The Secret of Moonacre (2008) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
40 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
A lovely fantasy adventure film.
Shopaholic353 March 2014
The Secret of Moonacre is a beautifully constructed fantasy adventure film. I would describe it as rather charming with a sense of childlike playfulness. While it may not be made on a very big budget, they make do with what they have. The sets are interesting, the costumes are beautiful and there is a decent amount of shiny pretty special effects.

While it may not be fast-paced it does continue on at a steady pace with a lovely storyline. It may seem similar to other fairy tales but the execution is what makes this movie special. Try to enjoy this one for what it is. It doesn't proclaim to offer you anything more than a lovely little movie set in a fantasy land and that is what it delivers.
14 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Poor in terms of story
neil-4769 February 2009
Warning: Spoilers
Imagine, if you will, the Story Warehouse. This is where storytellers collect the various bits and pieces which they then assemble into stories. We go past the Romance and Horror sections and arrive at Magic, where we find the shelves fairly empty. Some items are always in stock - you can always pick up Orphaned Child Sent To Live In Run-Down Old House Where Strange Things Happen With No Explanation, for instance, and there's never any shortage of Slightly Sinister Patriarch Figure Who Flies Into Rage For No Good Reason And Won't Answer Questions, or Quirky Manservant With Fantastic Abilities (I'll take two, please). The Magic Lions section was pretty much cleaned out by CS Lewis for the Narnia stories, of course, although it appears that he didn't have much call for Magic Lion (Black Fur) or Magic Lion (Disguised As Big Dog).

And that is the problem with The Secret Of Moonacre - the story has a strong feeling of having been cobbled together from bits and pieces, and those bits and pieces are either overly familiar - Ioan Gruffud's mysterious bad-tempered uncle is no stranger - or else simply not very good (clearly a great deal was left on the Moon shelves - we have Moon Pearls, Moon Princesses, Moonacre itself, the Moon coming down to destroy everything). Much which needs explaining is never explained, and the bits of the story simply don't fit very well together. It's as if by combining the legs from a flat-pack table and the carcase from a flat-pack kitchen unit you can make a sideboard. Well, yes, but I don't think I'd want it in my living room.

And this is a shame, because the look of the film is fine, as is Dakota Blue Richards. Gruffud and Tim Curry both deliver their cliché characters perfectly adequately, Juliet Stephenson is given a comedy nanny to play with rather uncomfortably, and Natasha McElhone looks wonderful and acts, at times, embarrassingly badly (she delivers a curse with a complete absence of menace, for instance. Clearly, cheekbones on their own are not enough).

I sometimes wonder why film producers still don't seem to understand that a solid story and script is the starting point for a successful movie.
47 out of 64 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A good fantasy tale, but could have been far better
GirishGowda28 July 2010
Warning: Spoilers
For me, it is very hard to pass up a fantasy film. And when I had the chance to see this, I didn't think twice. I thought the movie would be in the same league as Harry Potter or Chronicles of Narnia series, but it falls short. The way the film is executed makes it seem quite silly. Based on the novel 'The Little White Horse' (which I hear is good) by Elizabeth Goudge, the film tells the tale of two ancient powerful families who fall out with one other. The Moon Princess is believed to bring them together, or else, predictably, the world will end. The movie is partly adventurous and partly funny. The funny moments are never funny for the adults, but the children will really enjoy the movie. It has underlying themes like pride, the power of love and honesty. Dakota Richards makes you like the movie because she seems so immersed in her character. Natascha McElhone, Tim Curry and Ioan Gruffudd never come off as authentic and it hurts the movie. They all have a very short fuse and could blow off like a six year old kid if they are pushed too much.

An orphan girl, thirteen year old Marla Merryweather (Dakota Blue Richards) inherits nothing but a book of family secrets, 'The Ancient Chronicles Of Moonacre Valley', from her dead father. Without a proper home, she has no choice, but to move in with her grumpy uncle, Sir Benjamin Merryweather (Ioan Gruffudd) at Moonacre Manor along with her nanny, Miss Heliotrope (Juliet Stevenson). The book that her father left her tells her of an ancient curse placed upon her family. The daughter of Coeur De Noir (Tim Curry), Loveday (Natascha McElhone) is the Moon Princess and she has been gifted magical pearls which will give the power enormous power to control everything. Sir Merryweather and Loveday are in love and are about to be married. On the day of the marriage, the pearls have their effect on Sir Merryweather and Coeur De Noir and they show their true colours. Loveday runs away with the pearls and goes into hiding. But Coeur and Sir Merryweather think that the pearls are with the other one and they are bitter about it. Loveday has lost her powers and Maria is the apparent heir to the Moon Princess title and she has to save them all before the ascension of the moon for the 500th time.

While the story seems to be fascinating, director Gabor Csupo, who was also responsible for the wonderful 'The Bridge To Terabithia', cannot really get the magic working here. Dakota Richards as Maria comes across as a cross between shy and adamant, without being able to really establish her true nature. Tim Curry who is quite popular in these kinds of films doesn't really have much to do in this film. He is supposed to be sinister and menacing, instead he is an idiot. Ioan is a troubled man who doesn't stick to his decisions and keeps acting like a baby, as does Natascha's character. The costumes, sets are authentic and the special effects, which is the most important requirement in fantasy films are good enough not to appear fake or over the top. There are unicorns and black lions which will give you a sense of wonder. Not a bad watch as long as you don't think more than a 12 year old kid would.

6/10
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
World premiere today!
suthedit6 September 2008
Warning: Spoilers
I just saw the world premiere of Moonacre at the Toronto International Film Festival. Gabor Czupo (the director) was there, as well as Dakota Blue Richards and Augustus Prew.

The film was beautiful to watch--the sets were gorgeous and the scenery magical. The huge menacing moon bearing down on Moonacre was an amazing effect. Maria's outfits were worth watching just on their own!

There are many changes from the book (The Little White Horse by Elizabeth Goudge). I thought the ending they invented was a lot more effective than the ending in the book. However, I was very disappointed with how they changed Robin's character, and cut way back on Maria and Robin's partnership and completed eliminated their romance. Many subsidiary characters were eliminated as well.

Miss Heliotrope provides most of the humour in the film--and Juliet Stevenson has great comedic timing. Tim Curry is just a caricature as Cocq de Noir. Dakota shows lots of spunk and determination and the final underwater scene is very powerful. In a couple of her outfits they let her show some cleavage, which surprised me a bit. But the director didn't allow any sparks to fly between her and Robin (Prew).

Children and young teens should enjoy the movie. There's no swearing and the violence is only mildly scary.
18 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Ioan Gruffudd plus a happy ending
movieo2 September 2014
Warning: Spoilers
I watched this because Ioan Gruffudd is one of the actors. This character can't compare with his role as Horatio Hornblower, but he probably had a lot less to work with, script-wise, with this movie. I would have liked to have known why his character didn't seem to believe in the whole pearl story. Why did he hide the book if he didn't believe? If he did believe, why hadn't he been working to help break the curse, or why didn't he help Maria to do so?

Maria's nanny was supposed to be funny, but she was a little too bumbling for my taste. The men in black would definitely be scary for children, so I personally wouldn't let children watch this movie. The lion reminded me of Aslan, which is a good association.

Spoiler alert: I'm not exactly sure why Maria was willing to sacrifice her life at the end. It was noble, but I'm not sure they convinced me that she was invested enough in the whole thing to be willing to sacrifice her life.

I gave this movie a seven, despite some misgivings, because of Ioan, because it was a pretty clean movie, and because it had a happy ending. Themes of sacrifice and the need for humility fit well with what the Bible teaches about Jesus Christ, so that was also a plus.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Thoroughly enjoyable, for adults too (just about)
echai18 June 2009
I have to agree with all the other reviewers here - some very good reviews except for the two who went to premier and seem to have left them starstruck (moonstruck?) and ebullient about the use!! of!! exclamation marks!!!

In some ways, like CS Lewis and JK Rowling the narrative in the book (which I only know the story from the film) does seem to have a particular patchwork quality, many elements from old fabrics sewn together. Of course this is how stories have always been written not to mention the inherent structure needed for a story to be successful, a structure that has existed since language. So some of it seemed a bit old but that's what you need to sell something to a sometimes fickle audience. It was so great looking however that it almost made up for it. The sixth star of this review is for costumes, the seventh for set pieces so it's a 5 star really. The metalwork was particularly ornate.

The performances were all pretty much architypical regarding the actors previous casting, though it was interesting seeing good old Gruffudd getting grumpy again. It's true that Curry had little screen time though he was very antagonistic - but soon calmed down at the end (it is a children's film after all). The chef and the nanny were great and I liked the young guy who played Robin.

The animals (magic ones) were present as always, the obligatory unicorn and the lion from CS Lewis - though this lion was cooler that Aslan, he was BLACK. Having never seen or thought about a black lion before, this is now my favorite animal. Apart from bunnies. And I'm sure he could have kicked Aslan's ass (I've never been keen on CS Lewis and his stories have always annoyed me since I was a child but hey, we gotta live with them cos he was Tolkein's mate and he was well connected to get his rubbish printed and because of its popularity many people think it's actually good).

Sorry, rant over.

So it you're a parent - definitely get this for your children, you'll probably be able to bare watching it over again unlike horrific Di$ney films &c. If you're and adult ans you liked Stardust and Compass, you'll probably like this too, though it's not quite as good though it's better than Terabithia, which is just a children's film really.

I'm glad the fantasy films are back, there was a real dry patch in the nineties. But the key question is - WHEN is someone going to make a proper film of The Wizard of Earthsea? (I know there is a Canadian TV movie - it's awful - and the Ghibli film 'Tales From Earthsea', but it's not a proper telling of any of the books and it's directed by Goro and not Hayao Miyazaki so it's not even that good. Ah well. Read that Wizard of Earthsea if you've not, it's pretty much the foundation for Harry Potter and maybe Pullman's books as well though I'm not sure. Wizard of Earthsea is the greatest magus-topic novel I've come across because it's authentic. The thing is the mass will always desire the crass... *sigh*
6 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A few things good, a few things bad.
eon_rain21 July 2009
Warning: Spoilers
The set, and the props, the clothing, they were very well done for this movie. I loved watching some of the beautiful scenery such as the forest...and watching the unique clothes flow. However the only thing that I really didn't like about this movie was the acting and a little on the weak story. I think that Natascha McElhone, made a horrible effort on her part when acting the moon princess at the wedding, when she told them of the curse. It seemed completely off, her voice, even her emotion.

But think about it, this is a movie for children, not for adults! Reviews and comments from adults saying how horrible the movie was to them shouldn't really mean all that much, considering the target audience.

Girls love unicorns, boys love strong lions, all of these aspects were taken care of, and gives the child imagination & adventure. This movie is good for children.

All in all, this movie kept my attention the entire way through, even if there was a few flaws. But for a kids movie, they have done very well.
4 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Awful - Very bad acting, poor plot, too long, cheap special effects.
j_swingler9 February 2009
Warning: Spoilers
We'd read reviews on here and so thought that our six year olds demands to see it were a good idea. Firstly, the film takes a long time to get going. When it does there is some really wooden acting going on - enough to make Roger Moore look deep and meaningful in comparison.

Teenager Dakota Blue Richards gives a great performance which is more than can be said for many of her adult colleagues. It feels that many of them give up before the film is half way through.

Every so often something happens that makes you feel that this could have been a good movie. But this is a long way from being Stardust and similar fantasy films. Very third rate special effects, a plot you just don't care about and it simply goes on for far too long.

Our two eager six year olds seemed to quite like it. Emphasis on the "quite" though. It had all the right ingredients - a princess, a unicorn, baddies etc. If we hadn't bought an insane amount of pop corn and sweets I think the reaction might have been very different though. We really thought this film would be something great. Instead it'll end up being a very cheap DVD by the end of the year.
28 out of 50 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Well worth watching for the costumes and the sets!
TheLittleSongbird21 May 2009
First of all, I am 17 and I absolutely love the book "The Little White Horse" by Elizabeth Goudge, with its beautiful imagery, memorable characters and above all its magical story, and I do agree the book is better than the film in many ways. In fact, the Little White Horse is probably my favourite book of all time. I think the film Secret of Moonacre is a beautiful film, that unfortunately is undermined by one or two problems with the story, and doesn't quite capture the magic of the book.

The film looks absolutely exquisite, with those gorgeous costumes and the lovely sets with the huge menacing moon. The music by Christian Henson is gorgeous and very fitting with the scenery. Gabor Csupo, the director of Bridge of Tarabithia, which is admittedly better, obviously has an eye for art, as he used to be an animator. Other directors that have directed visually stunning fantasy films are Ridley Scott with Legend and Guillermo Del Torro with Pan's Labyrinth.(which is the best foreign language film I have ever seen) Whoever trained the animals, must be told he/she did a truly remarkable job.

The acting is very good, an obvious standout is Dakota Blue Richards of Golden Compass fame in a strong central performance as the protagonist Maria Merryweather. Juliet Stevenson and Andy Linden provide the comedy, with the jokes about indigestion, and whizzing quickly around the kitchen. Tim Curry brings a touch of melancholy to an otherwise menacing and complex character, and it made a difference after seeing Curry in over the top roles such as FrankNFurter and Wadsworth. Though, if anything, I wish Curry had more screen time. Natasha McElhone looked lovely as Loveday, with a lovely face that sometimes defies her when she is cursing for instance. Though I will confess I wasn't entirely convinced by Ioan Gruffodd as Sir Benjamin. In the book Sir Benjamin is fat with three chins, which is a far cry from the gorgeous Gruffodd. I am not saying he was bad, he wasn't. He was very brooding at times, but other times when he looked uncomfortable. That I can understand, because since I have participated in operas with similar costumes,(like the Magic Flute) I do know from experience they can be very uncomfortable to wear.

The story I do agree takes a while to get going, but the book takes one or two chapters to explain the story, which isn't a problem as it is called character development. The basics are all there, the Moon Princess, the pearls and the battle of good and evil, but a lot was changed from the book, and one or two of the characters were changed, and others like Old Parson were left out entirely. I was prepared for a lot of changes when I saw this film (they do it all the time), and although I was fine with most of them, I was annoyed that Maria and Robin's relationship from the book was virtually eliminated, as that was one of the book's main merits. The ending was a bit rushed, I am putting a huge emphasis on the bit, but I liked the underwater sequence very much.

All in all, a flawed but hugely enjoyable film (not the best fantasy I have ever seen but a solid attempt) that is well worth watching for the visuals. 8/10 Bethany Cox
56 out of 66 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
one of the better films about children's books
davidurieli-130 September 2009
Warning: Spoilers
This is a very uneven film however there is a huge amount to redeem it. The scenery wavers between beautiful and ravishing, the props and costumes are gorgeous and mostly appropriate although I would have sacrificed the darkness of the Noir side to give them a bit more class and style even if it was in black. The acting by the two main characters is really very good and the story is one the whole fairly charmingly adapted to the screen (something more or less impossible for really good literature of which the book is an example). There are many criticisms. The plot is partly made up and partly scrambled. Some of the effects are very poor. The acting of some parts is wooden at best The dialogue is often awful, and the loss of the vicar along with Robin in his real role is a missed opportunity. I hated Robin's costume which was far too reminiscent of clockwork orange. But still, a very nice evening out.
1 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Feels like a book that is desperately trying to be a movie
Sweetigal8525 June 2018
Warning: Spoilers
I saw this movie in the children and family section and went for it anyway since I love Tim Curry and I LOVE fantasy movies. I found that this movie was just too childish for me which is shocking because I am a huge Disney fan, love watching old Nickelodeon shows, etc.

Many plots and characters seemed like they were better suited for the book and did not transfer well to the screen. I honestly kept falling asleep multiple times and attempting to re-watch it and I am NOT the type of person who usually falls asleep during movies.

It felt like it took forever for anything to happen and when it did, it was just kind of boring and confusing. I enjoyed Miss Heliotrope's relationship with the main character but she did not appear to add anything at all to the story and I was flabbergasted that she kept belching loudly and randomly throughout the film. Though I suppose children would have found that hysterical.

Tim Curry definitely should have been used more and Gruffadd used much less. I personally cannot stand the latter and I wish I would have seen he was in it before I picked it. His acting has definitely improved a bit though with his age.

I found the steam punk ruffians to be nothing but laughable, not sure what they were going for with them lol.

I enjoyed the attitude of the main character as well her costumes and the scenery. I would definitely recommend this movie for children, tweens and teens. Adults may find it a little lackluster.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A great and underrated children's film
anniestormbornw17 May 2015
While the plot is a bit confusing, the entire film is beautiful in its aesthetics and has a strong message for girls to take control of their own life and fight for themselves. Dakota Blue Richards is absolutely brilliant in her 2nd major film role and Tim Curry and Ioan Gruffudd add to the magic. Harry Potter fans may see some familiar imagery, for the novel it was based on "The Little White Horse" was a favorite of J.K. Rowling when she was a child. This film deserves much more attention and has much more depth than any of the flashy CGI effects shows at the theaters today.

Read my full review: http://kingdomofcult.blogspot.com/2015/05/cult- movie-of-may-17th-secret-of.html
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
With its impressive technical aspects and captivating performances, it is a film that can be enjoyed by the whole family and that deserves more recognition
fernandoschiavi6 October 2023
"The Secret of Moonacre" fits into a certain breed of children's films set in the imaginary glow of Victorian or Edwardian England - see films like "Mary Poppins (1964)", "Chitty Chitty Bang Bang (1968)", "The Wolves of Willoughby Chase (1989)", "The Secret Garden (1993)", "Little Princess (1995)", "Peter Pan (2003)" and "The Chronicles of Narnia: The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe (2005)". It's a setting that seems to have an undeniable purity - where childhood is part of an undeniable class configuration, where parents exercise benevolent authority rather than being seen as silly subjects, where fantasy is untainted by modern pop culture and cynicism, and where the appearance of the magician holds something incredible that transforms the formality and rigidity of society with childish joy.

In the plot, after the death of her father, a 13-year-old girl, Maria Merryweather (Dakota Blue Richards), is shocked to discover that all his money has been consumed by debt. Maria and her guardian, Miss Heliotrope (Juliet Stevenson), are forced to leave their home and seek refuge with Maria's uncle, Sir Benjamin (Ioan Gruffudd), who lives on the forbidding Moonacre estate. All that's left for Maria is In His Father's Will is a picture book that tells the story of the Merryweather family and their rivals, the De Noirs. From the De Noirs came the Moon Princess, who was loved by nature. She had received a set of pearls that showed the truth in people's hearts. She was supposed to marry Sir Wrolf Merryweather, but the two families came into conflict, each wanting to use the pearls for their own purposes. Then, the Moon Princess placed a curse on both families that would last for the next 5000 moons.

When they arrive at the Valley of the Moon, Sir Benjamin appears rude and brusque, including confiscating the book, much to Maria's displeasure. The girl soon finds mysterious things happening on the property - delicious meals are left for her, despite there being no cooks or servants; the fierce dog Wrolf becomes her protector; and a mysterious white horse can be seen on the grounds. Sir. Benjamin gives stern warnings that Maria never enters the forest, but when she disobeys him, she finds herself threatened and later kidnapped by the De Noirs. With the help of the hermit Loveday (Natascha McElhone), Maria begins to discover a series of clues, which show that Maria is the incarnation of the Moon Princess, who returned after 5000 moons to find the secret hiding place of the pearls and unite the two families and free them from their centuries-old curse.

The problem that Gabor Csupo ran into in "Bridge to Terabithia" was being caught between conflicting sets of influences, each of which was pulling the film in a different direction. There was Disney, who clearly wanted to turn it into another version of "The Lord of the Rings" or "The Chronicles of Narnia," which required the addition of creature effects in the forest, even though "Terabithia" wasn't a movie from the epic fantasy type and could easily function without them. On the other hand, Walden Media, supported by Christian groups, seemed to want to use the film to promote the Gospel message. In the middle of it all was Csupo, who seemed to want to make a children's film grounded in an unsentimental reality and say something about how children deal with tragedy. Understandably, caught between these influences, "Bridge to Terabithia" ended up becoming confusing, even though it is an exciting film that is worth checking out.

The good news is that "The Secret of Moonacre" is a substantial improvement over "Bridge to Terabithia." The director presents his fantasy with almost impeccable respect. He goes to exceptional lengths to establish the forbidden world of the estate into which young Maria is thrown, and then enriches it with magical touches - the discovery of a kitchen-garden inhabited by a strange gnome who may have magical powers; the dog with glowing red eyes who momentarily appears to be the black lion from the book when seen in the mirror; the appearance of a unicorn. The most magical image is the one that occurs at the end (which was certainly conceived as a live-action-CGI version of the climax of "The Last Unicorn (1982)" or perhaps the scene in "The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring" (2001) at the Ford of Bruinen) - where Dakota Blue Richards dives into the ocean with the pearls and then her body is lifted by the waves that transform into white horses that carry her before dissolving into foam when they hit the sand. The production design team does an absolutely incredible job - Dakota Blue Richards sleeps in a room with walls painted a deep sky blue and covered in stars, fireplaces shaped like scrolls, and a glass ceiling that looks up at the night sky; and some equally good scenery of the ruined De Noir castle and the depths of its dungeons. The design is a mix of rich, colorful sets and costumes, which take on even more color when contrasted with the stark, crumbling surroundings of the Moonacre estate.

The cast ensures that this independent film has a wider appeal, while unrecognizable names could have made it less appealing. The talented and charming young Dakota Blue Richards repeats the charisma she had already demonstrated in "The Golden Compass" and does an admirable job of carrying the film as a young heroine. She is beautiful and charming, as well as emotional and decisive when necessary. Speaking strictly about household names, Ioan Gruffudd plays a completely different character than the one in the book. His performance adds complexity to the character, who begins as an austere figure, but gradually reveals layers of compassion and concern. Gruffudd, with his elegant and charismatic presence, contributes significantly to the cast's dynamics.

Tim Curry, known for his outstanding performances as villains, plays the role of Coeur De Noir, the leader of the De Noir family and the film's antagonist. Curry once again delivers a sinister and menacing performance, solidifying his status as a master at playing villains. Natascha McElhone brings charm and mystery to the role of Loveday, a mysterious figure who helps Maria on her journey. Her performance adds a layer of wisdom to the character, making her a captivating presence, while Juliet Stevenson plays Miss Heliotrope, Maria's guardian. Her performance conveys sweetness and concern, creating affectionate moments in the film and establishing a charming chemistry with Dakota Blue Richards (there, the two would work together shortly after in "Dustbin Baby").

The technical part of the film is remarkable. It's more a study in fantastical humor (woodland bandits, forbidden forest, unicorns) than a serious one, and overall, it's a magical journey that, while not as provocative as Narnia, is an interesting piece of cinematic work in its own right. The art direction and production design create a visually rich and immersive world. The costumes are stunning, especially the main characters' outfits, which are full of details and vibrant colors. The soundtrack perfectly complements the film's magical atmosphere, creating a sense of wonder and enchantment. Scene's worth highlighting include the discovery of the secret garden, inhabited by a peculiar gnome, which is a moment full of magic and surprise. The relationship between the young protagonist, Maria, and the majestic unicorn is moving and beautifully shot, capturing the sense of wonder that is fundamental to a fantasy story. Furthermore, the final scenes, involving the search for magical pearls and the characters' redemption, are full of emotion and action.

"The Secret of Moonacre" is not entirely perfect. The De Noirs are very stereotypical villains - all in capes, war suits and armor - which, given this caricatured treatment, undermines their redemption in the end, that is, it is difficult to see Tim Curry as redeemed when he is still there in a cape. Villain black. The focus on romantic redemption and pride is a little more modern than would have been the case for a British children's novel of the time, but you can't deny that Gabor Csupo has created an excellent film. Disappointingly, for such a beautiful film, it received uneven and sporadic distribution - for example, it only received a limited release in US theaters more than two years after its original debut. He deserved much more, especially when compared to the dull content that fills theaters every year. This is an enchanting and visually stunning fairy tale that offers an exciting journey full of magic. With its impressive technical aspects and captivating performances, it is a film that can be enjoyed by the whole family and that deserves more recognition than it received upon its release. Yes, the production explores so many common tropes that it's surprising no one pulls a sword from a stone at any point. Still, as far as fantasy films for kids go, "this one is among the best". Good messages mixed with a beautiful (if limited) production and a plot that kids can follow without much difficulty.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
*shakes head*
Yuliya1129 July 2010
Whatever you do, if you liked the book, don't see this movie. The whole idea of the book is rather ruined in order to make it appeal to people who didn't read the wonderful book. Starting with the fact that it isn't actually a fantasy book. So many things are added simply to make it seem more "magical" when that isn't what the book was about, and many things are just entirely wrong or tossed out so there isn't confusion when an idea was really quite simple. Everything is overdone to the extreme. The simple elegance in the description in the book is lost. I would only recommend seeing this movie if all you want is a run-of-the mill fantasy princess movie. I wouldn't say it has spark or shine at all. Don't expect anything new or a decent depiction of the wonderful story and world created by Elizabeth Goudge.
10 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Very little is done beyond this to help Moonacre feel like a tale of its own.
Otoboke6 July 2009
Fairy tales are movies that either sink or swim when it comes to the silver screen, based upon the merits of their story and the characters that exist to propel the fantasy past the absurd and into the tangibly real. The Secret of Moonacre is unfortunately an example of absurdist fairytale done with little restraint or tact; the story is robust with cliché devices, the characters flat and cursed with banal dialogue, and the backstory, costume designs, production—everything just falls far short of what you may come to expect fro productions of this nature. To be fair, there are certain elements inherent to Csupo's outing here that borders on mildly entertaining if only for the references that they make to other works, yet such moments are far and few between and never truly dispel the sour taste of hackneyed amateurism that permeates the majority of Moonacre's ridiculously generic universe.

At its core, The Secret of Moonacre strives to be part adventure fairytale and part whimsy comedy stitched together with undercooked themes of pride, corruption and the power of love to overcome all shadows of the human heart. Ostensibly, this mix has all the elements to make for an enjoyable family feature, yet burdened with a plodding pace and characters that never come off the screen in any manner, the Secret of Moonacre is a dull one. Centring around young teenage girl Maria (Dakota Blue Richards) as she moves into her extravagant and eccentric uncle's mansion in the Middle of Nowhere Forest under the protection of nanny Miss Heliotrope (Juliet Stevenson who serves as a trite source of comic relief every now and then with her biggest character trait being an impromptu belch), Goudge's story is one built upon established ground-works for any old fantasy tale. Sure, fair enough—there's nothing wrong with building upon already tried and tested methods—yet very little is done beyond this to help Moonacre feel like a tale of its own.

Perhaps the greatest and most obvious detractive trait inherent to Alborough's adaptation however is simply through its writing which seems to go through the motions at each and every turn. The result is a feature that plods along through countless cliché and predictable contrivances to the point where all fantastical elements are lost within the generic gloop that is the whole backstory and focus point of Moonacre's world. About half way into the movie, it should be no surprise then that the production boils down to one of absurd ridicule—without the feeling of otherworldly mysticism to back up all the theatrical dialogue, sets and costumes, Csupo neglects his feature to being bland and utterly forgettable in spite of its striking visuals and over-the-top performances. In fact, with the exception of perhaps Ioan Gruffudd , the majority of the acting ensemble here feel just as disconnected to the story's fantasy as everything else does. It's not just bad—it's distracting and downright laughable when any sort of tension or conflict is pushed down the throat with little to no tangible reason to believe in it.

Yet this neglect to raising the suspension of disbelief is what ultimately stops The Secret of Moonacre from ever truly coming off the screen. Perhaps with a greater budget, some bigger stars and a re-write or two, Csupo could have made something more than a sporadically pretty treat for the senses, yet as it stands nothing of the sort of achieved throughout its bumbling and overly melodramatic runtime. This in turn makes recommending Moonacre a lost cause; young females may be able to enjoy all the unicorns, pretty dresses and coy humour to the extent that everything else is ignored, yet even this assertion serves as a broad test of the imagination—which is ironically more than Csupo manages here through his excruciatingly mundane two hour exercise in creating yet another Pedestrian Fantasy By Numbers.

  • A review by Jamie Robert Ward (http://www.invocus.net)
20 out of 34 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Costume?
pattylee-2827621 April 2024
I've never seen crinolin worn on the outside of a bodice ever! At least not until the 60s when they started putting lite cages on the outside hips to make dresses look like a futuristic space costume. I can't get my head around the inaccuracy of Maria's dress. The rest of the movie is fantastic! The sets are incredibly wonderful and creative! The actors portray the emotions and intensity of the situations wonderfully. I haven't read the book, but movies are never the same as the imagination of someone who is reading the story anyway. The movie now has me interested in checking the book out. Movies are one way I use to build my library!
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Nothing new
JCR-42 August 2010
This is a film suited to children so perhaps I shouldn't be writing this review, although my two children didn't seem overly impressed. The problem I have with this film is that we are served up with what has become a very much repeated storyline over recent years after LOTR. Inevitably we have a piece of jewelery that holds magic powers, that has been lost and lead to feuding families, and the little star of the film must rectify matters. The sets and costumes are top notch and are what make the film really worth watching. The acting is mediocre to say the least, in particular Tim Curry as one of the feuding family heads, although I will say that Dakota Blue Richards as the child puts in a decent performance. Very few of the characters do anything that makes you really empathize with them, and I don't recall being moved in any one moment of this long film. I give it a 5 out of 10 thanks to the sets and costumes.
10 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Must-watch for any fairy tale and fantasy maniac!
sun_rises_down25 December 2009
Firstly, I haven't read the book. In a way it works for my advantage allowing me to criticize the movie solely based on what was presented there and not be distracted by what was left out compared to book etc. I can think of two kinds of fairy tales: one is the kind you love when you're 7 but think it utterly stupid and childish when you're 30; the other type is the kind you find magical no matter how old you are. This movie here could've easily belonged to the first group but turned out to be something more valuable. The bicycle has been invented and now it's all about how you do it, not what you do. The whole movie in its being is one big cliché, BUT they have successfully managed to turn that weakness into a strong point. This could've easily been a cheesy Raspberry candidate and I am very picky about my fairy tales and fantasy and I was not disappointed. Several aspects made the story believable, starting from the level of acting and ending with props. When it comes to acting, the weakest link in the bunch was Natascha McElhone, who didn't always seem to be in it as much as the others (e.g the cursing part, people seem to agree on that part mostly). I was thoroughly impressed by Ioan Gruffudd, going from cold to heartbroken definitely moved my cruel heart. The milieu and the special effects were outstanding. No Lord of the Rings, don't get me wrong, but there was no half-hearted effort in that area. The Moonacre Manor and the many other scenes were picturesque and the costumes far-enough-out-of-the-box creative, mixing the traditional with a modern touch in perfect balance. All in all, I was left feeling satisfied and enriched and I reckon this movie deserves a rating above 7 of 10 the least, for it certainly wasn't a mediocre experience.
34 out of 45 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
It may be a secret, but nobody seems to care
supernick-32 July 2009
Warning: Spoilers
I generally like mystery along the lines of "person goes home after a long absence, just to unlock a sh*tload of village/family secrets". This movie made me think I was up to the usual, and with some fantasy background, it sounded even better.

In my opinion it didn't deliver. The beginning was good, setting the atmosphere, creating the secret, placing everything in a nice setting. Let me add also that the costume department did a splendid job too. But then the girl actually arrives at the location where loose ends flew in her face. Okay, so she's supposed to make stuff happen to lift some curse that endangers life in general, cool. You would expect a little help from someone, from either side, good or bad. But no, these people enjoy facing doom, and never did seem too interested in changing the course of events. Not the uncle (emotionless, uncaring, basically not a nice type of guy), not the archenemy (not too bright, inactive), not even the people who might actually know things. Actually, no character is worth my sympathy. Even the girl is your typical annoying child.

Acting credit, on the other hand, does go the girl. The rest just plays their role, and I've seen all of them doing much better. Especially Tim Curry, whose proved potential isn't even remotely used.

Sour feeling at the end. 5 out of 10 for the setting in general.
8 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A Charming Fantasy Film with Some Gem Acting
organic-6629531 October 2015
I was charmed by this film and amused with Ioan Gruffudd's role here. I have to say he's actually a bit hilarious when he's angry. He struts about his keen acting skills with a natural edge. One scene in particular gives me a rather visceral reaction. (It involves a raw egg.)

I've seen some negative reviews and comments calling it silly, but it is in NO WAY any sillier than any Disney film! (And the Disney film won't have been made on a bargain budget.) If you dislike fantasy, then this film isn't for you. But some of us love fantasy regardless of age!

The animals add so much to this film. While watching, you can tell the main dog used is nothing but a big fluffy, marshmallowy sweetheart! I was impressed with Dakota Blue Richards in her subtle acting abilities and her interaction with the rabbit.

I can't recommend this film highly enough. It's child friendly but not child exclusive if you've a penchant for fantasy and don't mind a long gander at Ioan Gruffudd.
9 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
I'VE BEEN MOONED
MadamWarden30 April 2020
Terrible plot, awful acting, low budget. Not much else to say...
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Why have i never heard of this movie?
nicehealz30 December 2014
This is a lovely family/children's movie. It is a unique fairy tale that, though not very complex (remember it is mainly for children) is very clever and quite funny at times. The acting is very good and the sets and costumes are exquisite. I was thoroughly entertained and wish there were more movies like this out there. I rate movies by how much I wish they would not end so quickly, and this one was over far too fast.

I am a big Tim Curry fan, and while this part did not really showcase his abilities, I still appreciated seeing him in this kind of movie. The characters are very rich and the attention to detail made some of the scenes magical. If you enjoy fairy tales don't pass this movie up!
9 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
not for fans of the book
louannmitch13 March 2010
This film is not for people who have read the book. I loved The Little White Horse and was excited about it being made into a film but was very disappointed.

They changed a lot of the characters. Sir Benjamin's personality was completely different and Robin's origins and relationship with Maria was completely different. They also gave away some things right at the beginning which you are supposed the discover later. There was a lot of changes to the plot as well they need to make it much longer to fit everything in.

Having said that, if you haven't read the book, it's probably a perfectly enjoyable children's fantasy film. It is certainly visually stunning.
5 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
I loved this movie for so many reasons
makeashow16 June 2017
One of my all time favourite movies, the storyline is great, the action was amazing, and the romance wasn't the main point of the story line the budding romance formed naturally and wasn't focused on until the feelings were realised. This was very refreshing, I loved every thing about this movie. I would highly recommend that anyone should watch it. A fairytale with mystery, romance, a curse, and magic.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
A movie when you have nothing better to do
urockband3 September 2013
Basically, this movie is about a young girl who moves to her uncle's house due to the death of her father. What she doesn't know that it includes a whole new world to her and she plays an important role in it.

In my opinion, this movie was not completely horrible but filled with inaccuracies. At times I kept thinking to my self, "Why didn't he just do that?" An example came to mind when the young girl and an accomplice were found by the villain. They simply ran, or let's say jogged, away from him while he simply stood there yelling, "I will catch you!" Also, towards the end the Chef had miraculously said that he knew exactly where Maria had gone when Maria had never even mentioned any specific place she would be. She simply said, "I will know the place when I see it." And she was talking about one tree in a forest. A place filled with trees!

One minute, the villain was in the forest and after another we see him in a scene a top an enormous cliff in some sort of temple. The group who were searching for Maria Merryweather were also in the forest when they suddenly entered the temple as well. Some stuff just doesn't make sense to me.

The acting was below par. Dakota Richard's acting was acceptable compared to the adult actors. Juliet Stevenson put herself too much into the character that her expressions in specific situations were just awful.

When this movie started out, I thought it had great potential. But the actors made the dialogue laughable and the resolution to the story was too much to bear. The scene with the horses and the wave was just completely random and extremely unnecessary. How the unicorn managed to solve the horrific conflict seemed a little too much.

The setting was perfect for the story and the costumes were adequate for the time line but some aspects were useless. For example, Maria's tiny bedroom door that you almost have to crawl through. I cannot comprehend why that was necessary in the first place. Many more presented itself but none come to mind at the moment.

To bring this review to a conclusion...I would recommend this movie to parents who want to entertain their kids with silly fantasy movies or just to show them a good time. Children would appreciate this movie. Overall acting was atrocious apart from the young Dakota Richards who continued to prove her skills and as for the story...It was a great story with a lot of potential but was shut down with the poor choice of actors, the horrible special effects, the humorous inaccuracies, and bad directing.

If you have nothing better to do and happened to find this movie flipping through the channels, then it is an okay movie to pass the time.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed