I am increasingly wary of watching sci-fi movies these days. There is a trend that sci-fi movies are just horror movie set in a future time. Sometimes this works well - like Alien and Aliens - but the repetitive nature of this is now wearing thin and shows a lack of imagination by writers.
Sadly this movie falls into this trap, mixed with religious overlay. I was just waiting for the 'horror' part - hoping I would be wrong - and yawn, there it was...in all predictability...a lurking villain...not picked up by sensors (huh? - I would be asking for a refund from the sensor company!). It is an understatement to say that such a predicable storyline development is an insult to viewers. It ruined what was potentially good movie.
The intelligence of the character development shows considerable weakness. Somehow you get the idea that the writer is thinking the characters were just spending a few weeks on a nice Pacific Island - not an tough, long, demanding trip to the sun. Most of the characters would have been eliminated in basic psychology tests. Also the characters youngish ages showed they would not have the maturity expected of such a mission. Both of these points (and others) showed that the writer had a poor understanding of space travel, and sci-fi in general. Hence, one can only conclude that the intent of the writer was to develop a horror film (of sorts) on a loose sci-fi background.
Furthermore, the script showed a poor extrapolation of technology growth. Would really the space walk be done by humans in gold space suits in 2057? Somehow, such a difficult requirement would have been mastered by robot. One can only assume the idea to use humans was to remove a cast member. How original...
So 3 out of 10...simply because the cast tries their best with a poor script and weak storyline.
Sadly this movie falls into this trap, mixed with religious overlay. I was just waiting for the 'horror' part - hoping I would be wrong - and yawn, there it was...in all predictability...a lurking villain...not picked up by sensors (huh? - I would be asking for a refund from the sensor company!). It is an understatement to say that such a predicable storyline development is an insult to viewers. It ruined what was potentially good movie.
The intelligence of the character development shows considerable weakness. Somehow you get the idea that the writer is thinking the characters were just spending a few weeks on a nice Pacific Island - not an tough, long, demanding trip to the sun. Most of the characters would have been eliminated in basic psychology tests. Also the characters youngish ages showed they would not have the maturity expected of such a mission. Both of these points (and others) showed that the writer had a poor understanding of space travel, and sci-fi in general. Hence, one can only conclude that the intent of the writer was to develop a horror film (of sorts) on a loose sci-fi background.
Furthermore, the script showed a poor extrapolation of technology growth. Would really the space walk be done by humans in gold space suits in 2057? Somehow, such a difficult requirement would have been mastered by robot. One can only assume the idea to use humans was to remove a cast member. How original...
So 3 out of 10...simply because the cast tries their best with a poor script and weak storyline.
Tell Your Friends