To be honest, it's absurd to criticize a YouTube-made film as Umberto D. Enes Batur has a unique follower mass, he has good communication with them and deals with an important crowd that no one else could strive to make a film, as most people cannot. I think critics like 'not hold a camera before' or 'not wrote a script' is absurd. When someone starts this job at the age of 19, when can they try? I think it's a good viewing rate for the first movie and the things he does in YouTube are very successful. It is wrong to approach a film in this way. Anyone with logic can see from the votes that everyone voted this film in the manner of having preconceived opinions and voted without a watch.
Review of Enes Batur: Imagination or Reality?
