"Law & Order" Helpless (TV Episode 1992) Poster

(TV Series)

(1992)

User Reviews

Review this title
5 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
The Difference Between God and a Doctor.
rmax30482318 December 2010
Warning: Spoilers
As you probably know, Elizabeth Olivet (Carolyn McCormick) is the in-house shrink for the NYPD. I've never figured out exactly what KIND of shrink but in this episode she's clearly described as a psychologist with a PhD rather than a psychiatrist with an MD. She's pretty much at the center of this story. She visits a gynecologist, a nice slimy performance by Paul Hecht, and in addition to being routinely examined is non-routinely felt up by the doc. "It should feel GOOD," he observes about whatever it is he's doing down there. When Olivet objects he threatens her by bringing up cancer.

Her friends at the precinct, Serett and Logan, feel they can't do much because it's merely her word -- she who works for the police -- against that of a high-status doctor. So Olivet returns for another exam, this time with a hidden tape recorder. But Dr. Croesus is a step ahead of her. With the aid of his nurse, he injects her with a disabling tranquilizer instead of lydocaine and indisputably rapes her, muttering insults into the recorder.

Prosecutors Stone and Robinet win the case but the judge nullifies the jury's decision, arguing that they were inflamed by prejudice and some gruesome pictures of bruises. He dismisses the case.

What to do? And this is where it helps to be creatively manipulative. The bad doctor likes to brag about his misdeeds. He wears this smile of self satisfaction as he lies to everyone, knowing that he's getting away with Assault With A Friendly Weapon. A bitter Olivet tells Stone that this is part of the doc's enjoyment, that his crimes represent conquests and he's proud of them. The victims usually blame themselves and are too ashamed to come forward with complaints.

Stone is stricken with an idea. He re-indicts the doc -- or whatever the legalese is -- and makes sure the press knows about it. The case is all over the evening news, with the doc smiling into the camera and explaining that he's never done anything unethical in his life and, if necessary, he can bring in his Mama to testify that he was always a good boy.

As in a Shakespearean play, his vanity and superiority undo him. Having heard him boasting on the telly, fifty-two of his victims come forward to testify, hitherto silent out of shame. Doctor Hecht is headed towards a place where a urologist would feel more at home than an OB-GYN man.

I kind of enjoyed it. As usual, the performances are fine and the legal and ethical questions provocative. Exactly what, for instance, is "entrapment"? And as usual the episode really rather leaves the questions hanging without answer.
12 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Confronting
safenoe15 September 2023
Warning: Spoilers
Carolyn McCormick received opening credit status as Dr. Elizabeth Olivet, probably maybe the only time this has happened in the history of Law and Order. This episode, Helpless, is very uncomfortable viewing, and was quite awhile before the hashtag me 2 movement. The scenes with the creepy and sleazy male gynecologists was quite confronting and really made one squirm for sure.

This episode must have inspired Law and Order: SVU, and one of the few times a trial judge set aside the jury's decision, which is very controversial for sure. This isn't the usual Law and Order episode, and it is confronting.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Bearing witness
TheLittleSongbird24 June 2020
The previous Season 3 episodes of 'Law and Order' were of a very promising standard. Was a little disappointed by the opener "Skin Deep", but all five of the previous episodes of the season were good to brilliant. "The Corporate Veil" and "Wedded Bliss" were particularly good and as good as Seasons 1 and 2 at their best, which is a big compliment to give as they were solid seasons too and their best episodes were outstanding in either almost every or absolutely every category.

Outstanding Season 3's sixth episode "Helpless" falls short of being. It is definitely worth watching and interesting still and has a lot to recommend, all the episodes of Season 3 and of the previous two episodes do and that continued all the way throughout the show's run. For me though, "Helpless" is a lesser episode of Season 3, as well as of the early seasons and a contender for the weakest up to this still relatively early stage. Just felt that it could have handled its subject more tactfully. Very disappointing considering that it followed on from a season high-point.

"Helpless" looks typically slick, it is not an audacious episode perhaps but it's well made and the quality continues to improve. The music is used appropriately and didn't come over as overbearing, while the direction has force but not heavy-handedness. Can't fault the acting, which is very good. Especially from movingly vulnerable Carolyn McCormick and chillingly vile Paul Hecht who really does give the chills.

Michael Moriarty gives his usual fine performance and has great chemistry with also solid Richard Brooks. The legal parts of the story are compelling and quite creative, that rise "Helpless" from being potentially lacklustre to above average. Schiff's description of the judge is one of my favourite character moments of his. The writing in the legal scenes is thought provoking.

On the other hand, the first half for my tastes was a little on the dull and routine side. It's also, and actually this applies for the episode in general, pretty contrivance-heavy.

Particularly hard to swallow was Olivet's extreme unprofessionalism, even for a rape victim. The subject is a harrowing and important one to address could generally have been handled with more tact and taste, the sleaziness for my tastes went overboard.

Bottom line, "Helpless" is an above average episode but considering the high standard of the show at this point it could have been better. 6/10
8 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
A gynecologist's jollies
bkoganbing11 January 2018
One of the slimier perpetrators that Law And Order ever dealt with his Paul Hecht playing a gynecologist who gets more than intimately acquainted with his female patients. One of them confided to police consultant Dr. Elizabeth Olivet who persuades her to make a report. When that doesn't get any action Carolyn McCormick goes into Hecht's office and is given a paralytic drug and is raped.

Still as someone who works for law enforcement she gets accused of entrapment. I kind of thought they were really being hypertechnical here. Hecht needs all the help he can get, good thing he has Danielle Melnyk working on his behalf. As Law And Order's number one feminist defense attorney her presence alone as Hecht's lawyer is a help.

Without telling the outcome you will see Michael Moriarty and Richard Brooks go an extra two miles to see justice done. And Carolyn McCormick has never been so vulnerable and so human.
11 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Ick
Better_TV2 April 2018
While this episode arguably feels more personal due to the crimes being perpetrated on a member of the cast - in this case Carolyn McCormick as Dr. Elizabeth Olivet - it still reeks of plot contrivances and exploitative storytelling.

This is not Law & Order at its most classy or compelling. Rather, it feels schlocky and scummy, like any other bad procedural; the moment when Olivet willingly goes back to the sadistic OB-GYN's office, knowing that he is going to rape her, is sickening. She records this encounter and it's later used in court as part of the episode's examination of what does or doesn't constitute entrapment.

Those of a certain political bent would likely be outraged if this episode was produced today, and they might be inclined to use that nebulous and increasingly common label of "problematic." But I think that regardless of political persuasion, there's an argument here that this episode is simply slimy in its treatment of rape and contrived in its plotting.

There are, admittedly, some creative choices made by the DA's office towards the end of the episode to finally bring the bad guy to justice by preying on Dr. Merritt's ego (he's played wickedly, yet hammily, by actor Paul Hecht). I loved Schiff's description of the judge: "The Honorable Keith Silver. Wrote the book on the rights of the accused. He thinks Miranda is 5 pages too short." And the portrayal of the doctor's other victims being shamed into silence does carry some weight. But the first half of the episode tainted it for me, and there are more creative "order" segments in other episodes.

Additionally, most episodes of Law & Order move at a roadrunner's pace; I knew something was off when this one spent an unusual amount of time lingering on the graphic rapes (2 of them) from Olivet's perspective. It was clearly done to give our male lawfighters more motivation to pursue the villainous doc later on, but whether or not that outweighs some of the questionable creative decisions here will have to be up to the viewer to decide. In my opinion, Law & Order can (and did) do so much better than this.
9 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed