Five Little Pigs
- Episode aired Dec 14, 2003
- TV-14
- 1h 33m
IMDb RATING
8.4/10
4.1K
YOUR RATING
Lucy Crale enlists Poirot to investigate the 14-year-old murder in which her mother was hanged for poisoning her artist father.Lucy Crale enlists Poirot to investigate the 14-year-old murder in which her mother was hanged for poisoning her artist father.Lucy Crale enlists Poirot to investigate the 14-year-old murder in which her mother was hanged for poisoning her artist father.
- Director
- Writers
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Storyline
Did you know
- TriviaSecond generation actors Toby Stephens (Philip Blake) and Rachael Stirling's (Caroline Crale) respective mothers Maggie Smith and Diana Rigg starred together in another film based on an Agatha Christie novel: Evil Under the Sun (1982) which preceded this one in the chronological order of publishing.
- GoofsWe see young Amyas painting with his left hand. As an adult, he uses his right hand.
- Quotes
Hercule Poirot: It is surprising, is it not, how soon in life the die is cast.
- ConnectionsReferenced in Agatha Christie: Murder on the Orient Express (2006)
- SoundtracksFirst GNOSSIENNE
by Erik Satie
Featured review
Finally, the Truth Comes
Regular readers of my comments know I have dozens and dozens here that complain about Christie films. Oh, I'll ramble on and on about the nature of detective narrative and how the filmmakers (different each time) always seem to apply formulas in ways that trample on the most fun parts.
What a sourpuss! What a killjoy!
But it all sets the stage for my enthusiasm over this project.
Here's the basic problem set. You must set the track of the story so that facts can be interpreted in different ways, "playing fair" with different outcomes. At the same time, there are important mechanics of narrative which move the viewer into the thing, detecting, writing, conspiring. And then we have the cinematic and theatrical needs. All that stuff about faces and places, character and rhythms, types of rhythms.
We have it all here, thanks to some smart people and the happy structure of the novel, which is a rashoman-like retelling of the same event. Each layer, each visit shows more and we know some versions will be lies.
Yes, I must admit the trick of the overly juggled hand-held camera and washed colors for the "movie within" was a bit amateurish and annoying. But forgivable, especially since this Poirot is so unlike all the other Suchet portrayals. This one is not a prissy joke, but a mind on legs, one that can be patient with a foolish world. Swapping directors around is so interesting because even with the same actor, you get a completely different character.
This one also has a higher level of acting talent than in the series stories.
I've remarked on Julie Cox before. Striking woman, something like an anorexic Polly Walker.
Ted's Evaluation -- 3 of 3: Worth watching.
What a sourpuss! What a killjoy!
But it all sets the stage for my enthusiasm over this project.
Here's the basic problem set. You must set the track of the story so that facts can be interpreted in different ways, "playing fair" with different outcomes. At the same time, there are important mechanics of narrative which move the viewer into the thing, detecting, writing, conspiring. And then we have the cinematic and theatrical needs. All that stuff about faces and places, character and rhythms, types of rhythms.
We have it all here, thanks to some smart people and the happy structure of the novel, which is a rashoman-like retelling of the same event. Each layer, each visit shows more and we know some versions will be lies.
Yes, I must admit the trick of the overly juggled hand-held camera and washed colors for the "movie within" was a bit amateurish and annoying. But forgivable, especially since this Poirot is so unlike all the other Suchet portrayals. This one is not a prissy joke, but a mind on legs, one that can be patient with a foolish world. Swapping directors around is so interesting because even with the same actor, you get a completely different character.
This one also has a higher level of acting talent than in the series stories.
I've remarked on Julie Cox before. Striking woman, something like an anorexic Polly Walker.
Ted's Evaluation -- 3 of 3: Worth watching.
helpful•3112
- tedg
- Jan 9, 2006
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Official sites
- Languages
- Filming locations
- Production companies
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content