(2004 Video)

User Reviews

Review this title
10 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
2005's AVN award winner for best film
movieman_kev7 April 2005
Jim Mitchell (Justine Serling) is a lonely, somewhat creepy guy, whom bored with his dreary life decides to go to a masseuse named Barbara (Jenna Jameson). He starts spending more and more time with her, becoming more and more obsessed, not caring that his co-worker (Maya Divine) is attracted to him.This is a remake of Paul Thomas's own 1990 original and I just have to say even though I do like the original version, I enjoyed this remake a bit more. Furthermore, I've never been one for more than light bondage, but seeing Jenna tied up like that was really hot. But when the action isn't focused on Jenna and Justin, the film tends to falter a bit.

My Porn Grade: B+
16 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A great reminder of how hot Jenna was then... not a bad movie either!
fergarza7117 January 2008
Seeing Jenna and her body and mind decline today, could really make you think that it's not the same woman in this video... since she is smokin' hot in this little romp about the life of a lonely guy and the masseuse girl that gets into his fantasies. As somebody who has seen the rise and decline of the XXX rated film as a whole, it's nice to have something that at least pretends to have a story and characters, although somewhat unbelievable (not the situation) since the acting is a little subpar on the side of Justin Long, who pretends to be a lonely inexperienced guy with 'um..' kind of curious ticks. The story is good, but it plays too much, too fast... I would have liked the relationship to be a little more forced, and not slide all the way like it plays, since Jenna plays a go get it! kind of person that at least would have to be a little scared of the fantasies or things that would await her in the end... it's too easy, but in the end what would you expect of a XXX movie nowadays. But anyway, the sex scenes are hot and Jenna is up to her standards, and do not disappoint.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
So so but enjoyable
lorenamerino20 November 2006
Warning: Spoilers
I really liked this movie, its the the best of Jenna but really enjoyed it, her performance is very good and also Justin Sterling's. The sex is very good , hell yeah, although there wasn't many different posses and all that it was OK. The storyline was actually quiet good and different. Jenna looks very very pretty in this movie and i could tell it was a kinda new movie because of she looks older but still so hot. Justin plays a geek that fells in love with Jenna . The end was kinda sad though. I enjoyed very much the other actresses's solo very nice. and I swear if i were a lesbian i could for sure would like a peace of Jenna she's so hot she was the perfect body and i think Justin is so lucky
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Queen of Porn Finally Lives Up to Her Reputation
Nodriesrespect11 July 2008
Warning: Spoilers
Perhaps mirroring to some extent the creative drought plaguing mainstream Hollywood, the adult industry has seemingly sought to remake several of its greatest classics of late. Paradoxically to what you might expect, their attempts thus far have proved considerably more successful, possibly due to the key involvement of talented thespian turned fornication filmmaker Paul Thomas who has crafted perfectly honorable recreations of DEBBIE DOES DALLAS, DEVIL IN MISS JONES and now his own MASSEUSE. The original, one of the few ambitious projects coming into fruition circa the otherwise artistically barren year of 1990, proved a daring experiment at the time and as such certainly didn't please everyone. Basically a single sex scene evolving over the course of an entire movie, charting the growing attraction between 28-year old male virgin Randy Spears and the down-market masseuse he frequents, a career performance by legendary Hyapatia Lee, the film narrowed its focus to an almost minimalistic degree by including non-sex supporting characters for narrative purposes only. While this approach brought plaudits from fans worn down by formula, to a great many other it just wasn't porn anymore.

Tellingly, for his revised version, PT has "opened up" the condensed source material, retaining the original Mark Haggard screenplay almost in its entirety – with additional scenes courtesy of talented scribe Dean Nash who wrote the instant classics BAD WIVES and FADE TO BLACK for the same director – but allowing his characters to "see other people" as it were. Resulting on one hand in a more conventional carnal cinema format, the expanded script still succeeds in shifting nuance so it doesn't feel at all like a "dumbed down" rendition of a daring original. The basic situation stays the same. Lonely male virgin Jim (Justin Sterling), stuck in a dead end office job and – sign of the times ! – addicted to Internet porn, goes to visit a massage parlor in the seedier side of town. He's welcomed by sympathetic receptionist Tina Tyler, in a characteristically terrific turn, who casually informs him of all the possibilities and their prices before he settles on Barbara (Jenna Jameson) who just happens to be free. A match made in Heaven, or maybe it's the other place, as it turns out and the two of them get to know one another over a series of encounters, Barbara bending her no touching policy to include manual then oral relief and accepting Jim's invitation to visit him at home. As in the original, he has a considerable collection of S&M paraphernalia but while this initially scared off his reluctant lady love, this time she embraces it wholeheartedly. This provides the breaking point between both movies, where the remake diverges dramatically and takes on an identity of its own. While Barbara's intentions were primarily monetary yet basically benign in the original, her motivations prove far more sinister and harder to fathom on this occasion. Ironically, Vivid – the company producing and distributing the movie – commissioned this "update" for its extremely bankable contract star Jenna and her heavily publicized real life paramour Justin. Thomas tweaks the narrative to such an extent that Barbara might be viewed as its villain, milking Jim's dependence for all it's worth, having him wait by the phone for calls that never come. He also offers a clever twist on the presence of a baby in her "private" life, which seemed like a flubbed scene at first ("revealing" the bundled up tot as a toy doll) but presumably was no such thing. Think about it…

A potentially "superfluous" subplot has office co-worker Wendy – formerly Maya – Divine (who took center stage in Michael Raven's endearing WOMEN ON TOP) coming on to an increasingly distant Jim with buddy Evan Stone (about a million miles removed from his Fabio brooding hunk turn in Veronica Hart's superlative TAKEN) stepping in to literally fill the void ! An obvious side effect of the whole "opening up", this temporary distraction from the central coupling could have been disastrous if both parts hadn't been played this beguiling so there's an albeit minor audience investment in wanting to see these two get together as well. Savanna Samson, the impressive "new" Miss Jones, is wasted dramatically though put to good use sexually as Barbara's friend and colleague hired to "put on a show" for our out of his league anti-hero. Interestingly, Thomas has spun a few downright subversive variations on the film's central coupling while still delivering the tabloid-inspired star vehicle Vivid was clamoring for, making its more "conventional" appearance merely skin deep. While neither Jenna nor Justin possesses the versatility of their illustrious predecessors, both fit the bill visually (Sterling making for a more convincing nerd than matinée idol handsome Spears) and show a good grasp of character that outdoes most of their previous work. It goes without saying that they have incredible chemistry, perhaps even a little too strong at the outset when they're supposed to be perfect strangers feeling each outer out but, hey, these things happen, I suppose.

Both a wise and cost-effective decision on the director's part was to recycle Michaelangelo's absolutely haunting soundtrack from the original lock, stock 'n' barrel. A gifted singer/composer himself (he played Peter in Norman Jewison's film version of Jesus Christ SUPERSTAR and wrote several memorable songs for adult movies including Bob Chinn's LET'S GET PHYSICAL and Jeff Fairbanks' FANTASYWORLD), PT knows the importance of good – as in appropriate – music to underscore sex scenes, an art he delivers a virtual textbook example of on this occasion as in the movie it reflects and ever so subtly distorts.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Jenna Jamison still rocks as evidence in the Masseuse
MovieCriticMarvelfan11 October 2004
Its official Jenna Jamison is now one of the most famous and profitable porn stars ever, as is the case over the past dozen years, she has really skyrocked to the top.

She is now trying to go into mainstream movies with parts in Private Parts, SamHain and now this flick "The Masseuse".

True this is story a xxx flick but its not a standard porn video in that Jenna hardly does any sex scenes for the first forty five minutes, no she acts in the movie.

Jenna is now making thousands of doing "scenes" in her new films, so its obvious she control and do what she wants to do.

She plays the part of a sexy masseuse, who becomes involved with a guy who might into some of criminal activity.

As always Vivid knows how to deliver high quality adult entertainment, the industry has been thriving for them, although much of their rentals come from dead couples who cant consummate their love. lol

Jenna and friends are as always great as ever and in the second half she eventually gives us what we want to see in Jenna.
12 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A well-oiled, pornographic gem
StevePulaski26 July 2015
The sadness that lingers over the leading male character like a dark cloud in Paul Thomas's The Masseuse is what sets apart most contemporary pornographic films from being plastic (figuratively and literally) products of a large industry. A remake of the low-key 1990 film of the same name (also directed by Thomas), this remake concerns Barbara (Jenna Jameson), a gorgeous blonde masseuse who strikes up a sexual relationship with Jim (Justin Sterling), a middle-aged virgin who begins frequenting the massage parlor. Jim immediately takes a liking to Barbara's soft touch, relaxing voice, and radiant beauty, requesting sexual favors that result in hefty monetary compensation.

Eventually, their relationship spices up a bit, with Barbara coming over to Jim's house to indulge in his shed of sex toys, whips, paddles, chains, and trinkets. Contrary to romantic (and perhaps pornographic) convention, love isn't in the air on Barbara's end. Whenever Jim tries to further the relationship past casual, compensated sex, Barbara pushes away, claiming things will get "too complicated" and reaffirming her love for keeping things simple and easy to manage.

So much of The Masseuse is heartbreaking as it is arousing. Consider the scene when Jim and Barbara are trying to negotiate a price for the night's escapades. Barbara starts at $200. "That doesn't leave me much for the week," Jim feebly replies, "how about $150?," he counters, to which she accepts. This is a sad scene, even if it doesn't come off like that, and not in a pathetic way. The fact that Jim is about ready to give up his weekly income on a woman who (a) doesn't love him and (b) doesn't really care about his personal life shows his desperation for some level of human companionship and compassion. Jim's entire life has ostensibly been about playing safe and anticipating results over process. Barbara is the first thing in his life that adds unpredictability and attention to interrupt the banal doings of his every day busy work.

The loneliness writers Dean Nash and Mark Haggard profile in The Masseuse is one even the most independent films have a hard time adequately portraying, and they do it with great pacing and situational drama. Jameson and Sterling also spark terrific chemistry, sexual and conversational, especially Sterling as an actor, who's stammer and weak voice comes through to say more about his character than he could ever effectively say himself.

The Masseuse, however, works just fine as a pornographic film; its sex scenes are erotic and methodical, taking their time to build to a rewarding and satisfying climax. Jameson's beauty and energy compliments many of the scenes, and the way both her and Sterling exercise mannered patience with the escalation of their sex makes the film that much more charming and worthy of recognition. Nothing is rushed, nothing is unclear, and the videography is pristine.

Not since the original Taboo did I find myself anticipating the actual dialog scenes more than the sex scenes in a pornographic film but The Masseuse is a film with brain and a personality to add to its explicit sex. It also features one of the first lesbian scenes I actually found myself enjoying on a sexual level, rather than just being bored and disinterested throughout the entire time. Much like Taboo in a narrative sense, if one truly mustered the motivation and maturity to watch the film, they could enjoy it as a film in addition to an arousing piece of art.

Starring: Jenna Jameson and Justin Sterling. Directed by: Paul Thomas.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
# 56 : a great oiled production
lamegabyte4 April 2015
Usually, adult movies are dumb with no acting, no story and poor camera work. Here it's not the case and thus the movie stands out. Jenna's then husband plays a creepy, disturbed man who under a shy shell reveals to be a pure sadistic. Jenna plays a hard working masseuse who indulges into prostitution to realize her dream : adopt a baby. She is as much seduced by the dark side of her strange client as her desire for a sweet romance. So the focus is more on the characters (and they play as well as certain big names…) and the sex scenes aren't rushed. Sure as a Vivid movie, the picture quality is poor with lavished colors and a cheap production but at least, you can be drawn into something else than pink holes ! and it's also interesting for the premonition that Jenna's wedding couldn't go on forever with a husband like this !
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Jenna is great, but what a load of crap
ely-ess-ten22 December 2004
If you ever saw the original The Masseuse, with Hypathia Lee, you pretty much saw this one too. Yes, the cast is different, and the scenes are shot different, but the lines are the same, and therefore, so is the story. Of course, you aren't planning to watch this for the story, are you? I would have rated this DVD higher, except for one issue. There are about 12 advertisements at the start, before you ever get to the DVD menu. You cannot fast forward or skip them. You are forced to wait until they are done playing. They are ads for 900 telephone numbers, other movies, and adult products. Extremely annoying, to say the least. In the future I will not be purchasing any more Vivid productions until after viewing to be sure they don't have similar ads.
11 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
JJ has more to offer
chefredakteur20 May 2005
Jenna Jameson has obviously tried to get involved in the "serious corner" of the porn business - otherwise she wouldn't have agreed to shoot this movie. She looks as good as ever but in my opinion its the guy's fault I dislike the movie. He doesn't try to look fascinated by this woman but seems to be pleased by himself (watch his expression after being shaven). Furthermore the story of adopting a child is inappropriate in a porn movie - people watching this might even think it's an easy and light-minded issue. And if they'd cut it out nobody would have missed it because... well, why do you watch a porn? All in all I'm not giving this movie a good rating because JJ has more ability and skill to show.
4 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Jenna delivers but the writers fail
augustian30 May 2011
Warning: Spoilers
This film is a remake of Paul Thomas' original film which starred Randy Spears and Hyapatia Lee as Jim and Barbara. In this version Jim (Justin Sterling) plays a virginal singleton who falls for local masseuse Barbara (Jenna Jameson). From their initial meeting at the parlour, their relationship grows more intense and bizarre until Barbara has to decide where their relationship is going.

(Spoilers ahead). Unlike the original film which was rather sparse in the hardcore sex department, fans of the hard stuff should have no complaints with this one. The problem for me is in the plot. Somehow, Justin Sterling's Jim does not convince as the sort of man who would find it hard to attract women. As confirmation, his co-worker Amy (Wendy Divine) makes her intentions very explicit but Jim just stands there and does nothing. Another problem is Barbara. Would a woman got to the house of a man she hardly knows and engage in full bondage? On the other hand, people who watch hardcore sex films probably don't watch it for the plot anyway. In any sex film there has to be a lesbian element, and this one is no exception. Barbara's partner is a woman so maybe this is to appeal to the gay faction.

For me, the original is still the better of the two and Hyapatia Lee is simply stunning. Although Paul Thomas has tried to replicate the sophistication of the original, this one is first and foremost hardcore porn so it certainly succeeds on that score.

As a footnote, this review is from the French region 2 DVD which luckily also has English audio. There is also a UK version but strict censorship rules mean that it is cut or panned and scanned of all hardcore clips. However, the final sex scene with Jim and Barbara contains a couple of clips omitted from the DVD reviewed above.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed