"Law & Order: Special Victims Unit" Torch (TV Episode 2010) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
6 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
When SVU's "stunt casting" works!
garrard28 April 2010
Warning: Spoilers
Of the three remaining airing shows in the "Law & Order" franchise, "SVU" is known for having guest stars that rarely do television: Ellen Burstyn, Ann-Margret, Margot Kidder, and Robin Williams, just to name a few. "Torch" added Sharon Stone to that list of luminaries as she started her first of four episodes as ADA Jo Marlowe, once the partner of Det. Stabler (Chris Meloni). Stone brings her trademark sexiness to the role, even suggesting that her character might've considered more than just a working relationship with Stabler. Her addition to the cast is inspired and hints at a little tension brewing between her and Benson (Mariska Hargitay) in regards to Stabler.

Kevin Anderson is extremely good as the father of two young victims killed in a house fire and the primary suspect in their murder. It's also refreshing to see veteran character actor Brad Dourif as an expert on fire who aids Stone in her efforts to find out what really happened in the fire.

Oscar nominee Lindsey Crouse returns again as Judge Andrews and "L & O's" Sam Waterston stops by reprimand Stone's Marlowe.

The resolution for this story is truly a surprisingly fresh one.
24 out of 32 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Stabler and Stone have history
bkoganbing2 June 2013
Sharon Stone who got everyone's motors running in Casino guest stars as a new Assistant District Attorney for Sex Crimes. She's got a good track record in the field, back in the day she was Christopher Meloni's first partner, he broke into SVU with her.

Though juries will take the testimony of cops with a grain of salt and in fact are always instructed never to give their testimony more weight than anyone else's at trial, they will accept the word of a fire marshal without question. That's what happens here as the SVU squad gets a case involving what is called an arson fire by the Fire Department and its expert Brad Dourif. He says it was an arson and furthermore the father of the girls set it.

So Meloni and Mariska Hargitay even though they have a suspect, drop him and arrest Kevin Anderson the father. It's a gut wrenching episode because even if the result was unintended, the fact of putting his single digit age daughters in harm's way revolts the audience and we always take the word of fire marshals.

This is a good episode with an unusual twist to it.
11 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Experts
yazguloner4 July 2021
An episode featuring guest stars. Fire experts and of course Sharone Stone.

A good episode.

Ps. It will be off topic but... actually it might not be so off topic.

Unfortunately, Sharone Stone is perceived as a sex object in my country. It is not detected as a player. But as far as I understand from my observations, this situation is not much different abroad. It is not perceived that there is a female player there either. This is actually a general problem among female actors.

For example, in the Svu seasons after Elliot's departure, if Elliot had done what Olivia did in the script, she wouldn't have received as much criticism.

Unfortunately, there are some sexist and fanatic eyes.
13 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Potential goes up in smoke
TheLittleSongbird13 May 2022
"Torch" got a lot of press before and when it first aired, not just for the subject matter (with it being eerily reminiscent of the Cameron Todd Willingham case) but also for it being the first appearance of Sharon Stone as Marlowe. Expectations were mixed, because the subject is an interesting and hard hitting one which is the good thing, and the show and franchise have done "ripped from the headlines" stories very well. The bad thing is that Stone is a long way from a favourite of mine and Marlowe never did it for me as a character.

Despite some good things and there are times where the subject hits hard (how could it not), "Torch" falls far short of the potential it had. Liked the subject, seeing McCoy back and Brad Dourif is always a plus in anything he's in (not to mention the episode has a particularly great guest star playing the accused), but the messy storytelling, Stone and Stabler's character writing really make the potential go up in smoke and a flaming hot disappointment.

Am going to start with "Torch's" good things. Most of the production values are solid, intimate without being too close up or static. The music is not too over-used or melodramatic sounding. The regulars are very good, with the lion's share going to Christopher Meloni on typically steely form.

Kevin Anderson does a great job as the accused, a pretty gut-wrenching turn where one is not sure of the outcome of something so unthinkably awful. Dourif is reliably good value as is Lindsay Crouse.

For those good things, there are a lot of major debits. For one thing, it doesn't feel like a 'Special Victims Unit' episode and is not a sort of case that they would take on as it is not the type of case they do. This would have been much better as an episode of 'Criminal Intent', Goren and Eames would have a perfect pairing for this story, would even have said it wouldn't be too out of place on the original 'Law and Order' but that show was in its final season and nearing the end of it. The story has a truly heart-rending and disturbing subject and one does feel a lot of sadness and anger, but to me it did get lost amongst the unprofessionalism of both Stabler and Marlowe, the truly weak and disorganised prosecution case which made me feel that the case should never have gone to court and that Stabler's loose cannon personality has really run its course.

It is hard to believe too how long it took for them to get to the truth, it is quite anger-inducing that somebody experienced had overlooked something that obvious. Will say though that it did reinforce my feelings of that Willingham not only should not have been executed but that he shouldn't even have been convicted. Stone is completely flat as Marlowe, especially her one-dimensional line delivery, and there is nothing interesting or easy to like about Marlowe. Have always found her annoying, a lot more disrespectful than Paxton and that she acts in a way that makes me wonder how she even got her job. For a team that went a long way back, Stabler and Marlowe are very disconnected and an odd couple as a teaming and also never liked how Marlowe seems to not have much of a problem with Stabler's behaviour.

Moreover, the dialogue is often very awkward (especially between Stabler and Marlowe) and over-heated. Instead of clap hand to the mouth worthy, the first scene seemed rather amateurish. The episode is one that easily could have been longer, it feels rushed, tries to cram in too much (making the latter stages muddled) and the logistics of the crime are all over the place. More could have been done with the ending, where the truth is not delved into enough and came over as revealed too late. While shocking initially, seeing as it was something that should have been considered early on in the investigation it was not that much of a surprise in hindsight.

Overall, disappointing. 4/10.
17 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Stone Sets a New Low
mikejkocik16 November 2017
I am long time SVU fan, and generally appreciate the writing and the characters. Mostly I like that not every episode has a neat or happy ending.

In this episode Sharon Stone plays a DA who happens to have been Stabler's training partner. There is a bit of the expected tension between Stone's character and Olivia. And of course, the regular SVU standby of friction between detectives and DA.

It's a decent episode and worth watching for the story.

However, it definitely taught me something new. Just how much of a colossally bad actor Sharon Stone has become. Her flat delivery is exceeded only by her poor timing. Maybe I am selling her short. Perhaps the Botox just numbed her entire face so that she has no emotion whatsoever. Whatever the case, I have seen high school players with wider range and better timing. It is genuinely painful to watch Stone's performance.
22 out of 37 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
This is a disrespect for real innocent man.
De-illusionist14 September 2014
Warning: Spoilers
Law&Order,especially SVU have been used real event as stories,without mentioning the story was real,and most of the time,only ending or small parts are different from real event.

This time,Real man is mentioned in episode. But if You know the name "Cameron Todd Willingham"who is mentioned in this story as "innocent man executed in Texas and (political)tragedy he had been suffered,",You may think this episode is just negligent. Whole story is Mr.Willingham and another innocent man in Texas (Saved by same scientist who tried to save Mr.Willingham.I avoid to mention his name as he is free man.)have experienced. Scientist in this episode is just a mimic of real person.Scientific experiment is same one.

Mr.Willingham's innocence is known for many people by Chicago Tribune,and New York Times's report ion 2009.in 2010,This episode was made quickly.They jumped to real story and mentioned about innocent man in Texas like an excuse.This episode is stolen from real man's life no one can get it back.
10 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed