I feel bad for this show sometimes. I feel like it was doomed to be "the worst one" before it even started because of it's release date. Coming after the near-hysterical hype of wandavision? The show hadn't even started yet, and I was already seeing people saying they weren't going to like it. Going into the show with that kind of bias, of course you're not going to think it's as good.
Then, after people have had their buffer show to complain about and compare to their favorite, they've got their "it's not wandavision" hate out of their system, and are ready to like Loki once it comes out.
I'm not saying this show is a masterpiece. The flagsmashers were the worst villains ever, the pacing was bad and the finale was insanely rushed. But at the same time, Wandavision had the world's worst plot twist and Loki became a side character to an OP genderbent version of himself. So with that in mind, was it REALLY worse than the other two?
Not to mention, it came out right on the coat tail of the BLM movement, so racial tensions were already high and some people were sick of hearing about it. Is any of that the show's fault, though? Personally, I thought they handled the race issue very tastefully without being too preachy. Plus, there were some very poignant and moving scenes. Yeah, it was rushed, but that was also because of the pandemic. It's not even their fault that Disney didn't release it all at once, which is how it's meant to be watched.
Yes, the flagsmashers sucked, but John Walker was a great, complex anti-villain. Yes, the action scenes were stilted, but the character development for most of the characters was done really well. Yes, it lacked crazy fantastical CGI, but it also touched upon meaningful issues and expanded upon how the snap effected everything.
Honestly, considering the circumstances, I think they did a great job. I think they were incredibly unlucky and ran straight into a misfortunate time of filming and release. But I think what they managed to accomplish was pretty solid. Seeing the way it kind of just takes the flack for being the worst just because one of them HAS to be the worst, it just seems kind of unfair.
My real rating would probably be a 6/10.
Then, after people have had their buffer show to complain about and compare to their favorite, they've got their "it's not wandavision" hate out of their system, and are ready to like Loki once it comes out.
I'm not saying this show is a masterpiece. The flagsmashers were the worst villains ever, the pacing was bad and the finale was insanely rushed. But at the same time, Wandavision had the world's worst plot twist and Loki became a side character to an OP genderbent version of himself. So with that in mind, was it REALLY worse than the other two?
Not to mention, it came out right on the coat tail of the BLM movement, so racial tensions were already high and some people were sick of hearing about it. Is any of that the show's fault, though? Personally, I thought they handled the race issue very tastefully without being too preachy. Plus, there were some very poignant and moving scenes. Yeah, it was rushed, but that was also because of the pandemic. It's not even their fault that Disney didn't release it all at once, which is how it's meant to be watched.
Yes, the flagsmashers sucked, but John Walker was a great, complex anti-villain. Yes, the action scenes were stilted, but the character development for most of the characters was done really well. Yes, it lacked crazy fantastical CGI, but it also touched upon meaningful issues and expanded upon how the snap effected everything.
Honestly, considering the circumstances, I think they did a great job. I think they were incredibly unlucky and ran straight into a misfortunate time of filming and release. But I think what they managed to accomplish was pretty solid. Seeing the way it kind of just takes the flack for being the worst just because one of them HAS to be the worst, it just seems kind of unfair.
My real rating would probably be a 6/10.
Tell Your Friends