"Law & Order: Special Victims Unit" Mea Culpa (TV Episode 2018) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
6 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Mea Culpa
bobcobb30124 November 2018
Warning: Spoilers
The show certainly went further toward the center of #MeToo than I expected, but it is still missing the point. Olivia quickly judged the story as "credible" despite the fact that Ms. Kent lied about her original account.

It was an entertaining episode, but I wish the show would keep politics out of it. Knowing Dick Wolf that will never happen though.
18 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Fault
TheLittleSongbird25 May 2023
Expectations were mixed before rewatching "Mea Culpa", an episode that didn't do much for me on first watch. The story did have some potential despite traps and have no issues with the cast, but 'Law and Order: Special Victims Unit' have a very variable track record with mixing cases with personal life drama. And generally up to this still early stage of Season 20 had not done a good job with the personal life drama aspect, particularly with Stone and the way his way his dealing with his sister's death has been written.

"Mea Culpa" doesn't quite work. As far as the first half of Season 20 goes, this is one of the weaker episodes. There are a few of the usual strengths, but also some faults that have been issues for a few seasons as well as Stone still not being a well written character. "Mea Culpa" is not an awful episode and has its good things, but it also could have been so much better than it turned out and is one of the lesser episodes of Season 20 in general. To be seen for 'Special Victims Unit' complest sake, but not an awful lot more. It certainly does very little, if anything, to change my negative feelings on Stone.

There are good things here. The production values as ever are slick and with the right amount of muted grit, the photography doesn't try to do anything too fancy or gimmicky while not being claustrophobic and keeping things simple. The music doesn't overbear with the theme tune still memorable.

Peter Scanivino does a great job making Carisi's material work and makes the absolute most of it. Mariska Hargitay is also commanding.

However, too much of the SVU are underused. Excepting Olivia, who is used too prominently and is not much different than how she has been for a few seasons. Carisi has the best and most interesting material by far but deserved a good deal more material than he got. Especially considering that this is a milestone episode for him (his 100th).

Furthermore, "Mea Culpa" felt like an attempt to make Stone interesting, but it fails in this aspect. The episode doesn't build on him and basically reiterates what we already know about him, so he is still very under developed. Phillip Winchester is bland and looks like he's walking through the role. The main issue is that the story just didn't grab me. The episode goes at a dull pace throughout, the truth is never really in doubt, it is very contrived and far too reliant on silly coincidences. The script has too much soap opera.

Overall, rather lacklustre. 4/10.
11 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
SVU Continues Sliding into Soap Opera Mediocrity
bkkaz2 October 2020
Warning: Spoilers
In the past few years, SVU has positioned itself not as "ripped from the headlines" so much as "cobbled together from some Websites." Case in point: Mea Culpa is less like a story than an idea. What if an uber-sensitive male -- the sort who would pass a quiz in Cosmopolitan about the ideal mate -- suddenly finds himself accused of sexual assault? And what if he is so noble and passionate about his cause, he's not only willing to believe it but practically serve as his own prosecutor, even if there is no physical evidence and by her own admission the victim was passed out when it allegedly occurred? The rest is just filling in the players to make the story creak to life. In this case, there are further disadvantages, the most critical being the bland new ADA played by Philip Winchester. He's supposed to be the son of Ben Stone, the first ADA on the original Law and Order series, and while Michael Moriarty played Stone with Boy Scout seriousness, he was never boring. Winchester approaches the role with a weird mixture of being tedious in his delivery of lines while paradoxically seeming restless in his body language when uncalled for. It's a strange, off-putting performance that never gets better, especially at the writers continue to push his character further and further to the point of absurdity (culminating in his leaving the series because, I guess, he's fallen under Benson's incomparable, Siren-like sway over men). There's not much else to the episode except the sort of lazy twists and turns one expects from daytime TV, including an obvious villain portrayed by some d-bag straight out of central casting. There's also a cheesy soap subplot about the always annoying Rollins, with Carisi serving as yet another version of the Cosmopolitan guy. How sad this show got.
16 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
This episode should never have aired
tap-876415 February 2022
First error was arresting Stone or investigating a 12-year old rape case. Statutory limitations on rape is 5 years, in every single rape case they've aired. The writers and Mariska Hargitay, who directed this one, should be embarrassed. Hard to believe anyone kept a straight face.
15 out of 32 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
They who speaks first
This episode is telling people that as long as you speak first, you will be believed without skepticism. After all, who wants to go through the ordeal of telling 'their story' over and over again? Who wants to tell the world that they were 'weak' in the face of circumstance and power over not power with? And if the nature of the crime is heinous enough, then that alone in itself is proof that the preyed upon, the victimized is telling the truth, with all other additional information void, insignificant and certainly nonprobative.

-Carlos D. Montemayor 05/19/2020
14 out of 35 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
SVU is done
abbyirsan8 June 2019
The episode was a disaster, soo predictable and the acting was just laughable. watching a couple of episodes of season 20 i believe this show is over. no new ideas and no one shall expect that after hundreds of episodes
15 out of 47 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed