Tales of the Gun (1998– ) User Reviews

What a show! Learning stuff CAN be fun!

[ShogaNinja · 10/10 · 11 October 2007]

If you are a history buff, or an imaginary armchair soldier (videogame buff?), or heck even if you used one of these guns in service to your country, this is the show for you. Although it is approaching a decade old, this is one of the more informative shows on firearms. It brings you inside the gun, its history, its effectiveness, and how it changed the world. For authenticity, Historical Weapons Experts give you the details, and even put in a little trigger time. Tales of the Gun exposes aspects and perspectives of the gun and its critical role in history that other shows do not.

Episodes cover such things as Infamous Guns that were used in famous assassinations, Guns of WWII, the M-16,and the Ak-47. If it's a gun, be it historical or futuristic(for 10 years ago anyway), Tales of the Gun knows about it and has an episode all about it.

You can still occasionally catch episodes of Tales of the Gun on the History Channel in the mornings, but such showings are becoming increasingly rare. This series is one of the best that History Channel has to offer, and definitely one of the least known. Check it out!

The only way this show could be better is if they brought it back with R. Lee Ermey from Mail Call (or Hollywood fame, as it were).

Bigger and Better.

[rmax304823 · 6/10 · 30 August 2014]

The episode takes a historical approach, beginning with stone balls shot by the gun of a 15th-century, man-powered ship whose main armament was the ram. It ends with a retired captain of the US Navy, who once commanded a battleship, claiming that battleships are not obsolete, as everyone seems to think, but should be refurbished so that they can discharge their original duties. (I can't believe it either.)

There are a couple of talking heads, none of them boring and all of them informative. We're taken on tours of Horatio Nelson's ship, Victory, now a museum, as well as the USS Texas and the USS North Carolina, moored at Wilmington, North Carolina. When my brother and I stepped into one of the crowded steel turrets of the main battery, we were immediately followed by a dozen noisy Boy Scouts. It is no place for claustrophobics.

It covers several epic naval battles -- the Spanish Armada, Trafalgar, and the Monitor and the Merrimac -- with just the right amount of relevant detail, including a couple of quotes from witness's reports. The focus, of course, is not so much on the ships themselves but on the guns they carried.

The ship I served on carried one five-inch thirty-eight gun. I knew that the "five inches" was the diameter of the bore, but it wasn't until years later that I found out the "thirty-eight" meant that the barrel was 38 times as long as the diameter of the bore.

It was also interesting to learn that there was no need for long barrels on the cannon of sailing ship. The explosive force that propels the shot was expended long before the ball reached the muzzle. An increase in technology made necessary the longer barrels we see on today's ships, because the longer barrels make better use of the more powerful charges.

The narration points out that handling explosives is a dangerous business, even during peacetime. It briefly mentions a 1989 accident, an explosion in one of the forward turrets in which more than forty sailors died. It wasn't the sort of thing you could hush up because it was all over the news. It was quickly blamed by the Naval authorities on one sailor who had a history of homosexuality. There was the pat implication of a jealous intrigue. Finally the truth came out, much later. But social psychology experiments have established the fact that when people hear a lie, they believe it. When they're later debriefed and the lie refuted, after a time they will still remember only the lie.