I will agree with many people who have said they had trouble following all the subplots because if you're not a fan of the books, which had tons of words in them that never made it onto screen, then you might not enjoy this one as much as the first movie.
Having said all that, we really loved it and I wanted to put this out there now: Nagini and Credence have a kid and that's who Tom Riddle is, and that is why Dumbledore rescued him from the orphanage. (It also is why Tom could talk to snakes, and Harry could too, and is why he was so close to Nagini - anyone else feel this could be how these two connect?)
OK, it's out there, this is where my mind went during the movie.
I do think there was not enough of Newt Scamander in the movie - that would be a gripe (and not enough beasts perhaps too).
My biggest gripe is how DARK the movie was, and I do NOT mean "sinister", I literally mean it was murky, hard to see, needed more lighting.
If you read these comments and have anything to do with the movie, PLEASE brighten it up a little for the next movies - I'd like to be able to see some details!
Having said all that, we really loved it and I wanted to put this out there now: Nagini and Credence have a kid and that's who Tom Riddle is, and that is why Dumbledore rescued him from the orphanage. (It also is why Tom could talk to snakes, and Harry could too, and is why he was so close to Nagini - anyone else feel this could be how these two connect?)
OK, it's out there, this is where my mind went during the movie.
I do think there was not enough of Newt Scamander in the movie - that would be a gripe (and not enough beasts perhaps too).
My biggest gripe is how DARK the movie was, and I do NOT mean "sinister", I literally mean it was murky, hard to see, needed more lighting.
If you read these comments and have anything to do with the movie, PLEASE brighten it up a little for the next movies - I'd like to be able to see some details!