"Law & Order" Benevolence (TV Episode 1993) Poster

(TV Series)

(1993)

User Reviews

Review this title
4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Less than benevolent murder
TheLittleSongbird26 August 2020
Did like Season 3 quite a fair bit on the whole, though the second half was generally better than the first and it wasn't quite as consistent as the previous two seasons. Almost all the episodes ranged between good and outstanding, with the weakest episode between "Helpless" and even that was above average. Did admire the ever intelligent and far from sugar-coated approach to heavy subjects and Jerry Orbach proved to be one of the franchise's best casting choices.

"Benevolence" was a solid and well done episode with plenty to like. For a last episode of a season though, which ideally for any season for any show should be great, part of me felt that it could have been better and gone for it more, having more punch. As far as Season 3 goes, "Benevolence" is among the lesser episodes but merely generally because the best of the other episodes of the season were so brilliant and as good as the best episodes of the previous two seasons.

The good things are many and outweigh the bad. As always, it's a slickly made episode, the editing especially having come on quite a bit from when the show first started (never was it a problem but it got more fluid with each episode up to this stage). The music is sparingly used and never seemed melodramatic, the theme tune easy to remember as usual. The direction is sympathetic enough without being too low key on the whole. Furthermore, the script is thoughtful and flows well, the interaction between Stone and Gold generally had the necessary fireworks and there is some nice insight into the subject and sincere handling of the moral dilemmas that come with the case.

Story could have had more punch emotionally, but compels on the whole, the investigative elements have a nice mix of intrigue and dry humour and the final scene is well done. All the acting is strong, and it was interesting to have some actors deaf in real life in the cast, with Orbach and Chris Noth carrying the first half with ease and Michael Moriarty and George Grizzard relish their interaction together. Richard Brooks shows why it was a shame that Robinette didn't last longer. Leon Russom has agreed a very interesting character morally, and not as loathsome a defendant as other ones this season and of the previous seasons.

However, other episodes of Season 3 had more tension and emotion, made me feel more of a mix of sad and angry. Everything here is executed very well but is a little bland, and that is probably down to having a subject that doesn't hit as hard as others and doesn't take as many risks.

Would have at times liked a tighter pace with energy being lost in the second half.

Overall, a solid episode that has pretty much everything done presently and correctly but for a season finale it felt a little bland. 7/10
10 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
All For The Institute
bkoganbing20 January 2018
This last episode of season 3 and last for Dann Florek and Richard Brooks as cast members deals with a charitable institution for deaf people and the man who runs it. In a fit of rage he kills a woman, a deaf woman he regarded as a protege and something more. The something more led Leon Russom to commit murder though Jerry Orbach and Chris Noth don't get to him right away.

Russom is an interesting defendant, a man who thinks first, last and always of the charity he helped create and run. That is paramount in all his dealings with the criminal justice system.

George Grizzard is in this one as criminal defense attorney Arthur Gold and I have to say I never saw Steven Hill more in his let's make a deal mode than in this episode. Just like the mere mention of his name is supposed to intimidate Michael Moriarty. Didn't and does it happen.

But that final sitdown conference with Moriarty, Brooks, Grizzard and Russom reveals some interesting insights.
11 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Law and Coda
safenoe12 October 2023
Warning: Spoilers
Nearly 30 years before the Troy Kotsur won an Oscar for his groundbreaking rule in CODA, we have this season 3 finale, Benevolence. Anyway, this episode marks the final regular appearance of Dann Florek and Richard Brooks, so kind of a balance thing if you know what I mean.

This is one of the few (maybe the only one?) Law and Order episodes that has no courtroom trial, not even a grand jury. Anyway, this episode was groundbreaking 30 years before CODA because deaf actors were cast in this episode, and they weren't treated like freaks or ghouls thankfully, and they were treated like regular folk so that was quite groundbreaking.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Group Cohesion in Minorities.
rmax30482325 September 2011
Warning: Spoilers
This episode is fine, as most of them were during the show's first decade or so, though the duel between Moriarty and George Grizzard is a little sluggish. The reason it seems slow is that the most thoughtful part of the story shows up at about its middle.

A deaf college student is suspected of killing his deaf girl friend because she was planning on having a cochlear implant, which would have restored her hearing. Did he murder her because he figured, once she could hear, she would have nothing to do with a hearing-challenged suitor? One of the deaf characters shouts about how inferior hearing people are.

The question doesn't last long, doesn't hang in the air exactly, because the hearing-challenged suspects prove to be canards. Yet, it's a good question. If one belongs to a devalued minority group -- deaf people, blind people, African-Americans, Jews -- doesn't one feel a sense of group cohesion, of "us" against "them", or the other way around? How can "they" possibly understand us, since they've never walked in our shoes? It's a temptation difficult to resist, the sense that "they" are an enemy and they all hang together. It doesn't really matter if someone in my group does something weak or even evil. The chief point is to stand together against the assaults of "them." Somewhere in the video archives is a clip of a classroom full of African-American students leaping to their feet and embracing as O. J. Simpson is judged innocent of murder on the television news. And these were all law students at Howard University in Washington.

That's a clear expression of group solidarity and this program suggests that at least some blind people have that same sense of solidarity. Group solidarity is a more powerful motive than most of us -- who don't belong to any obvious minority -- realize. Stouffer's study of "The American Soldier" after World War II identified it as the strongest motivating factor in combat. In other words, people are willing to kill and be killed for it.

This episode, good as it is, would have been more provocative had the girl been killed by a deaf man who saw her as a traitor to the group. Instead, the resolution devolves into simple jealousy and greed.
10 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed