ghavamy Reviews

Freddy (2022)

Its what world wants to do with IRAN

[8/10 · 29 July 2023]

The family name of irani and also the restaurant name of Persia is not by chance chosen, I think film present the world kindness with Iran, but Islamic Republic of Iran lied to all the world for its nuclear program, and even not stepped back (not apologized), so the film present what could be the consequence of such stupid game between Iran with all the world, step by step, even if writer (parveez) did not think about this aspect, but the Iranian elements and actors chosen, induced it to my brain, this was my understanding and tought of this screenplay, the tragedic end for this game and suffering that already people of Iran are inside it, but still not finished as here foreseen could be the end of this bloody game.

Shattered (2007)

Review 2 film

[5/10 · 8 February 2017]

one the few works of William Morrissey as both writer and producer, indeed director were under impacts of his believes and opinions, the story line go smooth up and then flush at the end, the story of crime that finished by betrayed story of a couple. Actually the main kidnapping story was a side fake story that deceive you till end, means all long the film 80%, you see non sense matter , no output , no outcomes, ... of a fake kidnapping, and 5 minute at the end you will face to main subject, I think one of the worst method way of writing a novel or screen play. the acts were good especially Pierce Brosnan as always, the camera and shots were normal and flying shots not so bad.

Final Destination (2000)

Stroy line

[3/10 · 7 February 2017]

the screenplay was really poor and steady line, without up and down, the cliché base story of predicting things and rounds one by one, mix of horror and comedy and the balance turns to comedy aspects. story is for the range of teenagers, for flush enjoying of happenings and events, without logic or reasonable origins, in one word the story is disaster, about the playing the actors no comments and almost all of them were new comers and no superstar, or artist. music below normal, camera and shots normal for 2000s, special effects very poor even for 2000s movies. other thing that was a little interesting was to remembering viewers that die is near so be careful, any way for most of the aspects of a movie it was among 0 to 3 out of 10 score. and also the name of movie from my point of view was not coherent with what was inside it.

The Shawshank Redemption (1994)

Global view

[9/10 · 5 February 2017]

the main strong point of this film is a good backbone that created by multi layer, complex and unpredictable screenplay, and the dream of success inside all of us, especially in the bad times that everybody think, things goes not well, it is the story of life, and prove for us that every single second is valuable and must be seen carefully, with a plan toward future. it learn how politics works, and the chess playing of the life. and being ready for different scenarios of life. the playing of actor are good, and also overall atmosphere of film. camera, and flying shots for 1994, were really good, and state of the art. music and sound effects were really compatible with the moments of film, the other strong points of this film was the curve of info that screen play gave to viewer, it was trigger curve! as till end you can't predict any thing, you can create your own ending, happy or sad, (normally sad), but suddenly every things will change. this is really good, when you do a empathy with main character and then you will see that he finally winning the game.