"Law & Order: Special Victims Unit" Loophole (TV Episode 2007) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Ambiguity
TheLittleSongbird8 July 2021
The story, when it comes to the concept, sounds very been there done that initially, or at least that is the case with the first quarter. There are a good deal of 'Law and Order: Special Victims Unit' episodes, and episodes even in the 'Law and Order' franchise, that have stories and themes done before, but they do something a lot less simple and more complex than it seems with them. They are though themes that are worth addressing and need to be.

"Loophole" mostly executes its story very well. It is an uneven episode and a case of one half being better than the other, but when it is good it is very good indeed. It is not as good as "Infiltrated" and "Burned", but it is leagues better than the underwhelming previous outing "Outsider" and has a lot to recommend. Most of them the usual things and "Loophole" does get better when things become not what they seem initially. So a good episode but not great.

Will start with the not so good things, which is not many things but the not so good things are major quality-wise. The first 15-20 minutes are fairly standard, and while it does hit hard certainly (how could it not do with the subject) it is not much different to other episodes with this theme or similar.

Also felt that the gear change when things turn out to not be what they initially seemed is on the jarring side, making it feel like a different episode in one. Especially with the truth being nearly unrelated.

Fortunately, the rest of "Loophole" is much better, with there being more complexity and more shocks. Have seen criticisms of the episode making it too clear what its point of view on the subject is (primarily in the second half) and for being heavy-handed in doing so. Well, subtlety is not a strong suit sure, but other 'Special Victims Unit' episodes since have fared far worse in this (some from Season 7, such as "Strain" and "Alien" were the same).

Second half actually struck me as very informative and even quite scary. Script is tense, concise and beautifully balanced with no waffle. The performances are very good and more, especially from Mariska Hargitay (apart from the unbelievable fainting) and chilling Ray Wise. "Loophole" is well made, intimately photographed and slick with no signs of under-budget or anything. The music didn't sound melodramatic or too constant and the direction is accommodating while still having pulse.

In conclusion, good but not great. 7/10.
9 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Season 8 Episode 13 "Loophole"
tallyho-3481029 December 2019
Warning: Spoilers
This is a review + more info of the Law & Order SVU episode called Loophole, S8 E13. I was prompted to do more research after reading about it in the book "Law & Order Special Victims Unit - The Unofficial Companion" by Susan Green and Randee Dawn. They mentioned that the airing of this episode prompted a lot of discussion and even a bit of online controversy, where the US Environmental Protection Agency had to issue a "Response to Television Show Depicting Illegal Pesticide Human Study" on their EPA website, which is now long erased & taken down, but I did manage to find a cached copy online on the Wayback Machine -- here's the actual text, preserved here for posterity:

-----------------

A Law and Order: Special Victims Unit episode with a story line about pesticide testing aired on February 6. The story depicted "research" involving intentional dosing of uninformed individuals, who were harmed by their exposure to an unregistered pesticide. The show was filled with factual inaccuracies. The kind of testing depicted on the show violates multiple requirements in EPA's regulations designed to protect all people from unethical research:

The show alleged there were loopholes for "observational research" in EPA's rules that would allow pesticide companies to conduct such a fictional study. The fictional study, however, clearly involved intentional dosing of children with pesticides (not observational research), and EPA rules categorically prohibit all intentional dosing studies with children, as well as with pregnant or nursing women.

While such a study would never be allowed, the fictional chemical company went even further and lied about the research and did not tell the subjects they were being exposed to dangerous organophosphate pesticides.

The study unnecessarily put the subjects' health at serious risk - a risk that would never be tolerated under EPA rules, no matter how fully risks were disclosed.

In February 2006 EPA issued a tough new regulation governing human testing for pesticides by pesticide companies and other parties not affiliated with the government. Our rule put in place the nation's strongest protections for subjects in third-party research, including:

  • A prohibition against research involving intentional dosing of pregnant women, nursing women, or children;
  • A prohibition against EPA relying on such testing in its decisions under the pesticide laws; and
  • A requirement that all new intentional dosing human studies on non-pregnant, non-nursing adults be reviewed by EPA and a panel of independent experts for ethical and scientific acceptability.


For more information, see these Websites: EPA's Human Studies Web page; The Common Rule, a set of existing requirements that govern the conduct of all human research performed by EPA and 18 other federal departments and agencies.

There was also an entire scientific study published in (I believe?) 2011, that measured public response to the original airing of this SVU episode, Effects of a Television Drama about Environmental Exposure to Toxic Substances" lots more fascinating reading for hardcore Law & Order SVU fans, but far too lengthy to re-post here. I thought this episode was edgy, SUPER informative, crucial and important for people to see, and took so many twists & turns that you never knew what was going to happen next (thank goodness it had a happy ending!)
12 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Lab Rats
bkoganbing30 August 2016
Only because I cannot wrap my head around the monstrous callousness of a chemical company using a city slum building as a testing facility and the tenants as lab rats is the reason I can't rate this as higher. It seems so unbelievably frightening.

An investigation into someone disseminating kiddie porn leads the SVU squad in the persons of Ice T and Mariska Hargitay to a certain dilapidated building. When nerve gas was being tested it's Olivia Benson who falls victim and nearly dies saving a little boy and his mother. The kid already has cancer.

Ray Wise gives a chilling portrayal as American capitalism unregulated and on steroids.

It's more public opinion that anything else that brings some and only some justice here.
8 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed