"Law & Order: Special Victims Unit" Manic (TV Episode 2003) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Prescription for death
TheLittleSongbird11 November 2020
The first episode of 'Law and Order: Special Victims Unit's' Season 5 "Tragedy" was a good season opener, if not one that blew me away. Due to finding the conclusion a let down. The second episode "Manic" actually had potential to be a much better episode than it turned out to be and also be a better episode than "Tragedy", due to the concept appealing and resonating with me more on paper. Being somebody on medication with not very pleasant side effects.

"Manic" sadly was not the much better episode it could have been. On first watch, it didn't grip me and felt bland and unrealistic. On my recent re-watch, working my way overtime through re-watching the early seasons in particular, it fared a little better as it did do things that were admirable and there are two great guest turns. It still didn't completely grip me though and somehow it didn't feel like a 'Special Victims Unit' episode.

Am going to start with what "Manic" did well. The photography is slick and subtly gritty as usual and while the locations are limited in number they are still pleasing to look at and the more intimate ones aren't claustrophobic. The editing has also come on a long way since the show first started and it was always good from the very beginning, just that it became smoother and crisper as the production values became more refined. The music is haunting while not going over the top and not being intrusive, too constant and melodramatic music would have ruined the mood and would not have let the dialogue do the talking as effectively. The direction shines later on.

It is a very well acted episode, with an unsettling performance in particular from Rory Culkin and Mare Winningham is very powerful towards the end. Of the regulars, Stephanie March, on icily authoritative form, fares best. Fred Dalton Thompson intrigues in his cameo in a great scene with March. Some of the script is thought-provoking and intrigues, with Cabot and Sandra's role at the end being poignantly handled and resonant for any mother. It was very bold for "Manic" to tackle the issue of how products are promoted and the dangers that can ensue, something that is hardly outdated today. It does make one think twice about experimenting with different medications without supervision and it is hard to not be freaked out about how it can affect somebody.

Despite all those good things, "Manic" failed to completely grip me, with a case that generally lacked tension and tautness. A case too that felt too thin and felt rather routine outside of its strong start and finish and a few good scenes, too much of a filler feel here. Anybody wanting realism watching this episode are not going to get it watching "Manic", too many basic things in the plot that makes one go "really?", actually do think that the real guilty party got off too lightly.

Furthermore, "Manic" didn't feel enough like an episode of 'Special Victims Unit'. It was like it was lifted out of an episode of something else with the SVU guest starring with relatively little to do. It makes one question why they were even there when their roles could have been filled by pretty much anybody. Of the regulars, the only character to be written interestingly or bring a huge amount to the episode was Cabot. While the script does have intriguing and thoughtful moments, it felt a bit rushed through.

Overall, not bad at all but only slightly above average. A lesser episode of Season 5 in my view. 6/10
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
"Somebody has to pay"
bkoganbing14 May 2013
A school shooting at a Junior High School of two popular jock athletes brings the SVU squad in. But just who is to blame is the question and as DA Fred Dalton Thompson says to Stephanie March, 'someone has to pay'.

March is not inclined after John Cullum gives a spirited defense of young Rory Culkin the guilty party. True the kid was picked on and an incredibly stupid janitor actually gave this kid a gun. But as it turns out young Mr. Culkin was taking psychotropic drugs that really messed with his young mind.

When I was his age this was something unheard of and in a way I feel unable to comment. I knew someone who lived in a group home who was given it and from what I know of his history that wasn't the way to go either.

As it turns out Culkin and mother Mare Winningham were part of a new marketing technique by a pharmaceutical company the details of which I won't go into, but corporate greed is not unknown in that industry.

Mother and son Winningham and Culkin stand out and the issue is still with us.
8 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Big corporations bad
fbupdates19 April 2020
Warning: Spoilers
Another instance of blaming big corporations for a decision made by an individual. Joe Blane, a troubled teen, kills two classmates and it is revealed he took Aptrol, a drug for depression that was sent in the mail to his mother. It's for her but she decides to give it to him because he's causing trouble at school and her boss is on her case about all the calls she's getting. But she's not to blame it's the evil pharmaceutical company who sent it to her. So Joe goes off to a mental hospital and Cabot goes after the company. Give me a break. Another example of a lack of personal responsibility.
7 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Kind of weak for an SVU story
alexandrajade28 June 2009
Warning: Spoilers
only minor spoilers included, don't fear reading on Most episodes of SVU have something about their story that makes them fit with that particular show. Obviously, that's most often going to be some aspect of sexual assault being part of the episode's case, but not always.

This episode really doesn't. The only thing that's close, and it could easily have been a half-assed attempt to TRY to get something "SVU-esque" for the episode was the victims being stripped of their clothes before being killed.

This story could very, very easily have been told on the "flagship" Law & Order. It even seems to have an exact half-and-half between the detectives and the courtroom, like the flagship does. It also includes a cameo appearance from Fred Thompson as Arthur Branch and he, of course, appeared on the flagship most frequently. As such, this seems to make for a kind of fair-to-middlin' episode of SVU. I mean, it's not BAD or anything, but it's an incredibly missable episode. With the especially notable episode that comes two spots later, this one feels like it was designed from the outset to be a filler.
8 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed