I have to admit. I almost didn't hang with this movie for very long. Gratuitous isn't the word for the opening scenes. That would mean gratifying someone in the audience. Indulgent, vulgar and obsessively so, is more like it.
I got past the highly graphic scene where the elephant unloaded it's bowels on the poor guy pushing the truck it was in. Some of that shot from perspective of the recipient. Just so you get the point that having an elephant take a dump on you is a bad thing.
I got past the scene at the party where the prostitute pisses on the fat man who giggles with delight from that. Eww! Didn't need to see THAT! Yes, later she O. D's
I almost gave up after the scene with the midget hopping on a phallus and then using it to shoot simulated semen at the crowd at the party.
All this occurs in just the first 10 minutes of this 3 hour tome. Had I been in a theater I believed I would have walked out. I would have considered it for certain.
Since I had it on Paramount+ I tried again the next day skipping past that disturbing first 10 minutes. I guess I thought it would get better?
It did, somewhat, once the film stopped trying to just simply shock me.
The scene after Margo Robbie's character visits her mother in the asylum in the cab with Diego Calva was touching giving a background to her character.
The sound stage scene was funny and interesting, with all of the cast and crew struggling with the advent of sound in film production.
Then the next scene, another debauched party, milder than the first, leading to a snake fight scene which made little sense. Prior to this Margo Robbie's character Nelly, overhears others mocking her & her father. So she decides to goad her drunken father into fighting a rattlesnake and likely get horribly injured. Other than the fact he often bragged about the time he fought a snake, this made little sense. Why would Nelly take her anger out on her father? It seemed all just like purposeless tantrum and a failed attempt at humor by the director.
Next a scene where Robbie's character Nelly tries, with much coaching, to fit it at a high class respectable party, this being vital to her continued career. Alas, her frustration at this gets the better part of her patience. In yet another over-the-top tantrum Nelly makes an even bigger spectacle of herself. As outrageously excessive this scene is, director Damien Chazelle apparently was not satisfied with how destructive that moment was for the character Nelly. No. Something more is needed for this scene. So she returns to the party in order vomit very graphically on the floor. Cut! Hmmm, still not enough. Action! Nelly vomits on the host as well will both characters in full view of the camera for, um, realism.
Margo Robbie's character Nelly comes off as unlikeable and it's hard to have sympathy for her with a few exceptions such as the cab scene after visiting her mother in the asylum. This does show the abilities of Margo Robbie to evoke some empathy for such a character. Earlier in the film she cries on cue, apparently an actually acting skill Margo has. However a good film this does not make.
Brad Pitt plays his character, Jack Conrad, with great skill as well. He is a star of renowned from the silent era that, for only reasons of changing public tastes, is no longer desired by the film industry. The scene between him and gossip columnist Elinor St. John, expertly played by Jean Smart, was a high note in an otherwise circus of shock-value scenes.
Enter Tobey Maguire's character, James McKay, the extra creepy mob boss who leads Manny (Diego Clava) and friend through an underground chamber of horrors he thinks contains film worthy fun! In case you didn't get that he is a serious ghoul of a human being his face is painted in the most grotesque over-the-top makeup that would perhaps be even a bit much for a silent era horror film. Perhaps that was the point, to evoke that homage but it seems far overboard and comes off hokey. Not that Tobey Maguire's acting is to blame. The whole scene like so many others goes overboard to disturb the audience and not in an interesting way.
Everything in this movie seems wildly exaggerated, often farcically so.
It seems the only point of this movie is not how decadent Hollywood was in the 1920s and 30s. It's that is was way more decadent than you thought you knew. Here let me show you in the most ghastly and graphic ways.
Perhaps there is one other point. All that you love about the movies and film is born of desire, decadence, abuse, exploitation, greed and debauchery. Nothing too new there. So have a nice day! And remember this next time you want to enjoy a night at the movies.
I still don't know why Diego Clava's character smiles at the end. If it was supposed to mean something profound at that point in the film I no longer cared.
In the end all I could think of was, when will this be over?
2 out of 5 found this helpful.
Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Tell Your Friends