Reviews

8 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
10/10
I am anxious to teach GIANT LITTLE ONES in my film analysis class
25 January 2019
Warning: Spoilers
GIANT LITTLE ONES is a solid film, the kind that is great to discuss as it successfully does something that most films (unfortunately) don't do: it re-incorporates its themes throughout in big and small ways with major and minor characters.

For example: You'd think that the minor character Mouse is meant to be nothing more than comic relief and a throwaway character (meaning that the screenwriter could omit Mouse from the script, and the rest of the film would not be harmed significantly for that loss), but you'd be wrong; she is enormously important in relating the movie's core Theme.

Mouse makes Franky really think about the value of owning one's sexuality, and she cites examples of people who don't care what others think about them and, as a result, they are respected for their confidence and ownership of Self. And she is an example of accepting others as they wish to be seen without question -- a lesson that other characters need to learn including Franky (our protagonist).

The relationship between Franky and his father for much of the film seems stagnant and forever distant, but it's not. It takes a long time, but watch as it starts to shift; it is indicative of a shift in Franky's perceptions about his own sexual fluidity... AND his ability to own it. In other words, he takes Mouse's words to heart and, in time, he owns his sexuality -- whatever it may be.

Not knowing what happened between Franky and Ballas in bed is an excellent directorial choice because, like the other characters, we don't actually know the truth for quite a while. So, like the other kids at school, we can only assume (perhaps incorrectly) who did what to whom; we don't actually know the truth. And neither Franky nor Ballas know or acknowledge their own truths.

And the ending is terrific. It is not neatly tying up all the loose ends of Franky's relationship with Ballas (as most people expect and/or want) because, at its core, the film isn't about that. This film is about the acts of Ownership (particularly of Franky's ownership of his own sexuality) and Acceptance (particularly of his dad and Ballas).

In the end, Franky recognizes that Ballas has had extreme difficulty owning his own sexuality. Franky can finally see that Ballas is suffering, and he lets Ballas know that he is aware of that... but loves him anyway, as a friend... and maybe more (though, again, that doesn't matter).

Franky matures enormously through this film, and we know by its conclusion that after this movie is over, he will be patient person with others and make an excellent friend, an excellent sexual partner and an excellent father. In his confidence, he is owning Self and accepting of others.

Loved it.

And a final thought about the title -- I don't think it's a reference to growing up ("little ones" being kids). I have a sense that "little ones" refers to the cautious baby steps we take in life, and sometimes we need to take giant, confident grown-up steps in life in order to change for the better.

10/10
165 out of 196 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Brilliant direction!
3 August 2018
Kate Davis and David Heilbroner allowed us to show this magnificent documentary at the DOC WEEK Film Festival at the Martha's Vineyard Film Center in August 2018.

Kate's direction brilliantly incorporates Sandra Bland's video messages, placing them purposefully as bookends for the entire 100-minute documentary as well as scattered within the narrative of the film. Beautifully paced and elegantly edited, Sandra's story is revealed as a combination of mystery and biography.

You'll be thinking about this one for a long time after. In the future, every time you see a protest about police brutality, wrongful death or racial tensions in America, you mind will come back to this one.
25 out of 49 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
City of Ember (2008)
6/10
City of Ember
10 October 2008
Having just taken 129 eighth-graders who read the book to see the premiere, everyone left the theater disappointed with what director Kil Kenan and screenwriter Caroline Thompson have given us with this translation from the page to the screen. Thompson, an accomplished screenwriter, deserves more of the blame in their (and my) opinion.

Books rarely translate better to film and this one suffers for many reasons. Jeanne DuPrau's book is an amazing trove of metaphors (candles, the library, the seed, the Pipeworks, and the city itself). When works of literature work on multiple levels, the filmmakers should at least offer us more than one. In fact, this book could be a metaphor for metaphors -- there are things below the surface that exist whether we acknowledge them or not; it is our job to find the tools to excavate the "deeper" level of what exists for others only on the surface.

Having sacrificed the novel's intellectual depth, the film version does a great disservice to the dedicated reader: we are given special effects that defy logic and re-focus the story unnaturally and unnecessarily; there are included scenes of hyped-up action they are neither satisfying nor helpful with advancing the plot; we lose some of the intricate details of character development; there's an unnecessary inclusion of giant scary creatures that offer distracting (and bizarre) thrills; and the mystery of what Ember is is destroyed in the first minute of narration.

The design of the film is great, but as in design, the beauty is found in the details. I believe that the greatest details of the book are missing, hidden away like the people of Ember. Let them come into the light!
174 out of 257 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
An American Carol
4 October 2008
I can't say that my politics are very conservative (except in making government smaller), but this film makes "Baby Geniuses" seems like "Citizen Kane."

I can appreciate a well-made film regardless of its agenda. "Patton" and "Dirty Harry" are great, quality films with a Conservative bent. "An American Carol" is not.

This movie is not quality film-making. The writing, as Shakespeare wrote, "is a tale told by an idiot: full of sound and fury and signifying nothing." And NOT funny.

The acting - (Dennis Hopper, go watch your early work and strive for half of that artistry) - is painful. They say, "drama is hard, but comedy is harder." In this case, Kevin Farley (the Frank Stallone of the comedy world) must think drama is impossible.

As to the dual credits of direction/writing, David Zucker has completely lost it. I loved his earlier work, but he hasn't worked on an artistically successful film in over ten years, and it shows. Sort of like Dennis Hopper.
54 out of 116 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Ratatouille (2007)
10/10
RATATOUILLE est magnifique
3 July 2007
The best comedies are not the funniest; the best songs are not the most melodic; the best actresses are not the prettiest.

I bring this up because there seems to be a criticism that RATATOUILLE is not the funniest movie Pixar has put out. It does, however, have the biggest heart (not the "aw" factor like "Isn't that cute?", but in the truly moving moments that connect to something deep, deep down inside us all).

For anyone to find a talent, a passion, and to be able to pursue it without having to hold back -- that is achievement at the highest, most godly manner, as if he or she has connected to God intimately because he or she has found his or her true calling and happily gives his or her life to it. We all dream of finding our purpose in life, and dedicating our lives completely to it...but it is rare that we do -- rare that we find it, rare that we pursue it, rare that we dedicate our lives to it. And for someone to be denied that chance -- not because of lack of talent or passion, but by being told "you can't" (for any reason) -- is among the saddest things in the world. It hardly makes life worth living. THIS is the real story of RATATOUILLE.

(Confession: I am a 45 year-old guy who shed a couple of well-deserved tears at this film. I am a sucker for someone connecting completely to his or her life.)

It is clear that Brad Bird lives for this message; THE INCREDIBLES touches on it equally well. His artistry indicates (to me) that he, too, has found his true calling. His life's mission seems to be to spread the Word.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Yuck!
16 December 2006
Years ago, I owned a video store and I took this home one night to watch it.

This is the worst movie I have ever seen on video -- illogical; poorly acted, written, directed and produced -- this belongs in a massive garbage heap at the very bottom!

Michelle Johnson has never been known for her quality acting choices, probably due to the fact that she is a beautiful girl who cannot act her way INTO a paper bag, let alone OUT of one!

I strongly advise anyone reading this to run as fast as you can from this stinker!
4 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Ron Clark Story (2006 TV Movie)
6/10
RON CLARK STORY - A Hollywood-type story that becomes too Hollywood
19 August 2006
Being a teacher, I look for inspiration. I was fortunate to have seen Ron Clark speak last year. At this gathering, mention was made that there was a TV movie being made about his inspiring story starring Matthew Perry.

So, now comes that movie. But having seen it the other night, I must say how unimpressed I was. The reason why is that Ron Clark has been turned into "Ron Clark, role for TV star who wants people to see that he can act" and it doesn't seem to capture the personality of the real guy! The real Ron Clark I would describe as effervescent, clearly North Carolinian (the dialect gives that away), a bundle of energy. Matthew Perry's performance seemed, in comparison, to be Ron Clark on downers. A dynamic, even flamboyant, white guy in a Harlem school should seem to demand a stronger contrast in storytelling.

THE RON CLARK STORY was too convenient in the fact that all story lines end at the same time in the same room. It's sanitized, homogenized and Hollywood-ized into formulaic material that does not serve to inspire from a realistic point of view. It exaggerated too far beyond what the real story is.

Too bad. The inspiration for the storytelling got lost. It seems to have become less inspiring than the real Ron Clark would suggest. That's demotivating.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Brilliant Opening
24 June 2006
THE KING OF COMEDY remains one of my favorite films. In particular, there is no film, in my opinion, that has a better opening (some have equally good, but none surpasses it). The poster, first few minutes, and the opening titles must establish the mood for the audience. THE KING OF COMEDY hits you right off with the madness of the stage door -- the fans, the security, the noise, the rush, the desperation of a celebrity-mad America. Freeze.

In stark contrast to the pandemonium and cacophony of sound...silence. Frozen on the image of Sandra Bernhard's hands up against the interior wall of Jerry Lewis's limo just as a camera flashes, we hear the sweet, quiet beginning of Ray Charles singing, "Nobody's gonna love ya, like I'm gonna love ya, come rain or come shine..." This captures it all: the passion for celebrity, the madness of groupies, the insanity of it all. This to me is what a brilliant filmmaker can do. At the conclusion of the song, the oasis from the madness is gone, and we know what to expect for the next 90 minutes.

Love it! Though the rest of the film is excellent, this opening is Perfection.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed