factor of his life. I suppose it is in spectacular interpretations like these, that 'Suraj ka...' stands out as a truly unique piece of work.

Brilliant

[anuj-vivek · 10/10 · 28 September 2008]

I saw this movie about a year back and was really impressed by Benegal. I am not much of a reviewer, and decided to submit a review only because i was appalled by the reviews this movie has got here. This movie definitely deserves a watch, at least by all Indians. The screenplay was brilliant, the plot unfolds slowly and beautifully and you start feeling for the characters. The performances are brilliant, Nina Gupta and Amrish Puri being the most impressive. The direction and photography are flawless and clearly show why Benegal is so respected. Overall, the movie was entertaining and thought-provoking and definitely one of the best Hindi movies i have ever seen. And i can say i loved it more than several top 250 IMDb movies.

The Hindi, i agree, might be a little difficult to understand at times, but let it not bother you, or still better, use subtitles.

Among Benegal's masterpieces

[shankar_k · 10/10 · 4 January 2002]

The movie revolves around the romantic involvement of the protagonist -- Manik Mulla (brilliantly essayed by Rajit Kapur) with three women from different strata of India's social hierarchy: the lower-caste, the middle class, the intelligentsia. The movie is consequently laid out in three parts which are excellently woven together to form a wonderful story with lyrically humorous dialog and excellent performances. Shyam Benegal's direction is flawless and one can notice the characteristic complexities he infuses into his characters. Also, typical of Benegal, is the portrayal of the family co-existing synchronously with society and the protagonist in a perpetual surrealistic state of mind. The finale will leave you dazed and in awe of Benegal's story-telling prowess.

one of the greatest movies ever made in Indian cinema

[thinkerv0 · 10/10 · 29 January 2012]

Suraj Ka Saatvaan Ghoda was directed by Shyam Benegal and it's based on the novel of same name written by Dharmveer Bharati. Main roles have been played by Rajit Kapoor, Amrish Puri, Neena Gupta, and Raghuveer Yadav. This is a unique story. If a great story becomes a foundation for a great movie, this is a most significant example of the same. This movie has many outlier features as an Indian movie. Before Memento (2001) I had not seen technique of showing a single scene from many perspectives, but this movie had many such scenes as early as in 1992 when it was made. The narration is multi-layered. The raconteur and prime-protagonist of movie is played by Rajit Kapoor and he has done this with a great degree of refinement. You cannot overlook the fact that theater experience of most of the actors of this movie made it possible to create such fine performances. Shyam Benegal's cast is perfect and I did not find any weaklings in the movie. The usage of regional-dialects in speech along with standard Hindi makes pinch of humor perfectly set in otherwise tragic socio-romantic melodrama. As said earlier, there are many layers to this drama. When one of the characters visits an art gallery, he recalls ( because of one of the paintings in the gallery…) the pastime discussions he used to have along with his other friends, in company of Manik Mulla; where Mulla used to tell them many stories and since Mulla was a literati, his views were considered eminent. In one such discussion, Mulla narrates a few most moving stories which are based primarily on his own romantic affairs and these stories are so interconnected and interwoven that he has to continue telling these until the second day. Inside his stories there are other narrations, making this story a multi-layered complex-threaded story. Mulla tells his listeners many stories which seem different but are interconnected because the same set of characters are present in each of the stories and apart from the social conditions affecting the characters of these stories there are love affairs which permeate from one story to other in an endless-shocking-melodramatic fashion. Mulla is not only the raconteur but also the hero of all of the stories and the witness perspective of all of the stories. There is at least one scene in each of the stories which connects to another scene in the previous story and in the last story the dark side of Mulla is revealed. In the end of the movie Mulla has to cope with what he had done. In spite of characterization of the father of the lover boy in first story as a womanizer, it's Mulla himself who is the most flirtatious character of all. In every story he is playing an escapist coward who flirts until in trouble.

This movie is a masterpiece by Shyam Benegal because of his sensible direction and unique style of storytelling. The movie underscores the importance of great literature. The original story written by Dharmveer Bharati was a meta-fiction experiment in 1952.The movie is about Indian social structure and love-affairs getting affected because of lovers like Devdas (You cannot fail to observe mention of Devdas in more than one stories). It was an audacious story by the standards of Indian society of the decade in which it was created. I feel that nobody could have done justice with the role of Mulla more than Rajit Kapur and I think this movie is one of the greatest movies ever made in Indian cinema despite not being one of the most popular.

Stylistic and intellectually driven art-house production

[Aam_Aadmi · 7/10 · 23 January 2006]

Shyam Benegal directs this 1993 film based on Bharti's Hindi novel. The highly experienced cast and talented production team manage to cook up a rich tapestry of semi-dream-like experiences of a young man, entering into adulthood. Using a story-teller mosaic, the narrator (Rajat Kapur) goes back and forth over the lives of 3 women whom he was involved with in his high-school and early college.

Simple-minded country bumpkins do lead colorful complicated lives filled with drama and intensity. Surely but occasionally. Mostly not as it is shown here. There's somewhat of a mismatch between the rural atmosphere and the refined, educated, urbane, clean-cut protagonist. That cavalier attitude of his ('Look, I've arrived') doesn't give it away, rather it only serves to confound. Benegal conditions you from the very start not to expect great drama until the very end. Watching the dead-pan account with an equally dead-pan expression is all you can do. Use of purist as opposed to colloquial Hindi fails to have the desired effect. Could be due to Benegal's early background in documentaries for Films Division, NFDC, 'Door'darshan, et al.

If one watches such movies at a theater, it will either be mostly empty to start with, or mostly empty within 10 min., or most certainly mostly empty halfway thru i.e you can sit anywhere post-interval and munch on your popcorn. Audiences thumb it down, and the producers foolishly tell themselves its because viewers are illiterate, they don't get it, etc.

No doubt the screenplay, direction, photography, etc are all top-notch. But if there's no drama and not much entertainment, why blame viewers? Style alone can't substitute for substance.

The movie made no ripples at the box-office and disappeared without a trace (can't blame that on Shahrukh-Madhuri). Left a lot to be desired by way of suggestibility (not suspense, go figure!)

1 horse vs the six horses

[garvitgarg · 9/10 · 2 September 2018]

I am in one of those people, who read the reviews after watching the movie, to understand what others felt about the movie, what others are saying. I seldom write. But I felt my interpretation of the movie was different from most of the reviews that I came across, and hence the following:

My curiosity in this movie came up, when I saw the name of the director. I was even more curious to find out whats in the movie.

I was bored in first half of the movie, but acknowledging the reputation for the director the actors, and the title, I watched on.. The movie got leaner, and the plot became very poignant. Once I got the narration style and understood what the genius is trying to say, I got intrigued to know the story from every characters perspective, be it tonga wallah (how did he become so well off), or Jamuna's father (what led him to be the coward father he was, initially boldly disagreeing to what would not be good for her daughter, and later agreeing to it for sociao economic reasons), or Tanna's sisters (the reason for them supporting their womanising father instead of having a heart for their innocent brother).

The movie has several levels and subtexts and a very beautiful screenplay covering the entire essence.

The title talks about the seventh horse, which, as per Hindu mythology, has his own mind, and is made up of ambition, dreams and hope. Rest six follow the laid paths. For me, the seventh horse was Ambrish Puri's character Mahesar Dalaal. He is the person, who is driving the life of people around him. rest all have their books about practicality opened before them. By saying this I am not portraying the character in a favorable light, I am trying to present a scenario, where everyone is following the laid down path, but the horse with the malintent, is optimistic about his prospects, and brave enough to bring them to truth.

He ultimately wins!

Gem of a Find

[goyamjain-212-381704 · 8/10 · 23 October 2017]

I was strolling through amazon prime archives for movies in Hindi language. After crap load of 8 page search, i came across an oddly titled movie i had never heard of. It immediately kept my attention as i excitingly saw the director, Shaam Benegal. I had heard of middle cinema but had never witnessed one. And for the next 2 hr and some 20 minutes, movie had my utmost attention. It was gem of a find and it kept me engrossed with its masterful direction, crafty storytelling and surrealistic layers of symbolism scattered all throughout.

Movie is about 3 different stories entangled together at later stage. It amazingly captures same sequences through eyes of different subjects thus peeling of perspectives for same situation and scenes. It dwells into characters and suddenly comments through larger societal lens. And keeps on doing that for much of first half. For sure you would not have seen brutal realism of love stories as portrayed here. Narrative has no particular end, no moments of realization or take away but it flows on like life in general. Story itself is captivating enough. Our main protagonist is connected deeply with stories much later when we further learn how dicey human morals are, how we are mere product of our environment and act to maximize social gains from that environment. There is above all a surrealistic undertone, a detachment of sorts through out the movie. Characters are closely intertwined yet largely detached. And our protagonist is at forefront of this. Until of course the climax of movie hits us hard. And it tells us well that when the music is over, turn off the lights.

Brilliant movie

[lakhvirsingh84 · 10/10 · 12 March 2021]

When the movie was released that time people did not watch that kind of movies.I watched today and I would say this was the performance by rajit Kapoor underrated actor ..

A Good One

[avil-avate · 8/10 · 18 March 2007]

I was 16-17 when i watched it. It's a great one by Mr. Shyam Benegal. actually it was a first movie i saw directed by him. the direction is flawless and you can connect yourself with the characters in the flick. If you want a baseless entertainment then its not for you. The role played by Mr. Rajit Kapoor is far different than a common Hindi film hero it is not a very brave or larger than life kind of char. but it attracts why? because it close to reality. *********** spoiler alert*************

The story starts with raghuvir yadav in a modern art exhibition. He comes across this picture which reminds him of his mohalla (neighborhood) and his college days. He starts narrating about his days and starts talking about Manik mullah (Ranjit kapur) a railway employee who was a great story teller and how he and his friends would go there when ever they get free time and how manik would tell them stories.

The movie now shifts to a flashback where young raghuvir yadav and his friends discuss about the current literatures and romance. They ask manik to tell them a romantic story in his own style.Manik starts the first story "Being true to one's salt".Manik who is sitting in the window looks down at the next house and sees a cow tied to the shed and a girl walking towards the cow.He starts the story that when he was young they used to have a cow and the next door neighbour girl used to frequent to there house.

life, the way it is, and what you take from it

[ridi-arahan · 9/10 · 28 June 2020]

What worked:

• the screenplay and storytelling; it's one of those movies which touches you instantly as you go through the movie. The mood, setting and the narrative is balanced and tells the story with sub layers and each with a separate but intertwined theme. I am especially impressed by the way story unfolds, the narrator narrating the stories and he is somehow present in all these stories. Also, the use of vantage point to explore the characters' individual perspective is so clever and smart. I am hugely satisfied with the time of the movie, made me relate to the story although it's set in different time zone. And of course the songs , they are awesome.
• strong performances; Rajit Kapoor, Amrish Puri and Neena Gupta stole the show. It's so satisfying to see such a phenomenal performances. And of course, Shyam Benegal, for me , it's one of his finest movie. Overall production team deserves the praise.
• multiple interpretations and analysis; the movie questions our definition of love, marriage in a society with different socioeconomic status in a linear focus. Many instances of the movie shows the characters interpretation about love, events in life and human behaviors.The movie also is a metaphorical satire. Each set of stories has a weak, strong and confused character. As a psychological enthusiast, the movie is filled with many references in the field.The title was of the movie is explained at the end of the movie, and it does make sense.

Final verdict: highly recommended.

please see this movie...

[aamirmushtaque · 10/10 · 12 January 2017]

a neglected masterpiece...i am sure if people will get to know about it more and more will like it..there is no dearth of good cinema lovers in India...not everybody loves over the top romance..but this movie at least deserves more than 5000 votes so that it can enter the top movie list...please see and vote this movie...it will prove to be an experience you will never forget..such beautiful illusion of fact meeting fiction is never seen in Hindi cinema before...Shyam Benegal sir is a magician..and Rajit Kapoor...what a phenomenal actor..its a shame Bollywood didn't gave him the recognition he deserved..its good to see an actor like Christoph Waltz being recognised in Hollywood only because of his acting..Rajit Kapoor, Pankaj Kapoor are of same talent but its their luck(or bad luck) that they are in an industry where over the top over actors are megastars and those deserving are struggling for recognition....