4/10
Did someone get paid for writing this film
15 May 2013
Warning: Spoilers
I am a die hard fan, the original was awesome. Number 2 was OK. 3 was good and 4 was, again OK, but this one was simply awful. It was retro the fact they made the Russians the bad guys instead of the Middle East but that didn't stop the film having no substance or depth. It seems that Die Hard4.0 and this one were more about John McClane reconnecting with his kids who require explosions, near death experiences and exploding helicopters (as in 1,3 &4.....was there one in number 2 i can't remember) to call him dad at the end of the movie. Hence the last scene where they all walk off together. What is next Die Hard 6: night on the town with Holly Genero where John finds himself in china town where he stumbles across the Akuza smuggling guns.......it's practically written.......but count me out.

Give peas a chance
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed