Saul at Night (2019) Poster

(2019)

User Reviews

Review this title
3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
9/10
Still thinking about it
jramirez199521 May 2023
There is in the background of Cory Santilli's feature debut (written by Daniel Miska) a science-fiction premise explaining why it is that protagonist Saul (Kentucker Audley) keeps a strictly calibrated waking schedule that is different from everyone else's - including that of his wife Kathryn (Stephanie Ellis) and daughter Cleo (Acadia Colan) - but Saul at Night keeps that explanatory frame somewhat vague and abstract in its background, while preferring to focus on the psychological and emotional toll taken by only ever seeing one's loved ones asleep.

For even though Saul inhabits the same house, even the same rooms, as his family, they haunt each other's lives like ghosts, and Saul's loneliness in the long night hours leads him to compensate for his wife and child's absence by staging domestic scenarios in which he shares meals and time with mannequin copies of them.

Even the discovery of fellow nocturnal dweller Amalur (Suzanne Clément) serves only further to highlight both these characters' isolation, given that, for all the time that they are now condemned to spend with each other, they speak different languages (she is Francophone) and are unable to understand each other. Subtitles privilege us to appreciate, even better than they can, how deep the contrast is anyway between them in their differing attitudes and responses to their respective exiles from family, as Saul seeks vainly to maintain a fantasy simulacrum of his home life, while Amalur prefers to turn her back on hers.

You can sense the influence of Charlie Kaufman in the common, broadly existentialist themes of memory, alienation and oblivion, and more specifically in the blue-dyed hair that Cleo shares with Clementine Krczynski (Kate Winslet) from the Kaufman-scripted Eternal Sunshine Of The Spotless Mind (2004) and very particular surnames (Capgras, Cotard) which also occurred in Kaufman's Synecdoche, New York (2008), alluding significantly in both films to psychiatric delusions which are dramatised by the characters' actions and afflictions.

Much as Kaufman's Anomalisa (2015) reduced its characters' all too human flaws and routine drudgeries to stop-motion puppetry, here characters are replaced with dummies and dolls, as the most everyday of activities are turned into performance. Meanwhile Santilli, whose film had its world premiere in Tallinn, finds his own clock-based rhythm, as aching as it is absurd, for these melancholic motifs, making Saul at Night a moving mystery that, in never fully answering the questions that it raises, will continue occupying the rooms of your mind in both waking and sleeping hours.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Saul by Night
BandSAboutMovies3 February 2022
Warning: Spoilers
As a result of a bizarre experiment, Saul Capgras ihas become used to a life of isolation at night, while the rest of the city - and his family - all sleep under a mandated curfew. Saul is the only person left awake at night - perhaps by choice or sacrifice - and he yearns to experience the lives of his family, despite never seeing them awake ever.

Then, he meets Amalur, who avoids her family because she doesn't want to know that life has gone on without her.

From 10 PM to 6 AM, the world sleeps while Saul and Amalur roam the world, the only connection left with others being the notes left in a basket for them. And, at times, a beeping monitor forces them to take pills and answer the questions of a computer.

Unfortunately, Saul and Amalur speak different languages and can't understand one another, which is better than the life Saul has been leading, which finds him using large dolls to take the place of his loved ones.

The first full-length movie from director and writer Daniel Miska, Saul at Night uses science fiction to tell us all a story about being alone, about loss and about how our worlds can be so far apart. There's a lot to try and understand here, with no easy answers, but I found it especially poignant given the trapped world that we're all living in, then escaping briefly, then living in again.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
A "short" would have amply sufficed
imdbcom-6996913 May 2023
There are too few details that could explain, or at least give some clues about the situation and too little depiction of the characters' inner selves to drag this into a full-length movie. Keeping everything at a symbolic level, a "short" 20 min version would have been acceptable because some ideas in there about communication, or absence thereof, and the absurdity of a world dominated by computers are not new but are given an original context. Acting is ok but the script is so minimalist and the characters so poorly developed anyway that it does not require any high-level interpretation. The movie reminded me of Lluís Quílez's Grafitti, a beautiful short.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed