Fire Serpent (TV Movie 2007) Poster

(2007 TV Movie)

User Reviews

Review this title
25 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
3/10
not stupid enough to be offensive, but nothing of value either in production values or acting, or script
Quinoa198424 February 2007
Fire Serpent is a pretty run of the mill sci-fi channel movie of the week, which is strange considering how the one who 'created' the fire serpent concept, William Shatner, probably comes up with more wacky ideas than this. There's actually some messed-up creature potential with a thing like a 'fire serpent', as it's basically a gigantic fire-ball that spouts out of the sun, crashes to Earth, and sustains itself on human life and fossil fuels. But not much else is really explored, or exploited, aside from so-typical-it's-meh character schemes and a fairly complex level of figuring out how it is that the fire serpent actually goes about its business or how it can be stomped out. It's too run of the mill to get into any real interesting ground, but when compared to the last sci-fi channel movie featuring a Buffy alumni, Gryphon, Fire Serpent doesn't go into the depths of wretchedly hellish tripe all around.

This time we just get Nicholas Brendon as the 'young, teach-me-everything-from-a-mentor' young fireman, who meets Dutch Fallon (Randolph Mantooth, who's name is probably much cooler than anything else in the movie), a man who's been tracking the fire serpent for forty years, ever since it destroyed his girlfriend (which we see in a first inexplicable flashback at the start, then a second one where it's not really from his point of view as seen). Dutch, despite being an arsonist, is under the eye of an old rival, played by Rober Beltran, who also happens to be a big religious freak (some of this dialog is actually really funny, unintentionally of course). It all leads up to a showdown at a fossil-fuel station, where finally the cheesy sci-fi visual effects and limited action get their dues. Throughout we're treated to pretty half-note (not even quite one-note) characters, who occasionally talk in sound bytes from what might have been Shatner's pitch to the networks.

The lack of logic at times doesn't kill one's soul, but there's also not much to gorge on if you're looking for heavy action or twisted moments of delirious flights of sci-fi fancy; closest things I saw were when the serpent cut a woman in half (through a human host), and an amazingly entertaining- for all the wrong reasons- scene where a henchman tosses a grenade in Jake's car, leading to a very odd scene with the henchman just standing a while holding a targeting gun and not doing anything until a policeman and the fire serpent do their own things in the scene. Yet a lot of the time I just sat waiting for stuff to happen that built up to nothing very special, and a climax that didn't have me yelling or cursing at the screen but seemed still annoying in just going bigger and crazier (and not fun crazy) until that last warped moment of an open-book ending. Fire Serpent 2 perhaps? I'd really hope not, as there wasn't enough to really sustain the first one, except over-cooked plot contrivances (or under-cooked depending on point of view), cardboard acting (even when one is shot and near-death), and a fairly limited creature by way of the visual effects (not like Gryphon, though that's like saying it's the clap instead of AIDS).
18 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Solar invader plots a hot time for Earth
MartianOctocretr53 March 2007
A couple of campers, remembering Smokey the Bear's admonition that "only you can prevent forest fires" dutifully attempt to put out their campfire with water, only to be possessed/roasted by some angry fire entity (which occasionally growls or roars) that doesn't like water much. From there it torches or possesses anybody it can find, but it's out in the wilderness, so there aren't too many victims available. It's a smart fire creature, though, so it plots and executes a plan to...uhh, do something nasty, apparently.

Guess what? A government conspiracy, led by a lunatic who spouts off out-of-context biblical scriptures about fires, is trying to use the thing to wipe out people he doesn't like. Can you say "two-cliches-for-the-price-of-one?" Can you further believe this nut job with his "burning desire" is named (ready?) Cooke? Egad. His able assistant, unaware of his intentions, helps a firefighter find a way to extinguish the menace, with the predictable results as to who's going to end up french-fried and who survives. Theories about the invader abound: not only is it accused of apocalyptic tendencies, but apparently it came from solar flares. Because of these disjointed and impossible to reconcile backgrounds, plot holes proliferate faster than the charred bodies of victims. For example, why didn't these pyrotechnic wraiths sizzle the whole planet long ago?

The acting actually rises above the script and breathes some life into the characters' back stories and motivations. Special effects get a split-decision: some are impressive and interesting, others are just fake looking and cheap. Overall: watchable. However, nobody involved need write an Oscar acceptance speech.
11 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Giant computerized streaks of orange terrorize Minnesota
Phillemos25 February 2007
Warning: Spoilers
My expectations of this movie were agonizingly low, based on 1) the fact that it's a Sci-Fi Channel Original, and 2) according to the trailers, Captain Kirk had something to do with it. (Though I'm not sure exactly what. All the trailer said was, "From the mind of William Shatner." Does that mean they brainwashed him into writing a screenplay, or did he dial up Sci-Fi Channel corporate offices one day and say, "Hi, William Shatner calling. I think you should do a movie about a sun flare that shoots its way to earth and stalks people like a giant snake? Now get to work. Good-bye.") In reality, the movie wasn't as horrible as I suspected. It definitely sucks, but it sucks in such a way that you're kind of laughing yourself through it and waiting for the next scene to ridicule. The opening scene flashes back to 1966, when the Fire Serpent first came down to Minnesota as a spark that ambushed and killed a young female firefighter who was putting out a brush fire with her boyfriend Dutch. Instead of spending the next 40 years terrorizing the world, the Fire Serpent apparently hibernates until this past Saturday night, when some firefighter named Jake (played by Nicholas Brendon) sees the Fire Serpent do the exact same thing to his rookie friend. Brendon runs into Dutch, who tries to explain that this fire wasn't really a fire, it was a living, snake-like monster. Brendan thinks Dutch is on drugs and tells him to go pound sand. Right here, I wanted to slap Brendon upside the head. The last time I saw Brendon in a movie, he spent two hours getting chased all over a secluded island by a killer pinata in "Demon Island," so he should know that if giant pinatas can come to life, so can fire. In the meantime, Sci-Fi Original veteran actor Robert Beltran spends most of his time in a power struggle with a young actress who has a nice figure (can't remember her name but she played Evelyn in last season's "24") about who has jurisdiction over forest fires in Minnesota. The movie leaves you hanging with unanswered questions. For example, why did the Fire Serpent kill a young lady in 1966, take a 40-year hiatus and then re-emerge in the present day to continue it's killing spree? If the Fire Serpent is such a bad-a**, why is there only a cast of a half-dozen people in this whole movie (You'd think the Fire Serpent's reign of terror would've attracted more attention)? Why bother writing the nosy, investigative reporter and her photog into the film when they get killed 20 minutes into the movie? The special effects don't draw you in either, they're horrible and the creature looks like it was drawn by orange crayon. But the movie is just entertaining enough, even if in a laughable way, to get you to keep watching until the end. I give it a 4 out of 10, only because it's better than that "Pumpkinhead" drivel Sci-Fi Channel wheeled out two weeks ago and I gave that movie a 3.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Fire breathing dud.
michaelRokeefe24 February 2007
Warning: Spoilers
Sci-Fi channel presents FIRE SERPENT. Some interesting FX, but story line not all that interesting. Jake(Nicholas Brendon)is little more than a rookie firefighter that watches his partner go up in flames. A 40-year veteran, Dutch Fallon(Randolph Mantooth)convinces Jake that the recent strange fires are the product of a serpent that actually lives in the fire. Chris Andrews(Sandrine Holt)is a female government agent assigned to take charge of an investigation. She temporarily sides with an agent from Washington named Cooke, that seems to have had dealings with Fallon in the past. It is obvious that the serpent needs to be destroyed before it destroys mankind. This quirky film can't be taken seriously, though it will remind you to check your fire insurance. If you happen to have an innocent fetish with fire...this is your flick.
6 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
The colours were nice and bright
neil-47628 June 2009
Warning: Spoilers
The colours were nice and bright.

The special effects were mostly adequate, occasionally good, sometimes poor.

The colours were nice and bright.

The story was drivel. The script was poor.

The colours were nice and bright.

Nicholas Brendon was a regular in a popular TV series once.

The colours were nice and bright.

Randolph Mantooth was a regular in a popular TV series once.

The colours were nice and bright.

Robert Beltran was a regular in a popular TV series once.

The colours were nice and bright.

Oh, did I mention that the colours were nice and bright?
7 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Solar Flare Creatures
bkoganbing1 March 2007
Have you ever wondered about those angels spoken of in the Bible of fire and sword? Well science fiction has uncovered an explanation for them. Turns out in Fire Serpent they are living creatures unlike our carbon based life form that live in solar flares. Every now and then they get themselves loose and wreak all kinds of havoc. Check in the Bible Leviticus Chapter Ten and you can read what one of these things did to the sons of Aaron.

Some wacko agent from Homeland Security played by Voyager's Robert Beltran's who's a little far gone on religion has this brilliant idea to use one of these things as a method of meting out some of us his own divine retribution. Nothing like pretending you're the Deity when the power gets thrust upon you. It's up to Buffy the Vampire Slayer veteran Nicholas Brendon and Emergency's Randolph Mantooth to stop the creature and he who seeks to use it.

It's kind of sad to see what some players come down to, but a paycheck is a paycheck. The science in the science fiction leaves a lot to be desired and if this thing could really be true and these creatures have visited us before, the earth would have been left a burning cinder several millenia ago.
11 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
better than most sci-fil channels movies, BUT....
sejdoodah25 February 2007
I would not say this movie was akin to the usual sci-fi movies on Saturday night, but it won't be winning any awards either.

The writing was poor, however I believe the actors did the best they could with what they had – with the exception of the TV news crew women at the start. I found Nicholas Brendon's character to be the most 'believable' but they rest did as good as they could. I'm sorry but Beltran's character started off being poorly fleshed out, but by the end of the film he was over the top.

The SFX were not ILM worthy, but they were a hair better than most movies on the channel.

All in all, I found it watchable, but not very ripping. I will give the appropriate accolades to Mr. Brendon. He seems to have taken the part as far as he could with what he had. Better scripting and better directing by Shatner (although not nearly as bad as 'Star Trek: Generations' IMHO) may have made this just a wee bit better.
8 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Terrible Movie!!!!!!!!!!!
pchic24 February 2007
Well, Sci-Fi Channel did it again!! No wonder I keep watching re-runs of CSI and even Survivor!! I can't believe Nicholas Brendon, Robert Beltran and Randolph Mantooth would have ever considered doing this "movie"...that is unless since the cancellations of each of their own series', they "couldn't find work?" For Godsakes guys...do some cheesy commercials like maybe Geiko or something and I would have more respect for the each of you than I do right now!!

Before this "so-called movie" even aired, it was given a 7.something rating. What's up with that?? Color me stupid, but I was under the impression that in order to rate a movie, IT HAD TO BE WATCHED FIRST!! Or maybe given the cast line-up, IMDb members were taking for granted that this would be an excellent movie. I guess they never heard of the old saying, "Don't count your chickens BEFORE they hatch!!!!", cause instead of getting chickens, you just might get a clutch of mutant "what-evers" {sic}!! I have to admit though, the actor's performances were OK; but, I honestly believe that the Director(s) should be bitch-slapped for releasing such a lousy movie!!!

I am just glad it is over so I now have the chance to watch some really bad TV, at least "BY MY OWN choosing"!!

Remember, opinions are like ***holes; everyones got one... some stink more than others!
15 out of 34 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Truly terrible, no redeeming value
CelluloiDiva26 February 2007
Warning: Spoilers
Sometimes, a SCIFI original movie is worth watching simply because it is so awful, it's good. An MST3K-like guilty indulgence, if you will. In this case, the guilt stemmed from wasting two hours of my life on this dreck.

Malicious fireballs from space land in Minnesota and take over "host" bodies to ensure survival, although why the fire would need to do this in a woodland is never quite explained. Guess it's just cool to see that "fire-eyed" effect on the actors.

Although the movie was called "Fire Serpent" - and there was fire - there wasn't much serpent. There was a dragon-y looking critter within the flames at times, but only when it was fully erupted and not stuck in a human host's body. "Fire Parasite" might have been a more fitting title.

The plot was Chinese take-out menu predictable, the effects schlocky, the credibility strained to the breaking point. Did anyone believe that decrepit, rust-infested and weedy-looking pumping station made any sort of parallel to the Strategic Petroleum Reserve?? In Minnesota??? And the big mystery: what did any of this have to do with William Shatner? Bill, c'mon, 'splain! There are some interesting thought points along the way in this miserable journey, such as the danger posed by religious extremist zealots in positions of political power, which are perhaps relevant in some small way to these times. There's no misunderestimating the potential consequences of elevating ideology over objectivity and reason, especially that of a scientific nature. While religion and its most driven promoters (or slavish adherents, take your pick) are a natural foil for objective (if not altruistic) science, the inclusion of this subplot is utterly lost amid the rampant silliness of the primary plot itself. Better had they skipped it altogether.

"Fire Serpent" will make a great drinking game some day, perhaps, but it is not worth watching for its own merits, as those are entirely lacking.
5 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Waste of time
kymeera27 February 2007
This was absolutely awful but unfortunately I've seen worse. At least the production value is good (It doesn't look like someone shooting their first film with a camcorder). The basic story had possibilities but it went nowhere. It was just cheesy and a waste of time but considering that William Shatner wrote and produced this what do you expect but cheese. The major test of this is that I walked out of the room when it was playing and didn't care if I missed any of it. The only good thing about this was seeing Randolph Mantooth in something other than a soap but even he couldn't save this turkey. All I've seen Robert Beltran and Nicholas Brendon in since their series have ended has been really bad TV or straight to video movies. I should have known this would be bad but I keep hoping for something decent.
7 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
You get burnt playing with fire
djderka2 September 2012
Yes, some reviewers will agree with this observation. But this is not that bad a movie. Remember these are "low budget" films, do not expect Alien, Blade Runner, or 2001 Space Odyssey to be produced here.

Do not expect clever dialog as in Front Page, Treasure of Sierra Madre, Casablanca and others.

What you can expect is an entertaining flick about some sort of monster, hybrid monster or extra terrestrial monster with CGI, minimum dialog, hero flubs (like sudden inability to shoot straight to get the evil bureaucrat), chases, cute buxom (in this case flat chested)babes being chased by said monster. It is a predictable beef stew with the same ingredients but we usually enjoy it for lunch anyway.

The actors are above average as the main characters are played by good TV actors: Nicholas Brendon, Sandrine Holt and Randolph Mantooth, and they really keep the movie going and keep it from stalling out.

Plot: a "fireball" leaves the sun on it's own initiative to reek havoc on poor earthlings. And it does so by killing a firefighter sidekick, only to resurrect itself some 40 years later. The "fireball" "chases" and explodes victims into their own fireball.

Written by Bill Shatner of "Priceline" fame, it follows a generic voyage through the stars. But, I enjoyed the acting, the reporters cut in half, and unsuspecting innocents bursting into flame, the ubiquitous evil bureaucrat, baffled military personnel, and fire fighting heroes.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Another terrible Sci-Fi Channel 'Creature Teature'.
poolandrews9 May 2009
Warning: Spoilers
Fire Serpent is set in Minnesota where Jake Realm (Nicholas Brendon) works as an all man firefighter, while out in the bush damping out some forest fires he sees something strange, after an explosion the fire seems to come to life & reach out & grab is partner Dave (Steve Boyle) who gets toasted. Wracked by guilt & unsure of what he has seen Jake drowns his sorrow's in his local watering hole when ex-firefighter Dutch Fallon (Randolph Mantooth) tells Jake that the fire he saw was in fact alive & had a purpose & conscience. Jake scoffs at the claim but as the forest fires become more mysterious & he sees the evidence for himself Jake comes round to Dutch's way of thinking. Meanwhile the FBI think that Dutch is starting the fires & use local departments for their own needs but the truth is far more sinister as alien fire creatures from the surface of the sun blown here by solar winds are setting things on fire. A lot.

This Canadian American co-production was directed by John Terlesky & is yet again another Sci-Fi Channel 'Creature Feature' original, in other words you can guarantee it's crap. To be fair to the script it does at least try to be a bit different as there's no genetic experiments gone wrong on sort species of animal turning them into vicious killers or there's no huge giant sea creature or the like, no here in Fire Serpent there's living alien fire from the surface of the sun which is as ridiculous as it sounds & since this is a low budget Sci-Fi Channel flick you know it's as dumb as hell despite trying & almost succeeding to do something that bit different. You know what Fire Serpent has a stupid premise & it's boring & badly written. Nothing is explained to any great satisfaction, why does this alien fire thing which just looks like a ball of fire sometimes burn things (the forest fires & homes) yet at other times doesn't (the wooden fence it hides under to avoid the rain, inside Jake's backpack), why does it sometimes resemble a huge fire creature while at other's it's just a tiny fleck of flame & how can it possess people & make them walk through fire without them being burnt or even their clothes catching on fire? Then there's the boring subplots which take up most of the films runtime including some rubbish about a rouge agent trying to use the alien to destroy the world in a biblical type way, Government conspiracies & Fallon being accused of being an arsonist. The whole film is a jumbled mess that doesn't flow properly, makes next to no sense, it totally stupid & takes itself very seriously which just cheapens the whole thing even more. To be honest I am really struggling to say anything positive about this.

The only mildly interesting thing about Fire Serpent is that a one William Shatner was executive producer & also gets a mysterious 'Created By' credit as well. That's it really, there's nothing even remotely worth mentioning besides that, sorry. The final 'battle' scene is appallingly edited & looks awful, there's this high security Government facility yet only our two heroes seem to be around & they are allowed to blow up two huge storage tanks without anyone challenging them. The CGI effects are predictably terrible & the alien creature is never really seen, it's just more scenes of badly CGI rendered fire roaring & making silly noises. There's zero gore & the only death worth noting is when someone is burned in half. Fire Serpent can't really decide if it wants to be a thriller or a sci-fi film & ends up as a complete mess really.

With a supposed budget of about $2,000,000 all I can say is where did the money go? This has cheap Sci-Fi Channel production values & it looks drab & flat with no sense of style at all. Filmed in Ontario in Canada. Most of the cast are TV regulars & none stand out as being that good & the terrible material doesn't help.

Fire Serpent is an awful film & it's as simple & straight forward as that really. It's a mess of a film that makes little sense & is just plain stupid. Par for the course for the Sci-Fi Channel then I suppose.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Half a mark out of 10, which is too high.......
rbrb2 October 2008
Awful film.

This picture looks like the makers discovered they hardly had any budget and certainly no talent in any aspect. So they found the cheapest and worst "actors", used a few warehouse and street locations etc, and found some amateur special effects people to patch together this terrible movie.

The story:

"Alien creatures emerge from the sun and attack Earth"

More like alien picture producers emerge from the mental hospital to attack the viewing public.

How I could sit through this rubbish, goodness knows; suppose I was stupefied by the sheer badness of the whole thing.

I cannot give a vote less than 1 out of ten, so I have rounded up my half mark to that.
3 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Not terribly good......
jamcam0916 November 2019
......though it did have Robert Beltran - not, alas, as Chakotay. WWJD ? What Would Janeway Do ? Fire some of Voyager's inexhaustible supply of photon torpedoes, most likely. This gets 2 stars, for a decentish beginning, and a decentish end.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
"Sci-Fi Channel Original" is an Oxymoron
JoeB13115 February 2009
Warning: Spoilers
Because when you really think about it, all their stories have similar plots. Shadowy government agency creates CGI monster which proceeds to reek havoc.

The plot line of this one begins in 1966, where a firefighter is making out with his girlfriend after putting out a forest fire. Forget that women didn't dress like that or wear their hair like that in 1966, or serve as firefighters, for that matter. No, we have to set up the plot here. She is possessed by the alien fire serpent and launches a sequence of really bad special effects.

Anyway, flash forward to the present, where we have another forest fire, and a bunch of fires starting in mysterious places, being investigated by the Government Babe. (Note, a Sci-Fi channel original always has a government Babe or Hunk who helps the good guys!) the 1966 guy mysteriously shows up to watch the alien fire blow up the lunch wagon and kill a firefighter who tries to put it out.

Well, along comes Robert Beltran of Star Trek Voyager fame. Yup, you can't have a Sci-Fi original film without a washed up Star Trek actor. Instead of playing his usual new-age Castrati, Beltran plays a shadowy government agent who happens to be a religious fanatic. The word "Miscast" comes to mind. He believes the fire serpent is here to start the Apocalypse, and just needs a little help. Like sneaking it onto the government's strategic oil reserve.

The movie concludes with the actors running around unconvincingly fighting an imaginary CGI monster that is filled in later.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Left Me Cold
Theo Robertson14 August 2010
Warning: Spoilers
The plot of FIRE SERPENT is somewhat intriguing - alien creatures emerge from the Sun and attack Earth . You could easily see this plot being used by a Hollywood studio where a couple of A list actors and actresses battle demonic creatures from Hell with the future of civilization at stake . Certainly it sounds like a very easy to market . Sadly the pitch was made to the sci-fi channel and not a major Hollywood executive

From the outset we're shown that there's aliens involved but the characters don't realise this which means the narrative is very sluggish . If you're writing a script make sure the audience are as knowledgeable characters in the story or don't construct the story as a mystery . because it quickly becomes tedious when the characters are trying to unravel the causes of mysterious fire deaths while the audience knows whats happening

The writers also fail to keep things tightly plotted with a few too many characters and subplots . There's some callous FBI spooks on the case along with a TV crew , not to mention the religious fanatic and a friendly sheriff . There's plot conveniences of the fire monster burning down a house but no one being around to see it . Why did the monster burn down the house ? Ask the writers because there's on screen explanation as to why

That said the film could have been saved somewhat if they been impressive production values . A story like this would have greatly benefited from a big budget that would have included atmospheric night sequences . Sadly however it's made for the Sci-Fi channel which means all the sequences are shot in daylight and all the special effects are very obviously created with CGI
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Sleep inducing.
Stevieboy66619 July 2017
Fiery aliens land on Earth from the Sun, intent on causing havoc and destruction. About the only positive thing that I can say about this low budget, made for TV movie is that the acting was reasonable. Everything else - the ridiculous plot, rubbish special effects, etc - make for a very poor viewing experience and several times towards the end found myself nodding off. Did rewind the end to make sure I hadn't missed anything. I hadn't.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Too much contrivance, not enough fire
TheLittleSongbird7 May 2012
I do admittedly get some novelty value out of SyFy's movies, though most of them are simply terrible. Fire Serpent is not their worst, but when I say that most of their movies are terrible Fire Serpent is not an exception. The scenery is bright and colourful, but that's pretty much it for redeeming values, because everywhere else visually the editing is choppy at best and the effects are mostly artificial-looking, if never quite Titanic II or Mega Piranha bad. The script and characters are cardboard-thin, with the script also cheesy and the characters, even with some attempt at back story and motivations, are still unengaging. Even worse is the story which is contrived and dull for the most part and lacking any sort of suspense or excitement. The actors seem to know the movie is bad and don't really seem to have their hearts in it. That's including Nicholas Brendan, who I liked in Buffy the Vampire Slayer. In conclusion, too contrived and never ignited my fire, sorry. 1/10 Bethany Cox
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Decent if silly premise, less than fully entertaining realization
I_Ailurophile19 November 2023
Sometimes you just need a silly sci-fi monster flick, you know? Even for the Sci-Fi Channel (now SyFy) where this premiered, it's hard not to be gobsmacked by the list of names that are attached to it. Writers Judith and Garfield Reeves-Stevens should be at least nominally familiar to anyone who has dipped their toes into modern novels of science fiction; the man himself may be dubious, but it's safe to say William Shatner is no one to sneeze at in the genre. And with Robert Beltran and Nicholas Brendon helming the cast, among others, the least that can be said for this romp is that it has some star power. Of course, the fact remains that 'Fire serpent' is an unrepentant TV movie, and no matter who is involved in such a production it seems destined for schlock - it's the nature of the genre, the medium, and the network. Still, anyone who comes across this in passing already knows what they're getting into, so there's not too much point in making a fuss. What we see is what we get, and there are no real surprises on hand; if you're looking for a cheesy, uninvolved, low-grade creature feature, look no further.

To wit: the dialogue, characters, scene writing, plot, direction, and acting are all direly forced and unconvincing, though sometimes the acting switches things up and is instead wholly underwhelming. While the computer-generated imagery isn't the worst I've ever seen, there isn't the slightest effort to blend the digital creations into the filmed footage; post-production wizardry has rarely been more transparent and obvious than it is here (case in point, watch for a death scene around the half-hour mark). In no time at all the picture becomes something that we can "watch" just by having it on in the background and not meaningfully engaging with it otherwise; this Sci-Fi lark is light, unsophisticated kitsch just as much as the Hallmark romance or the Lifetime thriller, just in its own way. On the one hand, this is a tad more inventive than some of its kin as it goes so far as to introduce far-out weaponry to combat far-out entities; on the other hand, this grows more tiresome and dull as it invokes biblical mythology. Then again, maybe all such ruminations are beside the point; 'Fire serpent' never pretends to be anything it's not.

I think the title's reach exceeds its grasp as it tries to weave in narrative elements beyond the basic concept of "aliens made of fire." Those ideas are worth exploring in and of themselves, but the tawdry nature of the TV production means this ninety-minute film probably wasn't the best place to smash them all together. Moreover, the more this tries to do within its constraints, the more contrived and tough to swallow each component part becomes; we're given a complete, cohesive story, but it feels less cohesive with each addition. No matter how weak the contributions are as they present the least that can be said is that everyone involved helped to make this happen, and I can't say the end result isn't baseline enjoyable on some level. Even with that spirit of generosity in mind, though, the picture desperately needed to trim some of its excess and focus more tightly on a much smaller number of stronger central notions. As it stands, I don't think it comes close to meeting the potential of the premise; as it stands, the entertainment 'Fire serpent' has to offer is balanced against an inability to make viewers particularly care. There are still far worse ways to spend one's time, but even if you're a diehard fan of someone involved, this is best left as something frivolous to provide mild diversion on a lazy, quiet day. Take that as you will.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Former TV stars battle for non-careers..
shalimar-44 November 2017
Former TV stars battle for non-careers..

As Xander aka Nicolas Brendon post BTVS tries to battle against Chakotay aka Robert Beltran (Star Trek Voyager) battles fort he title of formerly had a career on a hit TV show.

Oh wait.. they have new names for this movie? Oh OK my bad..

They are jake and Cooke respectively this time around.. though I'd bet most ppl would be far more likely to remember them for their former roles..

Hire former stars out of pity or desperate attempt to pass production off as bigger budget? Check! Made for TV? Yep Low budget? Double Check Sub par childish writing? check check & check! Hired local HS geek club for special effects? Running out of checks fast! (Limit of one check for each geek/nerd please!) Syfy managed to not make a 100% disaster unlike most they touch? Check!

Actually all things considered not bad.. and "Xander" being notoriously drunk as hell during this time period probably helped I'm guessing..

it's campy at best.. very poor/low budget everything and has a huge # of errors of course.. but scary enough it's actually watchable.. unlike so much crap esp that has been on TV as of late as I've commented elsewhere (including horrid uwe boll crap)

Trivia as well as how to cut down on expenses for the script: The "abandoned glass factory" and "local fuel source" actually are exactly that IRL... (Vopak storage for the tanks iirc)

The Glass factory (Consumer's Glass Factory, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada http://www.IMDb.com/search/title? locations=Consumer%27s%20Glass%20Factory,%20Hamilton,%20Ontario,%20C anada&ref_=ttloc_loc_5 ) isn't abandoned however.. but it has not operated as such in many decades. I've worked there on set for several films using the same location including "Weapon" (aka Cyborg Soldier (2008)) IMDb tt1151928 , & "The Incredible Hulk" IMDb tt0800080 & many others..

Also note Filming at the Glass factory for both Hulk and "Weapon" were taking place at virtually the exact same time. We had to work around the creation of the freshly green painted walls for the "military base" section due to scheduling conflicts.

Oh also note.. While I poke fun at Nicolas and Robert as former stars.. it's only in fun and it is true they really are former stars at this point compared to their former status... and they both are still working away in the industry so applause for them on that point :)

I'm sure both are very nice guys as have the vast majority of those I've worked with. (I was not on set for this production at all) And I'm sure they would both happily laugh at themselves and this review as well unlike idiots such as uwe boll (whom I'd happily accept his idiotic challenge btw just for the fun of deflating his absurdly over inflated ego)
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Cheesy but fun flick
rainmon24 September 2011
Sometimes I enjoy a low budget science fiction film like this, mindless fun. Interesting that Chakotay from Star Trek Voyager is in this film, it took me a minute to figure out it was him as he looks a little older and has gained some weight. There is a really cute news crew camera lady that gets killed off in the film, could not find her name in the cast list. I read the main review but disagree as this is not a big budget film and I don't expect to great special affects and great acting, but I enjoy seeing minor B level actors sometimes. I saw the film today in Thailand on my cable TV Syfy Universal Channel. So if you just want to relax and watch a fun film and see some rookie actors with some seasoned B level actors, this is worth a look.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
not as bad as some
LetsReviewThat267 August 2022
Being one of the sy-fy channels earlier movies it does show the makings of something. If anything this film is actually better than most ones today. A more flushed out plot and the actors are actually pretty good in their roles, especially Nicholas brendon. The plot of having this creature born from fire that starts fires I found pretty interesting and would have been something to show with more progressing in a sequal. When it comes to it though this film was a fun watch and not to bad. Good one sy-fy.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Jesus Christ
samdragonwilliams20 September 2021
If you make it past the first literal 6 minutes it doesn't get any better, and I can say that, having seen the first 12 minutes.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Something in the water
bitbucketchip3 October 2021
Was the cast on quaaludes? The acting is so leaden you wonder if they were on something. No facial expressions, no reactions, no emotion. Just "actors" standing woodenly while reading slowly off cue cards. So slowly. Seriously detracts from the otherwise dreadful special effects and non existent plot.

Three stars for the Buffy alumni guy attempting to act and the surprisingly accurate depiction of just how expendable journalists are. Two die, no one even pretends to care. Three stars.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Lame and cheesy, as you'd expect from the Sci Fi Channel
Leofwine_draca30 June 2017
Warning: Spoilers
FIRE SERPENT is your usual science fiction-themed slice of low budget nonsense that comes courtesy of the Sci Fi Channel. This one was written by William Shatner, of all people, but other than the outer space premise it has nothing to distinguish it from all the rest. The titular fire serpents originate from the Sun and arrive on Earth, seeking power to build their strength and also occupying human bodies as required.

The film features the usual bunch of clichéd characters with renegade heroes on the run from sinister government forces. Nicholas Brendon, formerly of BUFFY THE VAMPIRE SLAYER fame, seems to have put a ton of weight on since those days and simply isn't good. Some of the other actors are even worse, particularly the blonde reporter who delivers perhaps the most grating turn I've ever seen from a Sci Fi Channel movie. The CGI fire effects really aren't up to scratch either, making this a chore all round.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed