The Central Region (1971) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
7 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
At times breathtaking, but the sound...
droopfozz17 April 2015
Note: It's pretty impossible to give an adequate number rating to films like this.

If you're reading this review, you're probably familiar enough with Snow to know what to expect from this film. I had seen a number of his other avant-garde classics, but was told this was his magnum-opus.

Like Snow's other structural works, on paper this may sound tedious: a 3 hour exploration of a landscape. But the movement, while slow at first, becomes breathtaking and even exhilarating. I never got as bored as I had expected, and I didn't have a problem with watching the film, but the sound started to get to me. After 90 minutes, I had to leave and take a break. It's not a deliberately assaultive soundtrack as some other films I've seen, but the repetitive mechanical noises, one of which sounds like a telephone ring, must have been the perfect tone to make me deeply uncomfortable and cause a headache. Part of that could also be that I was listening to these on a tiny, old speaker.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Another weird effort by Snow
tieman6418 October 2006
Warning. This film is not for everyone. Don't expect any narrative.

Following "Wavelength", Michael Snow made two films. "Standard Time", an eight minute series of pans and tilts in an apartment living room, and "Back and Forth", a more extended analysis. Both films continue his obsession with exploring the camera's relationships with space and time.

But with "La Region Centrale", Snow manages to create moving images that could not have possibly been observed by the human eye.

To capture these images, Snow designed and built a machine which would allow his camera to move smoothly about several different axes at various speeds. Snow placed this device on a mountain peak in Quebec and then programmed it to provide a series of continuously changing views of the landscape.

Initially the camera does a simple 360° pass (which serves to map out the terrain) but as the film progresses, increasingly stranger views are provided.

8/10
13 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A truly cinematic experience
chillroom-123 November 2016
It was the early 80s, probably 1981, winter, a Saturday night, La région centrale is being shown at the Anthology space in Soho. I go by myself. Just a few months before, as part of the ReCherChez Studio run by Lee Breuer and Ruth Maleczech in the East Village, a group of us had rented a 16mm print of Wavelength to study it, and that had been most rewarding. I walked to the space. It was snowing and quite chilly. The Anthology was a small theater with a nice screen. There were maybe a couple dozen people there. I didn't recognize anyone. I do recall a group of young Asian men sitting together. I knew that the film had been shot on a specially constructed machine built to let the camera do a 360 degree pan, and Snow was hidden off programming the arm's movement. The soundtrack consisted of the electronic waves of the programming. So I knew what I was to expect.

The film began. A desolate landscape. Quebec. I am sure I had smoked some cannabis on my way to the theater, and I easily settled in to nothing in particular happening for a long time. I just kept watching. I am sure my mind was going off to all kinds of places as I watched, but I never really lost interest watching it go. After a while the pans began to pick up in speed, and eventually the camera began to spin around in a circle as well. The velocity was not very high at first so there was little disorientation, but you could tell there would be. The only human artifact visible was the occasional sight on the ground of the shadow of the arm holding the camera. Otherwise, nothing was visible but a desolate landscape with no people or buildings or anything in a constantly sweeping pan.

After about an hour I began to squirm a bit in my seat. I knew this was a three hour film, and a couple of audience had already walked out. I lasted another fifteen to twenty minutes before I took a break. I used the bathroom, even stepped outside and smoked a cigarette. I recall it was snowing sort of heavily at that time. Then I stepped back inside, where it was warmer and welcome. I went back inside the theater and sat back down. The camera was zooming around much faster now. In short measures the camera started shooting around so swiftly it was impossible to keep up -- then it stopped and went the other direction! Now we were panning back the other way, and it was growing faster again. Then it changed directions again. It was hurtling madly swinging at the end of a tether, and the camera itself was revolving too. The universe was whirling madly before my eyes. It was astonishing and completely disorienting. In that era I was spending a couple of hours a week simply spinning in a circle, with other friends, at the studio, to focus myself physically and mentally. This film was an embodiment of that spinning.

Time completely stopped for this. So did my mind. Suddenly my thoughts weren't racing, suddenly I was deeply focused.

The movement no the screen slowed down until it was back to the slow spin it had begun with. You could feel the film coming to a stop. The room went black then the house lights came up. The group of us there, some folk had certainly left and not come back, probably less than a dozen of us slowly rising to our feet and looking around at each other. Again, I remember mostly Asian guys -- in fact, it was an all male audience. I had sweat dripping down my face. It was winter and snowing but watching La région centrale made me perspire.

No other experience of mechanical images has ever done to me what La région centrale did. I later went to the NYC premiere of his So Is This film and got to hear Michael Snow speak and got to shake his hand. I enjoyed that film, and I've also seen Back and Forth with an audience, and even went to a screening of Wavelength again in 2000 at the Hammer Museum here in Los Angeles. And I can rhapsodize about Wavelength at length, about meanings and all that. But nothing has ever come close to that viewing of La région centrale in Soho in the early 80s as an authentically startling alien experience. Even now, other than describing it, I cannot say why it was so powerful or why that viewing has resonated with me for over 35 years now. Maybe the central region is me?
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
10.13.2023
EasonVonn13 October 2023
Warning: Spoilers
The second Snow movie, but rather have me watch three hours of La Region Centrale ten times I wouldn't bother watching Oppenheimer once.

The only thing about Grass Skies is that there are no people, no humanized things, not a single plot, not a single character, not a single human presence except for the factory label at the end (I fell asleep an hour into it, and the appearance of the factory label man at the end woke me up straight away). The irregular movement of the camera is not bound by any human rule, and my dear Yale professor also called it "Copernicus has entered the movie" turning three hours to view a beautiful coast from the central region.

It is interesting to note that the director does not deny the existence of the camera, in the first half hour there is a reflection of the camera and a mechanical arm, which emphasizes the existence of the camera, unencumbered by the viewer, unencumbered by human beings, cinema's autonomous existence!

This film is also one of Chantal Akerman's important influences, and I didn't expect it to be brought here...
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Personal reaction
ItalianGerry11 April 2009
Warning: Spoilers
Last night I went to Brown University to watch the Modern Culture and Media screening in 16mm of Michael Snow's legendary experiment. I braced myself to stay through to the end (with a brief rest-room hiatus) and I made it, along with five others of the original twelve. I clocked the film at 194 minutes.

I found the movie particularly fascinating when the swirling, swinging, fluctuating, mountain-top images suggest not the real world but a kind of fragmented and almost abstract visual painting in motion. I'm not saying I enjoyed all of it, but I was fascinated by what Snow was doing in his one-of-a-kind tour-de-force and was drawn to the enormous variation he employed with the robot camera. If this were a piece of classical music rather than a film, its form would be that of theme and variations.

Particularly effective, I thought, was the use of sounds: beeps, vibratos, repeated motifs, which at one point sounded like a phone ringing in another room. They contributed to the mesmeric quality of the experience.

The swirling ending was really really really long and excessive, and by that point I had had enough and just wanted it to end, but in fact it is this very excess that gives the film its uncompromising strength.

This is a natural for DVD, where one could more comfortably watch it in bite-size segments, but then, purists might suggest, one would be deprive of the cumulative effect.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Pure and hypnotic
faloopnik218 February 2002
I saw this film projected many years ago and was completely drawn in by the use of sound and image. I found it to be deeply profound and comical, yet nearly impossible to describe, for it is the type of structural film that actually makes you think on numerous levels. So much has been written about this film, but I truly believe it is completely open to ones interpretation. Without doubt this is Snow's greatest film; a truly hypnotic masterpiece.
11 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Snow Explores All Movements
Tornado_Sam15 December 2019
Michael Snow's earlier works were all focused entirely on camera movement. First came "Wavelength", which was purely experimental: a slow zoom inwards over a period of forty-five minutes. The camera movement concept was not as great in that particular work, but it was nonetheless there. "Standard Time", which I have not seen, followed it, a simplistic exploration of panning in a singular setting. "Back and Forth" came next, and that was a longer elaboration on it, which provided more depth to the panning movements.

"La Region Centrale" proceeds all of these films, and explores the movements of all in one three-hour movie. That's not to say at all that this 1971 work is just a basic exploration of up-and-down and side-to-side movements. Every type of movement possible is present in Snow's enormous art film, contained in a single setting of the "Central Region" of the title. Indeed, the different kinds of panning that comprises this film could not be caught by the human eye: the project took several years, as Snow had to hire an engineer to build a robotic arm that could move any which way, which could support a 16mm camera. The viewer is treated to the same landscape for three hours, but the view is changed so much over that period of time that at times it doesn't look the same as before. The biggest variable that accomplishes this is the lighting, which changes. It is sometimes pitch black (which I would prefer Snow had cut out most of) sometimes it is dawn, other times it is normal daylight. The inward zooms emphasize and disguise certain features, and the movements of the robotic arm make unseen visual patterns and motions that are incredibly unique.

Is it worth spending three hours of your time on this? Maybe if you are a committed film buff or film theorist. You have to really be immersed in experimental filmmaking to get a lot out of it. For me, the camera movements were interesting and fascinating, yet it did not grip me or completely keep my interest the entire time. I was interested in the beginning, lost that interest in the middle during the night time scenes (it's hard to see anything in that part of the film), and regained it when the daylight returned. The colossal run-time makes it hard to swallow, but it should not go without any credit - not effective like "Back and Forth", but with a type of effectiveness all its own.

Another highlight, outside the crazy movement, is when the viewer catches various peeks of the shadow of the robotic arm, which is a neat behind-the-scenes glimpse.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed