"Le documentaire culturel" Le funeste destin du docteur Frankenstein (TV Episode 2018) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Fascinating Film Footage and Look at the Legacy of Shelley's Story
Cineanalyst28 October 2018
This under-an-hour documentary, premiering in the states on Turner Classic Movies after apparently traveling from France, "The Strange Life of Dr. Frankenstein" offers a good if brief investigation into Mary Shelley's novel "Frankenstein" in relation to its cultural legacy from theatrical and cinematic adaptations, mainly the 1931 "Frankenstein" and its sequel "Bride of Frankenstein" (1935), although the Japanese atomic giant monster clash "Frankenstein Conquers the World" (1965) and a couple films from the Hammer series are mentioned, as well as the non-Frankenstein-film "Metropolis" (1927). Perhaps, even of more interest, especially for one who already knew most of the information contained here, are the way the filmmakers edited together clips from films that mostly seem to have no connection to "Frankenstein," which helps to alleviate the usual scenes of talking-head experts and invites the classic-film buff to try to spot the origins of the black-and-white footage. The corridor shot from "The Cat and the Canary" (1927) and another moment from "Nosferatu" (1922) were easy ones for me since I've recently seen both.

The program is divided into six chapters (Mary Shelley's biography, "Dr. Frankenstein," "The Monster," "The Plea," "The Monster's Bride" and "The Prophecy") and an epilogue regarding polar exploration in the book. As members of The Classic Horror Film Board will attest, "Dr. Frankenstein" is a misnomer, as Shelley's protagonist wasn't a doctor, but also that this is one of the points of the doc--how this character, through the adaptations, has become part of the mad doctor trope. Likewise, her eloquent creature became renowned as a grunting monster. There's a lot more to Shelley's story, but with less than an hour to work with, this program does well--even going so far as to mention Rousseauian philosophy of innate goodness corrupted by society, as well as the novel's relation to the "Year Without a Summer," galvanism, electricity and surgery. Automatons to artificial intelligence and even the atom bomb are examined. While some of this seems far fetched in its connection to the book, I found the parts about the surgeon and eugenicist Alexis Carrel and the clips of head transplants by Vladmir Demikhov and Robert J. White to be especially intriguing and disturbing.

It's not a bad way to celebrate the 200th anniversary of the publication of Shelley's story, and I'm surprised such a short doc held my interest after I've already spent much of the year re-reading the novel and reviewing 46 Frankenstein films--and I even skipped "Frankenstein Conquers the World." Guess I'll make that 47 films soon.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Since a search of the internet shows that Frankenstein's Monster . . .
tadpole-596-9182567 March 2019
Warning: Spoilers
. . . has been compared to Leader Trump often if not exclusively since 2015, it's fair to ask: "Is THE STRANGE LIFE OF DR. FRANKEN$TEIN a legitimate film, or a compilation of Fake Facts?" Consider some of these "Tidbits of History" you never learned in school, but ALL of which figure prominently in THE STRANGE CASE OF DR. FRANKEN$TEIN: 1)A physician was allowed to electrocute a hung murderer in 1803, causing the dead guy to open his eyes, proving that YOU ONLY LIVE TWICE. 2)One of the guiding lights of the Third Reich won the Nobel Prize for Medicine for his outlandish theories. 3)Russians were successfully transplanting dogs' heads onto people in the 1950s, before launching them into Outer Space. 4)Japan is assembling an Army of Robots to wipe out America in revenge for losing a World War Two which THEY launched. 5)Dr. Victor Frankenstein was an Abortionist who instigated the Roe vs. Wade Battles. As Leader Trump would say, there could be "very fine people on both sides" of these events, except for the fact that NONE OF THEM EVER HAPPENED!!
0 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Unexpectedly good documentary on Frankenstein and its author
AlsExGal1 November 2018
This was shown on Turner Classic Movies during October in celebration of the 200th anniversary of the novel. There were a series of weird avantgarde promos that TCM showed prior to the documentary with some guy who ultimately had nothing to do with the film droning on and on about painting his vision of Frankenstein's monster that made me wonder what I was getting into, but the documentary turned out to be quite enjoyable and thorough at just under an hour running time.

It was a well put together piece on the novel, how it presaged some scientific developments and probably drew from others of the time, and ultimately how the novel might have been joined to the psyche of its author Mary Shelley. She was disowned by her father when she married, yet she dedicated the book to him, for example. Was she saying that Frankenstein's creature, abandoned by his creator when he didn't turn out as intended, was a metaphor for her relationship with her father? Maybe.

There were bits and pieces of the Frankenstein films, particularly the first two from Universal, "Frankenstein" and "Bride of Frankenstein", but mainly this was an examination of a literary work. I like how they worked in commentary from an expert in plastic surgery. I wasn't expecting that. There were also tales of other "mad scientists" - one who actually got so caught up in the idea of salvaging body parts that he transplanted one monkey's head to the body of another monkey. There were a bunch of protesters who did not share his enthusiasm.

I did have one "what the??" moment though. When the documentary is talking about Mary Shelley feeling like she had some kind of out of body experience the night that she conceived the idea behind "Frankenstein", one of the images put up on the screen, though only for a few seconds, appeared to be that of 1930s MGM actress Karen Morley. Maybe because this was largely made in other countries, the filmmakers did not think anybody would notice, but I couldn't help wondering what Miss Morley had to do with the tale of Frankenstein.

I would recommend it as a detailed documentary on the literary work that manages to not overstay its welcome by being too long.
8 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Great information!
jplowman-5448118 January 2021
Best Frankenstein doc ever! Anyone interested in the subject must wathch this.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed