"Law & Order: Special Victims Unit" Coerced (TV Episode 2003) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
9/10
Under pressure
TheLittleSongbird19 November 2020
Am a fan on the most part of the early seasons of 'Law and Order: Special Victims Unit', although not every episode wowed me. The previous Season 5 episodes were generally not as good as the episodes at this point of the previous seasons, apart from the amazing "Loss", but that is not meant as a bad thing as none of the previous episodes of Season 5 were bad in any way. The previous seasons at this point had superior episodes on the whole.

"Coerced" though is a great episode. More though for the character writing and interaction than the case, although the case is still fine. Just that the other elements are even better. It may not be one of the best episodes of 'Special Victims Unit' or one of the all time best of the show, not like "Loss", but it is still a great episode nonetheless in many ways. Is it one of the very best episodes of Season 5? Perhaps not quite. But it's close to being and certainly was one of the better ones of the first half of the season. A case of character writing and interaction being (even) better than the mystery itself.

Not that the story is bad, far from it. It's exceptionally well done and powerful, but when it comes to character writing and interaction, in getting to know the team members and why they think the way they do, "Coerced" is a triumph. It is one of those episodes where Stabler is in a career on the line situation, and one where his actions as a parent himself don't make one feel frustration or anger towards him. Actually found myself sympathising in a way with his argument when the case made his personal feelings get in the way. While completely understanding Huang in his anger about his ethics being compromised. The tension between the two sears.

It is always great when other characters show a supportive side while still staying professional in 'Special Victims Unit' and that is obvious in "Coerced", especially Cragen. Was very moved in his praise for Stabler. Also admired Novak's risk taking and her prominent role in the action, while her character is still in early stages and the personality is still a bit cold she is certainly not out of place. All the characters are written beautifully, with a perpetrator that is not completely hateable while still being unnerving and a situation that could have been done in a one-sided and ham-handed way but actually handled with great intensity and poignancy. What may sound simple on paper is anything but and isn't done predictably, the big twist is a real surprise.

The performances are all top drawer, with a typically intense (in a good way) one from Christopher Meloni and BD Wong giving some of his best acting of the show. The script is taut, pulls no punches and provokes thought, the writing for Stabler and Huang being where it really seared. The pace never felt dull. It's well made, intimately photographed and slick with no signs of under-budget or anything. The music didn't sound melodramatic or too constant and the direction is accomodating while still having pulse.

In summation, great with my only issue being the slightly too hastily wrapped up ending. 9/10
11 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Redeeming Qualities
labenji-1216320 November 2020
Whenever I view SVU, I try and see things from the perspective of the law and the general public (were people's actions reasonable) to determine the degree of punishment. So, there are times when I really feel that the SVU team is too heavy-handed on suspects, especially when their guilt has not yet been established. This is why I have a love/hate relationship with Stabler, but here he shows his redeeming qualities. Nevertheless, for his character to be written any other way would not work, as he represents the "average alpha male" viewpoint, which we know sometimes can be toxic.
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
The Cacistes
bkoganbing3 June 2015
Warning: Spoilers
Christopher Meloni takes center stage and puts his badge at risk in an effort to save a kidnapped child in this SVU story. Doing so also puts him in conflict with B. D. Wong as the squad has to deal with a schizophrenic criminal, Det. Stabler as a cop and Dr. Huang as a mental health professional.

Homeless mental patient Spencer List has fixated on a young boy whom he imagines to be his real son. He kidnaps him and holds him in a couple of hideouts he's created. The police capture him, but can't locate the kid and since he's also has health problems the boy might die.

When List is off his meds he's seeing these imaginary beings called the Cacistes. Give him his meds and he might cooperate and tell where he's stashed the kid. But that violates his privacy not to mention Fifth Amendment issues. Hence the conflict between Stabler and Huang. There is also a murder charge against List for the stabbing death of someone who tried to intervene in the kidnapping which may be blown.

It all works out far better than expected even for mental patient List. This is one of both Christopher Meloni's and B. D. Wong's best episodes.
14 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed