19 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
1/10
Bad and, dare I say, offensive.
2 April 2011
Maybe if your entire universe is limited to New York and L.A., you might not realize how offensive this movie truly was. As someone who considers myself fairly cultured, and definitely on the liberal side politically, this wasn't the Wyoming I know and love.

I suppose there is the temptation to portray small town folk as ignorant, backward thinking yokels who are too foolish to know how uncivilized they are. But, don't fool yourself into thinking this movie portrayed Wyoming. Don't get me wrong; Wyoming IS a conservative state, but it's not some ignorant form of conservatism. It's a place where people are fiercely independent, mindful of their individual freedoms, and largely have a live-and-let-live attitude.

In my two decades spent there growing up, I never felt like a fish out of water. Exactly the opposite was true. People are friendly, welcoming, and grateful to live in such a treasure of a place. That's what this movie missed. I get that they were trying to go for easy laughs about the characters in a fish out of water setting, but instead they too-often portrayed Wyoming as hell on earth. Anyone who truly knows the place knows this is laughably incorrect, and this was just lazy, uninspired filmmaking.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
George Lucas should retire from the creative side of film-making
24 May 2008
Warning: Spoilers
I have no problems with the fact that this movies is set in the fifties, and as a result the feel of the movie is going to be different. I liked the idea that it would be inspired by fifties science fiction and the cold war scare. Unfortunately, the execution is so muddled with things that can't be overlooked, that the fun gets sucked out of the experience.

On the plus side, the action is nearly nonstop. Unfortunately, the convoluted story is more than the film needs or wants. I also realize that the series is a tribute to old action serials, but Indy and crew make it out of so many situations unscathed, that it made it eventually made it impossible for me to watch them with any sense of suspense.(SPOILER ALERT) After hundreds,if not thousands, of missed shots by the bad guys, going over three waterfalls without a hitch, including one that was roaring like Niagra, and completing a Thelma and Louise-style cliff jump without second thought, I was at my limit by the time I saw the flying saucer.

Mr. Lucas, please have no involvement in the story the next time you do anything. PLEASE! After the embarrassment of the new Star Wars trilogy, and now this Indy release, I can't stand the thought of what awful things you will come up with next.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Core (2003)
2/10
Bad acting, Bad script. Bad effects.
24 August 2007
This was honestly one of the worst movies I've ever seen. The script is stupid, even for a popcorn movie. I can get into a far-fetched idea, but this pushes the limit. With some decent execution, I might have forgiven the stupidity of sending a craft of people to the center of the earth. Maybe it could have been saved with some cool effects, but they were simply awful. Maybe it would have worked if Eckhart and Swank would have played up the camp factor of such a ridiculous project, but instead the went for soap opera-level overacting. At a 5.3 at the time I'm writing this, The Core has to be one of the more overrated movies on IMDb.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Knocked Up (2007)
7/10
Pretty good, far from great.
17 June 2007
Are we all so fed up with how bad comedies usually are that we're instantly calling this one of the greatest movies of all time? I like Judd Apatow's style, but Knocked Up mined a lot of the same territory as The 40 Year Old Virgin, and in a less original way. That movie's endearing exploration of freaks, geeks, and immature man/boys was tighter and funnier. Knocked Up was a bit too schmaltzy and meandering during it's 129 minutes. Many scenes and situations come straight from the generic pregnancy movie guidebook. Buying all the pregnancy tests in a store was funny 15 years ago in Singles, and if a filmmaker wanted to cop from John Hughes, She's Having a Baby isn't the greatest place to start. This was indeed an enjoyable movie, but it doesn't quite reach greatness.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Anatomy of a Hate Crime (2001 TV Movie)
1/10
The story of the Matthew Shepard tragedy deserves better than this
3 August 2006
I was in college in Laramie, Wyoming, at the time of the Matthew Shepard tragedy, and will always be ashamed that such a crime could have taken place in my community. With that said, this movie gets it all wrong. They went for easy plot devices, the furthering of stereotypes (which shouldn't be Matthew's legacy), and a misrepresentation of the community. The sad part is that with a little work, they could have made a film that sent a lasting message. Instead they made a movie that portrayed a town full of simple minded rednecks who somehow have Southern accents, a police force consisting of a Barney Fife cop, and a total reinvention of certain parts of the story. Being that the idiots that murdered Matthew came from Laramie, examining the responsibility of the community is fair, but this isn't examination. This is lazy story telling that MTV unfortunately passed off as an educational film (They used to show it late at night without commercials as part of their Cable in the Classroom series so educators could tape it). If you want to see the definitive movie (or play) on the Matthew Shepard tragedy, see The Laramie Project. That movie doesn't let anyone off the hook. It doesn't look for easy answers, and it gives the subject matter the true examination it deserves.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Wimbledon (2004)
2/10
Contrived and clichéd sports romance that always takes expected turn
20 August 2005
I wasn't expecting Schindler's List when I sat down to watch Wimbledon, but this movie scrapes the bottom of the barrel when it comes to supposed lighthearted romantic fare. Professional tennis players Peter and Lizzie simply meet, have sex and fall in love before we've seen them have a meaningful conversation. Throughout the movie, we never learn exactly what these two see in each other. We're supposed to blindly believe that they met and fell madly in love for no reason, with Lizzie suddenly becoming a muse for an over-the-hill tennis player. There is absolutely no suspense in any of the tennis matches, and every turn is completely obvious. With such a weak script and such a phoned in performance by Kirsten Dunst, this played like a bad TV movie of the week.
11 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
The U of Wyoming appearance
19 August 2005
I was at this appearance. It was totally free, and he talked for five hours, just like IMDb says he did at Cornell. He only taped for about the first three, and then he did a fake goodbye for the cameras. He told people in the audience to go ahead and leave if they wanted to, but he would stay and answer questions as long as they kept coming. This was the only appearance on the DVD that Jason Mewes was at. He seemed a little out of place. He just sat in his chair and occasionally answered a question, and he didn't give long, elaborate answers like Kevin did. He didn't stay on stage the whole time either. Kevin more than made up for it though. I didn't have the nerve to get on the mike, but I know a few of the guys that made it on the DVD.

I used to live in the same dorm as this guy that asked Kevin and Jason if they wanted to get down after the show as he made a gesture like he was smoking a joint. Kevin jokingly asked if the guy if he was saying he wanted to suck their @#%#%s.
6 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The New Guy (2002)
8/10
Totally slapstick and I love it.
22 July 2005
This movie is a total slapstick gem. I really think it holds up better than most of the teen movies of the last decade. The first time I watched it, I was with a couple of people who complained how stupid it was the entire time. Later, it was on one of the movie channels and I watched it alone. I found myself laughing my head off. The humor is sometimes low brow and rarely realistic, but that makes it great. You really have to embrace the absurdity of this movie. At it's core, The New Guy is still a sweet little movie about an uncool kid making it to the top. The cameos are great, and so is DJ Qualls. If you're ready to laugh and have a good time, lose your inhibitions and check it out.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Far and Away (1992)
10/10
Underrated storybook of a movie that embraces its cliches
27 December 2003
If you pay too much attention to the cliches and unlikely situations the characters are placed, you really miss the charm of this movie. I can see how people would be put off if they were expecting a serious historical reenactment. Still, I believe that Ron Howard fully meant for this to be a fully romanticized account of the time. This movie works in many of the ways Titanic does, and I think it does it more effectively. Still, with Titanic, most people seemed more than willing to overlook the absurdities. With Far and Away, I don't think Ron Howard was trying to trick us or dumb us down. I don't think he was ever trying to underestimate the intelligence of his viewers. I think he was asking us to follow him and trust him as he told a story. I enjoyed it. Kidman and Cruise were both fun to watch. The supporting cast, although they did seem like they came from a comic book, were entertaining. I hope this movie has life on cable and DVD.
90 out of 111 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Interesting characters in search of a script and direction
5 December 2003
I don't find the writing in this movie extraordinary in the slightest. There are some interesting conversations, but I have interesting conversations with my coworkers that honestly would be as entertaining or profound on film. I really feel that this movie is too self inulgent. I really like the cast, and I saw potential in these characters, but it just didn't add up at all. A sparse, simple movie like this really has to get a person to think about the characters. It really needs to ask questions, and at least give us some reason to latch onto something. I just didn't see it. I see how people could like this movie simply because of the great cast and the potential that could have been realized, but it just didn't come together.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Frailty (2001)
10/10
Makes you queazy, but don't let that scare you off.
30 December 2002
People that have given this movie negative ratings seems to miss out on what this movie is trying to say. It isn't promoting child abuse or cultish behavior. If anything, it is making a statement that children are too easily made the victims of their parents. Unfortunately, old time religion and modern society can't always protect us from this. Bill Paxton isn't trying to exploit the less desirable side of society at all. If anything, he's using this quirky tale of the supernatural to open our eyes.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Light of Day (1987)
10/10
underrated movie that deserves a second viewing
30 December 2002
Warning: Spoilers
This movie has really received undue negative ratings. With rocker Joan Jett in the cast, I'm sure most people were expecting a fun rock and roll movie. Instead we got a somber movie about forgiveness and reconciling with the people you love. Jett may not be perfect, but she certainly isn't the hack of an actress that this film's detractors make her out to be. I thought she brought a blue collar sensibility and realism to the part. Also, Jett and Michael J. Fox were portraying members of a bar band. If you expected them to sound polished and professional, you really missed the point. The story may have moved slowly at times, but I found it to be quite original. Although the mother died, I don't see what's so cliche about it. The tension between Gena Rowlands and Jett was quite believable. I liked that is wasn't sugar-coated. If this movie had been sugar-coated a bit, I'm sure the ratings would have been higher and I'm sure it would have made more money. However, I don't think it would have been as good of a film. Give it another chance.
8 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Good, but not a masterpiece.
18 June 2002
I couldn't believe all the awards this movie received. It was good, but it isn't a masterpiece. I don't understand what was so great about Jennifer Conelly's performance. People talk about how she was stoic or something. Basically, she had a boring role, and she didn't mess it up. Is that worth an Oscar? I doubt that this will be remembered as one of the great movies of the decade. I think that Hollywood was merely ready to give Ron Howard some props. This was his first serious dramatic film in awhile, and it gave the industry the perfect opportunity. Honestly, when you think of the best movies you've seen in the last year, is this even in the top 5?
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Quite possibly the worst movie of all time
15 December 2001
I'm all for low-brow entertainment, but this doesn't even qualify as entertainment. I don't know if Tom Green was trying to make some artistic statement with this movie, but it is completely unwatchable. I felt sorry for all the actors in the movie, including Green. He would benefit from simple screen writing and comedy writing classes. I'm sure that after the success of his MTV show and the movie "Road Trip" he was given a long leash to do whatever he wanted. Unfortunately, he made a multi-million dollar bad home movie.
12 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Special Delivery (2000 TV Movie)
How can you not love Andy Dick(even in a B-movie like this)?
25 December 2000
Andy Dick made the most of his trip into low budget made-for-cable land. This was a role that many actors would have embarrassingly sleep-walked through, the kind of role that your average 90's sitcom star on the skids would have done for the paycheck - which I'm sure Dick did. But, instead of giving a half-hearted performance, he really made the most of a hokey script about a delivery man for an adoption service that loses the recipient family's baby. I found myself watching the whole thing despite my better objections. Funny guy. With all the talk of his past addiction problems, I hope he doesn't go the Robert Downey Jr. route. Hopefully he won't be stuck in made-for-cable land for long.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Forget Hollywood formulas, big budgets and effects. Great film.
26 November 2000
I remember hearing about the premise of this movie, and I was hooked long before I'd ever seen it. The premise of three college kids making a documentary about a witch, and then being hunted, is refreshingly original. I didn't need special effects. I loved the shaky camera work. It made the premise seem realistic.

This is a love it/hate it type movie. Many people complain of the cheap production values. Well, the movie wouldn't have worked any other way. Another big complaint people have had is that they didn't understand the premise. They didn't know if it was supposed to be fact or fiction. WHAT,ARE YOU STUPID? I knew it was fiction from the get go. Do you think this would have escaped the news? Do you think the families involved would have allowed a mass-marketed movie to be released in the aftermath of their tragedies? Of course the movie was fiction. But, that didn't ruin a thing for me. I know that most every movie I see is fiction. That doesn't ruin my good time. And, with this movie, I was watching really good, really original fiction. I was glad to see a movie that didn't rely on millions of dollars of special effects. I was glad that we didn't see the money shot of the witch.

This movie left me thinking of possibilities of what happened for weeks. It also worked on a level that truly scary movies like "Rosemary's Baby" worked. Both movies were truly scary because they dealt with real fears, with human emotion. Neither movies showed any graphic violence, but both were truly scary. They made me think about scary possibilities that can't simply be discounted. That kind of stuff is a whole lot scarier than a guy in a hockey mask. So, even to those who weren't able to give this movie a chance, go rent it and watch it in the dark on a quiet night. Only a real Scrooge won't be a little scared.
6 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Matrix (1999)
1/10
Special fx fans will love it, but I was bored by a lacking story.
26 November 2000
While most of the world seems head over heels for this film, I can't get over the fact that I was bored to tears. The movie seemed really long, and while special effects are nice, a few hours into this thing I was more interested in looking at my watch.

I thought the whole premise of our entire existence being fake was a good one. But, once seeing the movie, I realized that the premise isn't really expanded that much. It's just developed enough to hold together the action scenes. Maybe I would have been more entranced with a better cast. But Keanu Reaves and Lawrence Fishburne don't exactly amount to genius in casting.

Maybe there's some element of this movie I'm just not getting, but if this movie was the only thing on TV, I don't think I would watch.
18 out of 47 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Kubrick's forgotten masterpiece
26 November 2000
I've been a fan of Stanley Kubrick since I first saw "A Clockwork Orange" 10 years ago at the age of 15. Many film scholars more articulate than myself could go on about the depth of his films, and I would surely agree.

But, unfortunately, "Paths of Glory" is hardly ever mentioned when Kubrick's films are discussed. Of course, "Spartacus," "2001," "The Shining," "Full Metal Jacket," and "A Clockwork Orange" are classics, but this film is just as good. One of my friends has the Kubrick Collection that was released on video last year. Sadly this isn't in the box set. I honestly hadn't even heard of it until I watched it in a war film class last spring. What a revelation. The cinematography is awesome. The scenes of men walking through the trenches were later duplicated by Kubrick himself, but these work the best.

Kubrick knows how to pull at our heart strings. He doesn't leave us with any doubt as to how he feels about war. This film makes a definite statement. Most films work as entertainment. This one works as a true piece of art. Possibly Kubrick's best.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Magnolia (1999)
Melora Walters and John C. Reilly outweigh the film's flaws.
19 October 2000
I would say that despite the film's flaws, Paul Thomas Anderson continues to prove he is one of the great modern filmmakers with "Magnolia." At best, it displays a poetic quality. The way story lines intertwine emotionally, often times without blending in the actual plot of the movie, creates a desperate, lonely tone. Even though the film doesn't find Anderson at his most focused, his total disregard of typical cookie-cutter Hollywood storytelling is refreshing.

With that said, I find some serious flaws with the film. I've heard Anderson saying he relished the chance to create a film around the songs of Aimee Mann. She does indeed add some good music to the soundtrack, but the way it's edited into the film in several scenes is quite annoying. In one of the opening scenes we are introduced to all the main characters as Mann sings "One is the loneliest number." This would work fine, but the song is quite sparse and simple, and the arrangement is quite long. I know this was necessary, since there was quite a bit of story to set up, but by the end of the sequence, I wanted to scream, "turn off that #@%&* song!," especially since it was featured fairly loud in the audio mix. In another scene, Mann's song "Wise Up" is played as we see the characters in their various situations singing along. The lyrics lent themselves to what was happening at that point in the movie, and I don't have a problem with the premise, but for the time being it spoiled my suspension of disbelief. Jason Robards was very ill. Why didn't Anderson leave the singing in that part to Philip Seymore Hoffman, or at least have had Robards mutter the words in a manner believable for someone in his physical condition. I'm sure Anderson intended this musical sequence to have more of an art house quality than the rest of the picture. Still, I've seen sequences where actors have broken into song where, although definitely still the stuff of movies, they worked more effectively (off the top of my head, "Almost Famous" comes to mind). My biggest complaint with the music comes at the end of the picture. In an emotional scene between Melora Walters and John C. Reilly, Thomas has another Mann song so high in the mix you can't hear what Reilly is saying. I'm sure Thomas wanted to us to see how the lyrics related to the moment, but the song would have worked much more effectively in the background. I find myself straining to hear the dialogue when I watch the scene. I want to stress that I don't have a problem with Mann's music, I just think Thomas went overboard with including it in the film. Instead of enhancing Magnolia, it detracted from it.

Another complaint I have is that Anderson seemed to force a theme upon the film, when the film already had an unsaid theme of it's own. I'm talking about adding the whole thing about how sometimes the seemingly unimaginable, the stuff of movies, happens to everyday people. I don't see how the scenes that bookend the movie, the stuff about the suicide, the diver and the robbers adds to the movie. And I don't see how the thing with the frogs adds to it, either. They don't drastically detract from it, but Anderson definitely lost focus. The rest of the movie had a theme of its own- This is a lonely world. It can be difficult letting go of the past when it won't let go of us.

Although Thomas' use of ensemble casts and multiple storylines are his forte, in this case, he went a little far. In "Boogie Nights" we had Eddie/Dirk Diggler holding the whole thing together. With Magnolia, their is no central character, and the movie drags as a result. Although all of the actors gave great performances, some dead weight could have been cut from the script. Julianne Moore was great in some emotional scenes, but her character in particular seems to have been unnecessary to the movie. The role should have been cut or broadened. It doesn't add much emotionally to the film. When I go back and watch the movie, I find myself fast-forwarding through her scenes. I just don't have any emotional attachment to what's going on. Same with some of the scenes with Robards and Hoffman- great actors, but upon a second viewing some of this stuff just drags. After seeing Hoffman's great performance in "Boogie Nights," his talent almost seems wasted.

The Fast-Forward-stoppers, the scenes that I find myself popping this movie in for, are the ones featuring Melora Walters (Claudia Wilson Gator), and John C. Reilly (Jim Kurring). The scenes with these characters have a focus the rest of the movie lacks. I loved John C. Reilly in "Boogie Nights," but I love this character even more. As he attempts to flirt with Claudia, he displays a charming nervousness that goes beyond the script. I can imagine the heartache and loneliness that his character has experienced without the script having to lay it all out for me. Melora Walters came as a surprise. It seems that the performances of Tom Cruise and Julianne Moore have been heralded, but the emotional bulk of their performances don't seem to match-up to the performances of Walters and Reilly (although Cruise did great work, especially in the bedside scene with Robards). The less-famous and consequently less-heralded Walters really knocked one out of the ball park. In a manner that went far-beyond the script, I could believe this lady couldn't function without constant lines of cocaine; I could believe that the past wouldn't leave her alone.

This is a good movie that could have been a great one. Anderson could have cut some of the unnecessary characters or scenes. He could have chosen a character or two to feature more prominently as he did with Dirk Diggler in "Boogie Nights." After seeing the great performances of Reilly and Walters, I wish they would have been the ones to get the star treatment.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed