I'm a fan of the early talkies, so I know the limitations of the medium of film in 1929. Thus static cameras, long-winded dialogue, and some wild gesturing on the actors' part don't bother me when it comes to films of this era. Yet, I was expecting more from this film considering the other reviews and the high rating. The performances are good, that's not the problem. The problem is that this film can't figure out what it's really about. The overriding theme is how much Walter Huston's character has lost personally in order to achieve professionally as a newspaperman. The rest of the film is a bit of a muddle. The romance between Huston and Francis never really plays out, the scandal surrounding one of his employers never really plays out, and the relationship between he and his daughter never quite plays out, though that part of the film is the most complete in plot. The most annoying part of this film is Charles Ruggles' character who plays Huston's long time friend and associate. A little bit of his drunk routine is funny, but the joke tries to ride out the entire film and wears out its welcome.
The only reason to watch this film is Kay Francis and Walter Huston. They are terrific as always, and about ten years ahead of their time in acting technique. Watch it for that reason, but pretty much forget trying to find a coherent plot line. You'll just hit a bunch of dead ends.
The only reason to watch this film is Kay Francis and Walter Huston. They are terrific as always, and about ten years ahead of their time in acting technique. Watch it for that reason, but pretty much forget trying to find a coherent plot line. You'll just hit a bunch of dead ends.