Reviews

5 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
10/10
The perfect 60s movie--and still timely today
14 August 2005
I always remembered how this film had just about everything from the 60s in it--spies, assassinations, conspiracies, the Cold War, national politics, international politics, racial politics, Zen, guns, gun control, karate, psychoanalysis, paranoia, suburban families, suburban homes, spy kits, kids wanting to have long hair, hippies with long hair, VW vans, free love, a super-tech villain lair, M-16s--and, of course, the standard sex, drugs, and rock and roll. And did I mention government conspiracies, paranoia, and spies.

And then there's the totally 60's background music throughout the film. Only the 60s offered that kind of funky, jazzy, pop with that, you know, 60s happy-clappy sound. I especially always remembered the medley with the female vocals doing a hip (well, "hip" by 60's standards) rendition of "Joy to the World" at the beginning of the film as the James Coburn character roams about Manhattan digging life and his new promotion--before everything in his life and career goes south.

All I could say about this film was that it was totally 60s. It caught that era of American culture and politics perfectly as no other film did.

Then my wife and I watched this film again recently and were surprised at how its comedy still works and how most of its satire is still relevant. In some ways it is not far removed from "The X-Files" (only much more funny) with all of its conspiracies and paranoia, government agents, good spies and bad spies. People still suspect the government of always being on the verge of completely intruding into their lives. Some people still seek escape through psychology, others still through "tuning out," and others in suburban family values. And, of course, people still hate the phone company (though now it is "the phone companies").

So much has changed, yet so much has stayed the same.

It is hard to say which sequence of this film is the funniest. We literally laughed throughout the film. I laughed hardest at the trip into suburbia--hey, just add a few more kids and that was my family, my dad, my mom. My wife laughed hardest at the Russian spy's description of how the Cold War would eventually wrap up--making this film a helluvalot more insightful than all of the fear and gloom of those who predicted nuclear holocaust.

And then there is the "ultimate sex and violence sequence" where various spies in the background "eliminate" one another while the main character is being initiated into the joys of free love with a hot, if air-headed, hippie chick.

What can you say? This was the 60s. And it is still funny as hell today.
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Terminal (2004)
5/10
Good but incomplete
25 March 2005
Warning: Spoilers
As a movie about waiting, perseverance, hope (bringing a question from Enrique to Torres everyday) and friendship it is great , but the romantic angle is misleading and disappointing. I loved the three friends and how they bond. But why bring Catherine Zeta-Jones into the picture? A romance is developed and then it goes nowhere, just like the past relationships of her character. What did she do for him? Get him the one day emergency visa? And was it worth it? Because Dixon denies it to him by blackmailing him with his friendship to the people who helped him. It's his friends who turn it around for him (Gupta delaying the plane), and Dixon's own staff (which he turned against himself by being such a legalist) -- his top guy gives him his coat to go out in the snow. Who were the marketing gurus that let this ending happen? What audiences want is the "happily ever after" scenario -- don't mess with the formula if you're in the romantic genre; otherwise, leave romance out of it.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Drive-In (1976)
8/10
See it for Movie within the Movie
8 January 2005
I saw this movie at a drive-in back in the summer of 1976 in rural Wyoming, not Texas, but it still seemed pretty close. It was the second feature to another movie that I cannot even remember. I was with my big brother and his girl friend, and so this movie just seemed to fit us. I remember we were belly-laughing through the whole thing. Saw it later on someone's VHS. Didn't laugh as hard, but it sure brought back memories. And this movie does catch that part of small town life dead on--a summer night when everyone gathers at the drive-in.

Of course, the best thing about this movie was the movie within the movie--"Disaster '76." With it's "macho" hero delivering lame disaster movie lines while encountering situations out of the "Airport" movies, "Towering Inferno," "Earthquake," and "Jaws," it was a send up of just about every disaster movie made at that time. And this still a couple of years before "Airplane." I still laugh just thinking about it.
17 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
60s nihilism, spaghetti western style -- cool, violent and fun
9 August 2000
"When I die, someone will bury me. And if they don't, what's the difference. Who gives a damn, huh?" Thus the philosophy of life (or lack there of) is summed up once and for all in this less than classic but nevertheless fun spinoff of Sergio Leone's "Dollars Trilogy."

In the opening scene, three obviously evil gunmen ride into a western town and, with menacing glares, they intimidate all the pathetic normal people hiding in their homes. The observant watcher will notice that each of these three bears a striking resemblance to characters from Leone's For A Few Dollars More. There is one guy in Eastwood's poncho, one in Lee Van Cleef's black suit, and one seeming to act like Gian Marie Volonte's Indio. But this movie is not about these guys. No sooner do they ride into town when they are gunned down by someone even cooler than they, a mysterious bounty hunter known simply as the Stranger.

No. this is an altogether different story.

In an obvious copying of Leone's The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly, three gunmen are again vying for a hidden treasure. Once again there is the bounty hunter and the Mexican bandit. The Stranger (George Hilton) is a supercool bounty hunter with a penchant for shooting people while dressed up like a priest. He is after the reward for the bandit Monetero (Gilbert Roland). But when Monetero's gang steals three hundred thousand in gold coins, the Stranger gets sidetracked from his normal line of work.

To round off the trio there is Edd Byrne's corrupt bank executive, Clayton. He too wants the money for himself. But after the money is hidden away, the only man who knows where it is gets shot. Now the only clue to the hiding place is a medallion that shows a family crest. The game is too find the treasure before anyone else does. And any gun can play.

With plenty of gunfights, fist fights, and double crosses, the action takes these three to the ultimate showdown ripoff, a three way draw for the hidden treasure ala The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly -- but with a twist.

This movie is not as good as Leone's films, of course, but in the end who gives a damn, huh? This movie is fun -- 60s nihilism, spaghetti western style. There are no rules, no enduring loyalties, and no right or wrong -- just the treasure and whatever it takes to get it. And, though the movie is not classic, the ending surely is. Hey, maybe we all can get along after all, for a hundred thousand a piece.

If you like spaghetti westerns, check this one out. It is fast, furious, and worth the look.
22 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Harakiri (1962)
10/10
A great story of revenge that is told with devastating effect.
12 June 2000
"Another one? Is there no end?"

So the clan elder of the House of Iyi greets the news that Hanshiro Tsugumo (Tatsuya Nakadai) is at his gate with an odd request. Hanshiro, an old, impoverished, unemployed samurai, seeks use of their mansion to perform harakiri, ceremonial suicide that involves self-disembowlment and is an honorable death for a samurai living in disgrace.

But in a time of peace, Japan abounds with ex-warriors who threaten to perform this rite only to extort money from weak-willed clans. In light of such dishonorable conduct, the House of Iyi has adopted stern measures: Any samurai who threatens to perform this rite at their gate will be forced to do so. Thus a younger ex-warrior, Motome Chigiiwa, met his fate. Coming with the same request, this unfortunate youth was forced to carry out the rite with a bamboo sword -- "an unsightly affair." The clan elder would warn the older Hanshiro away with the story of Motome's death, but the old warrior is resolved to die.

Things, however, are not what they seem. Hanshiro seems to have more on his mind than suicide. And, as he relates his own lifestory to the warriors of Iyi clan, not only are their stern measures called into question, but also the very honor of which they are so proud.

Seppuku is an awesome story of revenge told with devastating effect. By the time you know what the story is really about, you yourself have cast judgement on the characters. Then things turn on you, and nothing appears as it did before. In this film a tragic story, great sword duels, haunting atmospheric music, and an exciting final battle combine to form what I think is an overlooked masterpiece. Director Masaki Kobayashi does to the samurai genre what Sam Pekinpah will later do to the western in The Wild Bunch: He takes the samurai code and turns it upon its head. This film is great, and worth every repeated watching.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed