Back in the late 90s, there was Y2K. If you were old enough to remember, you remember. If you weren't, no amount of explanation could really make sense, because it was pretty nonsensical. This movie is something like a worst-case scenario realization of the Y2K fear, where mob mentality grips the world and causes more damage than the potential computer problems. It's interesting, but there's not too much to it. The characters don't really seem to develop, in fact do little but panic. The action is kept to a single area, which is neat, but isn't kept very dynamic. Worst of all, what really dates this movie 10 years after it was made is the lack of real conclusion as to what Y2K means or meant to people. It's not a problem with ambiguity, it's a problem with uncertainty. Thus why the whole Y2K phenomenon seems so absurd these days.
What really stands out for this movie is the set-design. No expense was spared in the little details. This is not all that surprising as the director mostly works in set-design. And for what it's worth, he knows how to block his shots and tell the story visually. It's just that there wasn't much of a story he had to tell.
--PolarisDiB
What really stands out for this movie is the set-design. No expense was spared in the little details. This is not all that surprising as the director mostly works in set-design. And for what it's worth, he knows how to block his shots and tell the story visually. It's just that there wasn't much of a story he had to tell.
--PolarisDiB