there's such a thing in terms of horror films, that the material might get so graphic, obscene and vulgar that it might be crossing the line. Final Destination 1 didn't do that. there was some violence, but it wsn't extremely graphic. F.D.2. REEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAALLLLLLLLYYYYYYY crossed the line with so much gore and violenc that i threw up several times. Final Destination 3 however was different. the violence level was pretty high, which made the film just as disturbing and in bad taste as FD2. basically, it's the same story repeated over and over again, except the deaths are different, the main disaster is caused by something else that's pretty obvious, and the characters are different. just stick with the first one. it's not as graphic nor as obscene as 2 or 3. 2/10
The acting was good though. but the deaths were disgusting
The acting was good though. but the deaths were disgusting