8/10
Bad Billing
27 June 2005
This one was closer to the book than the 1977 TV flick, but still way off. Do yourself a favor and buy the book, it is excellent. Now I have a problem with the billing, Why is JJ, the MAIN character billed fifth? Even the guardian, who's part was no where near the largest got better billing, it seems like an ego massage to the "stars" The bigger the NAME, the higher the billing, regardless of the size of the part. It just shouldn't be this way- The billing should be prioritized by the size of the part, not the size of the name playing the part.Frank Nasso should have got first billing, plain and simple. After all he had the biggest part and not only that, The title of the movie embodied his part. And once again, buy the book!
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed