"The X-Files" Badlaa (TV Episode 2001) Poster

(TV Series)

(2001)

User Reviews

Review this title
16 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Where's a butt-plug when you need one?
lnvicta8 August 2015
Badlaa was the first Doggett-era X-File episode I ever saw, and upon initial viewing I thought it was awful. No questions answered, sloppy writing and a silly premise. However after seeing it in sequential order years later, especially after the previous couple episodes being so dull (Surekill and Salvage), Badlaa was a breath of fresh air. It doesn't spell everything out for the viewer, it has a unique monster-of-the-week (to say the least), and it feels like a genuine X-File because you are just as confused as the agents are - what is the killer's motive? How is he doing what he does? Why is he killing these people?

The episode revolves around a small, legless beggar man with powers of illusion - he uses some form of Indian magic that allows him to hide in plain sight or alter other people's perception. He can disguise himself as anyone and can act as a parasite by entering through the victim's ass and using their body as a flesh suit. If that isn't a creative MO then I don't know what is. The beggar stows himself inside an overweight man on a flight from India to America. Once in the states, he begins killing people seemingly at random, posing as a janitor at a school and spying on certain kids and their fathers. There is no clear motive of the killer which causes tension between Scully and Doggett because Doggett believes the case is a waste of time from the get-go, but Scully is dead-set on finding the connection.

In the end, a boy finally claims to have seen this man which proved Scully was on the right track, but other questions remained unanswered: Why was a random beggar terrorizing these families in the US? What was the pattern? What was the point?

It can be simplified as this: revenge (badlaa). The businessman in the beginning treats the beggar like a subhuman, pitying him and perfunctorily giving him spare change. Then the beggar goes on to kill seemingly anyone in his path, using a janitor's body to get himself access to a school's-worth of victims. This man had presumably never seen America, and growing up with such terrible luck and literally making a living begging for his life, he is angry at these people for having what he doesn't - freedom. Maybe there was a clear motive the writers had in mind, but from what I gathered the beggar man wasn't choosing victims so much as he was trying to live their lives. He wanted what felt like a normal life, and he did so in the only way he knew how - by killing the hosts from the inside out and experiencing the American dream first-hand. He had no remorse, like the businessman had none for him as a beggar. No one knew this man's suffering so he brought it to them - these people were simply unfortunate enough to be in his path.

Perhaps I looked too much into this episode, but there's something primal and terrifyingly human about Badlaa that I can't quite put my finger on. It leaves so much to the imagination but provides you with the canvas from which interpretations can be made. The screeching of the beggar's crawl is undoubtedly creepy, and his MO is downright horrifying. Badlaa can be dismissed as a silly X-Files episode or appreciated as a metaphor for the lower- and upper-class. Regardless of how you see it, Badlaa allows you fill in the blanks for yourself, and as a stand-alone episode, it's one you won't forget.
35 out of 38 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
"The man sitting there may not be the man sitting there."
classicsoncall19 August 2017
Warning: Spoilers
Ten episodes into the Robert Patrick era of The X-Files, and have you noticed something? Whenever Doggett and Scully address each other, they precede their remarks with 'Agent', as in Agent Doggett or Agent Scully. Whereas with David Duchovny on board, it was always 'Scully' or 'Mulder', which carried a more personal ring to it, even if it was their last names. I think that's kind of interesting, an indication that Doggett and Scully truly haven't warmed up to the idea of being teamed up together on the X-Files.

Well I don't know, this episode seems to have a lot of disconnects. If you listen to Scully's theory about someone small taking up residence in a larger person's body, it didn't sound convincing even after we know it happened that way in the case of Fat Man Potocki (Calvin Remsberg). The first thing I thought about when I saw him was Sydney Greenstreet in "Casablanca"; that's why I tagged him as 'Fat Man'. Somehow Scully automatically assumes Potocki would have been thirty three pounds heavier if she had compared his autopsy weight against his known weight. But wait, why assume that, even if it was the case with the second victim? And why would the second victim be thirty three pounds heavier? The Beggar Man had already move on. See what I mean?

Later on, the little Beggar Man (Deep Roy) appears to have entered the boy Trevor (Michael Welch), but if so, the whole weight discrepancy thing gets blown up and you have to go with some other theory. I guess making the beggar man a Siddhi mystic or fakir who could do those kinds of mystical things is about the only explanation you needed here, making the earlier one unnecessary.

But the biggest problem comes with the resolution to the story. Scully suffered much angst over the idea that she shot at a young boy, while believing it was an illusion created by the Beggar Man. Why? Making the case of how Mulder would have handled it was all she needed to rely on to make the proper assessment. But then, when the Beggar Man showed up back in Mumbai, India, AFTER we presume he was shot dead by Scully - what is one supposed to make of that? As I say, big disconnect.
10 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
"Well that's just wrong!" Warning: Spoilers
This episode isn't quite as great as I remembered it but I still enjoy it enough, I wouldn't say that it's an episode that's deserving of outright hatred or anything, judging it solely by the small plot detail of the um.. 'Up the ass' thing would be doing it a bit of a disservice as it does have one or two pretty cool creepy moments and visuals. Why does he even have to travel to America that way anyway when his amazing abilities allow him to make people see pretty much anything he needs them to? Unless he just liked to but let's not even think about that! That's the problem with this episode, a murderous Pygmy-sized Indian mystic who hides in the stomachs of his victims and possibly controls them like dead puppets is pretty frightening stuff, but it must've worked better on paper because the story is noticeably thin and unfocused and seriously underdeveloped somewhere. And that's really too bad because the beggar man kicks ass! I tell you that man was tiny but he sure made a big impression, that piercing pinched little face is one you just don't forget. It does nothing to humanise him, he's so menacingly impassive about his grisly work and always has the same expression. He's a fantastic idea for a 'monster' and he feels like he represents something ominous and terrible like inexorable grim death or twisted karmic justice for hidden sins, or the dreaded 'exotic' spirit reaching out of the filth and poverty to strike down fat greedy and uncaring foreigners, third world vengeance for first world exploitation as it were? He's a very striking creation visually but it feels almost like they didn't know what to do with him in the story, we're never given any real insight into his plan or real motives apart from one throwaway sentence about a gas plant explosion, and that's annoying because if they'd only bothered to add just one little line or two that linked his victims together or suggested that they'd done some bad things while in India it would gone a long way to making the sloppy narrative a lot more coherent. It doesn't make sense how he could go after two young kids and kill a loving father when he himself used to be a father. I can't believe he was attacking them just to protect his identity, it isn't as if anyone would have believed them if they did tell. There's no rhyme or reason, the audience definitely needed a little more revealing of the details with this one.. I do like it but it falls short, the execution of the story is competent enough but not particularly spectacular or enlightening in any way. It had the potential for a great story but the plot holes and unanswered questions kind of f**k it up, and so I can only really enjoy it for its monster, if nothing else.. What I think regarding how it shows him alive and still up to his deadly tricks at the end is that maybe if his mental powers of illusion were truly so great then maybe he never left the Indian airport to begin with. The scene where he's in the police interrogation room but the camera shows that nobody's really there does I reckon suggest in a very roundabout way that he's not actually there at all... So overall to me it's a neat little bloody episode that's still fun and eerie to watch. The wheels are a little squeaky but it gets where it's going!
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A classic
treborbasset8 July 2021
Warning: Spoilers
For me this is a classic X-Files episode just because of how creepy the "monster of the week" is. It was seared into my memory for 20 years.

I was surprised when rewatching it that it was a season 8 episode with Agent Doggett, because that's not how I remembered it. I think it's a decent enough episode with a weird concept but it is lacking in explanations and resolution, which lets it down. It's a shame they didn't elaborate on the Siddhi aspect more or show more of what the villain was capable of and why he was doing it in the end, nothing is answered... at all.

I'm also not a fan of the personality swap Scully has in season 8. Gillian Anderson played the sceptical scientist so well for 7 season, and David Duchovny played the conspiracy theorist so well, that it was the combination of them and their charisma and rapport that basically made the show. It was an iconic duo. Having Scully give out Mulder's theories and Doggett be the (slightly more gullible) sceptic just doesn't work as well.

I could have really imagined Mulder carrying this episode with Scully refusing to believe, before ultimately being the one forced to kill the boy, and struggling to come to terms with it, which would have been more poignant than the ending we got, where her motives and feelings are more muddled.

I only rate this episode a 7 instead of a 5 or 6 because the little Indian man on a skateboard with no legs who climbs inside people is such a memorable and unnerving villain.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
To the Thailand guys comment above
jzap228822 July 2013
You're probably right. In fact, Duchovny probably didn't decide until last minute that he wanted out from this season and they HAD TO find someone to replace him in a way that all their work wouldn't go to waste and the way of doing that is bringing in Dogget and making him Scully and Scully Mulder. Regardless, I have liked a few Carter episodes but i understand you here. My favorite writer for the X-Files by the way, is Vince Gilligan. Than Frank Spotnitz. They always stood out the most to me but i also have many complaints with the X-Files... For one thing, they never seem to remember relevant memories, like in Hollywood A.D., Scully sais "Mulder, you do know that there aren't such thing as dead people, right?" Yet in that very same season just a few episodes earlier 'Millennium', she was ATTACKED by dead people. Just doesn't make sense when they do that and the writers should have worked together better to make sure their stories all fit. Back to season 8, I like Doggett so far, i started the entire show from season 1 and have gotten to season 8, currently just finished Badlaa and thought it sucked. 1 example, how did the bully Trevor know the janitor killed the other kids dad? Doesn't explain A lot. But the season itself isn't bad, i thought i was going to hate Doggett but he isn't bad, i just miss Mulder. I need to really investigate why this happened, why he is blank in pretty much the whole season and maybe next season for all i know.
7 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Fakir Fetish
mrdonleone6 February 2022
Realisation that Gillian Anderson and Robert Patrick really cannot act at all and this is nowhere more clear than in this episode which was good but really should have made by David to shove me and unfortunately it's not that he was still there so the question is why not when it was written clearly with him and then of course you come to the conclusion that it's just a money bribing sing and that you don't really want to know more about it and it could have been worked out better I mean secures and such things in maharajas and and people were unfriendly and all these things it's very important I could work it out so very cool science fiction scary movie but unfortunately this was not the case here and we can then only got clothes it wasn't great and that is very sad.
1 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
This whole episode doesn't make any sense.
Muldernscully10 September 2007
Badlaa is a good, creepy episode that is quite enjoyable to watch if you don't think about it too much. If you start thinking about it, the glaring plot holes start jumping out at you and lessen your enjoyment of the episode. With each viewing, they become more apparent to me.

I like in the beginning how Scully says her theory to Doggett slowly as if she can't believe what she is saying. The scene where Quinton's dad is killed reminds me of Folie a Deux where the lady is killed in her house. Both times screams are heard but then the person looks calm and undisturbed. I like how the other boy sees the janitor's face flicker.

I love seeing Chuck Burk in this episode. He has a much larger role than just one scene. After Doggett shuts down Scully's theory, she later divulges a new theory to Chuck, not Doggett. She knows Chuck won't shoot her down. I wouldn't be telling Doggett anymore theories either.

The apparition of the janitor that was just sitting in the police station is an interesting scene. However, they never explain when it disappeared. Or is it still sitting there to this day?

I love how Scully talks at the end about trying to see the case how Mulder would've seen it. It's great development for her character to try to step out of her shell a little.

These are the biggest problems with the episode:

How is the beggar able to get along without speaking? It makes the character creepier, but a principal wouldn't hire him as a janitor if he never spoke. Does he have "Pusher" abilities as well?

Early in the episode, Chuck says, "If this is for revenge, then why is he killing the people who he is killing?" John Shiban never answers that question. Big plot hole.

If the beggar didn't enter the mom, why are her eyes red? Isn't that the indication that he entered the person?

Also, at the end of a lot of X-files episodes, they show hints of the monster continuing on WHEN he gets away. When the monster is caught or killed, they don't show that. The beggar was shot and (supposedly) killed by Scully, then they show the 2 weeks later shot at the airport. How ridiculous! Completely unnecessary! That ruined the ending.

John Shiban did some good work for the x-files, but I think he had more mental lapses than any other staff writer. Upon initial viewing, Badlaa is a really good, creepy episode. But it loses it charms upon subsequent viewings as the plot holes emerge and sour the viewing experience.
57 out of 89 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
It makes absolutely no sense.
Sleepin_Dragon28 September 2022
An Indian man who wheels himself about on a small cart travels to The USA, several brutal, bloody deaths follow.

If you look back, my reviews of the more weird episodes are sometimes on trend as it were, but quite often I buck the trend, enjoying some of the weird and wonderful, but not in the case of Badlaa.

John Shiban wrote some of the wackier episodes, and penned some of my favourites, I will forever adore him for writing Dreamland, but here though, let's just say he had an off day.

I'll applaud it for the horror factor, Alien eat your heart out, this boasts one scene in particular that would give Freddie Kruger nightmares, that worked incredibly well, and was the highlight of this muddled episode.

I just didn't think it made any sense, there's no cohesion, it doesn't gel, Scully and Doggett's relationship has gone backwards, their dynamic felt off kilter somehow.

I'm a big fan of Deep Roy, an awesome role of credits, including Doctor Who, but the Beggar man just doesn't quite cut the mustard, Bill Dow was pretty good.

This is one of the poorer episodes, 4/10.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Worst Ever
gonewishing24 November 2013
Normally, my response to any X-Files episode which comes under extreme criticism is: It's just a TV show- get over it! As a series, I consider The X-files one of the best series in recently TV history. Most of the plots have some basis in reality, even if they did twist the facts to fit the show. The series gave you something to think about. This episode; however, was pure junk. Completely senseless and tasteless. There was no clear motivation for killings. INCONSISTENCIES everywhere. When David Duchovny left the show, he took a lot with him. This episode made me think the writers must've left the show, too. Season 1-7 were a success, season 8 struggled to get somewhere, and here it appears to have reached the bottom. Move along- nothing to see here, folks...
12 out of 35 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Worst ever
asthavchandraker18 April 2019
Oh my god! I love X-files. I loved even some of the worst episodes. But, this episode is the worst. I am an Indian and I found all of the things are factually wrong. I am so offended. If Chris Carter doesn't understand the exotic culture he should not make the episodes based on them. The acting is so off. Doggett does not know what to do. Scully is trying so hard to prove herself a believer.
9 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
I hate Chris Carter!
xnet9517 October 2010
Chris Carter has to be the biggest charlatan in the whole history of television producing. He sickens me, and I can't believe people put up with his and his staff's lazy writing for nine years. This episode is the epitome of why I despise this so-called man.

Carter milked the Scully-scientist-serious-give me proof cop against Mulder wacko-open minded-mystical cop for years until Duchovny had enough and bailed. At this point, Carter must've been ready to poop his pants because he could no longer MILK the tried and true formula that had served him so well. So, what does he do? Well, he makes Doggett the new Scully and Scully becomes Mulder (or at least tries to). This episode wastes valuable time on this, and it really destroys the whole episode. Instead of having to hear how Doggett doesn't believe what Scully is laying down, why couldn't that time have been used to answer why Mr. Oompa Loompa is in Washington DC killing the people he has chosen to kill? The reason is Chris Carter is a lazy jerk-off. He hides behind the theme that there are things out there that are unexplainable, so why waste energy trying to explain them. He sits there and laughs at his loving fans that will happily eat any excrement that Carter feeds them. During the first season he probably said to himself, "Oh my God, I can write anything I want and not explain it, not tie up ANY loose ends, and they'll buy it. Bwaaahahahaha - what a bunch of idiots!!!!!!!!!!!!!"

Trust me, I don't expect everything to be sewn up nicely like on Start Trek:TNG, but how about a little once in a while! Throw me a friggin' bone, people! This episode could've been awesome if a little time and care was put into explaining why the Indian mystic was killing these specific people and less on Scully being Mulder and Doggett being Scully.
24 out of 119 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
A 'Bad'laa episode
divelostmind25 July 2021
This is so boring. For the first time in my life I'm browsing my phone the whole time just to get through it. I haven't even finished it yet I'm halfway through but I needed to type this out just to bear these next 20 minutes or so. Half the scenes are just silent suspense building scenes of characters walking around with no plot development. I am pretty much forcing myself go get through these seasons so I can finish the series. Mulder pls come back.
2 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
I want some Badlaa after watching this
pat66442215 June 2022
Warning: Spoilers
This is a really bad episode. It made me long for First Person Shooter, the episode I used to consider the worst before this. This guy has two special abilities - to make people see illusions and to kill people by shooting up into their backside. I'm not sure who has it worse, the victim or the murderer. He then somehow pilots the corpse around like he's driving a car. One question comes to mind - how does he breathe in there?

The episode tries to be scary by showing someone talking to his illusory form, and then at the end of interaction shows him in his real form with dramatic music. He's the antithesis of an intimidating character though, so it's just silly.

The only part of the episode that was worth seeing was Scully admit she was trying to see things through Moulder's eyes, but couldn't. I just wish that scene hadn't been this debacle of an episode.
1 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Too many glaring plotholes to be enjoyable
xtheoldgodsx10 November 2022
Horrible. Just. Really awful. The plot makes no sense at all which leaves you wondering what the actual crap is going on the entire time.

I really enjoy Doggett as a character and like the energy he brings to the show but not in this episode. The story was weak and full of holes, the characters incredibly flat, and the relationship between Scully and Doggett has seemingly backpedaled into awkwardness. I think if there had been some kind of solid motive for the people who were killed or even a hint of reasoning, it would be almost passable... But there isn't.

So as it stands, this one may take the cake for my least favorite, most poorly realized episode.
0 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Can we please get an electrician to set?
pmicocci-1890815 July 2021
The early Noughties were tough at Fox; they couldn't even afford to light their programs adequately.

Or maybe Scully preferred to do her unauthorized autopsies in the half-dark, lit only from one side at a low angle, or from the inside of storage cabinets with plasric sheeting on the front. At least she had the good sense to make an audio recording of her illegal procedure. Oh, and to leave her sidearm on the trolley with her medical instruments, so that when she backed away startled from the totally unexpected stirring of the corpse's hugely distended abdomen she was cutting open, she would be sure to knock trolley and weapon to the floor, thus adding a few gripping seconds of tension to the scene.

And I for one was glad that an Indian mystic was wheeling around Maryland gruesomely dispatching random school kid punks and houewives - they got what was coming to them! Bet you'll think twice about blowing off the next panhandler who accosts you.

It's not hard to see why the X-Files was so popular in its day, or why it continues to resonate so strongly with so many fanboys. Not at all.
0 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Came up short
rjgrund-123-6034387 January 2024
Weak badly written script with bad editing. Sometimes things don't go as planned. Doggett says dead men don't tip the bellman when in fact he didn't tip the bellman. I get them making Scully be like Mulder and Doggett is Sculky now but the inconsistency in their characters feels like they are forcing it. All of the episodes before this one felt right and like Season 1 & 2 but this one doesn't belong anywhere. I've liked the season up until now. A episode like this would never get made today. And it shouldn't. Besides being offensive to Indians it's just bad. This was a major blip in things for me.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed