Reviews

2 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Missing (1982)
Gripping, thought-provoking and important viewing
9 November 2004
Warning: Spoilers
(Possible spoilers.)

The test of whether a film (or any art form) is truly 'good' is surely whether it makes one think or not. I think that what divides films that merely entertain from the select few that really matter is the extent to which the viewer feels compelled to act after seeing it.

This, of course, depends on your view of the world; I guess that many people value films for 'escapism' or 'entertainment' and shrink at the suggestion that they might actually learn something.

'Missing' is certainly entertaining. I found it gripping from start to finish. Moreover, here we have a well-acted and directed film that engages with the real world. Be in no doubt that comfortably-living Americans are the intended target and Jack Lemmon's character is perfectly written and played to appeal squarely to ordinary, decent men everywhere. He shields his eyes from reality: his son and daughter-in-law have a different way of seeing things and are therefore worthy of his criticism; he values 'authority' and his country's representatives are people whom he thinks deserve his respect. Slowly, inexorably, tragically, he comes to understand how mistaken he is.

I think one of the most important parts of the film is when Lemmon's character is told that three thousand American firms have business interests in this country; as if all the dollars in the world can be set against the life of a loved one!

If, after seeing this compelling film, just one person becomes interested enough in the disturbing story of US involvement in South America to visit the library, search the internet, or buy a book, then the director has succeeded.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Worthy subject but why tell half a story?
13 October 2004
This film's subject matter may be more worthwhile than average - let's face it, the institutions of the European Union need all the PR they can get - but that doesn't make up for the unlikely plot twists, unsubtle (cliched, even) characters and the feeling that this is only the first part of a bigger story.

The viewer is likely to feel unsatisfied because different elements aren't connected well; for example, the film begins with a very dramatic scene but this turns out not to be the real climax, only one of a series of dramatic events. The nature of the relationships between John Hurt's character and other characters, such as his wife, his lover, the prime minister and the journalist, is not shown in a way that reveals how it is relevant to the plot.

John Hurt is always watchable and it's just a shame that this partly-realized story provides the viewer with only the odd glimpse of what his character could be; a determined, morally decent (but flawed) man prepared to bring the world down around him for the sake of justice.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed