High-profile lawyer falls for her client, a suspect in a kinky murder case, but is he innocent or guilty? Could she be in danger of becoming the next victim or is it all a conspiracy? As you can see, "Forbidden Sins" is the umpteenth variation on the familiar "Jagged Edge" / "Body Of Evidence" formula and unfortunately this film is not made with enough energy or style to set itself apart from the pack, though it must be said that it is more explicit than most mainstream releases in this genre. Shannon Tweed herself has only one sex scene, but the woman is still in such fantastic shape that I'll push the rating of the film to a probably undeserved ** just for her.
7 Reviews
Jagged Tweed
chow9138 May 2013
Is it really a spoiler to call this the Shannon Tweed Skinemax version of 'Jagged Edge?' And just like the real 'Jagged Edge' the audience has already figured out whom the real killer is. We're just waiting for the heroine to catch up.
The original title 'Night Moves' was for some reason replaced with the redundant 'Forbidden Sins.' Perhaps 'A Shocking Surprise' or 'Violent Force' or 'Eternity Forever' or 'Criminal Conspiracy' or 'Maximum Extreme' would have been better Skinemax titles? Anyhow... David Mulholland is the wealthy owner of the Californian (Canadian) "Night Moves" (hence the original title) exotic dancer gentlemen's club (strip bar) arrested for killing one of his employees during rough sex.
Mulholland professes his innocence and blames the murder on a serial silicone killer. He hires the lead detective's ex wife as his high profile defense attorney. She's smart, she's sexy, she's sophisticated, she's Shannon Tweed.
Predictably the plot of 'Jagged Edge' ensues with more silicone boobs and sex than the original. And thankfully NO sex scenes between Glenn Close and Jeff Bridges! As far as Shannon Tweed films go this is actually one of the better ones. Only brief nudity by Tweed herself and only sexy courtroom suits, but at least the camera stays in focus and scenes of cheat actors forgetting their lines have been edited out. Two things the 'Night Eyes' series cannot claim.
Shannon Tweed fans should give it a look but don't expect too much.
The original title 'Night Moves' was for some reason replaced with the redundant 'Forbidden Sins.' Perhaps 'A Shocking Surprise' or 'Violent Force' or 'Eternity Forever' or 'Criminal Conspiracy' or 'Maximum Extreme' would have been better Skinemax titles? Anyhow... David Mulholland is the wealthy owner of the Californian (Canadian) "Night Moves" (hence the original title) exotic dancer gentlemen's club (strip bar) arrested for killing one of his employees during rough sex.
Mulholland professes his innocence and blames the murder on a serial silicone killer. He hires the lead detective's ex wife as his high profile defense attorney. She's smart, she's sexy, she's sophisticated, she's Shannon Tweed.
Predictably the plot of 'Jagged Edge' ensues with more silicone boobs and sex than the original. And thankfully NO sex scenes between Glenn Close and Jeff Bridges! As far as Shannon Tweed films go this is actually one of the better ones. Only brief nudity by Tweed herself and only sexy courtroom suits, but at least the camera stays in focus and scenes of cheat actors forgetting their lines have been edited out. Two things the 'Night Eyes' series cannot claim.
Shannon Tweed fans should give it a look but don't expect too much.
Blahish
dj_bassett25 March 2005
Warning: Spoilers
Routine reworking of THE JAGGED EDGE, with Tweed a defense attorney who picks up a slimy client, an owner of a strip bar who's been accused of murdering one of his dancers in kinky sex games. Of course, she comes to believe he's innocent, and of course, the truth is pretty different...and pretty much like THE JAGGED EDGE.
Not especially thrilling. As for erotic, well, it's edited together exceptionally well, especially during the love scenes. Outside of that, no, not really. Amy Lindsay takes off her clothes the most and she's not my particular cup of tea. Tweed remains lovely, but only gets naked once. (Incidentally, Tweed has developed into a perfectly plausible actress, nothing special but she surely can do decent work in better projects than this.) Even in this rather disreputable genre, not too good.
Not especially thrilling. As for erotic, well, it's edited together exceptionally well, especially during the love scenes. Outside of that, no, not really. Amy Lindsay takes off her clothes the most and she's not my particular cup of tea. Tweed remains lovely, but only gets naked once. (Incidentally, Tweed has developed into a perfectly plausible actress, nothing special but she surely can do decent work in better projects than this.) Even in this rather disreputable genre, not too good.
Focus not on Shannon but Amy
jim61616 January 2000
The movies was average in the scope of soft porn movies. However, a shining star was Amy Lindsay playing Molly Malone.
While her acting skills are weak, she is very sharp. She is not a knockout but is very sweet and subtle and has several fantastic nude shots.
She is very worthy of a look.
While her acting skills are weak, she is very sharp. She is not a knockout but is very sweet and subtle and has several fantastic nude shots.
She is very worthy of a look.
Rather advanced soft-porn with a script!
mistermadonna-124 August 2002
Considering the pretty advanced soft-porn this film isn't actually half bad. The plot is about the murder of a stripper, a good-looking and filthy rich male prime suspect who hires a stunning female super- lawyer to defend him not only in court but also against a bent cop who also happens to be the ex-husband of the lawyer. Seen it before? Yes and no, because the script avoids most of the normal Hollywood clichés in the sense that just when you think you can tell what´s going to happen next it doesn't. Unfortunately most of the actors are not as good as the twists of the script and although they may look their parts most of them can't act them. Finally, if you do not like explicit sex- scenes, and I do not mean the "Basic instinct" and "Sliver"-league, this film is not for you. On the other hand if you do like watching beautiful people involved in sado-masochistic sex-play, which actually fits into the plot, then it is.
Murder with lots of Glam
ebiros25 January 2013
I think this movie deserves extra points for its taste and style. The cinematography is great, actors are all beautiful, and the homes that the people lives in are just gorgeous.
I don't know who MRG Entertainment is, but the production is flawless in this movie. It's bit of drama with intrigue for mature audience, but everything is done very professionally. Shannon Tweed is convincing as a professional lawyer (maybe with too much glam but who cares).
I can't give this movie a low rating, because everything is done so well. I'm not sure if this can just be categorized as soft porn because the drama part of it stands on its own.
The movie was fab, and is highly recommended for viewing.
I don't know who MRG Entertainment is, but the production is flawless in this movie. It's bit of drama with intrigue for mature audience, but everything is done very professionally. Shannon Tweed is convincing as a professional lawyer (maybe with too much glam but who cares).
I can't give this movie a low rating, because everything is done so well. I'm not sure if this can just be categorized as soft porn because the drama part of it stands on its own.
The movie was fab, and is highly recommended for viewing.
Some pleasurable moments
andyb-426 April 2001
Check out Amy Lindsay for her erotic performance in this otherwise forgettable film. She is fresh faced and innocent looking and its a great pleasure to see her disrobe on several occasions.
As for Shannon Tweed, well she looks like a turkey that was plucked years ago and how she gets parts in so many films is beyond me.
But if you get to see an uncut version of this film you should not be totally disappointed.
As for Shannon Tweed, well she looks like a turkey that was plucked years ago and how she gets parts in so many films is beyond me.
But if you get to see an uncut version of this film you should not be totally disappointed.
See also
Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews
