It's probably not necessary to review this, as it's only been in the International Forum at Berlinale this year and your chances of having heard about it are slim. But on reminiscing on all the bad films I've seen on the festival circuit this year, this one easily comes up on top and therefore merits some warning.
'Terrorists' combines shaky digital footage of (not particularly attractive) Thai boys fondling or wanking themselves with shaky digital footage of the 2010 Bangkok protests. What sounds like an interesting (i.e. strange) idea is in fact an extremely obvious attempt to cash in on festival rep. Producer Jürgen Brüning is presenter at and on the board of the International Forum, which is how this film could make it into the program; he also owns Berlin-based gay porn company Cazzo. It's therefore an easy guess that 'Terrorists' combines soft-core footage of a regular porn shoot with newsreel stuff that the crew came up with when the protests happened.
What makes this so terrible is less the amateur direction and lack of coherence or background information, but willful distortion of facts mingled with the distinct impression that the filmmakers are not really concerned with the unrest they've seen, but rather try to cash in on it. The stills amply used are actually from the Chinese Cultural Revolution (including a very famous shot of a man hanged with barbed wire while Red Guards force a shoe down his throat); it is implied here that these were actions of the Thai military against communist rebels. Thus pictures of communist violence are being presented as pictures of violence against communists - therefore 'Terrorists' cannot be interpreted as a documentary even in the most generous terms. The idea was probably: 'If Weerasethikul could use stills of rebels in 'Uncle Boonmee', why can't I?' Only that those shots were actually real.
In the panel discussion, the director refused to elaborate what the conflict in Thailand was about, claiming that he would not do the (meanwhile defunct) government the honor of explaining who they are. This deepened my suspicion that he was faking his interest in the issue, for if someone makes a film about the situation in his country and gets the chance to present it to a festival audience, it would be logical to explain the situation to people interested in it.
Most likely none of this will matter to you, as it would be hard to catch this film anywhere anyway. But in case they're trying to market it on DVD and you find the idea intriguing - don't bother.
'Terrorists' combines shaky digital footage of (not particularly attractive) Thai boys fondling or wanking themselves with shaky digital footage of the 2010 Bangkok protests. What sounds like an interesting (i.e. strange) idea is in fact an extremely obvious attempt to cash in on festival rep. Producer Jürgen Brüning is presenter at and on the board of the International Forum, which is how this film could make it into the program; he also owns Berlin-based gay porn company Cazzo. It's therefore an easy guess that 'Terrorists' combines soft-core footage of a regular porn shoot with newsreel stuff that the crew came up with when the protests happened.
What makes this so terrible is less the amateur direction and lack of coherence or background information, but willful distortion of facts mingled with the distinct impression that the filmmakers are not really concerned with the unrest they've seen, but rather try to cash in on it. The stills amply used are actually from the Chinese Cultural Revolution (including a very famous shot of a man hanged with barbed wire while Red Guards force a shoe down his throat); it is implied here that these were actions of the Thai military against communist rebels. Thus pictures of communist violence are being presented as pictures of violence against communists - therefore 'Terrorists' cannot be interpreted as a documentary even in the most generous terms. The idea was probably: 'If Weerasethikul could use stills of rebels in 'Uncle Boonmee', why can't I?' Only that those shots were actually real.
In the panel discussion, the director refused to elaborate what the conflict in Thailand was about, claiming that he would not do the (meanwhile defunct) government the honor of explaining who they are. This deepened my suspicion that he was faking his interest in the issue, for if someone makes a film about the situation in his country and gets the chance to present it to a festival audience, it would be logical to explain the situation to people interested in it.
Most likely none of this will matter to you, as it would be hard to catch this film anywhere anyway. But in case they're trying to market it on DVD and you find the idea intriguing - don't bother.
