Reviews

3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Inside Edge (2017– )
7/10
When Indians speak like Indians...
23 February 2018
You know you are dealing with quality content when people speak like they normally would in their part of the world. It gets tiresome watching Indians speak English in Hollywood produced films where they sound anywhere between participating in a P.G Wodehouse school play or like Apu from the Simpsons! So I was pleasantly surprised to see the actors here speak like people in Bombay (or other parts of India) normally would. A good mix of English, Hindi and "Hinglish"... and a few good "gaalis" (curse words) thrown in to add that extra layer of authenticity!

The show has a lot of things going for it - 1) A well paced plot, 2) Solid actors - both in the lead roles and the ones who have small parts. This is a great ensemble cast with very little star power, yet everyone looks very sincere and earnest in playing their roles. 3) Excellent aesthetics - you can almost tell Farhan Akthar and Ritesh Sidhwani are involved somehow, with the attention to detail! 4) Situations that are rooted in reality. And that's probably what makes the show connect to Indians all over... Cricket is a religion in India, as cliched as it may sound, but this series goes farther into the psyche of the players and the people who "play behind the scenes"...These range from small time bookies, enablers, politicians, Bollywood and underworld figures, drug dealers, businessmen etc. And an entire ecosystem of sports managers, media personnel, product endorsements deals, announcers etc. This entire nexus between the sportsmen, their dependents and the fringe characters come together nicely in "Inside Edge". Despite the many characters and sub-plots, the writing is tight and rarely meanders.

The series also has its flaws--- 1) The relationships seem almost caricaturish, as do some of the characters. 2) The English, while spoken effortlessly, does seem forced in many situations where switching to Hindi or English may have been more apt.. 3) The sex almost always look forced (no pun intended).. I get the modern, bold India concept where people are more sexually expressive and demanding, than their previous generations... but the creators of the show seem contractually obliged to force that concept down your throat in every episode! 4) The character development also seem half baked. For example, the Vivek Oberoi and Haryana Huurricanes owner character, could have been shaped up to be more nuanced/complex ... and earlier episodes appear to go in that direction... but then that gets thrown by the wayside and the creators resort to confining them to a standard Bollywood definition of a villian or an opportunist.

All that said, this is still an amazing attempt and a very exciting watch. I look forward to seeing some of these actors in other projects. But above all, this may indicate Television in India finally coming out of the slapstick, soapy, brain numbing slump that has prevailed since the early 90's towards quality, intelligent content. Hats off to the the real players behind this show for bringing this together!
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Good plot, mediocre execution
3 July 2012
I admire Sudhir Mishra. He is a huge talent and there is no denying that… he also needs to be thanked for inspiring a generation of filmmakers like Anurag Kashyap who clearly benefited from his mentorship during AK's earlier films like Black Friday!

But where I find Mr. Mishra falling short of true glory is due to his execution. His stories are usually intriguing but fail to cause an impact due to a general tepid visual style. I felt that with Hazaron Khwahishen Aisi and even more with this one. After watching IRKSN last night again (I had watched it originally when it first came out), I believe it may have to do with funding of his films (or lack thereof).

The story itself is not novel in this day and age when every other film today that calls itself "offbeat" appear to have characters with "shades of gray" in them. The overall pace of the film is good and does justice to the story … but the production values and the economy of the shots are where the film falls short. In some scenes you almost can't help but wonder if the scene could have been a lot better with a retake or placing the camera a little differently! It can't be the actors since you have some of the finest talent here - Ashish Vidyarthi, Saurabh Shukla and the late Nirmal Pandey! Some scenes that are supposed to convey a sense of wealth and high society seem tacky that you would think you are watching a B-grade flick!

I would watch this for the ensemble cast and acting (if you can ignore the tacky wigs and costumes that they don!).
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Happy Thanksgiving Mr. Allen !
4 November 2002
I watched this film last weekend after having the DVD on my shelf for almost a year, not realizing what an amazingly beautiful film I have in my collection. I do not have any further insight to offer towards this movie than what some reviewers here have already put so well. But if you haven't seen this touching and funny little gem from the master Allen then do watch it. The Thanksgiving dinner finale that's mentioned in so many posts here makes you believe in the magic of cinema. One cannot help but be moved to tears just seeing that expression on Woody's face and the hope and dreams of all the "artists" present at the frozen-turkey dinner. The diners at the restaurant sums it up the best as Danny Rose being a true legend on Broadway.

It's movies like these that come along once in a blue moon that make the wait and the heap of junk one is so often subjected to, worth it.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed