23 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
10/10
A Rarely Seen Chahine Gem !
17 April 2024
Growing up as an Egyptian, Youssef Chahine and his oeuvre are integral to my cultural lexicon. By my mid-twenties, I had seen almost every Chahine film out there, except for this one. This movie eluded me for over 30 years. By chance, I happened to watch it for the first time yesterday. I think I may have discovered a new favorite Youssef Chahine film.

The Golden Era of Egyptian film, a period which spanned the 1940s to 1970s, was rife with great social commentaries, particularly after the 1952 military overthrow of the feudal monarchy. In this regime change, the aristocracy were forced to forfeit all their assets, wealth, and businesses to the newly formed socialist republic. Numerous films, including this one, highlighted the confusion felt by the aristocracy and their quest to find meaning in a post-revolutionary world after losing everything. This is the same struggle felt by protagonist Nayla (Sanaa Gamil). Nayla hails from an aristocratic family. Her father, who squandered his own wealth, weds Nayla at a young age to Hamada (Youssef Chahine). Hamada is rich, but a toxic and self-obsessed man with little empathy. Fifteen years into their marriage, Hamada and his bourgeois coterie have fallen on hard times post-revolution and drink themselves to a stupor almost every night. Hamada squanders his money on booze, but fails to pay his servants who remain in his employ and who desperately need money to care for their ailing families. At a benefit gala, Nayla meets Tareq (Seif Abdel Rahman), a college student from a working-class background who can barely afford a drink. Nayla lends him money to purchase a drink. When Tareq returns the money the following day, what started out as an innocent car ride quickly escalates into a whirlwind affair that changes Nayla's outlook on love, life, and the future.

Several elements single out this film as one of Chahine's best works. Firstly, his casting choices are, as always, spot on. Sanaa Gamil was at that point a star of stage and screen in Egypt, and she plays the role of the tortured middle-aged Nayla to perfection. Chahine himself excels at the role of the vile Hamada. Other actors famous for their supporting roles, like Zouzou Madi, Madiha Salem, Abdel Khaleq Saleh, and a young Soheir El Bably (who would later join the ranks of Egypt's great actresses and comediennes) are equally brilliant. This movie was one of Seif Abdel Rahman's first roles -if not his first role- and though his performance was not the strongest, he successfully translated Khaled's youthful naivete to screen.

Second, Chahine's use of color, shadow, and lighting are a visual treat. His juxtaposition of the ornate homes, lives and outfits of the wealthy and the raw simple beauty of both Khaled's humble rooftop residence and his physique mirrors the stark contrasts that coexisted in Egyptian society at the time. This movie is also of historic value as Chahine prominently features Cairo as a main character, something he was known to do in his oeuvre. In this film, we are presented with ample archival colored footage documenting the once beautiful Cairo of the 1960s, before the ravages of time set in. We see panoramic views of Cairo from atop the (then) newly inaugurated Cairo tower, we see Giza Street, the iconic Pyramids and Sphinx, and numerous shots of the famous Tahrir Square. Chahine further treats the audience by using a helicopter to shoot superb arial footage of the suburbs of Zamalek, Maspiro, and Islamic Cairo that so wonderfully complements a joyous car ride with the two ecstatic lovers.

My only complaint here is that these movies -along with most movies from Egypt made during the golden age of Egyptian film - are incredibly difficult to find, own or see in a decent quality with proper subtitling. I would love to share these movies with friends from different cultures, but it is so hard to introduce them to our culture without proper care and distribution. It is a shame that it took me so long to see this film. I am aware that Chahine's oeuvre has been digitally remastered. If anyone at Misr International Films reads this, please take note. We need these films to be shared with the world !
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Thought provoking - a very well executed series.
24 August 2021
With this latest Netflix mini-series, Jordan is really stepping up as a major TV player in the region. 'Al Rawabi School for Girls' is a very thought-provoking piece that puts a spotlight on the Herculean task of being a woman in an Arab society.

The series is centered around the prestigious 'Al Rawabi School for Girls' in Amman, a school that takes pride in its' instilling a strong moral fiber - in this case, a toxic patriarchal mix of modesty and chastity - in its' pupils. It is this very same toxic mix that is employed in a bitter 'Mean Girls'-esque feud between students throughout the series. Embodying the 'Plastics' in this instance are queen bee Layan, daughter of a prominent Jordanian official, and her minions - the snarky athlete Rania and the holier-than-thou hijabi Ruqayya. Their target is the overachieving awkward Mariam, who they frame for sexual harassment and eventually beat to a pulp in the show's pilot. Seething with rage at her very public humiliation, Mariam devises a plan to use the same toxic patri-arsenal against her bullies with the help of her two misfit friends, the jovial gossip Dina and brooding emo newcomer Nouf.

Direction of the show is excellent, boasting great cinematography, beautiful settings, and a very pleasing soundtrack of local and regional artists. The acting is also quite top notch; none of the parts felt forced and the entire cast did a great job. The three standout performances in my opinion were Joanna Arida as Rania, Yara Mustafa as Dina and Reem Saadeh as Ms Abeer. All three excelled at portraying their roles in a drama, simultaneously infusing a dash of comedy, thus making their characters the three most endearing ones in the series.

The show presented many relevant and controversial issues in Arab society, which include bullying, mental health, therapy, sexual harassment, male authority figures, female authority figures upholding the patriarchy, internalized misogyny, and women's bodies as the definitive measure of family honor. As a feminist, I perceive this show's story arc as a critique of the patriarchy and its' often-devastating consequences on young (and old) women. However, a conservative might interpret this differently, given that this series may have (perhaps inadvertently) fallen back on negative tropes such as the unstable or the forever-defiled (tragic) woman. This ambiguity is a very clever tactic often used by Arab cinema and TV to appease both conservatives and liberals without delivering a concrete message or an opinion on where it stands. What's more unsettling is the removal of any kind of male accountability, given that some of the key events in this story were perpetrated by men. Again, I could interpret this as a critique of men getting carte blanche, while others won't. Overall, I consider this show to be a force of social good - for instance, the running campaign against bullying at the end of each episode. I am especially proud of the women who produced, wrote and starred in this.

I really hope to see this caliber of great shows come out of Jordan, Egypt and the whole Arab region, because in recent years we have fallen behind on this. This show made me think and rethink. Good TV should always do that, and this show definitely did.
15 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
DuckTales (2017– )
10/10
Very Impressive Reboot !!
26 August 2019
I've always been a massive Scrooge McDuck/Carl Barks/Don Rosa superfan. Additionally, I was a kid when the original Ducktales series graced our Saturday morning television sets. I won't lie; I was very skeptical that Disney would live up to the original Ducktales cartoons and the Barks/Rosa classic comics.

Before I continue, I have to say that the series bears very little resemblance to the Barksian universe on which both shows are based, so don't expect an adaptation of 'Tralla La' or 'The Mines of King Solomon' here.

The show's main strength over its' 80's predecessor lies in its' character development. Huey, Dewey and Louie are now three completely different personalities that complement one another. Huey is mature and reserved, Dewey (the focus of the show) is the most daring and reckless, and Louie is lazy and self-serving. More importantly, the two female protagonists of the original (Bentina Beakley and her granddaughter Webbigail Vanderquack) are far more interesting than their 80's versions. Webby is smart and resourceful, and Mrs Beakley has a very interesting back story. I love this series' inclusion of Donald Duck, unlike the original which kicked him out of the show in the first few minutes. The character that (lovably) remains the same as in the original is Launchpad, and his clumsy charm never fails.

I have seen only the first season thus far; the season did have an interesting story arc which concluded in an amazing season finale. The writers did an interesting job of picking and reworking the original series/characters and the Barks/Rosa universe into an interesting combo that's relevant to today's young (savvier) children.

The series also caters heavily to my own generation who grew up on 80's Disney Saturdays. There are numerous Darkwing Duck references throughout, as well as nods to the Gummi Bears and a hilarious performance from Don Karnage (of TaleSpin).

Overall, I really enjoyed how the reboot is fun. I'm guessing that it has it's own new legions of young fans and has not shut out the original Ducktales kids. If you are a Barks hardliner and are looking for true adaptations, this might not be your cup of tea. But if you are willing to keep an open mind, I'm sure you will love the reworked Ducktales as I have.
15 out of 26 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Beautiful !
7 March 2018
Saw this at the cinema yesterday and loved it ! Definitely worth watching.

Plot-wise, the film offers nothing new. It is basically a reworking/mash up of vintage creature features and the classic 'Beauty and the Beast' storyline. Socially awkward/withdrawn girl finds and falls in love with misunderstood beast, set in early 1960's Baltimore in a Cold War era top secret research/military facility.

The real magic in this movie stems from both the lush cinematography and the flawless cast. The sets and feel of the movie are very true to the times. Del Toro relies heavily on green symbolism - one character stating that 'green is the colour of the future' - and the entire movie has a hint of green. The significance of the colour is interesting, and would love to find out more about that.

The casting choices for this film are perfect. Sally Hawkins played the lead role to awkward perfection. Michael Stuhlbarg and Michael Shannon were really natural choices as the shifty/conflicted scientist/spy and the dead-inside antagonist, respectively. My favourite acting duo in this film come in the form of Octavia Spencer and Richard Jenkins, whose comedic performances really made the film. It was also amazing how the movie touched upon their personal lives as segregated minority groups whilst focusing on them as such multidimensional characters.

These days, it is rare to watch a film that really elicits the number of emotions (and some tears) that this movie has done. Very well done Mr Del Toro!
35 out of 62 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Mimosas (2016)
2/10
One and a half hours of sulking faces set against mountain landscapes.
12 May 2017
Morocco has - of late - been a major player in recent Arab cinema. Given the number of great films it has produced in recent years, I was expecting a great movie. I was sorely disappointed.

The movie revolves around a caravan wandering into the Atlas mountains, its' main aim to help a dying elderly sheikh to pass away and be buried in his native village. Death, however, has other plans, claiming the sheikh around twenty minutes into the film. At this point, the majority of the caravan backs out and leaves. The rest of the film follows the remaining members who uphold their end of the deal and persevere through the mountains with the sheikh's corpse.

The only plus in the movie is its' camera work, the focus being on the breathtaking majestic natural landscapes, often with a sulking face in the foreground. However, if I had wanted to see sulking faces against gorgeous backgrounds, I would probably visit a photo exhibition.

The film offers no shortage of flaws, including a deafening absence of music (amplifying the boredom ten-fold), wooden acting and occasional bleating by a rather lack-lustre cast (with the exception of Shakib), and a limited dialogue, with painfully long pauses in between each character's lines. Moreover, the entire plot, which could have easily been made into a 40 minute episode, was dragged out for FAR TOO LONG. Let's just say that death claimed the cinema audience's attention way before it claimed the sheikh's soul. I was later shocked that the film was one hour and thirty six minutes; it felt more like an eternity of boredom.

From the get-go, it was obvious that this film was aimed at international film festivals (I saw this film in one of those festivals). I could even picture artsy European hipsters saying 'Oh my God, this is so ethnic!'. Despite this, the film makes numerous religious allusions that - if not viewed by an Arabic/Muslim audience - will leave international audiences in the dark. A rather exclusive move that will probably not bode well in a non Middle- Eastern context.

Overall, this film is a perfect example of the stereotypical 'pretentious art film' that you will probably watch just once (hopefully never) unless you a) have an incurable case of insomnia or b) intend to spoil a perfectly good movie night.

I second the reviewer above in demanding my time back.
9 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Heartwarming
31 December 2016
Warning: Spoilers
I saw this film a couple of days ago at an art house cinema in Cairo, and was not left disappointed. A very touching film, which doesn't often come out of Egypt of late.

The story follows Kawthar and her father Mokhtar who turns 75. She decides to gift Mokhtar tickets to Italy to meet his former Italian girlfriend, Patrizzia from his university days in Rome. The film follows the entire journey, staring with the arduous task of obtaining a visa (a nightmarish bureaucratic task for Egyptians hoping to travel) and throughout the subsequent trip. The entire movie is shot in an amateurish video cam style.

I rather enjoyed the film. Mokhtar is not only the star, but the most lovable character in the whole film. The movie really captures him in all his (fun/cranky) glory and he is extremely endearing throughout. Moreover, if you're an Egyptian watching this, you will love him as he is very characteristically Egyptian. I think most Egyptians have a relative like him.

The beauty of the movie is the father-daughter dynamic, much more so than the old lovers dynamic or any other. Patrizzia herself is also a very lovable bubbly character, and the older generation totally steals this film in their 'performances'.

My only disappointment in the film was one lapse in logic which put me off. If you try to find someone you lost touch with - in this day and age - the FIRST thing you do is to try to find them on social media. You don't wait halfway into the film to decide to search for them on Facebook, after having paid extortionate airplane, hotel fees and visas and having physically travelled. Fair enough, a portion of the film MAY have been scripted, but I hardly think anyone will believe this particular point - if it was in fact the intention of the filmmaker to put this in for dramatic effect.

Despite my rant above, I would recommend this film. I laughed a lot (especially at some brilliant lines by the father). I would love to see father and daughter in a series/spin off of their own. They are very watchable.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
An outstanding example of Egyptian cinema
27 August 2016
A big part of Egypt's massive cultural output in the mid 20th century was its' literary output, most famously the novels of Naguib Mahfouz, who went on to win the Nobel Literature Prize. Adrift On the Nile was one of his most famous novels, written in 1966. It prophetically foresaw the Six Day War and painted a rather accurate picture of Nasserite Egypt. This movie adaptation was filmed five years after the book's release, in 1971.

The movie follows protagonist Anis Zaki, a former tutor and current civil servant who's only escape from everyday life and hardships is his supply of hash. A chance encounter with an old student - now a very successful handsome ageing leading actor - leads him to be quickly initiated into a group of fellow stoners who convene regularly on the actor's private riverboat on the Nile. Among them are a renowned thinker, a famous news critic, a struggling single working girl, and a student-turned-aspiring actress. The very cleverly scripted dialogue offers a snapshot and critique of Egyptian society in the late 1960's.

This movie presents some of the finest talents from Egypt's Golden Age of Cinema. Emad Hamdy's portrayal of Anis Zaki is truly Oscar worthy, and so was Adel Adham (who always played his supporting roles to perfection). Ahmed Ramzy excels at playing the ageing leading actor; I believe he based the character partly on himself (he was a dashing leading man in the 1950's and 60's, and by the early 70's his career was starting to wane).

My only concern with respect to non-Arab viewers is that whenever I watch the movie, the English subtitling is rather poor and leaves little of the original dialogue's beauty. Speaking as both a native English and Arabic speaker, I find the subtitling too literal, often bordering on cheesy. Regardless, I think this movie is a must watch and I think the actors' performances really transcend language.

I have seen this movie about 15 times since my teens. Every time, I sit through the entire movie, and it always feels fresh. It is also one of the finest films produced in Egypt and often makes its' way to Arab film festivals. Highly recommended.
9 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A Fantastic Lesson on Compromise
16 August 2016
This is one of those 'wow' films I see once every blue moon. I walked into this film with no idea of the plot, and it was money well spent.

The story centres around a married couple who decide to have, raise and school their children in the wilderness far from the consumerist Culture of modern times. When the mother (who was very ill and seeking help in her parents' hometown) commits suicide, this drives the husband and children out of their comfort zone and into modern America to attend her funeral, and to make sure her dying wishes were fulfilled to the letter.The children find themselves often out of place and slightly alien in this new environment, despite being incredibly knowledgeable and critical thinkers.

This movie is extremely touching. What amazed me is the number of issues they managed to work into this beautiful story line, including how to raise your kids, honesty to children, children leaving the nest, compromise, achieving a balance between your own belief system and the real world, interpersonal vs logical intelligence, and coping with grief. Despite the emotional tsunami, the movie is light and funny at times, and it achieves that delicate balance so that it doesn't veer into either dismal depressive drama or callous careless comedy.

There isn't one single actor in this movie who did not do their job to absolute perfection. Viggo Mortensen should get an Oscar for his role as Ben, and I think this will probably be one of his most remembered roles alongside Aragorn. The dialogue is down-to-earth yet excellent with some very memorable scenes. The soundtrack is very carefully chosen with some very fitting numbers and a surprisingly good folk cover of a heavy rock classic. I won't tell you which.

This definitely ranks as one of my best cinema outings. A big chapeau to the makers, cast and crew behind this gem.
19 out of 43 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Suicide Squad (2016)
7/10
Superbly packaged mediocrity
11 August 2016
I was expecting much more from Suicide Squad given the massive hype it has received throughout the past year.

The film centres around a group of imprisoned highly dangerous villains, including Deadshot, Harley Quinn, El Diablo and others who are recruited as a team/weapon by the CIA.

The plot is quite average, with some obvious mistakes/holes. However the movie is very well shot, camera work is superb, and the highlight of the movie is the awesome soundtrack of golden oldies (The Animals, Stones, CCR and Queen to name a few) which often has you singing along.

As for the actors, Margot Robbie is superb as Harley Quinn and is definitely the attention grabber in this film. Will Smith is acceptable-yet-lacklustre as Deadshot. Jai Courteney is brilliant as Captain Boomerang. My biggest disappointment was Jared Leto's interpretation of the Joker (who was absent throughout the majority of the film). All previous interpretations of the Joker captured his essence (random, slightly kooky or camp), but Leto's Joker is calculating,and portrayed as an angry (rather than crazy) mobster/pimp with too much bling on.

Overall, it was a fun experience but a let down after all the hype.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Finally, a show for the long time fans ! The best Scooby spin-off.
9 August 2016
I was a massive Scooby Doo fan as a kid in the 80's and 90's. I followed every Mystery Inc outing, up until the mediocre 'Legend of the Vampire' and the stale 'What's New Scooby-Doo?'series after which I gave up on the shows, tired of the overused Scooby formula. That was until I accidentally stumbled onto the pilot of this show back in 2010.

The show takes place in Crystal Cove, a virtual hub of seemingly 'paranormal'activity, which the locals welcome as a boon to the town's revenue (haunted tourism). Sadly for them, a local high school gang of meddling kids are fixated on solving mysteries, one of whom (Fred Jones) is the Mayor's son. Mystery Inc are essentially persona non grata. The episodes are your traditional mystery format, with a running subplot that gains momentum throughout this very well paced, well written and elaborately layered series.

I can safely say this is the best Scooby-Doo series since 'Scooby- Doo Where Are You?'. Dare I say it surpasses it? It probably does, but the original show is so sacrosanct that I can't even bring myself to say it. The show draws from the massive Scooby-Doo backlog, often featuring cameos like previous monsters and sidekicks which definitely appeals to the die-hard fan. The show also has many references to pop culture that younger audiences may not be too familiar with (things like Lovecraft, the Velvet Underground, 8 track tapes, to name a few). The show is very retro-modern in both feel and content. The artwork manages to be cartoony yet macabre which really adds to the quality of the show.

There is a LOT of character development in the show. All previous instalments focused on Shaggy as the central human character, often neglecting and reducing the other three to one dimensional stereotypes (the nerd, the jock, the popular girl). This series invests so much into all the gang members that it's hard to say who my favourite character is. Moreover, the romantic entanglements within the group are addressed head-on and actually take centre stage. Great screenplay and writing too.

I think this show appeals to all regardless of where they lie on the Scooby fan spectrum.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Suburra (2015)
9/10
Intense !!!!!!
29 June 2016
I went into this movie with a friend having only read the summary and we were not disappointed. The movie, although over two hours long, did not feel as such and was intense and gripping from start to finish.

The movie is set in Rome over 7 days and shows how the paths of people from various walks of life come together in an all too catastrophic and tragic way. This includes corrupt politicians, a hooker, and warring mafia gangs. The movie plays out like a snowball effect,starting with one event descending into the tragedy to become.

The movie does not shy from graphic sex scenes and excessive violence, but it is not done in poor taste. In fact, it actually makes the film so much more potent. The acting is of course superb, and the actors really embody their roles. Production is excellent from all aspects.

Definitely worth a watch, especially in a theatre.
19 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Frasier (1993–2004)
10/10
Best sitcom ever.
18 June 2016
Growing up in the era of such great sitcoms like Friends, Seinfeld and Frasier in particular, it's hard to like any sitcom that follows. Deservedly, Frasier is the highest Emmy-winning sitcom in history. Frasier is a spin-off of 80's sitcom Cheers, and follows Dr Frasier Crane's return to his hometown of Seattle to a) care for his retired father Martin and b) helm his very own radio show.

The writing throughout the show's 11 seasons is stellar. Dialogue is incredibly witty, and may not appeal to some but is definitely my cup of tea.

The show's real gem however is its' cast and how they interact with one another. You can tell (as with the Friends cast) that these are a very close knit group of professionals who really love their job and each other. Each of the main cast brings their own unique brand of comedy into the mix, whether it's through Frasier's ego, Niles' quirkiness, Martin's all American attitude, Roz's cynicism or Daphne's kookiness. None of the supporting cast disappointed either; Bebe Glazer was deliciously evil, Lilith deliciously cold, Gill Chesterton deliciously camp, Bulldog deliciously a jerk, Noel deliciously pervy, and Maris (who never appeared) deliciously..well, Maris! Every actor was flawless.

If you haven't watched Frasier yet, do yourself a favour and buy/watch it. Nothing more to be said. Well done to all those involved in making such a timeless classic.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Gotham (2014–2019)
6/10
Great first season, disappointing second season.
18 June 2016
The idea behind Gotham is definitely a cash-cow and of massive interest to bat fans. It follows a young Jim Gordon as he tries to rid the Gotham City Police Department of corruption while dealing with mob bosses and Batvillians in the making. Moreover, his investigation of Thomas and Martha Wayne's murder leads to a friendship with the young Bruce Wayne, still reeling from the traumatic incident.

With respect to casting and characters, a huge chapeau to Robin Lord Taylor, whose portrayal of the Penguin is nothing short of phenomenal. He seriously is the driving force of this show and is a truly remarkable actor. Hats off to Jada Pinkett Smith and Cory Michael Smith for their respective roles as Fish Mooney and Ed Nygma, and Sean Pertwee makes a rather good Alfred. I often found Jim Gordon's character to be quite banal and too goody-two- shoes/naive to function (am not sure if they intended it as such). Leslie Tomkins is also quite banal and doesn't use Morena Baccarin to her capacities (am a huge fan).

Plot wise, I will not spoil anything, but I found the first season to be excellent, starting and ending on a consistent high. The second season was far more varied in quality, some episodes being exceptionally good and others being exceptionally bad. What made the poor episodes unbearable was their regression to childish plots and incredibly clichéd acting and scenarios (nothing new was offered, and even though some clichés are acceptable, they were badly executed). The season finale was a very low point in the series; I almost fell asleep.

I hope that the next season of Gotham restores the show to season 1 quality, as it has such massive potential and such a great cast. I would also love to see Gordon and Tomkins characters developed a little more; they are still too banal and often have me rooting for the villains - Penguin in particular.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Knick (2014–2015)
10/10
Flawless, Deep and Historically Perfect
2 February 2016
The Knick is a TV drama set in the turn of the 20th century in NYC, and focuses on the lives of the doctors, administration and staff of the Knickerbocker Hospital, notably the brilliant resident physician Dr John Thackery (Clive Owen).

Having finished the second season (the whole series to date), I can honestly say this series is a must watch. Firstly, the show's attention to detail and historical accuracy deserve a chapeau, be it the costumes, the attitudes, sets, as well as the social and medical issues prevalent at the time. The show also managed, much like other excellent dramas this past decade (Mad Men, Boardwalk Empire) to weave actual historic events into the show.

The show's strongest point is its' character study. Every single actress/actor on the show is flawless in their portrayal of their respective characters. Throughout the two seasons, each of these characters' personal and professional growths is detailed, as well as their inner turmoil, doubts, opinions. The brilliant thing about the show is that each character (mediocre or not) has a quality about them, so you get to love some characters and hate others. The acting and character development is THAT good.

I have to add my favourite characters on the show are definitely Sister Harriet (Cara Seymour) and Tom Cleary (Chris Sullivan), whose character development from episode one really shows that one shouldn't take things at face value. This principle applies to other characters too, but I won't get into detail. That's up to you to find out !
10 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Arrested Development (2003–2019)
10/10
Comedy Gold.
30 January 2016
*Note: My review refers ONLY to the original series (seasons 1-3).

What can I say ? This is a flawless and brilliant character-based gem of a comedy. The show's premise (how rich people would cope if they lost all their money) is ground for massive potential, and the show's creators do not disappoint. This show is also in a sense prophetic as it cleverly anticipated the boom of reality-TV, being shot in brilliantly amateurish fashion.

The story revolves around the super-wealthy Bluth family, rendered penniless after the patriarch is jailed for embezzlement. The one 'normal' son, Michael, tries to salvage his eccentric family as they get into blunder after blunder. This includes his elder brother Gob (a 'magician'), younger brother Buster (an 'academic'), twin sister Lindsay (an 'activist'), brother in law Tobias (an 'actor'), niece Maeby (a slacker), mother Lucille (sharp-tongued socialite) and son George Michael (an innocent).

The show is brilliant on so many levels, and the writing is incredibly smart. The show is highly quotable, and throughout its original 3 series never lost momentum. The beauty of this show is definitely the delusional characters. They all clearly suffer from a delusion of still being rich, and each character has a particular quirk. Even the supporting characters are brilliant (nods to Liza Minelli as Lucille Ostero, Henry Winkler as Barry Zuckercorn, Julia- Louis Dreyfuss as Maggie Lieser, and Ben Stiller as Tony Wonder).

Brilliant brilliant show, but I advise against watching Netflix's 2013 4th season. The 2003-6 run was epic.
8 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
DuckTales (1987–1990)
9/10
Definitely stands the test of time.
29 January 2016
Recently having re-watched Ducktales, I can safely say it's still as good as I remember. Definitely an iconic, defining show of my generation.

The stories are heavily based on the comic world created by Carl Barks, starring his most famous creation Scrooge McDuck, as well as Magica de Spell, the Beagle Boys,Gyro Gearloose, and Flintheart Glomgold among others. Unlike the comics, Donald duck is omitted from the plot (having enlisted in the navy), which doesn't impact the show's quality. Non-Barksian supporting characters in Donald's place include Launchpad Mc Quack, Webby, Mrs Beakley and Duckworth (all four are quite likable).

In typical Barks fashion, the episodes follow Scrooge's love of treasure hunting and wealth accumulation, as well as protecting his fortune (safe in his money bin). Some stories are taken directly from Barks classics, such 'The Lost Crown of Genghis Khan', 'Back to the Klondike', and 'The Land of Tralla La'. They tend to be loose adaptations and some work very well, but 'Tralla La' was a disappointment (I consider the comic to be Barks' masterpiece) and thus one of the weakest episodes in the series.The animation is also lush and top notch, a characteristic of Disney TV shows of that era.

I prefer the older episodes, mainly because the show later shifted focus from Scrooge and the boys to Gizmoduck (in my opinion, the show's Scrappy-Doo). Add to the mix the highly annoying Bubba- Tootsie combo and the show quickly went downhill. I do love Gizmoduck's cranky soap-addicted mother though, what a character!!

As an adult, it was fun to pick up on the subtle references here and there, and it's amazing how the show's themes appeal to both adults and children. Examples include the hilarious 'Till Nephews Do Us Part', where Scrooge falls in love, and 'The Status Seeker' which addresses the concept of status and high society.

If you've heard of this show and want to buy/watch it, regardless of age, I'd highly recommend and not just because I'm an 80's child.

And in the highly UNLIKELY chance you have not heard the theme song, it will stick for YEARS.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Gripping film
29 January 2016
From the moment I saw the trailer, I knew this film would be great and it did not disappoint.

The movie follows an alcoholic who ends up in prison in a remote town. His time behind bars suddenly becomes a living hell at the hands of a madman cop who pays a surprise visit. Will he be able to escape this lunatic?

The performances are perfect, notably Ali Suliman who plays Daban (the psycho cop) to perfection. His performance, although unique, is slightly reminiscent of Heath Ledger's Joker, in his ability to be funny as well as menacing. The comedy/chemistry between Daban and the portly female warden who takes a liking to him is brilliant. The cinematography is brilliant, dark and definitely adds to the suspense.

A highly recommended film.
19 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Dexter (2006–2013)
7/10
All the workings of a great show, but a HIGHLY disappointing ending.
28 January 2016
Warning: Spoilers
The premise behind Dexter was definitely interesting enough for me to start watching from 2006 (the year it came out). Dexter Morgan is your somewhat-boring mild-mannered blood spatter analyst at Miami Metropolitan Police Dept. He moonlights as a serial killer, but channels his homicidal urges to rid Miami of its' remorseless criminals (serial killers, serial rapists etc).

Dexter had many pluses. A catchy theme tune, symbolic/arty opening, great camera work, and brilliant actors. Michael C Hall will probably be best known for this role for years to come. Jennifer Carpenter was probably the most stand-out actress as Dexter's foul- mouthed sister Deborah and Laura Luna Velez is perfect as the annoying Lt LaGuerta. The weakest link in the cast is definitely Desmond Harrington's wooden performance as plastic spray-tan pretty boy Quinn, however if this was intentional then the man nailed it. I found him to be the blandest supporting character, often forgetting he exists in between seasons.

As for the series 8 year run, the first four series were the strongest. The best season was definitely the fourth, boasting the best villain; those of you who -like me- grew up watching '3rd Rock from the Sun' will be BLOWN AWAY by John Lithgow's performance. The man is truly a GREAT and UNDERRATED actor. The season 4 finale is truly a shocker, one of the most shocking TV moments I encountered.

Season 5 was by far the weakest season, and I HATED the supporting character in that season (the highly annoying and pointless LUMEN, who I was ever so glad to see gone). The rest of the seasons picked up, and continued to improve (great supporting roles from Colin Hanks, Edward James Olmos, Yassin Bey, and Charlotte Rampling). Season 8 seemed to be heading towards a satisfying ending ( I will not spoil it) but managed to destroy it all in the last two episodes.

This series truly deserves a better rating, but the ending was THAT disappointing, and as a fan I felt cheated having invested so much in the show. Despite all that, it was a great show, never boring, with a lot of highs and some great characters.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A Timeless Family Favourite
28 January 2016
Bedknobs and Broomsticks remains one of my favourite childhood films and re watching it has only cemented this. This film never fails to disappoint.

Set in WWII era England, the movie centres around Englantine Price, an apprentice witch attempting to use her powers to end the war. Her plans are compromised when a) three children from London are forcibly relocated under her care and b) the London based college of witchcraft she corresponds with closes down before sending her the crucial spell she needs to end the war. The movie then follows her as she and the kids head to London to try to find her teacher Professor Emilius Brown and obtain that spell.

The movie bears a resemblance to it's 'predecessor' Mary Poppins (the use of life meets animation, Sherman Brothers soundtrack, David Tomlinson, the English setting), yet manages to remain unique, fresh and interesting. Angela Lansbury (a favourite of mine, growing up on 'Murder, She Wrote') plays Englantine flawlessly, as does David Tomlinson, and the on-screen chemistry between the duo adds to the magic of this film. Of the three children, Carrie (Cindy O'Callahan) is the most convincing character; the two boys aren't as convincing but are nonetheless passable.

The songs are of course brilliant (each and every one!) and very memorable. My personal favourite would have to be 'The Age of Not Believing'. Overall, definitely recommended to the (probably few) who have not yet seen this film.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Ghadi (2013)
10/10
Beautiful masterpiece with a beautiful message.
20 May 2015
Rarely do I walk into a movie and come out speechless. I did with Ghadi, and so did my best friend who I went with.

This movie is set in a predominantly Christian quartier in Lebanon, where people -and attitudes- stay the same. The protagonist, Leba (Georges Khabbaz), is a simple music teacher. As with every young Arab, he's traditionally expected to marry and to get a baby boy. After two daughters, he finally has a son, but one with special needs.Can Leba persuade the neighbourhood to view his son in a positive light?

This movie tackles many themes, mainly the theme of being different (in more ways than one) in Arab society. It also deals with the hypocrisy of being judgemental despite having faults of one's own (an endemic quality in Arab society). Finally, it explores humans' endless capacity to love.

Khabbaz gives a great performance as Leba, and so does Emmanuel Khairallah as the titular character. The ensemble is amazing, no actor performs poorly. Standout characters include the greedy barber, his kind, camp and often degraded assistant Lello, and the cranky neighbour lady.

The film made me laugh, cry and smile. A great movie, great storyline, with beautiful aesthetics and an equally beautiful positive message.Definitely worth watching.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Bedazzled (1967)
9/10
If you had to choose one version of Bedazzled to watch, this would be it !!
20 May 2015
Sadly, my first encounter with the Bedazzled movies was watching the unfortunate Liz Hurley remake. I was a teen at the time and Liz Hurley was one of the 'It' girls of the day (the days of Austin Powers and Serving Sara). I loved the idea, and loved Hurley's devil, but that was pretty much it. I never could stand Brendan Frazer and it always pains me to watch him. A couple of years later, I came across the original Pete & Dud film and I fell in love.

The story is pretty much the same. It's 1967, Stanley Moon (Dudley Moore) has a dead end job as a Wimpy's cook and is hopelessly in love with waitress Margaret Spencer (Eleanor Bron). Unable to muster the courage to ask her out, he attempts suicide but is stopped by George Spiggot aka. the Devil (Peter Cook), who grants him seven wishes in exchange for his soul. Moon agrees and all his wishes are fixated on winning Margaret's heart, however each wish is altered (courtesy of Mr Spiggot).

The movie's strongest point is its' screenplay, incredibly witty and brilliantly blasphemous at the same time. The screenplay is taken to another level with Cook and Moore's undeniable chemistry, and Cook's devil is cultured, smart, charming, very English and deliciously mean. Eleanor Bron is brilliant as the many incarnations of Margaret Spencer, playing each version with comedic brilliance. Raquel Welch, despite appearing for under 10 minutes throughout the film, gives an unforgettable performance as Lillian Lust, one of the personified seven sins. Equally unforgettable is Barry Humphries as the delightfully camp Envy who also makes an incredibly brief appearance.

A more personal reason why I love this film is that I love the Sixties. This movie is essentially a time capsule of 1967, set in Swinging London - technically the epicentre of the decade's cultural movement. Perhaps unknowingly, the movie's makers portrayed everything wonderful about 1967 in just over 90 minutes. The London scenery, the cars, the Pete & Dud chemistry, the fashions, the sexuality, hippies, Julie Andrews... the movie has it all. But perhaps the ultimate 60's moment in this film is Stanley's pop star wish. He is transported to a TV studio in the style of 'Ready, Steady, Go' or 'Top of the Pops' where his and Cook's performances are performed/filmed in the most 60's way possible: a crude elevated stage,a dancing teenage fan audience, leggy go-go girls, B&W screens with 60's TV effects, unusual/long band names a-la-1967 (Drimble Wedge & the Vegetation) and the very groovy titular song, composed by Moore and performed brilliantly by Cook.

I absolutely loved this film. I'm not sure if this movie will cater for everyone's tastes, but if you're into Pete & Dud, British wit, clever screenplays or the Sixties in general, then this movie is definitely worth watching.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Adventures of Tintin (1991–1992)
8/10
The most faithful animated depiction of Herge's work.
24 May 2014
Compared to the Belvision series of the 60's, this series is the most faithful adaptation to Herge's timeless comics. Not only are the stories very faithful to the books, but they are also animated in Herge's characteristic 'ligne claire' style. The show's musical score and theme song are great (and often catchy - I still find myself humming them). The voice actors in both French and English versions are very well chosen (even though Tintin sounds too Canadian at times in the English dubbing).

A couple of criticisms though, as a die hard fan of the books and of Herge's masterpieces. Many of the adult themes Herge tackled in his stories are altered - eg. the conversation between Tintin and Chang on stereotypes in the Blue Lotus was removed (in fact several themes in that book are missing in the episode), Captain Haddock's drinking problems are toned down. My other criticism is that the 'Tintin and the Picaros' episode was the least faithful to its' book, differing in the era in which the story was set, and neglecting Tintin's own character development (physical and internal).

All in all, this series is definitely worth watching and buying. It's fun, and for a Tintin lover it's heaven. It's also a great introduction to perhaps the greatest comic creation of the 20th century.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Timeless Classic for all ages. The best Asterix animated movie.
12 May 2014
I have been a die-hard Asterix fan since childhood. However, Asterix's animated outings have been largely disappointing, and the live movies abysmal. This movie is the exception.

Made by Goscinny and Uderzo's (Asterix's creators) ill-fated animation Studio (Studios Idefix) in 1976, the cartoon is a modern take on the Herculean tasks. Asterix and Obelix are required to successfully perform 12 tasks, upon which Caesar will surrender to them. Failure in one task means surrender, certain imprisonment, and probably death to the Gaulish villagers.

This Asterix movie outshines all others in several aspects. Firstly, the animation (although dated) is lush and very true to the comic books; in fact it feels like Uderzo drew some scenes himself (I wouldn't be surprised if he did). Secondly, the screenplay by Goscinny drives the clever humour in the movie (and in the comic books, which have suffered greatly since his death in 1977). Thirdly, this movie caters to all ages. I've seen this film countless times as a child and as an adult, and it never grows old. The movie is brilliant in the way it presents tasks aimed at the universal child in people of all ages (ie. The race with Asbestos) and tasks aimed at adults (ie. The Isle of Pleasure and the Place that sends you Mad) without alienating children too young to understand the themes presented.

I highly recommend this film. One of my favourite movies (not just animated). Very re-watchable. Highly enjoyable. Great humour. Great animation.
11 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed