Judy Berlin (1999) Poster

(1999)

User Reviews

Review this title
41 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Dreams and Deceptions in a Day of Eclipse
claudio_carvalho28 February 2010
In a day of eclipse in Babylon Village, in New York, the thirty-two year-old aspirant actress Judy Berlin (Edie Falco) is moving to California expecting to make her dream come true. Her mother Suzan 'Sue' Berlin (Barbara Barrie) is a bitter school teacher that likes to flirt with the principal Arthur Gold (Bob Dishy), who is married with the housewife Alice Gold (Madeline Kahn) that is close to a breakdown. Their thirty year-old son David Gold (Aaron Harnick) has just moved back home after a frustrating experience as filmmaker. While wandering on the street, David meets Judy who studied with him in the elementary school and they spend the day together. Meanwhile the confused Arthur kisses Sue during the eclipse.

"Judy Berlin" is a delightful low-budget movie with entwined stories in the suburb of Babylon. The performances are excellent, disclosing the intimacy of the characters in a realistic way. This movie was released in Brazil on VHS by Cult Films Distributor. My vote is eight.

Title (Brazil): "Judy Berlin"
11 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A wonderful little film.
dvanhouwelingen3 November 2000
JUDY BERLIN was obviously inspired by the many comedies of Woody Allen. Everything from the black and white look (that Allen used in MANHATTAN and STARDUST MEMORIES among others), to the neuroses of it's main character David (a struggling filmmaker) to the girl he tries to win (THE SOPRANOS' great Edie Falco) to the portrayal of the parents (including the late, great Madeline Kahn, in her final performance), all suggests Woody. But the director, Eric Mendelson, making his first film, captures all these people in the same way Allen does in all their humour- but also suggests a level of sadness that Woody hardly ever did. This is a wonderful little film that should be enjoyed by all.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
6/10
charly18 August 2000
This film has a quiet beauty and some very wonderful performances. However, the poetry of the movie is too disjointed for my personal taste. I understand the ideas the director is going for, but I felt the movie lacked enough charm to pull it off. The dialogue has moments of reality, yet often tries too hard for truth, missing the mark. This is a very artistic effort, not meant for the average movie-goer. With a bit more practice and polish, the director could one day be quite great. He needs to stop imitating others and find his own voice.

I was torn between admiring it's gentility and screaming to have the monotony end! That is real life, isn't it? Sometimes moments last too long and others pass too quickly.

It is a film for film lovers, yet needs a tighter reining by the editor/director.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Remember when art films weren't "independent films"?
John-4059 January 2001
Remember when art films weren't directed by teenagers for teenagers? Remember when they didn't have anything to do with pop culture. Remember when there was actually something as an adult culture?

Neither do I. But there must be some old people out there who do.

"Independent films", a new genre that has replaced what used to be called "art films", are not worthy of their name. They're, on the whole, hip, mass-marketed screwball comedies, "chick flicks", novelty films, etc. Little other than budget separates an "independent film" from a slick, cynical Hollywood marketing effort. In fact, many independent films are slick, cynical Hollywood marketing efforts.

Seeing Judy Berlin is what it used to be like seeing art films. The very fact that nothing in it is designed to shock or surprise you will shock and surprise you. The very fact that nothing in it was test-screened for maximal emotional manipulation will maximally emotionally manipulate you. The fact that no surprising plot twists were inserted to make you want to go see it again will so surprise you that you will want to see it again.

This is not necessarily an endorsement. But I want to stress that this is a film that will not remind you of any other film. It will not be die hard on an anything. It doesn't count Gilligan's Island and My Favorite Martian among its influences, but Checkhov, Camus and Bergman--the sorts of things you've been taught to think are pretentious and stodgy. It is something new--even dare I say it, experimental. Gasp! Avant garde. It wasn't made to make the most money possible. There will be no toy tie-in available with your happy meal.

Whatever you think of this film, cherish it as a kind of throwback, a one-in-a-million, the last dodo bird yet living.
19 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A Sparkling Gem
Malkovich-222 December 2000
After reading all the reviews of people complaining about either how pretentious or boring "Judy Berlin" was, I just had to write something about how incredible this movie is. It is the complete opposite of pretension. Real people, living real lives, catching us up in their emotion as we recognize and identify with their loneliness. I just don't get how this is pretentious. Perhaps it could be because "pretentious" is a word most people throw around to sound smart without knowing what it means. "Pi" is pretentious, "Judy Berlin" is not. Filled to the brim with haunting and incredible performances, it evokes Allen's more insightful dramas, such as "Interiors," as well as Ingmar Bergman's best work. And yet, Bergman is not in style now. Mass culture goes more for the insane mind-benders, like "Fight Club" and "Being John Malkovich." Even though both were great movies, "Judy Berlin" is better. It is an exploration of the souls of a small town. Madeline Kahn, Edie Falco, Barbara Barrie, and Bob Dishy are all superb, completely immersing themselves in their roles. Not to mention the gorgeous cinematography or the incredible harpsichord soundtrack. "Judy Berlin" has a lot to say, if you'll just listen to it.
11 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A Little Gem
fubared130 December 2004
This is an overlooked and sadly neglected little gem of a film, primarily because of some wonderful performances, especially the sadly underused Barbara Barrie. The other 3 main players are also wonderful, Bob Dishy, Madeline Kahn, and Bette Henritze. Edie Falco is competent without reaching their high standards. I don't understand the negative comments about the score as it's one of the better one's I've heard in years. Certainly better than anything by minimalist Phillip Glass, which another reviewer compared it to, and light years better than Danny Elfman or any of his other bombastic compatriots could devise. And it was nice to see a film of this nature done in black and white for once...and done so just because black and white can be as beautiful as color (though it's clearly not up to the standards of earlier Hollywood films), not because it's attempting to be some kind of pseudo-noir film.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Madeline Kahn in her last film gem.
DomCom195731 December 2005
Judy Berlin is a unique independent film and stands out also because it was the final film of the late and great Madeline Kahn.

Filmed in black and white and directed by Eric Mendelson, I was actually an extra in the diner scene with Edie Falco and Aaron Harnick. You don't actually see me, because Iam far off from the scene. I met Edie and she was very nice. A good friend of mine is her first cousin. I was hoping to finally meet Madeline Kahn, but she wasn't in the scene they were filming that day. Even Edie was disappointed she didn't have any scenes with her in the whole movie. The rest of the cast is so great. Bob Dishy, Barbara Barrie, Julie Kavner, Anne Meara and the rest all are a pleasure to watch. It was filmed here in New York, all over Long Island. The film is funny and so bittersweet. It played all the film festivals in 1999 and was officially released in 2000. Madeline Kahn passed away in December of 1999, so it was released 2 months after. Even though she didn't live to see the year 2000 she has this one remarkable film for her only movie of the 21st century. If she had lived, she may have won an academy award for her outstanding performance. Watch it and you see if she wasn't Oscar worthy.

The DVD has some great deleted scenes too. If you haven't seen this movie yet, you should really give it a try. Its not a big budget comedy or drama, just a small independent film with a big name cast of pros. I have to say though this is the perfect film for us to remember the wonderful and beautiful and the very multi-talented star Madeline Kahn.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Good, but could have been better
CHendri88711 April 2001
Well, what to say about this odd short movie? I like the music--Baroque, Bach-like, wistful. I like the use of black and white film. I like the way the characters are presented in a disjointed way. I like the idea of presenting a small suburban town "as it is." I like some of the dialogue. I like some of the acting.

But then there are some things in the film that seem like they were not really thought through completely by the director/writer. I like some of Madeline Kahn's character in this film, but other parts, I just don't get. The same goes for the characters portrayed by Edie Falco and Aaron Harnick. There's a sense for me that the writer doesn't know whether he wants to make all of these characters "real" or "melodramatized." Case in point would be scene when Kahn is talking to her neighbor during the eclipse and the dialogue sort of veers from reality-based to comic melodramatic. Perhaps this was intentional on the part of the writer/director, but for me, it was disconcerting. And what was up with the whole part where Kahn keeps saying, "We're spacemen"? That got annoying to me after about one minute.

I guess what bothered me, what I wanted from this film, was acting and dialogue that matched the melancholy-ish soundtrack better. Something more intimate, less distancing with moments of comedy. Lots of potential, but in the end, doesn't deliver in my opinion.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Classic Independent Film!
Sylviastel26 May 2008
This film has a first rate cast including some famous faces like the wonderful and missed Madeline Kahn, the brilliant and subtle Barbara Barrie, the under-appreciated Julie Kavner, and Emmy Winner Edie Falco in the title role as an aspiring actress from Long Island. The suburbia has become the new it thing. Of course, suburbia is not as boring as we like to make it out to be on screen. There are some brilliant moments and casting of Barrie and Falco as mother and daughter is perfect casting. Kahn plays the bored housewife and loving mother who needs assurance from her husband played by Bob Dishy who is a school principal where Berlin's mother Sue works as a teacher. Kavner plays a cafeteria lady while Anne Meare plays his secretary. It's shot in black and white which is a departure from the normal color. The shots are quite first rate and the film has a slow but steady peace. The characters are realistic at least to my lifelong suburban eyes. I can identify with almost all of them.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
An uneven oddity...talent in abundance, though the film works only intermittently
moonspinner5518 September 2010
News of an impending solar eclipse has an irrational affect on the residents of a stifling New York suburb, particularly between parents and their now-grown children. Writer-director Eric Mendelsohn has an undeniable talent for ferreting out quirky human behavior from chance meetings and ordinary interaction. He has assembled a solid cast of actors, though he seems to have allowed his players to self-define their characters and, as a possible result, the picture doesn't have much meat on its bones. Mendelsohn is amusingly cognizant of how people react in uncomfortable or embarrassing situations, yet he sets up ideas for potential scenes that never quite come through (such as having the schoolchildren being told how to view an eclipse--though when the big moment arrives, their reaction is to jump up and down as if a parade were passing by). "Judy Berlin" has some courage, but it's crass; an arty series of vignettes which feels long at 97 minutes. Moments of vitality do stand out, and the black-and-white cinematography by Jeffrey Seckendorf is expressive, if derivative. Michael Nicholas' mandolin-heavy score works to create a quirky mood, and yet intimate conversation and revelations do not a movie make. *1/2 from ****
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Great performances caught on stunning black & white film
AGG3 March 1999
Great performances by Madeline Kahn and Edie Falco, as well as the rest of the cast push this fine independent movie. The story revolves around one day on Long Island in the lives of a half dozen or so people, connected by various relationships (family, school, work). From the depressed would-be filmmaker to the talentless, but ever hopeful, aspiring actress the movie finds a way to take you deep inside the characters without really letting you know much about their lives beyond this single day. The eclipse at the heart of the story allows for some great lighting effects on the black & white film.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Boring Berlin.
anaconda-406584 May 2015
Warning: Spoilers
Judy Berlin (1999): Dir: Eric Mendelsohn / Cast: Aaron Harnick, Edie Falco, Bob Dishy, Barbara Barrie, Madeline Kahn: Beautiful black and white photography wasted on a film so dense. Final film for Madeline Kahn who believes her husband is having an affair. Bob Dishy plays a high school principal showing interest in a teacher played by Barbara Barrie. Edie Falco plays Judy Berlin who wishes to be in movies. Aaron Harnick plays Kahn's son is detached who hardly notices anything going on around him. Director Eric Mendelsohn shows little promise and the screenwriter shows even less. This all takes place during an eclipse although the screenplay could have easily done without it. Of the cast only Dishy and Barrie pull off performances with elevated levels of interest. Harnick and Falco play characters that never seem to clue in and are a distraction within their idiotic mannerisms. Rarely are two individuals as difficult to watch as these two are here. They are not sympathetic and viewers may likely care less for their visions on life. How sad it is that Kahn's final film appearance is within a film as stupid as this one. She is best remembered for her great comic moments in Mel Brooks as well as What's Up Doc? This is an unfortunate send off. Supposedly about family dysfunction but it is so unfocused and boring that the only thing that comes across as dysfunctional is the screenplay. Score: 2 / 10
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Neglected Gem of 2000
luca-3312 May 2001
This is the neglected gem of last year, and in my estimation the best film of the year.

Think of it as a middle-class Ice Storm, but while the upper-class suburbanites of Ice Storm were too distant and unreal to care about, the middle-class lives depicted in Judy Berlin are very real and both heart-breakingly sad and genuinely funny (without caricature or directorial mocking). I've often heard the phrase laughing through tears, but never experienced it until seeing this film.

The performances are without exception incisive and dead-on. Of particular note: the counterpoint of Aaron Harnick's sad, lost David and the open-faced lifeforce that is Edie Falco's Judy; Barbara Barrie's portrait of a loving schoolteacher -- with an edge; Bob Dishy's sullen and conflicted Arthur, among the most subtle work in this usually comic actor's long career; and Madelyn Kahn in her final film role, touching and hilarious (as always) as a housewife on the verge of a nervous breakdown. Her scene when she encounters her psychiatrist while aimlessly wandering the streets during the eclipse, and manages to offer him words of comfort, is the film's defining moment -- a film of beautifully etched characters behaving in very real yet very surprising ways in moments of conflict filled with shades of gray.

Speaking of which, the film is shot brilliantly in black and white to point up both the beauty and the horror of this suburban landscape.

However did this film languish on a shelf for two years? If film scripts were eligible for Pulitzer Prizes, Eric Mendelsohn's would have surely been a contender.
14 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Sweet but not overly sentimental
TravisD-22 June 2000
This is an excellent movie. I had to hunt it down while visiting LA, but Judy Berlin is definitely worth catching. Eddie Falco, Barbara Barrie, and Madeline Kahn are excellent leading ladies. Kahn especially makes an impact as a worrisome and somewhat philosophical housewife who goes on a long walk during the eclipse. Beautifully shot in black and white, Judy Berlin is wonderful, definitely one of my favorite movies. Too bad it didn't get a wider release.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
An Independent gem that eclipses many Blockbusters
tm-sheehan26 April 2022
My Review - Judy Berlin ( 1999)

My Rating 8/10

Yesterday I had a retro movie day seeing 2 films of the late 1990's and thoroughly enjoyed them both .

Most of my readers know I have a very wide taste in my film viewing and I often find a small independent movie can offer more viewing satisfaction than 2 so called Blockbusters put together.

I only came across Judy Berlin a rare movie to trace from reading Madeline Khan's Biography . She was so proud of her final performance in this movie cast as Alice Gold saying she was glad she had the chance to make the film before she tragically died from ovarian cancer that same year.

Judy Berlin is a 1999 American independent drama film directed by Eric Mendelsohn who won the directing prize for Judy Berlin at the 1999 Sundance International Film Festival.

It centres around the characters and events that occur during a full eclipse of the sun and they all are interesting characters that live in a small town on Long Island called Babylon . At the center of the story is aspiring actress Judy Berlin (Edie Falco), the daughter of a local teacher Sue Berlin ( Barbara Barrie ) Unlike many of the characters in the film, she is upbeat, excitable and enthusiastic reminding me a little of Lulamae before she left for New York and became Holly Golightly .

The local school Principal Arthur Gold (Bob Dishy) is married to Alice (Madeline Kahn). Alice lives on her nerves babbling away and trying to control both men in her life husband Arthur and their son David (Aaron Harnick), who is thirty, and depressed after a failed attempt at being a Hollywood filmmaker.

It soon is apparent that School Principal Arthur Gold and Alice are experiencing marriage problems.

When a hilarious interruption to Sue Berlin's class by an elderly ex teacher and resident of Babylon who is in the early stages of dementia Dolores Engler played delightfully by Bette Henritze during the start of the eclipse a connection between teacher and Principal sets of an intriguing chain of events .

The eclipse seems to effect all the characters a little like some people experience during a full moon .

I think Judy Berlin is a little gem of a movie but as I mentioned a difficult one to track down but well worth it .

I read that in memory of Madeline Kahn, who died of ovarian cancer, the profits from this film's premiere were donated towards ovarian cancer research.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
It accomplishes exactly what it sets out to do
wlbtraveler31 July 2021
Warning: Spoilers
"Judy Berlin" is the rare type of film that feels oddly incomplete yet succeeds in doing exactly what it set out to do. Essentially a character study of the often eccentric yet unsatisfied and lonely denizens of an unnamed New York town, "Judy Berlin" is often depressing yet undeniably effective at presenting harsh reality.

Though the film generally centers on David Gold (Aaron Harnick), a failed Hollywood filmmaker, and Judy Berlin (Edie Falco), an upbeat yet naive aspiring actress, "Judy Berlin" makes a point of avoiding any sort of Hollywood conventions one typically sees in a film. Conversations between characters are painfully awkward, statements are made that make little sense, and there are few moments that could be described as satisfying, especially to viewers that are accustomed to films treating their audience with a clearly happy ending. In a way, "Judy Berlin" is a simulated documentary, exploring reality as it is, not as the cheerful and sorrow-free farce that Hollywood often presents. In this film, the characters are all clearly lonely and often depressed, and in multiple cases, that never truly gets resolved. "Judy Berlin" is content with simply showing its players admitting their sorrows to themselves and agreeing to overcome them, rather than having those sorrows magically vanish. At one point during a conversation between Judy and David, he tells her about how he had always wanted to make a documentary about their town. Not in an embellished fashion, but rather an utterly real depiction that simply shows, as he puts it, what exists when no one is looking. In a sense, that is exactly what "Judy Berlin" is. It's a film about people. It's a film about characters and their day-to-day struggles: marital issues, depression, senility, loneliness, etc. It's a film that occupies itself with exploring nothing but the intricacies of people and the issues they both face and choose not to face.

The solar eclipse that the film's progression revolves around is an interesting touch, both visually and symbolically. Solar eclipses typically last no more than seven minutes or so, yet the sun in "Judy Berlin" vanishes behind a particularly foreboding water tower and remains there throughout the second half of the film. Alice Gold (Madeline Kahn) notes this to her housekeeper Carol (Novella Nelson), admitting that while she knows very little about eclipses, she is sure of that fact that they usually don't last this long. The matter is brought up very little after that conversation, as if the characters have come to terms with the permanent presence of both the eclipse and the struggles it seems to represents in their lives.

This eclipse is an interesting element in that its appearance seems to trigger a series of personal revelations in each of the residents of "Judy Berlin"-ville. Though an element of unhappiness is clearly present in the lives of each character throughout their brightly-lit morning, they often choose to ignore it. Once the eclipse occurs and the town is cast into darkness, each character abruptly admits their insecurities and sorrows to themselves and those close to them. By doing away with the optimistic shield that is daylight, the eclipse similarly breaks down the emotional barriers within the characters of "Judy Berlin", forcing them to realize that avoiding their deepest concerns does nothing to stave them off.

The eclipse also has an interesting effect on the film's cinematography. Shot in black-and-white, "Judy Berlin" is already stark before its main event, but the sunlight makes everything easy to see and there is no room for secrets or surprises. Following the eclipse, the town becomes a dark place where making out just about anything, even faces during a conversation, is difficult. Multiple characters repeatedly note that "the streetlights are on" in a manner that suggests they find it comforting, yet these streetlights are rarely visible and often provide very little light. In a way, this seems to reflect the emotional states of the townspeople. Prior to the eclipse, trouble was present for all of them, but it could be brushed to the side as everything seemed clear and visible. Following the eclipse, they are cast into emotional turmoil where almost nothing is clear and a level of unease is a constant presence.

The confrontation of reality that the second half of "Judy Berlin" revolves around is bleak, yet utterly real in that each character quietly comes to terms with their own woes. After Alice and Carol become "space explorers" in their street, parade around for a while, and have a particularly awkward meeting with Alice's neighbor Maddie (Carlin Glynn), Arthur Gold (Bob Dishy) returns from work. Despite the obvious marital difficulties the Golds are going through, Alice seems delighted to have him home and is fully prepared to continue the farce that is their happy relationship. Unexpectedly however, he drives off again. All at once, Alice drops her act.

"My husband just left me," she says quietly to Maddie and Carol.

It's a brutal collision with reality that creates a moment more tender than most blockbusters could ever dream of, and it's only furthered by what immediately follows it. After Alice says goodbye to Maddie and walks back home with Carol, she invites her housekeeper to wander around with her some more. Carol kindly but firmly turns her down, telling her that it is 3:00, she is finished working for the afternoon, and she has to go home to her daughter. Driving away, she leaves Alice alone in the street. For a character that frequently daydreams about being young again, it's another harsh reminder of reality for Alice, who, as much as she wants to play "space explorers" with her friends, has to consider that she and her friends are all grown up now and have lives to live and obligations to attend to. Finally dropping her act once and for all, she wanders off down the street by herself for a bit of melancholic yet finally authentic self-reflection.

David and Judy have a similar confrontation with reality after their afternoon "date." Frustrated with Judy's lack of seriousness in regards to her move to Hollywood, David tells her that Hollywood will be different from her acting classes, and criticizes her for not admitting to herself that Hollywood is a harsh world where she will find little hospitality or kindness. Hurt, she walks away. David calls out to her to tell her that he's just stating the facts as he sees them. Rather than ignoring him or lying to both David and herself once again, Judy simply turns and responds:

"I know."

For a character that seems to thrive off of unbridled optimism and denial of the harshness of life, it's a heartbreaking yet completely necessary moment for Judy and marks a significant turning point for both her and the rest of her town.

Having just finished Madeline Kahn's biography, I read quite a lot about "Judy Berlin" and Alice Gold, which many of Kahn's fans consider to be her finest performance. Having now watched it for myself, I firmly agree. It makes me especially happy to see that, as an actress with immense comedic talent but a desire for dramatic roles, she finally got the kind of role she truly wanted before she died. While I wouldn't go as far as to say that I love "Judy Berlin", I truly appreciate it for confronting the hard truth that reality can often be. In a world where movies often present us with the reality we want rather than the one we have, writer-director Eric Mendelsohn truly created a film that does exactly the opposite: it shows us what reality is, and nothing else. No fluff, no icing on top; just the hard truth. That is something that everyone should see, no matter how unpleasant it can be.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
boring
andysdeformedtwin7 January 2002
This is an excruciatingly dull, slow movie. Amateur night all the way. Just another boring movie about boring people doing boring things. But here's the twist: it all happens during an eclipse! Still boring, though. Now it just looks poorly shot, as well.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Let's have more like this one...
Peegee-315 July 2000
While super-critical cineasts might find fault with this debut offering of Eric Mendelsohn, I was delighted and moved by it. A poetic tone, a profound humanism, graceful and splendid perfomances by sadly neglected actors and an innovativeness that a more splashy, slick film like "American Beauty" lacked. Suburbia and its inhabitants aching for real communion, mostly unable to give or receive it...how well this movie expressed it! Bravo and may there soon be more from Mendelsohn and his like!
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
decent, but not a masterpiece
savage miser14 June 2002
i'm getting a little tired of the the whole idea about putting characters who are filmmakers in movies, having them say "i want to make a movie about a boring town" when the movie that they are in is about a boring town. kind of like in those TV shows where the characters say "Something like this only happens in movies, this is real life!"

anyways, the movie is decent. It isn't particularly good or bad, but there was nothing that really did all that much for me. i won't try and dissuade you from seeing it, maybe it WILL do something for you.

has anyone else noticed that all these movies filmed in black and white on modern cameras look like they are stifling things, holding it back? it doesn't look natural, it doesn't look like the way the old black and white movies did. you can almost see in modern black and white movies that the shot is established by someone used to seeing in color. old movies were different in that that was all they knew, composition and lighting were more well thought out.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Kahn's Oscar-worthy performance
tonyfyffe26 April 2004
In a film full of wonderful, low-key performances by actors playing lonely, unhappy characters, Madeline Kahn is the standout as a woman on the verge of a nervous breakdown. Unlike any other performance she gave in film, Kahn -- known for her comic roles -- turns in a marvelous, dramatic turn that should have netted her a posthomous Academy Award nomination. She is simply brilliant, and she should have been given a lot more dramatic roles in her career. After all, they say that comedy is the hardest thing for an actor to do, and with all the great comic roles she had -- in "Paper Moon," "Blazing Saddles" and "Young Frankenstein," just to name a few -- directors should have known that behind those funny faces was a great actress who could play any role.
9 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A quite excellent movie
jean-no8 August 2003
I don't know if this movie uses a little or a lot the author's own past, but it could have, it is, somehow, very much like a memory exploration (and it talks a lot about memory actually : remembering school pals, remembering teachers word, remembering the 19th, etc.). The storyline is a mess, but that is not the point, this movie doesn't offer a message like "the good one wins", "the girl married the nice guy". The image is fantastic sometimes. The acting is great. The whole thing reminds me a lot of Mark Kalesniko's comic book called "Alex" (a very good comic book, too)
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A wonderful piece of film making.
pdillon22 December 1999
Why can't more films be like this? Mr. Mendelsohn has created a gem. Without any flash, this film takes you down an uncomfortable path and at the end makes you want to get back on it. Wonderful score as well.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A total gem
sulla4 November 1999
I remember David Denby in the New Yorker going on and on about how great this movie was after Sundance, and I was very curious to see it. I finally saw it a couple weeks ago at the Hamptons Film Festival (It won there, too.) and still find myself thinking about it. I'm so tired of all that gimmicky stuff that passes for indie film, but this is what it's all about -- poignant, funny and so totally worth seeing. It's beautifully written, brilliantly acted, (check out Edie Falco from the Sopranos and Madeline Kahn as a high-strung suburban housewife) gorgeously shot and subtly directed. This is a movie for grownups. Remember acting??!? Remember images? Remember three- dimensional characters? But what's really great is it has all that, but it's not pretentiously "arty," either. It's just a real charmer.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Truly in black AND white..its gray
Boyo-219 February 2002
I had a hard time watching this movie. I need characters to care about, and a decent reason why I should. This has neither.

Madeline Kahn is married to Bob Dishy and they are unhappy. Their son, David, is living at home again and he is unhappy. Barbara Barrie is a school teacher, and unhappy although she does not know it. Edie Falco is Judy Berlin, who's too clueless to know she's unhappy.

This is all well and good..but WHY are they unhappy? Why hire actresses like Anne Meara and Julie Kavner and then use them in two scenes each? Why should I care about these people? They are not particularly interesting, and they can't even be articulate about why!

There's some nonsense with an eclipse..an Alzheimer's victim walks in a classroom and stays there..a possible affair..and then its over, thankfully. 4/10.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A Weird Indie
Chad-1121 October 2000
I love indie film, I like art films, I am split on this one. It is about nothing really, it's performances are fine, it's photography is decent (The Eclips scenes look great), yet this story goes no where. Should it go somewhere? No, but it doesn't stay with it's characters long enough to be about them! I feel awful about not enjoying this film, it's slight and sweet, it's not a hip indie and it doesn't have to be. Wonderland was a film about real people, doing real things, it's the most beatuful film of 2000, this film is pointless. The film isn't a comedy, it has dramatic elements, a film should have to fit into a certain genre (like what was American Psycho, The Virgin Sucides and Run Lola Run really....A horror film or a comedy, a drama or a comedy, or an action or foreign art film, repectively). This film has no genre because it is nothing. It's like a documentary about boring people living their boring life...it's not groundbreaking...but it's not good either. First Love Last Rites and Wonderland are two very overlooked films about real people that are much better than this art film wannabe. At Orlando's Enzian it would have been laughed off the screens by the art film crowd and the film professors that attend the theater. I understand why this film got picked up by the Shooting Gallery, it's not a real film, it's someone's life told without homor, insite or excitment. On the other hand it's charactors and direction were ok-I don't totaly hate this film-there are worce places to be in (like a screening of Adam Sandler's latest opus)-yet I am split on to what the message and the story the filmmaker is trying to tell? What is he saying, what is he telling us....he may be talented but the script is pointless, sure these people exist in real life by is it a documentation of these "real people"? If it is Wonderland is the movie to see (that film gets a 10, this one a 4)
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed