Reviews

12 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Avatar: The Last Airbender - A Magical Journey
15 September 2023
"Avatar: The Last Airbender" is a show that has left an indelible mark on my heart. It's a journey through a fantastical world filled with rich lore, memorable characters, and profound life lessons. While I have immense love for this series, I must admit it has a few quirks that keep it from perfection, which is why I'd rate it an 8 out of 10.

The story unfolds in a world divided into four nations, each with the ability to control one of the four elements: Water, Earth, Fire, and Air. The Avatar, a master of all four elements, is the only one who can bring balance to the world. But when the Avatar disappears, the Fire Nation wages war, plunging the world into chaos.

The heart of the show is Aang, the last Airbender and the long-lost Avatar. Along with his loyal friends Katara and Sokka, he embarks on a quest to master the elements, confront the Fire Nation, and fulfill his destiny as the Avatar. Aang's journey is one of growth, responsibility, and self-discovery.

One of the show's greatest strengths is its character development. Every member of the main cast undergoes significant growth, with Aang's transition from a carefree boy to a mature Avatar being particularly moving. The moral dilemmas they face and the choices they make resonate with viewers of all ages.

The world-building is impeccable. The different nations, cultures, and bending styles are not only visually distinct but also deeply rooted in their philosophies. The attention to detail in the lore is astounding, making the world feel alive and authentic.

"Avatar" strikes a perfect balance between humor and seriousness. It can have you laughing at Sokka's witty remarks in one scene and contemplating the consequences of war and prejudice in the next. It's a testament to the show's ability to cater to both children and adults.

However, there are a few episodes that feel like filler, contributing little to the overall plot or character development. These moments, while entertaining, can be frustrating when you're eager for the main story to progress.

The show's conclusion is satisfying, but it does feel somewhat rushed in its final moments. Certain character arcs could have been explored further, and loose ends could have been tied up more neatly.

In conclusion, "Avatar: The Last Airbender" is a masterfully crafted series that transcends the boundaries of animated television. Its compelling characters, intricate world-building, and the exploration of complex themes make it a timeless classic. While it may have minor imperfections, they are overshadowed by its brilliance. If you haven't experienced this magical journey yet, I highly recommend it. For me, it's an 8/10, a testament to its lasting impact on the world of animation and storytelling.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Rick and Morty (2013– )
7/10
Rick and Morty - A Mind-Bending Cosmic Rollercoaster (7/10)
15 September 2023
"Rick and Morty" is one of those shows that takes you on a wild and unpredictable ride through the multiverse. I've been a fan of animated series for a long time, and this one is truly like nothing else I've ever seen. But while it's brilliant in many ways, it also has its fair share of flaws, which is why I'd rate it a 7 out of 10.

The show follows the adventures of an eccentric and alcoholic scientist, Rick Sanchez, and his good-hearted but easily influenced grandson, Morty Smith. Together, they traverse different dimensions and planets, getting entangled in bizarre and often dangerous situations. It's a unique blend of science fiction, dark humor, and social commentary that can be both thought-provoking and absurdly hilarious.

One of the strengths of "Rick and Morty" lies in its creativity. The show's creators, Dan Harmon and Justin Roiland, have crafted an intricate multiverse filled with imaginative worlds, creatures, and concepts. The storytelling is often non-linear, and each episode can stand on its own while contributing to an overarching narrative. This keeps things fresh and exciting.

The character of Rick is a standout. He's a morally ambiguous genius who's seen it all, and his unpredictable behavior and disregard for consequences make him endlessly fascinating. Morty, on the other hand, serves as the audience's relatable anchor in this chaotic universe. Their dynamic is the driving force of the show.

The humor in "Rick and Morty" is a mixed bag. When it hits, it's brilliant, delivering clever satire and absurdity in equal measure. However, there are moments when the show relies too heavily on shock value and gross-out humor, which can feel forced and gratuitous. Some episodes also tend to overuse certain catchphrases and running gags, which can get tiresome.

As the series progresses, it delves into deeper philosophical and existential themes, often prompting viewers to contemplate the nature of reality and the consequences of our actions. It's a testament to the show's ability to balance humor with moments of genuine depth.

On the downside, the fanbase can be somewhat polarizing, with a vocal minority engaging in toxic behavior. This can detract from the overall enjoyment of the show.

In summary, "Rick and Morty" is a mind-bending and wildly creative series that pushes the boundaries of animated television. While it has moments of brilliance and intellectual depth, it also has its share of inconsistent humor and occasional excesses. If you're looking for a show that challenges your intellect while making you laugh, it's definitely worth a watch, but be prepared for a rollercoaster of emotions and ideas. I'd give it a solid 7/10 for its ambition and originality.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Fullmetal Alchemist: Brotherhood - An Alchemical Journey to Remember (2009-2010)
15 September 2023
I've always been a fan of anime that blend intricate storytelling with well-developed characters, and "Fullmetal Alchemist: Brotherhood" didn't disappoint. This series, adapted from the manga by Hiromu Arakawa, is often hailed as a masterpiece, and while I found it compelling, I had my reservations.

The story revolves around two brothers, Edward and Alphonse Elric, who use alchemy to try and bring their mother back from the dead but pay a terrible price. Edward loses his arm and leg while Alphonse's entire body is taken, leaving his soul bound to a suit of armor. The brothers embark on a journey to find the Philosopher's Stone, a legendary artifact that can restore their bodies.

The narrative is the strongest aspect of "Fullmetal Alchemist: Brotherhood." The plot is intricate, filled with political intrigue, moral dilemmas, and complex character relationships. It doesn't shy away from exploring the consequences of seeking power and the toll it takes on individuals and society. The themes of sacrifice, redemption, and the value of human life are woven into the story's fabric.

The character development is impressive, especially for the Elric brothers. Edward's determination and resilience are inspiring, and his unwavering commitment to protecting his loved ones makes him a compelling protagonist. Alphonse's struggle with identity and the meaning of existence adds depth to his character. The supporting cast is diverse, each with their own motivations and arcs, though some side characters could have been more fleshed out.

The animation quality by Studio Bones is consistent throughout the series, with fluid action sequences and detailed character designs. The alchemical battles are a visual spectacle, showcasing the versatility of alchemy in combat.

However, "Fullmetal Alchemist: Brotherhood" has its flaws. The pacing, particularly in the earlier episodes, can be slow, and the series assumes viewers have seen the 2003 adaptation or read the manga, resulting in some rushed character introductions and world-building. The humor, while occasionally amusing, can feel out of place in the midst of the story's darker themes.

The climax and resolution of the series, while emotionally satisfying, left me wanting more closure for certain characters and plotlines. Some questions remained unanswered, which was a bit frustrating.

In conclusion, "Fullmetal Alchemist: Brotherhood" is a memorable and thought-provoking anime that explores complex themes and boasts well-rounded characters. While it has its share of pacing issues and unanswered questions, its strengths far outweigh its weaknesses. I rate it 7/10 because it offers a captivating journey through a richly crafted world of alchemy, ethics, and the enduring bonds of brotherhood.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Attack on Titan (2013–2023)
6/10
Attack on Titan - An Epic Saga That Lost Its Way (2013-2023)
15 September 2023
I remember when "Attack on Titan" burst onto the anime scene back in 2013. It was like a breath of fresh air in a genre often cluttered with high school settings and slice-of-life stories. The premise was intriguing: humanity on the brink of extinction, surrounded by colossal humanoid creatures known as Titans. As a longtime anime fan, I was excited to see where this series would take us.

The first season of "Attack on Titan" gripped me from the start. The grim atmosphere, the towering Titans, and the sense of hopelessness that shrouded the characters made for an intense and immersive experience. Eren Yeager, Mikasa Ackerman, and Armin Arlert were well-developed protagonists, and their journey to uncover the truth about the Titans was a compelling narrative.

The animation quality by Wit Studio was outstanding, especially during the jaw-dropping action sequences where the omni-directional mobility gear was used to fight Titans. The fluidity of movement and the sheer scale of the battles were a visual treat for any anime enthusiast.

However, as the series progressed, I couldn't help but notice some cracks in the armor. The pacing became erratic, with episodes of slow exposition followed by frenetic action. New characters were introduced at a rapid pace, making it difficult to form strong connections with them. The mysteries surrounding the Titans and the world they inhabited grew increasingly convoluted, leaving me with more questions than answers.

Another issue that emerged was the tonal shift in the story. The initial sense of dread and urgency gave way to political intrigue and philosophical debates. While these elements can enhance a story, they felt forced at times, causing the narrative to lose its focus.

The decision to split the final season into two parts further disrupted the flow of the story. It left viewers hanging with numerous unresolved plotlines, creating a sense of frustration rather than anticipation.

Character development suffered as well. Eren, once a relatable protagonist driven by a desire for vengeance, underwent a transformation that made him less empathetic. The moral complexities that were initially explored were overshadowed by an increasingly black-and-white worldview.

The animation quality, too, saw a decline, particularly in the final season. While some episodes still delivered stunning visuals, others were marred by inconsistent art and animation.

In conclusion, "Attack on Titan" began as a promising and groundbreaking series that challenged the conventions of anime. Its first season was a thrilling ride, but as the years passed, it lost its way. The complex narrative, once a strength, became convoluted, and the tonal shifts left me feeling disconnected from the characters and their struggles.

While I appreciate the ambition and creativity that went into "Attack on Titan," I can't help but feel that it didn't fulfill its early promise. I rate it 6/10 because, despite its flaws, it still managed to captivate me at times and deliver memorable moments, but the inconsistency and lack of a satisfying conclusion left me somewhat disappointed.
4 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Firefly (2002–2003)
7/10
Firefly - A Sci-Fi Gem That Burned Too Briefly (2002-2003)
15 September 2023
"Firefly" holds a special place in my heart. As a sci-fi enthusiast, I was drawn to this series when it first aired in 2002. It was a show that dared to be different in a genre filled with space operas and futuristic fantasies. With its unique blend of Western and space elements, "Firefly" offered a refreshing take on the sci-fi genre.

The premise is intriguing from the start. Set in a future where humanity has colonized other planets and a civil war has left the galaxy divided, the show follows the ragtag crew of the spaceship Serenity. Led by Captain Malcolm Reynolds, brilliantly portrayed by Nathan Fillion, this crew of misfits takes on various smuggling jobs to survive in the fringes of society. Each character is distinct, with their own quirks and complexities, and the chemistry among the cast is undeniable.

What makes "Firefly" stand out is its world-building. Creator Joss Whedon crafted a rich and believable universe where technology and frontier life coexist. The blend of futuristic technology and Wild West aesthetics creates a unique visual style that adds depth to the storytelling. The frontier planets, each with its own culture and challenges, provide a fascinating backdrop for the crew's adventures.

The show excels in character development. From the stoic Zoe (Gina Torres) to the enigmatic River (Summer Glau) and the charmingly roguish Jayne (Adam Baldwin), every character is given their moment to shine. The witty and often humorous dialogue, a hallmark of Whedon's work, adds layers to these characters and helps viewers connect with them on a personal level.

"Firefly" also isn't afraid to explore moral ambiguity. Captain Reynolds and his crew often find themselves in morally gray situations, making tough decisions to survive in a harsh and unforgiving galaxy. This willingness to delve into complex ethical dilemmas adds depth to the show's narrative.

However, "Firefly" is not without its flaws. The show's cancellation after only one season left many plot threads unresolved. Viewers were left wanting more, and the abrupt ending remains a sore point for fans. While the follow-up film, "Serenity," provided some closure, it couldn't fully compensate for the lost potential of additional seasons.

Additionally, the show's non-linear airing of episodes contributed to its initial struggle to find a dedicated audience. Some argue that a different episode order could have better showcased the series' strengths.

In conclusion, "Firefly" is a sci-fi gem that deserved a longer life on television. Its memorable characters, inventive world-building, and willingness to explore moral complexities set it apart from the usual genre fare. While its cancellation left us with a sense of loss, the show's impact on the sci-fi community endures. I rate it 7/10 because, despite its brevity, "Firefly" remains a testament to the power of creativity and storytelling in the world of science fiction.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Only Fools and Horses (1981–2003)
8/10
Only Fools and Horses - A Timeless Comedy Gem (1981-2003)
15 September 2023
"Only Fools and Horses" is a show that has been a part of my life for as long as I can remember. From the moment I first tuned in to the misadventures of the Trotter family, I was hooked. This iconic British sitcom, which aired from 1981 to 2003, has become a timeless classic, and for good reason.

The heart of the show is undoubtedly its characters. Del Boy, played brilliantly by David Jason, is the lovable rogue with dreams of grandeur and an endless supply of get-rich-quick schemes. His brother, Rodney, portrayed by Nicholas Lyndhurst, is the hapless but endearing younger sibling, always trying to keep Del out of trouble. And of course, there's Grandad, the loveable old soul who provides both humor and heart to the mix.

What makes "Only Fools and Horses" truly exceptional is its ability to seamlessly blend humor and emotion. One moment, you're in stitches from Del Boy's outrageous antics, and the next, you're touched by the genuine love and camaraderie between the Trotter family. This balance is a testament to the show's incredible writing and the exceptional performances of its cast.

The show's setting, the working-class streets of Peckham in South London, becomes a character in itself. It's a place where dreams collide with reality, where the Trotters, despite their financial struggles, never lose their sense of humor or their aspirations for a better life. The familiar backdrop of the Nag's Head pub and the local market adds a layer of authenticity to the show's world.

"Only Fools and Horses" is known for its memorable catchphrases and iconic moments. Whether it's Del Boy falling through the bar, the classic Batman and Robin scene, or the Trotter van with its iconic "Trotters Independent Traders" logo, the show is a treasure trove of comedic brilliance that has left an indelible mark on British television history.

While the humor is undeniably a key selling point, the show also isn't afraid to tackle more serious topics. Episodes like "Time on Our Hands" and "Strangers on the Shore" demonstrate the show's ability to handle poignant moments and heartfelt storytelling.

That said, "Only Fools and Horses" isn't without its flaws. The later series, after the departure of Grandad and introduction of Uncle Albert, can be hit or miss, with a few weaker storylines. Some fans argue that the show should have ended earlier to maintain its perfect legacy.

In conclusion, "Only Fools and Horses" is more than just a television show; it's a cultural phenomenon. It's a testament to the enduring appeal of well-written characters, brilliant comedic timing, and the universal themes of family, friendship, and the pursuit of dreams. I rate it 8/10, not because it's flawless, but because it's a show that has brought joy and laughter to generations of viewers, including myself. It's a classic that will continue to make us laugh and warm our hearts for years to come.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Jericho (2006–2008)
7/10
My Post-Apocalyptic Journey with "Jericho" (2006-2008) - A Solid 7/10
15 September 2023
"Jericho" was one of those TV series that came into my life during a time when I was craving a good post-apocalyptic story. From the moment I started watching it back in 2006, I was hooked. It offered a unique blend of small-town charm, survivalist grit, and the intrigue of a world plunged into chaos.

The premise was straightforward yet compelling. After a series of mysterious nuclear attacks on major U. S. cities, the residents of Jericho, a small Kansas town, found themselves isolated and forced to confront the harsh realities of life in a world that had suddenly turned hostile. The series excelled in portraying the initial shock and confusion of the characters as they grappled with the enormity of the situation.

One of the standout aspects of "Jericho" was its characters. These were ordinary people thrust into extraordinary circumstances, and their struggles felt genuine and relatable. The show's protagonist, Jake Green, played by Skeet Ulrich, embodied the rugged hero archetype. His return to Jericho after years of absence added depth to the story and gave us a flawed yet compelling central character to follow.

The ensemble cast was solid, and each character had their moments to shine. I found myself invested in the lives of the Green family, the Hawkins family, and the town's quirky residents. Their interactions, conflicts, and alliances made "Jericho" more than just a survival story; it was about the resilience of the human spirit.

The world-building in "Jericho" was another strong point. The series explored the challenges of survival in a world with limited resources and the constant threat of outside forces. It raised thought-provoking questions about morality, leadership, and the lengths people would go to protect their loved ones.

However, "Jericho" wasn't without its flaws. The pacing could be uneven at times, with certain episodes feeling slower compared to the high-stakes drama that characterized the series. The first season was particularly strong, but the second season, shortened due to budget constraints, felt rushed and left some storylines unresolved.

The show's cancellation after the second season left many fans disappointed and wanting more. While a graphic novel continuation provided some closure, it couldn't fully satisfy the appetite for answers and resolution that had built up over the series.

In hindsight, my journey with "Jericho" was a memorable one. It offered a fresh take on the post-apocalyptic genre, filled with memorable characters and thought-provoking scenarios. While it may not have reached the lofty heights of some other TV series, "Jericho" holds a special place in my heart as a solid 7/10 experience, and I'm glad I took that journey into the heart of a town fighting for survival.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Heroes (II) (2006–2010)
7/10
My Journey with "Heroes" (2006-2010) - A Rollercoaster of Superpowered Dreams
15 September 2023
When "Heroes" first graced our screens back in 2006, I was instantly captivated. The premise was unlike anything I had seen before in a TV series. Ordinary people from all walks of life suddenly discovering they possessed extraordinary abilities was a concept that felt fresh and exhilarating.

As I followed the lives of these newfound heroes, portrayed by a talented ensemble cast, I found myself drawn into their world. Characters like Peter Petrelli, Claire Bennet, and Sylar quickly became familiar faces in my living room. Each of them brought a unique set of powers and personal struggles to the table, making them feel relatable despite their extraordinary abilities.

The first season of "Heroes" was, in my opinion, an absolute triumph. It was a rollercoaster of suspense, mystery, and character-driven storytelling. The famous tagline, "Save the cheerleader, save the world," was etched into my memory, and I eagerly awaited each episode to uncover the next piece of the puzzle.

What I admired most about "Heroes" was its exploration of moral dilemmas. These characters weren't just grappling with their newfound powers; they were facing complex choices with real consequences. It was a reflection of the human experience, and it resonated deeply with me.

However, as the series progressed, it wasn't all smooth sailing. The second season was notably disrupted by the Writers Guild of America strike, resulting in a rushed and disjointed storyline. It was during this time that I began to notice the show's occasional missteps.

Subsequent seasons introduced a slew of new characters and story arcs, often at the expense of the original fan favorites. The series seemed to struggle with balancing its expanding ensemble cast, leading to pacing issues and convoluted plotlines.

One of the challenges "Heroes" faced was its inconsistent portrayal of characters' powers. The rules governing these abilities often felt murky, and the introduction of new powers without clear boundaries could be confusing.

Despite these flaws, "Heroes" remained a cultural phenomenon. It sparked discussions about power, responsibility, and the blurred lines between heroism and villainy. It was a testament to the enduring appeal of the superhero genre.

In retrospect, my journey with "Heroes" was a rollercoaster of superpowered dreams. It had its highs and lows, moments of sheer brilliance, and instances where it lost its way. Yet, I can't deny the impact it had on my fascination with the superhero genre and its ability to provoke thought about the complexities of human nature in an extraordinary world.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Walking Dead (2010–2022)
7/10
"The Walking Dead" (2010-2022) - A Decade-Long Zombie Odyssey with Highs and Lows
15 September 2023
"The Walking Dead," the long-running television series that spanned from 2010 to 2022, is a zombie apocalypse epic that has had its fair share of triumphs and stumbles over its 12-season journey. With a rating of 7/10, let's explore my reasons behind its mixed reception.

Based on Robert Kirkman's comic series, the show kicks off with sheriff's deputy Rick Grimes, portrayed by Andrew Lincoln, awakening from a coma to a world overrun by flesh-eating zombies. The series follows Rick and a diverse group of survivors as they navigate a post-apocalyptic landscape filled with not only the undead but also human adversaries.

One of "The Walking Dead's" standout qualities is its character development. Over the years, viewers witnessed characters evolve, adapt, and grapple with moral dilemmas in the face of constant danger. Complex characters like Daryl Dixon (Norman Reedus) and Michonne (Danai Gurira) became fan favorites for their compelling arcs.

The show excels in its exploration of human nature under extreme circumstances. It delves into themes of survival, leadership, morality, and the loss of humanity in a world where the living can be as dangerous as the dead. This depth provides an engaging backdrop to the relentless zombie action.

"The Walking Dead" boasts impressive production values, with convincing makeup and practical effects that bring the undead to life. The post-apocalyptic world is richly detailed, from the overgrown landscapes to the makeshift communities survivors create.

However, "The Walking Dead" has faced its fair share of criticism, contributing to its 7/10 rating. One recurring issue is pacing. Some seasons and episodes suffer from slow narratives and a lack of significant developments, leading to viewer fatigue.

The series has also been criticized for its tendency to introduce new characters, only to sideline or abruptly write them off. This revolving door of characters can dilute emotional connections and undermine long-term storytelling.

Another point of contention is the uneven quality of storytelling across seasons. While some seasons are praised for their tension and character-driven drama, others are criticized for meandering plots and inconsistent character motivations.

"The Walking Dead" faced backlash for graphic violence, which, at times, overshadowed the storytelling. Viewers were divided on whether the show's commitment to portraying the brutality of its world was a strength or a detriment.

In conclusion, "The Walking Dead" is a television series that has left a significant mark on the zombie genre and television as a whole. Its strengths lie in its character development, exploration of human nature, and impressive production values. However, it has also been marred by pacing issues, character turnover, and varying quality in storytelling.

With a rating of 7/10, "The Walking Dead" is a series that has had its highs and lows. Fans of the zombie genre and character-driven dramas will find much to appreciate in this decade-long odyssey. While not without its flaws, it remains a memorable and influential contribution to the world of television.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Tribe (1999–2003)
8/10
"The Tribe" - A Post-Apocalyptic Gem That Transcends Generations
15 September 2023
"The Tribe," a television series that ran from 1999 to 2003, is a remarkable journey into the realm of post-apocalyptic storytelling. Created by Raymond Thompson and Harry Duffin, this New Zealand-produced series has left an indelible mark on its viewers, transcending generations with its compelling narrative, unforgettable characters, and thought-provoking themes.

Set in a world where a deadly virus has wiped out all adults, "The Tribe" follows a group of children and teenagers struggling to survive and build a new society amidst the chaos. The show's unique premise immediately captivates, immersing viewers in a world devoid of authority, where the young must fend for themselves.

One of the series' greatest strengths lies in its well-crafted characters. Each member of the tribe is distinct, with their personalities, strengths, and weaknesses. Viewers quickly form attachments to these young survivors, investing emotionally in their trials and triumphs. From the fearless and resourceful Amber to the enigmatic and brooding Bray, the characters are multi-dimensional and relatable.

"The Tribe" doesn't shy away from exploring complex themes. It delves into issues of leadership, morality, identity, and the struggle for power in a world without rules. Through its storytelling, the series poses thought-provoking questions about the consequences of adult society's collapse and the resilience of youth.

The production design deserves special mention. The makeshift city the tribe inhabits, known as the "Mall," is a visual marvel. Its gritty, post-apocalyptic aesthetic is both evocative and immersive, adding depth to the narrative. The use of practical effects and real-world locations enhances the show's authenticity.

The soundtrack of "The Tribe" is another highlight. Composed by Simon May, it complements the series perfectly, enhancing the emotional impact of each scene. The iconic tribal drumbeat that accompanies the characters' struggles is both haunting and unforgettable.

While "The Tribe" has garnered a dedicated fan base, it's not without its flaws. Some critics argue that the series occasionally succumbs to melodrama, and the budget constraints of a New Zealand production are evident in certain episodes. Additionally, the ending of the series left some viewers divided, as it left several loose ends.

In conclusion, "The Tribe" stands as a post-apocalyptic gem that continues to captivate audiences long after its original run. Its compelling characters, exploration of profound themes, and distinctive production design make it a must-watch for fans of the genre. While it may have its imperfections, its enduring popularity speaks to its timeless appeal. For those seeking a thought-provoking and emotionally resonant journey through a world without adults, "The Tribe" remains a compelling choice.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Great Movie
27 March 2023
Warning: Spoilers
Another great movie with Tom Hanks.

Setting the theme of the movie around loss, this movie shows the importance of relationships from the highs and the lows. May it be barriers to communicate to ignorance. This movie portraits a man living by himself with a set routine. *Based upon the Swedish movie "En man som heter Ove (A Man Called Ove)" from 2015.

Day by day we understand Otto's story, from his blunt and unapologetic personality and his exploration of suicide. The movie may be 2 hours long but with each scene transitioning smoothly into the another, you loose track of time.

A down to earth movie that promotes character development/reflection its a must watch.
1 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
38mins. Turned it off
13 February 2023
What a let Down to a great group of books. How can you go from "following" the narrative with Harry Potter. Showing us multiple uses of using magic from howlers, sturing a teaspoon to lighting a fire. But all this move does make me cringe. Magic only being used for attacking? And what the hell is with the god awful accent. Jessica Williams character eulalie hicks who has a "Mid-atlantic" accent, caused me to turn this movie off.

I can say that for the worst accent I can ever recall. This character and actor is in 1st place for reference in the future.

I feel sorry for Eddie redmayne "newt" as he's such a good actor. As well as Mr. Mikkelsen and Mr. Law.
16 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed