24: Legacy (2016–2017) User Reviews

Lost it's soul

[wilson-michael24 · 6/10 · 20 February 2017]

I absolutely love the show "24" and was really looking forward to this series.

Episode #1 wasn't bad but Episode #2 is where this show got extremely stupid *** SPOILERS BELOW *** Breaking in to a police station to steal money to pay off his friend? Your telling me a government protection agency like CTU which has the Presidents doesn't have the resources to either request the money or get it elsewhere? I'm sorry, I know the show takes liberties but this is beyond any scope of believability.

They lost me here.

To add; Carter looks too young and out of his league to be believable as a hero. I just didn't get behind him.

Let's pretend this season never happened...

The importance of good acting from the lead, which is what's lacking right here...

[davidkcwong · 6/10 · 8 February 2017]

Being a huge fan of 24, knowing 24:Legacy coming out was good news. Anticipating with excitement, and watching it with lowered expectations after reading some reviews, it turned out... is the same old good, 24.

What's good with the old 24 was the intensity, the spying, story-line, plot holes, all the flaws and amazing acting by Kiefer Sutherland. With 24:Legacy, everything remains except for the good acting (from the lead mainly).

It's inevitable to compare 24 with this new show, especially when 24 only ended not too long ago. Having said that, it's also important to keep an open mind that as all the actors have changed, the chemistry of the show would also differ. All in all, the story is as expected (good old CTU), the intensity is there, the constant search for the mole through the story, basically everything we enjoyed from 24 is replicated. So if you're looking for something new, this may not be for you. But if you're never tired of the same old 24, then you may enjoy this.

With all that said, there is only one problem. The lead actor, Corey Hawkins, playing Eric Carter. One of the main reason 24 was so great was because of Kiefer Sutherland. Until this day, I could still picture Jack Bauer in my head of how he would react and handle different situations and national crisis. Unfortunately, Corey Hawkins does not live up to this legacy. 5 mins in the show and I realise his acting is not up to par. Blank facial expressions, poor action scenes, with little to none chemistry with other actors/actresses. Having only watched the first episode, I truly cannot understand and relate at all what this character Eric Carter is, which is pretty much the main job of an actor. Now fortunately, the supporting roles were done properly by all others. Whether it's Carter's wife or his brother, CTU members, and even the terrorists, all performed on an acceptable standard.

There's no one TV series or movie that's perfect. So, accepting one's flaws and enjoying the show is all we, as audiences can do. But, if the acting of the lead does not shape up, that's too much of a flaw to bare and I might just give up after a few episodes. Let's wait and see.

For now, I'll give it a 6/10.

Worst Storyline ever... Full of plot holes

[ahmetlutfiaksoy-647-695484 · 5/10 · 28 March 2017]

I have watched episode 9 just seconds ago.

I have been following this series from the first Season and it has been my favourite show up until now.

Not the cast.. not the director... They are OK..

But the plot holes made this series non-watchable now.

No need to go in details.

Watch yourself and see...

Big Disappointment

[princesscasmere · 18 March 2017]

I really wanted to love this series as I loved 24. What I can't get over is this show is on the same channel as the original so you would think it would follow the regular and be as intense and real as the prior. This is not the case. Some parts look so fake it takes away from the intensity of the show. The acting is just mediocre but I think that's more the writing. None of the characters seem real. I think the writers followed Kiefer over to channel 7 as designated survivor has been great.

While 24 was diversified and even before it's time by having a black president then a women president this show tries to hard to make sure everyone is represented but still has the stereo typical villains. The thing that bothers me the most though is there are no " oh sh*t " moments. In 24 there where those moments that jumped out and just changed what I was thinking. Some even blew me away. You don't get that here as it is fairly predictable and there are no surprises.

It's a show living on the reputation of the prior and doesn't feel like it needs to work that hard when it fact it needs to work twice as hard to prove itself. I will stick it out this year but will not be watching after that.

Same old but OK

[drago_85 · 7/10 · 6 February 2017]

I am a big fan of 24 from the very beginning. Season 1 and 2 are still the best for me (meaning lesser plot holes and suspension of disbelief). From there the show kept repeating itself and became quite generic, even so generic that you can effortlessly predict the twists coming. And yet I continued watching and enjoying - the characters were solid, the pace was good and all in all I got what I wanted and what I enjoyed (just not so much as the the first season which is normal).

24: Legacy is no different - it follows the same formula, it doesn't offer anything new but also it does not take away what we need in 24 - characters and pacing. Which is alright for me - I don't expect anything groundbreaking anyway. Something that is bugging me a little - since this will be aimed at hardcore fans I just would like to see more references towards the old series (so far we got just one for Edgar Stiles and waiting for Tony Almeida to appear).

The new lead is quite alright, also I never thought that 24 should end with Kiefer (don't get me wrong he was born to play this role) so I am not taking out any points for him missing.

To conclude: it is the same old done according to the standards. Nothing more, nothing less.

Oh boy

[inc-133-70013 · 6/10 · 6 February 2017]

Based on premiere, huh. It's still 24, that's for sure. Show opens with 3 nearly omnipotent Muslim terrorists wiping out 4 Army Rangers on their own turf. That's the fascinating part of 24: enemies so horrible they're barely real.

But then, all the check boxes will get ticked really quickly...

High-position spy in CTU? Check. Probably not the spy after all, but a guy holding grudges and keeping CTU back for the rest of the season, but someone else actually is a spy? Probably.

CTU HQ being a damp, dark basement with question how analysts don't go blind in this place never got asked? Check.

Generating "4D environment" from 3 cameras? (what) Check.

Computers still not using mice? Check.

Computers that zoom, open files and slides with no input while someone's talking about the same stuff? Check, somewhat.

I'll bet next episodes will have "tapping into trunk lines" and "opening protocols" and all that other dumb techno babble that has no basis in reality. I'm still sad to see that this, very essential part hasn't really matured. Could someone go over and hit producers' face with a laptop?

Moving over large distances in insanely short time? Check. I wouldn't be surprised if all the other tropes are there too, such as:

The initial plot gets resolved and then turns into part of much bigger plot in the mid- season

CTU has actually 2 double agents / CTU gets attacked directly (or hacked)

One of the friendly characters turns into bad one (my bets are on Isaac, protagonist's gangster brother... or her jealous girlfriend) etc

Eh, well. Another essential part of 24 has always been the protagonist. I think "Legacy" is on shaky grounds here too - while Jack Bauer was not only an ex- special forces soldier, he was also a seasoned operative. New lead is not, and his experience, while not explained yet, seems to be very low. So we get a young un' with a gun, doing all kinds of crazy antics involving shooting ropes off sewer pipes and running into three gunmen or having prolonged debates with ex-colleague while said gunmen are basically next to him.

It's fresh, but not quite 24. Then again, I'd not rather see poor Jack Bauer suffer through another season of torture, beating, pain of loss, and endless betrayal by both friends and enemies. So all that's left to see is how quickly new kid picks up the trade.

So far, it's classic 24, but all the horrible faults and tropes are still there, too. I wonder how many seasons it takes to clean them up.

You'll like it if you are a fan of the format, not so much if you think Jack Bauer when you see 24.

[vonnoosh · 6/10 · 13 February 2017]

2 episodes in, and everything about 24 Legacy reflects the 24 series. Intrigue, suspense, and action is in abundance.

It's debatable if you prefer the 24 season broken down into 24 episodes, covering every minute of the day or this format which has gaps because it's one day shown in 12 one hour episodes. I liked the series better when it was 24 episodes but too often the twists and turns to plot don't work as well over a full 24 episodes. 12 episodes allows for better writing and a more cohesive plot. Part of me still thinks if this series did run 24 episodes, the new characters would have a better chance of shining through and be better associated with he name of the series. This is an uphill battle in only 12 episodes. 24 episodes means more air time for the actors of course but more situations for the characters to develop in the viewer's mind.

I did not like 24 : Live Another Day much when it was done. There was closure of course and an opportunity to bid farewell to series regulars but the 12 episode format didn't develop much story beyond the surface and the plot twists had less impact since they weren't being played out longer in the full context of the story.

The problem with calling this spinoff 24 is that if you always associated the show with Bauer, Chloe O'Brien or whoever during those 8 seasons plus 24:Live Another Day, then this won't feel much like a spinoff of the original 24 except in name only.

The casting is good, the story is fine so far. If you liked the 24 show, you will like this but if you can't get past thinking of the characters from the original series when seeing that logo appear at the start of the episodes except for the potential of occasional cameos or references, then perhaps you may be disappointed.

Personally, I always thought spinoffs of a successful show focused on one character from the original show and made him or her the focal point forward. Frasier is a spinoff of Cheers because the character was in Cheers etc, but I guess I was wrong? This show, with any other title, could be a success.

Missing that old spark.

[recklesscow · 4/10 · 20 March 2017]

I remember when the original "24" began, it was the best thing since sliced bread in terms of TV. In 2001 we were just beginning to see the upward tick of quality series that would eventually lead to a golden age of television with networks like HBO, FX, AMC, and now Netflix contributing some of the most engaging series ever made for the small screen and turning television into an experience akin to going to the cinema.

"24" was dark, edgy, it had novelty with the fresh real-time concept, and it had a very engaging plot and a great lead. It was TV crack.

"Legacy" attempts to recapture that magic, but ultimately fails. It's not that Kiefer is no longer around. It's not that the real-time format is old hat now. It's the fact that the human drama is no longer interesting and the plot is a rehash of old ideas like being served warmed-up leftovers that have been in the fridge a day too long.

The suspense isn't as intense, the actors aren't as intriguing, and there's no blonde little girl running around getting into mishaps with cougars and everything else. In essence, the "magic" is missing from this reincarnation and that feeling of being on the edge of your seat for the entire hour is sorely lacking. This is "24", no doubt, but it's a hollow version of its predecessor that lacks bite and feels so very routine. Even the dark, brooding nature of the original series is absent and composer Sean Callery's themes are strangely lackluster and fail to pull you in.

I am holding out hope that this improves, though as of this writing we are currently on episode 5. As of now, this is watered-down "24" with no soul, no grit, and no spunk. What do you have left? A by-the-numbers action series with shootouts, explosions, and people running around "doing things." This reboot needs a soul. Right now it's "watch in the background while playing on your phone" material.

24 legacy is still kicking ass

[ivalrie · 10/10 · 5 February 2017]

Only ignorant, racism people as the previous reviewer will describe the show as "pathetic black-washed crap" 24 has always and will always be one my favorite TV show. Jack Bauer was a great agent, but just because Eric Carter is black, this doesn't make him any less of a great actor than Jack. So people grow up, and try to evolve. Carter is fine. He has a warm voice That's make him sound very interesting. He has such a high lethal confidence when he's kicking ass, which convince me of his character. And there's no undying of his anger and frustration to spill blood after finding out that they've killed most of his crew, so I'm positive that he has more than enough to fill Jack's shoes when he joined CTU.

Didn't Think It Would Work W/out Jack Bauer...

[MovieHoliks · 7/10 · 20 February 2017]

I saw the "24" mini-series on 3 years ago, "24: Redemption" I think it was called? -- and wasn't terribly impressed w/ that show really. I had never watched the original series when it was on from 2001 to 2008 or 2009, whenever, but watched the whole series in a series of "bing watches" off Netflix in the early 2010's, and just couldn't imagine having to wait from week to week to see what happened to our hero, counter-intelligence agent, Jack Bauer (played of course by Kiefer Sutherland) from week to week! LOL

This "reboot" of the TV franchise finds a new CTU agent (Corey Hawkins, "Straight Outta Compton") in a similar situation as to many we've previously seen JB in over the years, and I just didn't think I was going to be able to accept anyone other than that character, but to my pleasant surprise, this is a really exciting show - EVEN watching them week to week as I have been the first few shows. Miranda Otto, Jimmy Smits and Gerald McRaney co-star.

Destined to be mediocre

[Remingtontr · 4/10 · 19 February 2017]

My first experience with Corey was through the Walking Dead and I was certainly impressed with what he gave us during his short screen time. Unfortunately, I think he made a mistake of taking the lead role in a spin off that was never going to work. My mom and I watched every episode of the original 24 and when it came to the end, there was no doubting that the show had run its course. Hate to break it to you, but Eric is no Jack Bauer even though we're only a few episodes in. It's boring, predictable and uninteresting.

Admittedly, I am a bit of a walking dead fanboy. In my humble opinion, Corey went for the short-term gain instead of looking at the long-term. Needless to say, I don't see this lasting very long as a fan of the original and after watching the first few episodes.

Kept my interest the entire time

[chrisdye-17212 · 9/10 · 8 February 2017]

I will say that I am not usually one to be taken by action programs however this is a complete exception I was on the edge of my seat watching Mr Carter battle the same people who he thought were with him and I have to say that I have found a new program to keep me waiting for Monday night yes it may have lost viewers but I personally don't see how it could have I was blown away by the sense of adventure and action packed fun here pure thrilling adventure if you are not a action fan I still recommend it for you to try and see how you enjoy it I personally would not be able to see anyone not liking it but it is just my opinion on the matter of the subject I will say that I have not seen a action show in quite awhile and can only hope it gets better and judging by what I saw I am in for a treat

This is a 50/50 (SPOILER ALERT!!!!)

[jonnyjay · 7/10 · 6 February 2017]

Some aspects of the plot are more or less from the previous series, where the main actor can not trust an institution they work for. I like the spin off elements, though some parts could be better.

I know a lot of people especially my girlfriend want Kiefer Sutherland (Jack Bauer) back, but with how "24: Live Another Day" ended there was no realistic way to have Jack return to the states and lead and lead a normal life, maybe he'll come in a cameo or something but I seriously doubt that. Corey Hawkins(Eric Carter) delivers a great character who has his own unique back story that is yet to be told, Eric clearly has unspoken demons and comes from what seems to be a dysfunctional family (which everybody does).

As with all 24 previous seasons, each character has a lot to gain and lose, a vantage point. Anyone who hates this should remember that it isn't Jacks show, its a show that tackles Terrorism on the domestic and global theater; Pierce Brosnan was a great Bond, Daniel Craig didn't have to replace him but showed a different James Bond.

Lacking, in writing, plot ,characters , innovation

[jodake · 2/10 · 6 February 2017]

Seems to be impossible to give a Spoiler Alert for this show as you seen it all before. Legacy is similar to original, same feel in a sense, but this seems like 24 the soap opera edition and poorly written soap with clichéd black character types. Lead as yet don't stand out. Had expected more innovation than poor imitation. It would be nice to see characters which went against the stereo-typical,here you know in advance, what they will say , how they will say it and you even know exactly how they will walk with attitude. Besides the writing being poor, it is mostly a rehash from the past easily anticipated. If this series is to survive the writers have to come up with clever dialogue to give the characters some depth,creative not rehashed diatribe we have seen so many times before.

Oh boy....this sucked!

[shiva-kakkar11 · 21 March 2017]

I am from India and 24 was the first television series I started watching. It was a hell of a ride. But this one.....I couldn't stand the first 15 minutes! It was utterly ridiculous and exasperating. As pointed out by many, this is more of a left-liberalist diversity propaganda rather than an engrossing thriller series. I am not white and even I can make out that they are trying to unnecesarily portray white people in a negative light, especially males. They should understand that Keifer Stherland wasn't successful because he was white. It was because he looked the part of a CTU agent to the T. The temperament he displayed convinced viewers that this is a man who'll break the rules if it gets the job done. This legacy stuff is non-sense. I wasn't able to make out whether they rebooted 24 or parodied it. This is SAD! They absolutely ruined it!

Poor Casting overall decent

[paulmueller-858-539929 · 6/10 · 21 March 2022]

Overall this is a decent enough watch to keep you entertained... However the casting is horrible.... My primary beef is Jimmy Smits as Gerald McRaineys son.... A) They look nothing a like.... B) Jimmy Smits looks as old as Gerald McRainey if not older and in real life there is only 5 years difference in age between the 2... If I was McRainey I would have been pissed. Even the actor who plays his uncle is only 4 years difference in age Daniel Zacapa. If real life counter intelligence units operate as inefficiently as the CTU in the tv show its surprising there hasnt been more terrorist attacks. Agents acting outside the law what appears to be all the time. Lead character robs a police station and is allowed to continue on... its all a bit crazy. Casting director should definately be fired from hollywood..... Horrible casting.

Not as good as 24

[orr-21168 · 6/10 · 14 April 2017]

I was hoping this was going to be as good as the first 8 seasons of 24 but so far it has been a big disappointment so I have just deleted from my DVR. The writing acting and story lines are poor to fair and you do not get that rush that 24 had. On a good note Designated Survivor is great so that is my replacement for my 24 fix.

Too much black getto drama

[clive_1999 · 6/10 · 23 April 2017]

Not bad, hope the next season cuts back on the getto family drama. Really didn't like seeing that black skank wife of Eric Carter. Maybe they'll dump her for a white woman like all successful black men do in real life. And that ugly Indian woman at CTU has to go also, I can smell the curry thru the TV.

Does not really carry the legacy of "24"

[ritesh2028 · 3/10 · 16 February 2017]

nothing really connects this time, there does not seem to be any emotional connection between the lead hero and her wife, it looks like everyone is forced to play their character. Plot suggests a large sleeper cell attack is being planned on American Soil, from CTU to Lead hero no one's expression, action suggests that a threat is really looming over their country. Lousy acting what is all I see this time. I have tried three episodes and every episode has decreased my interest in the show. Jimmy Smits seems more convincing in his role than any one else. But i truly hope this show gets better as the time goes by but for now i am not too sure if will really keep audience attracted to it.

Ignore the critics

[the_remixer08 · 9/10 · 6 February 2017]

This show is full of action and suspense. The ratings had a lot to do with the super bowl. I never really understood why they show premiers after an exciting yet draining super bowl game, especially one that goes into overtime for the first time. It's late and people are ready for bed afterwards. I couldn't even watch it when I wanted to and I am a strong believer of helping with ratings.

A lot of people who are fans of the original 24 also have a hard time not comparing this one to the original, but I truly believe that Corey Hawkins is holding his own. It's called a reboot for a reason. It's not supposed to be the same. The sooner fans realize that, the better off they will be. If you are a true fan, I encourage you to to go into this series with an open mind and accept the fresh faces.

Review after 4 episodes

[my-647-826944 · 7/10 · 5 March 2017]

I mean, we all wanted to see Jack Bauer on screen kicking asses once more. I did too, but it's about time to let that beloved character go.

This new series is again about highly trained and tech-skillful terrorist's haunting the US's top agency CTU. It has all the past stuff like a superb tactics agent (loved that Edgar Stiles reference), a rogue leader (former leader in this case), a complete ass and stick-to-the-rules head.

Unfortunately for Middle East people, you are the bad guys once more. Not that I don't like it, but I don't see cartel kingpins to become a terrorist threat to US government.

I'm kind of liking it so far. Perhaps based on my guy Bauer, and even with their faulty scenes filled with tech gaps, terrorists always one step ahead of the "good fellas", ridiculous moments (police station escape scene), I will continue to its conclusion.

It it gets renewed (which its highly possible), I will be a fanboy once again.

The 24 legacy should have been left well enough alone.

[Cinemaniac1984 · 4/10 · 21 July 2017]

24: Legacy was never going to be the same without Kiefer Sutherland's Jack Bauer. It was just common knowledge. At least 24 ended on a good note when it finished in 2010. I'm still yet to see 24: Live Another Day, but my interest was sitting on the 50/50 mark. I thought I'd give 24: Legacy a chance regardless, but after the first episode it was just the same thing done all over again albeit with a different cast.

Nothing against Corey Hawkins stepping into the shoes as the heroic Eric Carter, but he just doesn't have the same presence and charisma as Kiefer Sutherland's Jack Bauer.

24: Legacy just didn't have me hooked from the first episode. Rewind back to the very first episode of 24, and there were plenty of twists and turns to have you hooked as well as a variety of interesting characters. 24: Legacy failed to tick all the right boxes.

Just as well that 24: Legacy was cancelled after one season. It just could not resurrect the same popularity, and a lot of 24 fans were very indifferent. Sorry, but the 24 legacy should have been left well enough alone.

4/10.

Jack Bauer was great but, if you want more 24, you need to let him go.

[dbsoundcheck-132-655104 · 8/10 · 14 March 2017]

We all know that Kiefer Sutherland was the man when it came to 24. 24 Legacy is a new show that is trying to fill the void. If you expect the show to be the same you will absolutely 100% be disappointed. However, if you are open to change, 24 legacy is awesome! You need to watch it with a mindset that there is no main character. It is CTU and there is a terrorist threat. There are new characters, and possibly some revisited from the original series. In any case, if you are looking for a great show to watch and you liked the original, you will love this show. You just need to let Jack Bauer go and have an open mind.

Not as good as 24, but Fox MUST do season 2. Here's the reason

[knightspublic · 6/10 · 18 April 2017]

I think if audiences didn't have the original 24 to compare against, this show might get higher ratings. I found it entertaining enough to continue watching despite some of the negatives that others have pointed out.

I hear that Fox is still deliberating about whether to go forward with season 2. I think it should be a "no brainer" for Fox if they consider the LONG-TERM consequences of canceling instead of just the short-term. Here are some of the long-term factors they should consider:

1) Further damage to their brand

They already suffer from a reputation of canceling shows prematurely, leaving the audience hanging mid-plot.

2) The genre of the show

This isn't just a sitcom what provides relative closure after each weekly episode, it has an ongoing, intrigue-building, multi-faceted, conspiratorial plot. Because of this, audiences have invested a lot of their time having their curiosity piqued and intensified week-after-week. The reaction when a show like this is ended without closure (or with obviously-contrived and rushed faux closure after they decide to cancel) is not just disappointment (as in, "shoot, I'm going to miss that show"); it is frustration and anger; it is visceral. The audience feels cheated and manipulated. And they will hold a grudge.

3) The new watching habits of audiences--especially for series like this one

Because audiences have already been burned by networks canceling shows mid-plot, many of them have learned not to commit to one. Rather than joining in with the week-by-week audience, they simply wait until a season completes and ensure the show isn't being abandoned before they commit to it. And often, at that point, they binge watch it.

This new audience behavior pattern should not, however, be interpreted as being proof that the genre is no longer valid. In fact, audiences LOVE it. And they love it especially because they now have the liberty to queue up and binge watch rather than being held in suspense every week. The networks just need to create a strategy and business model that takes in to account the audiences' likely viewing behavior for this genre so that they can monetize it profitably. And one indispensable component of profitable strategy is to provide their audience assurances that they when they commit to a series like this, they will see it through to a satisfying closure. If they don't provide that, they'll find public excitement for this "keep-me-in-suspense-each-week" genre will continue to dwindle.

Stupid version of great show

[rohanal · 1/10 · 22 November 2017]

If you have not already seen the 8 seasons of 24 and the bonus season in London, then watch those. This is not worth your time. From an unbelievable, cliché, and stupid plot line, I stopped watching after a few episodes. Honestly does not have anything interesting despite having big possibilities. Re-watching 24 is better than seeing this garbage!