This movie is not so much about children stories, nor about doing this specific police work. If it were about any of that, it would take more time and scenes to portray personalities of children abusers, the process of investigating, analyzing, preparing operations or doing treatment with victims.
It does not offer us any of that depth. It offers a couple of flashing scenes, brief stories that are just being used as everyday background and (police work) methodology - to take effect on small group of people that are of (!)seemingly random personalities.
In the movie you are being tossed right in the middle, with no character introduction. With time you will be provided with very subtle hints to reconstruct pieces (for example in some actions and some situations characters don't act according to their natural response) and that's the breaking point.
The way I saw it, personal histories and stories of police officers and of children they treat are connected. Some character insight hints are given throughout the movie, but almost every scene of child molestation story basically has - two - main protagonists to look at.
> Nora is of course connected to non-displayed daughter of a traditional Muslim father. Her reaction is so emotional it feels she shouts things she kept in for a long time
> Fred, who is constantly angered and on the outburst is connected with a homeless boy whose mother had to give him up. The boy is just so full of anger and sad and terrified; and only Fred was able to truly calm him down; and only then Fred is really showing his vulnerability.
> Nadine is connected to the girl who gave an extra push to get back her phone (it was a smart phone!) - in the whole scene she's in the background, laughing but a bit embarrassed and out of the center spot, laying low, not feeling or sharing the absurdity of the story (BTW, I just love the acting of the girl in that scene. You see in her eyes how she is slowly realizing, and how she is ashamed but also angry and deeply hurt by their laughter)
> And Iris - the last story, the closure. It has been winking at us for the entire time - her cold nature, detached; her disliking and even hatred of men; her bulimia and body-acceptance problems; identifying herself with a creature dead, gone, unwanted, sick, rotten. That happened when she was the same age as is Solal, I would guess. The contrast of her and Solal could be seen in two ways - are they opposites of character (one succumbs, the other overcomes), or is her ending also his future ending, no matter what he may accomplish in life? (she did have a very successful career after all) Can he escape his "destiny"? This is yours to conclude.
To conclude, all of this is not to represent or demonstrate police work or traumatic stories of real life. It's about past and present, about surviving, understanding, revealing the hidden. Outside of their jobs, would you make friends, hang out with these people? Or would you find Fred closed up and aggressive; Iris bitter cynic and passive aggressive; Nora a bitchy go-getter big-mouth. Outside in the real world these people are non-functioning; but when on their ground, which we all wouldn't even go near, they are heroes and experts.
To end, I would say the movie is very very emotional and even if I'm wrong with all this and over the top, I see it that way and like it that way.
It does not offer us any of that depth. It offers a couple of flashing scenes, brief stories that are just being used as everyday background and (police work) methodology - to take effect on small group of people that are of (!)seemingly random personalities.
In the movie you are being tossed right in the middle, with no character introduction. With time you will be provided with very subtle hints to reconstruct pieces (for example in some actions and some situations characters don't act according to their natural response) and that's the breaking point.
The way I saw it, personal histories and stories of police officers and of children they treat are connected. Some character insight hints are given throughout the movie, but almost every scene of child molestation story basically has - two - main protagonists to look at.
> Nora is of course connected to non-displayed daughter of a traditional Muslim father. Her reaction is so emotional it feels she shouts things she kept in for a long time
> Fred, who is constantly angered and on the outburst is connected with a homeless boy whose mother had to give him up. The boy is just so full of anger and sad and terrified; and only Fred was able to truly calm him down; and only then Fred is really showing his vulnerability.
> Nadine is connected to the girl who gave an extra push to get back her phone (it was a smart phone!) - in the whole scene she's in the background, laughing but a bit embarrassed and out of the center spot, laying low, not feeling or sharing the absurdity of the story (BTW, I just love the acting of the girl in that scene. You see in her eyes how she is slowly realizing, and how she is ashamed but also angry and deeply hurt by their laughter)
> And Iris - the last story, the closure. It has been winking at us for the entire time - her cold nature, detached; her disliking and even hatred of men; her bulimia and body-acceptance problems; identifying herself with a creature dead, gone, unwanted, sick, rotten. That happened when she was the same age as is Solal, I would guess. The contrast of her and Solal could be seen in two ways - are they opposites of character (one succumbs, the other overcomes), or is her ending also his future ending, no matter what he may accomplish in life? (she did have a very successful career after all) Can he escape his "destiny"? This is yours to conclude.
To conclude, all of this is not to represent or demonstrate police work or traumatic stories of real life. It's about past and present, about surviving, understanding, revealing the hidden. Outside of their jobs, would you make friends, hang out with these people? Or would you find Fred closed up and aggressive; Iris bitter cynic and passive aggressive; Nora a bitchy go-getter big-mouth. Outside in the real world these people are non-functioning; but when on their ground, which we all wouldn't even go near, they are heroes and experts.
To end, I would say the movie is very very emotional and even if I'm wrong with all this and over the top, I see it that way and like it that way.