"Law & Order: Special Victims Unit" Confidential (TV Episode 2010) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
The confession
TheLittleSongbird11 May 2022
On first watch, "Confidential" struck me as a good but not great episode. It was compelling and had a wonderful guest appearance, but much of me was very disappointed that the episode left out what was hyped so much in the promos (an appearance from Jack McCoy, who ended up not in it after all). Have never been a fan really of how Stabler was written in Season 11, where he got away with far too much and was too much of a loose cannon.

"Confidential" still is a good but not great outing, is a major improvement over the previous two episodes (it would have been difficult though to be worse) and somewhere in the middle as far as ranking Season 11 episodes goes. My initial thoughts are pretty much the same now, with one thing elevating it to a greater level (the main reason as to why "Confidential" was not worse than it turned out) but also with one major aspect that unbalances the drama.

So much is good. Lena Olin is absolutely riveting and gives one of, perhaps even the, best guest turns of Season 11 and of the mid seasons, playing her role with great class and authority. Richard Burgi is effectively smarmy, despite his role being brief. Christopher Meloni and Stephanie March are also very strong, Meloni has lost none of his intense steel and March brings nuance and ruthlessness. It was great to see Munch back, with Season 11 criminally underusing him, and also Donnelly.

Did like that every SVU regular had screen time and a sufficient amount, instead of focusing on primarily one or two and everyone else getting brief look ins every now and again. The story is a very 'Special Victims Unit' scenario and executed in a way that's twisty, intriguing and with the right degree of tension. The script is tight and thought-provoking. It looks good, with the usual slickness and subtle grit. Really liked too that the photography was simple and close up but doing so without being claustrophobic. The music has presence when used, and luckily it isn't constant, and when it is used it doesn't feel over-scored. The direction allows the drama to breathe while still giving it momentum as well.

Stabler's character writing does unbalance the episode though. Once again he is too much of a loose cannon, in serious need of anger management and self-acknowledgement of his mistakes (the closest the season ever got to that was "Turmoil") and the episode does threaten to fall apart in his arresting of Ingrid. His getting away with things that would be considered sackable offense-worthy and in a few cases criminal really had gotten old by Season 11 and is by now truly tired.

Really hated the way Cabot is treated, getting the amount of flack she got for something that was not her fault (a case of the wrong person being blamed). The ending feels rushed and another one where something happens but shouldn't have realistically.

In summary, good but not great. 7/10.
13 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
explaining why there were no intervening murders
wdstarr-129 December 2020
Warning: Spoilers
I just want to respond to bkoganbing7's comment that "I would have trouble believing that a man would kill two women a quarter of a century apart and have no others pop up on law enforcement's attention." In-story, those were the only two times that the killer had felt that he *had* to kill someone in order to keep them from revealing his secret (that he was operating a Bernie Madoff-like very-long-running Ponzi scheme). The police weren't able to find any similar murders in the intervening years because there *weren't* any, because the killer hadn't needed to commit any.
12 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
I swore
yazguloner3 July 2021
In this episode, Elliot has the pain of not being able to save an innocent nearly.

This time it gets rid of the pain.

A beautiful and gripping episode.
11 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Attorney /client privilege
bkoganbing7 April 2016
Other than the fact that I would have trouble believing that a man would kill two women a quarter of a century apart and have no others pop up on law enforcement's attention this is not a bad episode for SVU. It focuses on attorney/client privilege.

Richard Burgi plays a Donald Trump like billionaire who is connected to both a fresh case and the method suggests a very similar one a killing of a woman 25 years earlier.

But the focus here is on his attorney Lena Olin who has a strange relationship with Burgi, almost like she's his mommy. Definitely weird.

The state tries to hold her responsible as well, how much did she know or how much did she surmise and how far does attorney/client privilege go. Specifically it's Christopher Meloni who has the questions and he also has some issues from previous episodes.

Olin is very good here, but I can't believe that SVU couldn't connect this guy to other cases.
16 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed